Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga

El presente proyecto de investigación parte de la comprensión que la educación debe fomentar espacios de aprendizaje en múltiples entornos, y contribuir con el desarrollo social de las comunidades. Es así como evaluando los índices de cooperación de los actores de la triada Universidad-Empresa-Estad...

Full description

Autores:
Guayán Perdomo, Oscar Eduardo
Tipo de recurso:
Doctoral thesis
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/27563
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/27563
Palabra clave:
Social Network
Innovation
Learning
Collaborative Learning
Collective Intelligence
Competitiveness
Redes sociales
Método de casos
Estrategias de aprendizaje
Didáctica
Red Social
Aprendizaje
Innovación
Aprendizaje Colaborativo
Inteligencia Colectiva
Competitividad
Rights
openAccess
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id SantoToma2_1e206578e90140662b6c277815d17f06
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/27563
network_acronym_str SantoToma2
network_name_str Universidad Santo Tomás
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga
title Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga
spellingShingle Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga
Social Network
Innovation
Learning
Collaborative Learning
Collective Intelligence
Competitiveness
Redes sociales
Método de casos
Estrategias de aprendizaje
Didáctica
Red Social
Aprendizaje
Innovación
Aprendizaje Colaborativo
Inteligencia Colectiva
Competitividad
title_short Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga
title_full Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga
title_fullStr Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga
title_full_unstemmed Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga
title_sort Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Guayán Perdomo, Oscar Eduardo
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv Rojas, Julio
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Guayán Perdomo, Oscar Eduardo
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Social Network
Innovation
Learning
Collaborative Learning
Collective Intelligence
Competitiveness
topic Social Network
Innovation
Learning
Collaborative Learning
Collective Intelligence
Competitiveness
Redes sociales
Método de casos
Estrategias de aprendizaje
Didáctica
Red Social
Aprendizaje
Innovación
Aprendizaje Colaborativo
Inteligencia Colectiva
Competitividad
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv Redes sociales
Método de casos
Estrategias de aprendizaje
Didáctica
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Red Social
Aprendizaje
Innovación
Aprendizaje Colaborativo
Inteligencia Colectiva
Competitividad
description El presente proyecto de investigación parte de la comprensión que la educación debe fomentar espacios de aprendizaje en múltiples entornos, y contribuir con el desarrollo social de las comunidades. Es así como evaluando los índices de cooperación de los actores de la triada Universidad-Empresa-Estado del Área Metropolitana de Bucaramanga para el fomento de la competitividad regional, se detectan dificultades como: reducidos lazos de confianza, poca sostenibilidad de las redes a través del tiempo, lenguajes dispares entre actores y reducida gestión de aprendizaje, entre otros. Es así, que bajo la propuesta teórica de la sociedad del conocimiento articulado con el aprendizaje (conectado, distribuido y a lo largo de la vida) y la mediación de la innovación; se propone el diseño de un modelo de red social, de aprendizaje e innovación, que promueva la cooperación entre actores Universidad-Empresa-Estado para fomentar la competitividad del Área Metropolitana de Bucaramanga. A partir de un diseño metodológico mixto (cuantitativo-cualitativo), utilizando entrevistas a los actores más relevantes de la región asociados al tema de la competitividad, encuestas a integrantes de redes regionales y caracterización de la dinámica de interacción utilizando Análisis de Redes Sociales; fue posible generar un modelo con estrategias específicas, estructuradas en componentes asociados a dimensiones propias del trabajo en red. La propuesta se encuentra constituida por cuatro elementos principales: Generales (marco de referencia), las componentes estructurales (desde lo teórico), las componentes integradores y las estrategias operativas (desde lo metodológico). La iniciativa aporta un desarrollo innovador en la búsqueda de pertinencia de escenarios de aprendizaje en la sociedad, proponiendo una red estructurada a la medida de la región y con acciones de alta pertinencia y coherencia con las necesidades y caracterización generada.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2020-07-01T01:10:08Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2020-07-01T01:10:08Z
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2020-06-30
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Tesis doctoral
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Guayan Perdomo, O. E. (2020) Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad Santo Tomás] Colombia
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11634/27563
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
identifier_str_mv Guayan Perdomo, O. E. (2020) Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad Santo Tomás] Colombia
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
instname:Universidad Santo Tomás
repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
url http://hdl.handle.net/11634/27563
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Acosta-Valdeleón, W., & Carreño-Manosalva, C. (2013). Modo 3 de producción de conocimiento- Implicaciones para la Universidad de hoy. Revista de La Universidad de La Salle, 61, 67–86.
