Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividad
Danilo Cruz Vélez appreciates the attempt made by Edmund Husserl to free the philosophy from all suppositions, specifically for everyday belief in the existence of the world, also known as a general thesis of the natural attitude. For Edmund Husserl, the starting point of philosophy is the negation...
- Autores:
-
Rodríguez, Manuel Leonardo Prada
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39147
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/analisis/article/view/1937
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39147
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
SantoToma2_28a2b92dd539d47b968f1fee8c7394c0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39147 |
network_acronym_str |
SantoToma2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Rodríguez, Manuel Leonardo Prada2022-01-18T15:56:50Z2022-01-18T15:56:50Z2015-04-06https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/analisis/article/view/193710.15332/s0120-8454.2009.0075.09http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39147Danilo Cruz Vélez appreciates the attempt made by Edmund Husserl to free the philosophy from all suppositions, specifically for everyday belief in the existence of the world, also known as a general thesis of the natural attitude. For Edmund Husserl, the starting point of philosophy is the negation of that thesis, epojé, allowing the return of self to self erecting, as it as done by René Descartes methodical doubt of centuries ago, as the only true in which you can substantiate everything. It is the latter that precisely Danilo Cruz Vélez more criticism, that the father of phenomenology did not realize the main course which was still submerged: the metaphysics of subjectivity. Hence the caldense philosopher expose the thought of his teacher, Martin Heidegger, who did not despise the natural attitude, but who rated it as a starting point for philosophizing. From this difference, according to Danilo Cruz Vélez, the philosopher of the Black Forest was able to overcome the metaphysics of subjectivity, by not using the concept of representation, so linked to sight but to propose the concept of use of, forgive the repetition, useful, more connected to the hand. The question is: Martin Heidegger managed to get really, of the metaphysics of subjectivity?Danilo Cruz Vélez valora el intento de Edmund Husserl de liberar a la filosofía de todos los supuestos, específicamente de la creencia cotidiana en la existencia del mundo, también conocida como tesis general de la actitud natural. Para Edmund Husserl, el punto de partida de la filosofía es la negación de dicha tesis, la epojé, que posibilita la vuelta del yo a sí mismo, erigiéndolo, tal como lo hizo la duda metódica de René Descartes siglos atrás, como lo único verdadero en lo cual se puede fundamentar todo lo que hay. Es esto último lo que, precisamente, más critica Danilo Cruz Vélez, que el padre de la fenomenología no se dio cuenta del supuesto principal en el cual estaba todavía inmerso: la metafísica de la subjetividad. De ahí que el filósofo caldense exponga el pensamiento de su maestro, Martin Heidegger, el cual no despreció la actitud natural, sino que la valoró como punto de partida del filosofar. Desde esa diferencia, según Danilo Cruz Vélez, el filósofo de la Selva Negra logró superar la metafísica de la subjetividad, al no usar el concepto de representación, tan ligado a la vista, sino al proponer el concepto de utilización de, valga la redundancia, útiles, más ligado a la mano. La cuestión es: ¿logró salir Martin Heidegger, realmente, de la metafísica de la subjetividad?application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombiahttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/analisis/article/view/1937/2056Análisis; Núm. 75 (Jl-Di) (2009): Fenomenología y Hermenéutica; 227-251Analisis; No. 75 (Jl-Di) (2009): Fenomenología y Hermenéutica; 227-251Analisis; n. 75 (Jl-Di) (2009): Fenomenología y Hermenéutica; 227-2512145-91690120-8454Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividadDanilo Cruz Vélez and the overcoming of the metaphysics of subjectivityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf211634/39147oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/391472023-07-14 16:06:42.674metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividad |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Danilo Cruz Vélez and the overcoming of the metaphysics of subjectivity |
title |
Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividad |
spellingShingle |
Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividad |
title_short |
Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividad |
title_full |
Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividad |
title_fullStr |
Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividad |
title_full_unstemmed |
Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividad |
title_sort |
Danilo Cruz Vélez y la superación de la metafísica de la subjetividad |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Rodríguez, Manuel Leonardo Prada |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Rodríguez, Manuel Leonardo Prada |
description |
Danilo Cruz Vélez appreciates the attempt made by Edmund Husserl to free the philosophy from all suppositions, specifically for everyday belief in the existence of the world, also known as a general thesis of the natural attitude. For Edmund Husserl, the starting point of philosophy is the negation of that thesis, epojé, allowing the return of self to self erecting, as it as done by René Descartes methodical doubt of centuries ago, as the only true in which you can substantiate everything. It is the latter that precisely Danilo Cruz Vélez more criticism, that the father of phenomenology did not realize the main course which was still submerged: the metaphysics of subjectivity. Hence the caldense philosopher expose the thought of his teacher, Martin Heidegger, who did not despise the natural attitude, but who rated it as a starting point for philosophizing. From this difference, according to Danilo Cruz Vélez, the philosopher of the Black Forest was able to overcome the metaphysics of subjectivity, by not using the concept of representation, so linked to sight but to propose the concept of use of, forgive the repetition, useful, more connected to the hand. The question is: Martin Heidegger managed to get really, of the metaphysics of subjectivity? |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-04-06 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T15:56:50Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T15:56:50Z |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/analisis/article/view/1937 10.15332/s0120-8454.2009.0075.09 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39147 |
url |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/analisis/article/view/1937 http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39147 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15332/s0120-8454.2009.0075.09 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/analisis/article/view/1937/2056 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
Análisis; Núm. 75 (Jl-Di) (2009): Fenomenología y Hermenéutica; 227-251 |
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
Analisis; No. 75 (Jl-Di) (2009): Fenomenología y Hermenéutica; 227-251 |
dc.relation.citationissue.por.fl_str_mv |
Analisis; n. 75 (Jl-Di) (2009): Fenomenología y Hermenéutica; 227-251 |
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv |
2145-9169 0120-8454 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombia |
institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
noreply@usta.edu.co |
_version_ |
1800786344773943296 |