Alag, S. (2008). Collective intelligence in action. Manning Publications Co.
ARS-CHILE. (2014). Manual Tutorial de UCINET 6. Retrieved from http://www.arschile.cl/ucinet2014/index.htm
Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2
Barabasi, A. (2002). The New Science of Networks (Vol. 6). Cambridge: Perseus Books Group. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033300
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200773143_Education_and_Mind_in_the_Knowledge_Age
Berlanga, A., García-Peñalvo, F., & Sloep. (2010). Towards eLearning 2.0 University. Guest Editorial, Special Issue, 8(3), 199–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.500498
Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2014). Why space matters in technological innovation systems - Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy, 43(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=VjS6NAEACAAJ
Boschma, R. A., & ter Wal, A. L. J. (2007). Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy. Industry & Innovation, 14(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701253441
Broekel, T. (2012). Collaboration Intensity and Regional Innovation Efficiency in Germany—A Conditional Efficiency Approach. Industry & Innovation, 19(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.650884
Broekel, T., & Brachert, M. (2015). The Structure and Evolution of Intersectoral Technological Complementarity in R&D in Germany from 1990 to 2011. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25, 755–785. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0415-7
Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2001). Education, Globalization and Economic Development. In A. Bolder, W. R. Heinz, & G. Kutscha (Eds.), Deregulierung der Arbeit --- Pluralisierung der Bildung? (pp. 31–53). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97487-7_3
Burbules, N. C. (2014). Los significados de “aprendizaje ubicuo.” Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 22, 1–10.
Cabero-Almenara, J. (2016). Tendencias educativas para el siglo XXI (1st ed.). Madrid: UDIMA.
Campos-Freire, F., Rivera-Rogel, D., & Rodríguez, C. (2014). La presencia e impacto de las universidades de los países andinos en las redes sociales digitales. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 571–592. Retrieved from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/069/paper/1025_USC/28es.html
Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35(4), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2006.01.002
Cantner, U., Meder, A., & ter Wal, A. L. J. (2010). Innovator networks and regional knowledge base. Technovation, 30(9–10), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2010.04.002
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
arson, D. A., Carson, D. B., & Hodge, H. (2014). Understanding local innovation systems in peripheral tourism destinations. Tourism Geographies, 16(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2013.868030
Castañeda, L., & Gutiérrez, I. (2010). Redes sociales y otros tejidos online para conectar personas. Aprendizaje Con Redes Sociales. Tejidos Educativos Para Los Nuevos Entornos, 17–39.
Castells, M. (2000a). Internet y la sociedad red. In Conferencia de Presentación del Programa de Doctorado sobre la Sociedad de la Información y el Conocimiento. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Vol. 7, pp. 1–13).
Castells, M. (2000b). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358408
Chesbrough, H. W. (2009). Innovación abierta: nuevos imperativos para la creación y el aprovechamiento de la tecnología. Plataforma editorial.
Clark, L. (2006). Manual para el mapeo de redes como una herramienta de diagnóstico. Retrieved from http://revista-redes.rediris.es/webredes/textos/Mapeo_redes_LC06.pdf
Cobo, C., & Pardo, H. (2007). Planeta Web 2.0. Inteligencia Colectiva o Medios Fast Food, 27–117.
Coll, C. (2013). El currículo escolar en el marco de la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. Aula de Innovación Educativa, 219, 31–36. https://doi.org/1131-995X
Coll, C., & Monereo, C. (2008). Psicología de la educación virtual. Aprender y enseñar con las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación. Madrid: Morata.
Consejo Privado de Competitividad. (2019). Índice Departamental de Competitividad. Retrieved from https://idc.compite.com.co/
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2010). Ubiquitous learning. University of Illinois press.
Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2019). Global Innovation Index 2019- Creating Healthy Lives—The Future of Medical Innovation. Ginebra-Suiza. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf
Csizmadia, Z. (2008). Co-operation and ability for innovation. Relationship network foundations of the regional innovation system. Szociologiai Szemle (Sociological Review), 18(2), 22–56.
De Bono, E., & Zimbalist, E. (1970). Lateral thinking. Penguin London, UK.
De Kerckhove, D. (1997). The skin of culture: Investigating the new electronic reality. (Gedisa, Ed.). Taylor & Francis US.
Departamento de Hacienda y Economía del Gobierno Vasco. (2017). Ekonomiaz. In Papel de la Universidad en el desarrollo regional (pp. 8–12). San Sebastian. Retrieved from http://www.euskadi.eus/web01-a2reveko/es/k86aEkonomiazWar/ekonomiaz/downloadPDF?R01HNoPortal=true&idpubl=88&registro=1
Diaz, P. (2014). Huila Construyendo Mundo: desarrollo social a través de la apropiación de ciencia y tecnología en el departamento del Huila, Colombia. In Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación. Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos. Retrieved from https://www.oei.es/historico/congreso2014/memoriactei/1252.pdf
Dolfsma, W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Innovation systems as patent networks: The Netherlands, India and Nanotech. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.3.311
Doran, J., & Jordan, D. (2016). Cross-sectoral differences in the drivers of innovation. Journal of Economic Studies, 43(5), 719–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2014-0171
Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(1), 6.
Downes, S. (2017). New models of open and distributed learning. In Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs (pp. 1–22). Springer.
Drabenstott, M. (2008). Universities, Innovation and Regional Development (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v20-art10-en
Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning. Boston, Allyn and Bacon.
Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society.
Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
Etzkowitz, H. (2018). Chapter 8 : Innovation Governance: From the “Endless Frontier” to the Triple Helix. In Springer (Ed.), Geographies of the University (12th ed., pp. 291–310). Nottingham.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerespol/v_3a29_3ay_3a2000_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a109-123.htm
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. https://doi.org///dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
Fantoni, J. (2016). La ecología de la acción: conflicto y responsabilidad The ecology of the action: conflict and responsibility.
Fischer, M. M., & Varga, A. (2002). Technological Innovation and Interfirm Cooperation An exploratory analysis using survey data from manufacturing firms in the metropolitan region of Vienna. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, (10679).
Flores, R. L., Belaud, J.-P., Le Lann, J.-M., & Negny, S. (2015). Using the Collective Intelligence for inventive problem solving: A contribution for Open Computer Aided Innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9340–9352.
Fritsch, M. (2001). Co-operation in Regional Innovation Systems. Regional Studies, 35(4), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400124434
Fritsch, M., & Graf, H. (2011). How sub-national conditions affect regional innovation systems: The case of the two Germanys. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00364.x
Fromhold-Eisebith, M., & Werker, C. (2013). Universities’ functions in knowledge transfer: A geographical perspective. Annals of Regional Science, 51(3), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0559-z
García de León, G. (2009). El concepto de competitividad sistémica. Revista de La Universidad de Sonora, 25, 29–31.
Gergen, K. (1996). Realidades y relaciones. Aproximaciones a la construcción social. Barcelona: Paidos.
Goddard, J. (2018). Chapter 11- The Civic University and the City. In Springer (Ed.), Geographies of the University (12th ed., pp. 355–373). Nottingham.
González-Sánchez, R., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2011). Innovación abierta: Un modelo preliminar desde la gestión del conocimiento. Intangible Capital, 7(1), 82–115.
González-Sanmamed, M., Sangrà, A., Souto-Seijo, A., & Blanco, E. (2018). Ecologías de aprendizaje en la Era Digital: desafíos para la Educación Superior.
Graca, P., & Camarinha, L. (2016). Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems. Literature review. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1–19.
Gros, B., & Maina, M. (2015). The future of ubiquitous learning: Learning designs for emerging pedagogies. Springer.
Guan, J. C., Zuo, K. R., Chen, K. H., & Yam, R. C. M. (2016). Does country-level R&D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure? Research Policy, 45(4), 770–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2016.01.003
Guan, J., Zhang, J., & Yan, Y. (2015). The impact of multilevel networks on innovation. Research Policy, 44(3), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.007
Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments.
Hanneman, R. (2000). Introducción a los métodos del análisis de redes sociales.
Hansen, T. (2013). Bridging regional innovation: cross-border collaboration in the Øresund Region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 113(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2013.781306
Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672–1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.873120
Hernandez-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza-Torres, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación - Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Interamericana. Retrieved from https://www.ebooks7-24.com:443/?il=6443
Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2014). Are technology gatekeepers renewing clusters? Understanding gatekeepers and their dynamics across cluster life cycles. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26(5–6), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.933489
Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Albors-Garrigos, J., de-Miguel, B., & Hidalgo, A. (2012). The role of a firm’s absorptive capacity and the technology transfer process in clusters: How effective are technology centres in low-tech clusters? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(7–8), 523–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.710256
Hu, J., Liu, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A semantic model for academic social network analysis. In 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014) (pp. 310–313). https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2014.6921602
Huggins, R., & Johnston, A. (2010). Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(5), 457–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903171350
Inkinen, T., & Kaakinen, I. (2016). Economic Geography of Knowledge-Intensive Technology Clusters: Lessons from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1090196
Inkinen, T., & Suorsa, K. (2009). Intermediaries in regional innovation systems. High-technology enterprise survey from Northern Finland. Nordia Geographical Publications, 38(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903491556
Instance, D. (2012). DEBATES DE EDUCACIÓN: DAVID ISTANCE “CREAR ENTORNOS INNOVADORES PARA MEJORAR EL APRENDIZAJE.” Retrieved from https://www.macba.cat/es/educacion-debates-david-istance
James, R, Mcinnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities : ideas, strategies and resources for quality in student assessment. (Richard James, Ed.). Melbourne : Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3).
Kozma, R. (2012). Las TIC y la transformación de la educación en la economía del conocimiento. Retrieved from http://www.debats.cat/es/debates/las-tic-y-la-transformacion-de-la-educacion-en-la-economia-del-conocimiento
Kustepeli, Y., Gulcan, Y., & Akgungor, S. (2012). The innovativeness of the Turkish textile industry within similar knowledge bases across different regional innovation systems. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412448088
Lee, P. C., & Su, H. N. (2010). Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.26
Levy, P. (2010). Cibercultura. (Anthropos, Ed.). Barcelona: Editora 34.
López, M., Marulanda, C., & Castaño, J. (2015). Competir y colaborar con conocimiento e innovación. (Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ed.). Manizales.
Loveless, A., & Williamson, B. (2017). Nuevas indentidades de aprendizaje en la era digital. Creatividad. Educación. Tecnología. Sociedad. Ministerio de Educación.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem press.
Lundvall, B. A., & Johnson, B. (1994). Sistemas nacionales de innovación y aprendizaje institucional. Comercio Exterior, 44(8), 695–704.
Maggioni, M. A., Uberti, T. E., & Usai, S. (2011). Treating patents as relational data: Knowledge transfers and spillovers across Italian provinces. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.528928
Makkonen, T., & Rohde, S. (2016). Cross-border regional innovation systems: conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1623–1642. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1184626
Malerba, F. (2007). Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(4), 675–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.07.005
Marek, D., & Blažek, J. (2016). The challenge of breaking the academia–business firewall in Czechia: comparing the role of differentiated knowledge bases in collaborative R&D projects. European Planning Studies, 24(4), 809–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1121204
Martin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411427326
Miguélez, E., & Moreno, R. (2015). Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions. Research Policy, 44(4), 833–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.016
Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2012a). Mapping the network structure of science parks: An exploratory study of cross‐sectoral interactions reflected on the web. Aslib Proceedings, 64(4), 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244716
Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2012b). Mapping the network structure of science parks. Aslib Proceedings, 64(4), 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244716
Misión Internacional de Sabios 2019. (2019). Colombia hacia una sociedad del conocimiento. Retrieved from https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/paginas/191205_informe_mision_de_sabios_2019_vpreliminar.pdf
Misseri, V. (2013). Local Ecosystem versus Digital Ecosystem: A Different Purpose Than Multiple Innovation Platforms (pp. 688–694). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2013.117
Morales-Gualdrón, S. T., & Giraldo-Gómez, A. S. (2015). Análisis de una innovación social: el Comité Universidad Empresa Estado del Departamento de Antioquia (Colombia) y su funcionamiento como mecanismo de interacción. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 25(56), 141–152. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24329636
Muscio, A. (2013). University-industry linkages: What are the determinants of distance in collaborations? Papers in Regional Science, 92(4), 715–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00442.x
Niu, X. S. (2014). International scientific collaboration between Australia and China: A mixed-methodology for investigating the social processes and its implications for national innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.014
Ó Huallacháin, B., & Kane, K. (2015). Regional Aspects of Collaborative Invention Across National Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2227–2252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.942602
Oerlemans, L., & Meeus, M. (2005). Do Organizational and Spatial Proximity Impact on Firm Performance? Regional Studies, 39(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320896
Onrubia, J. (2016). ¿Por qué aprender en red? El debate sobre las finalidades de la educación en la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. In B. Gros-Salvat & C. Suárez-Guerrero (Eds.) (pp. 13–36). España.
Padilla‐Meléndez, A., & Garrido‐Moreno, A. (2013). Open innovation in universities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552551211239474
Park, S. O. (2003). Economic spaces in the Pacific Rim: A paradigm shift and new dynamics. Papers in Regional Science, 82(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101100200144
Perkmann, M. (2006). Extraregional linkages and the territorial embeddedness of multinational branch plants: Evidence from the South Tyrol region in northeast Italy. Economic Geography, 82(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00324.x
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. (Oxford, Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Plechero, M., & Chaminade, C. (2016). The role of regional sectoral specialisation on the geography of innovation networks: a comparison between firms located in regions in developed and emerging economies. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 8(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2016.077106
Prats, L., Guia, J., & Molina, F. X. (2008). How tourism destinations evolve: The Notion of Tourism Local Innovation System. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(3), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1057/thr.2008.24
Quatraro, F. (2009). Diffusion of regional innovation capabilities: Evidence from Italian patent data. Regional Studies, 43(10), 1333–1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802195162
Quintella, R. H., da Silva Monteiro de Freitas, E. J., Ventura, A. C., Santos, M. A., de Melo, D. R. A., da Silva Motta, G., & Jucá, S. (2012). Scientific knowledge networks in peripheral regions and local innovation systems: The case of chemistry in the state of Bahia. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(1), 85–103.
R., J. M., M., M. J., & A., S. (2009). El análisis de redes en el estudio de la colaboración científica. Redes. Revista Hispana Para El Análisis de Redes Sociales, 17, 39–47. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93112847002
Radosevic, S. (2002). Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: determinants, organizers and alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87–96.
Rodríguez-Martínez, J. B., & Rodríguez-Fernandez, E. (2017). Ecologías de Aprendizaje: Educación Expandida en.
Rodríguez, E. F., & Martínez, R. A. (2015). Aprendizajes invisibles en contextos de educación expandida. Retos y oportunidades en la sociedad hiperconectada. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 19(2), 1–16.
Rubach, S. S. (2013). Collaborative Regional Innovation Initiatives: A Booster for Local Company Innovation Processes? Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9270-8
Ruiz-Corbella, M., & Bautista-Cerro, M. J. (2016). La responsabilidad social en la universidad española. Teoría de La Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 28(1), 159–188.
Russo, M., & Rossi, F. (2009). Cooperation Networks and Innovation. Evaluation, 15(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008097872
Salavisa, I., Sousa, C., & Fontes, M. (2012). Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: Sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties. Technovation, 32(6), 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.003
Saleh, M.-H. A. M., & Misseri, V. (2015). Investigating the similarity between collaboration systems and digital ecosystems (p. 30). Piscataway: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709535508
Salinas, J. (2000). El aprendizaje colaborativo con los nuevo canales de comunicación (pp. 199–228).
Saltzberg, S., & Polyson, S. (1995). Distributed learning on the world wide web. Syllabus, 9(1), 10–12.
Schøtt, T., & Jensen, K. W. (2016). Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects. Research Policy, 45(6), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.006
Schüßler, E., Decker, C., & Lerch, F. (2013). Networks of Clusters: A Governance Perspective. Industry and Innovation, 20(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.805929
Shapiro, M. A., So, M., & Park, H. W. (2010). Quantifying the national innovation system: Inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(7), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511158
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 15.
Siemens, G., & Downes, S. (2008). Connectivism & connective knowledge. Universidad de Manitoba.
Sohn, D. W., Kim, H., & Lee, J. H. (2009). Policy-driven university - Industry linkages and regional innovation networks in Korea. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(4), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0890b
Solleiro, J. L., Luna, R. C. K., Herrera, A., & Montiel, M. (2007). A Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy in Mexico, Spain, Chile and Korea. In PICMET ’07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 392–400). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349353
Stantchev, V., Prieto-González, L., & Tamm, G. (2015). Cloud computing service for knowledge assessment and studies recommendation in crowdsourcing and collaborative learning environments based on social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 762–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.11.092
Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2016). How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006
Sternberg, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship, proximity and regional innovation systems. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(5), 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00431.x
Stiglitz, J. E., & Greenwald, B. C. N. (2015). Creating a learning society. New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved from http://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1089748
Stuck, J., Broekel, T., & Revilla Diez, J. (2016). Network Structures in Regional Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 24(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1074984
Su, H. N., Lee, P. C., & Chan, T. Y. (2010). Bibliometric assessments of network formations by keyword-based vector space model. PICMET ’10 - Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings - Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, 230–238.
Suárez-Guerrero, C., & Gros-Salvat, B. (2013). Aprender en red. De la interacción a la colaboración (Primera ed, Vol. 52). Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Retrieved from http://www.digitaliapublishing.com/a/24389/
Takeda, Y., Kajikawa, Y., Sakata, I., & Matsushima, K. (2008). An analysis of geographical agglomeration and modularized industrial networks in a regional cluster: A case study at Yamagata prefecture in Japan. Technovation, 28(8), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2007.12.006
Teixeira, A. A. C., Santos, P., & Delgado, A. (2013). International regional patterns of R & D networks involving low tech SMEs. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8(2), 1–20.
Tödtling, F., Grillitsch, M., & Höglinger, C. (2012). Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation in Austrian ICT Companies-How Does Geography Matter? Industry and Innovation, 19(4), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.694678
Tsai, H.-T. T., Huang, S.-Z. Z., & Wang, C.-H. H. (2015). Cross-border R&D alliance networks: An empirical study of the umbilical cord blood banking industry in emerging markets. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2015.1120502
Valkering, P., Beumer, C., de Kraker, J., & Ruelle, C. (2013). An analysis of learning interactions in a cross-border network for sustainable urban neighbourhood development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.09.010
van der Valk, T., & Gijsbers, G. (2010). The use of social network analysis in innovation studies: Mapping actors and technologies. Innovation-management Policy & Practice - INNOV-MANAG POLICY PRACT (Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.5
Velázquez, A., & Aguilar, N. (2005). Manual introductorio al análisis de redes sociales. México.
von Proff, S., & Brenner, T. (2014). The dynamics of inter-regional collaboration: An analysis of co-patenting. Annals of Regional Science, 52(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0573-1
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1999). Social Network Analysis- Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2008). The Internet in everyday life. John Wiley & Sons.
World Economic Forum. (2015). Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015.
World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report. Ginebra-Suiza. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
Yan, J. (2011). A study on consulting network of university research team. In 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC) (pp. 1871–1874). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMSEC.2011.6011215
Yokura, Y., Matsubara, H., & Sternberg, R. (2013). R&D networks and regional innovation: A social network analysis of joint research projects in Japan. Area, 45(4), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12055
Zhao, S. L., Cacciolatti, L., Lee, S. H., & Song, W. (2015). Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: A multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.014
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.campus.spa.fl_str_mv CRAI-USTA Duad
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv Doctorado en Educación
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad de Educación
institution Universidad Santo Tomás
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/1/2020GuayanOscar.pdf
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/2/2020GuayanOscar1.pdf
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/3/2020GuayanOscar2.pdf
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/4/license.txt
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/5/2020GuayanOscar.pdf.jpg
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/6/2020GuayanOscar1.pdf.jpg
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/7/2020GuayanOscar2.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d94fed89e22c8b9bf9c3b7a52d5d2b3e
b382def65ad87683091995e51b66e18f
bd11617e340e4d31278974fe7ba8528f
aedeaf396fcd827b537c73d23464fc27
7854f781b2066c5fcd34019021a5ecd7
04f189263a51a89ee3d6a378f1fb2d04
28ced9524ad7f14a106da5a697c2bef0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@usantotomas.edu.co
_version_ 1800786427560067072
spelling Rojas, JulioGuayán Perdomo, Oscar Eduardo2020-07-01T01:10:08Z2020-07-01T01:10:08Z2020-06-30Guayan Perdomo, O. E. (2020) Diseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de Bucaramanga [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad Santo Tomás] Colombiahttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/27563reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.coEl presente proyecto de investigación parte de la comprensión que la educación debe fomentar espacios de aprendizaje en múltiples entornos, y contribuir con el desarrollo social de las comunidades. Es así como evaluando los índices de cooperación de los actores de la triada Universidad-Empresa-Estado del Área Metropolitana de Bucaramanga para el fomento de la competitividad regional, se detectan dificultades como: reducidos lazos de confianza, poca sostenibilidad de las redes a través del tiempo, lenguajes dispares entre actores y reducida gestión de aprendizaje, entre otros. Es así, que bajo la propuesta teórica de la sociedad del conocimiento articulado con el aprendizaje (conectado, distribuido y a lo largo de la vida) y la mediación de la innovación; se propone el diseño de un modelo de red social, de aprendizaje e innovación, que promueva la cooperación entre actores Universidad-Empresa-Estado para fomentar la competitividad del Área Metropolitana de Bucaramanga. A partir de un diseño metodológico mixto (cuantitativo-cualitativo), utilizando entrevistas a los actores más relevantes de la región asociados al tema de la competitividad, encuestas a integrantes de redes regionales y caracterización de la dinámica de interacción utilizando Análisis de Redes Sociales; fue posible generar un modelo con estrategias específicas, estructuradas en componentes asociados a dimensiones propias del trabajo en red. La propuesta se encuentra constituida por cuatro elementos principales: Generales (marco de referencia), las componentes estructurales (desde lo teórico), las componentes integradores y las estrategias operativas (desde lo metodológico). La iniciativa aporta un desarrollo innovador en la búsqueda de pertinencia de escenarios de aprendizaje en la sociedad, proponiendo una red estructurada a la medida de la región y con acciones de alta pertinencia y coherencia con las necesidades y caracterización generada.This research work is part of the current perspective of education that offers new identities to learning when it is enriched by technological influence, wider social connections and innovation, and its relevance for the socio-economic development of a region. For this reason, counting on the fact that learning and innovation are the foundations of the new social and educational theories, the design of a social network model of learning and innovation that promotes cooperation among Universities, Corporations and the State is proposed to promote competitiveness in the Metropolitan Area of Bucaramanga. After evaluating the competitiveness indicators of this region and contrasting cooperation among Universities, Corporations and the State, the reduced number of strategies for generating learning and innovation are evident. Based upon a mixed methodological design (quantitative-qualitative), using interviews with the most relevant actors in the region linked to the issue of competitiveness, surveys to members of regional networks and the characterization of the dynamics of interaction through the analysis of social networks, it was possible to present a social network model with specific and well-defined strategies that will contribute to regional competitiveness generating learning and innovation. The proposal is made up of four main elements: General (frame of reference), structural components (from the theoretical), integrating components and operational strategies (from the methodological). The initiative provides innovative development in the search for relevance of learning scenarios in society, proposing a structured network tailored to the region and with actions of high relevance and coherence with the needs and characterization generated.Doctor en Eduaciónhttp://www.ustadistancia.edu.co/?page_id=3956Doctoradoapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Santo TomásDoctorado en EducaciónFacultad de EducaciónDiseño de red social de aprendizaje e innovación para el fomento de la competitividad regional: estudio de caso de las relaciones universidad-empresa-estado en el área metropolitana de BucaramangaSocial NetworkInnovationLearningCollaborative LearningCollective IntelligenceCompetitivenessRedes socialesMétodo de casosEstrategias de aprendizajeDidácticaRed SocialAprendizajeInnovaciónAprendizaje ColaborativoInteligencia ColectivaCompetitividadTesis doctoralinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisAbierto (Texto Completo)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2CRAI-USTA DuadAcosta-Valdeleón, W., & Carreño-Manosalva, C. (2013). Modo 3 de producción de conocimiento- Implicaciones para la Universidad de hoy. Revista de La Universidad de La Salle, 61, 67–86.Alag, S. (2008). Collective intelligence in action. Manning Publications Co.ARS-CHILE. (2014). Manual Tutorial de UCINET 6. Retrieved from http://www.arschile.cl/ucinet2014/index.htmBalconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2Barabasi, A. (2002). The New Science of Networks (Vol. 6). Cambridge: Perseus Books Group. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033300Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200773143_Education_and_Mind_in_the_Knowledge_AgeBerlanga, A., García-Peñalvo, F., & Sloep. (2010). Towards eLearning 2.0 University. Guest Editorial, Special Issue, 8(3), 199–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.500498Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2014). Why space matters in technological innovation systems - Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy, 43(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=VjS6NAEACAAJBoschma, R. A., & ter Wal, A. L. J. (2007). Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy. Industry & Innovation, 14(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701253441Broekel, T. (2012). Collaboration Intensity and Regional Innovation Efficiency in Germany—A Conditional Efficiency Approach. Industry & Innovation, 19(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.650884Broekel, T., & Brachert, M. (2015). The Structure and Evolution of Intersectoral Technological Complementarity in R&D in Germany from 1990 to 2011. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25, 755–785. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0415-7Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2001). Education, Globalization and Economic Development. In A. Bolder, W. R. Heinz, & G. Kutscha (Eds.), Deregulierung der Arbeit --- Pluralisierung der Bildung? (pp. 31–53). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97487-7_3Burbules, N. C. (2014). Los significados de “aprendizaje ubicuo.” Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 22, 1–10.Cabero-Almenara, J. (2016). Tendencias educativas para el siglo XXI (1st ed.). Madrid: UDIMA.Campos-Freire, F., Rivera-Rogel, D., & Rodríguez, C. (2014). La presencia e impacto de las universidades de los países andinos en las redes sociales digitales. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 571–592. Retrieved from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/069/paper/1025_USC/28es.htmlCantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35(4), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2006.01.002Cantner, U., Meder, A., & ter Wal, A. L. J. (2010). Innovator networks and regional knowledge base. Technovation, 30(9–10), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2010.04.002Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2arson, D. A., Carson, D. B., & Hodge, H. (2014). Understanding local innovation systems in peripheral tourism destinations. Tourism Geographies, 16(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2013.868030Castañeda, L., & Gutiérrez, I. (2010). Redes sociales y otros tejidos online para conectar personas. Aprendizaje Con Redes Sociales. Tejidos Educativos Para Los Nuevos Entornos, 17–39.Castells, M. (2000a). Internet y la sociedad red. In Conferencia de Presentación del Programa de Doctorado sobre la Sociedad de la Información y el Conocimiento. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Vol. 7, pp. 1–13).Castells, M. (2000b). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358408Chesbrough, H. W. (2009). Innovación abierta: nuevos imperativos para la creación y el aprovechamiento de la tecnología. Plataforma editorial.Clark, L. (2006). Manual para el mapeo de redes como una herramienta de diagnóstico. Retrieved from http://revista-redes.rediris.es/webredes/textos/Mapeo_redes_LC06.pdfCobo, C., & Pardo, H. (2007). Planeta Web 2.0. Inteligencia Colectiva o Medios Fast Food, 27–117.Coll, C. (2013). El currículo escolar en el marco de la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. Aula de Innovación Educativa, 219, 31–36. https://doi.org/1131-995XColl, C., & Monereo, C. (2008). Psicología de la educación virtual. Aprender y enseñar con las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación. Madrid: Morata.Consejo Privado de Competitividad. (2019). Índice Departamental de Competitividad. Retrieved from https://idc.compite.com.co/Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2010). Ubiquitous learning. University of Illinois press.Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2019). Global Innovation Index 2019- Creating Healthy Lives—The Future of Medical Innovation. Ginebra-Suiza. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdfCsizmadia, Z. (2008). Co-operation and ability for innovation. Relationship network foundations of the regional innovation system. Szociologiai Szemle (Sociological Review), 18(2), 22–56.De Bono, E., & Zimbalist, E. (1970). Lateral thinking. Penguin London, UK.De Kerckhove, D. (1997). The skin of culture: Investigating the new electronic reality. (Gedisa, Ed.). Taylor & Francis US.Departamento de Hacienda y Economía del Gobierno Vasco. (2017). Ekonomiaz. In Papel de la Universidad en el desarrollo regional (pp. 8–12). San Sebastian. Retrieved from http://www.euskadi.eus/web01-a2reveko/es/k86aEkonomiazWar/ekonomiaz/downloadPDF?R01HNoPortal=true&idpubl=88&registro=1Diaz, P. (2014). Huila Construyendo Mundo: desarrollo social a través de la apropiación de ciencia y tecnología en el departamento del Huila, Colombia. In Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación. Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos. Retrieved from https://www.oei.es/historico/congreso2014/memoriactei/1252.pdfDolfsma, W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Innovation systems as patent networks: The Netherlands, India and Nanotech. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.3.311Doran, J., & Jordan, D. (2016). Cross-sectoral differences in the drivers of innovation. Journal of Economic Studies, 43(5), 719–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2014-0171Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(1), 6.Downes, S. (2017). New models of open and distributed learning. In Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs (pp. 1–22). Springer.Drabenstott, M. (2008). Universities, Innovation and Regional Development (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v20-art10-enDriscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning. Boston, Allyn and Bacon.Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society.Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6Etzkowitz, H. (2018). Chapter 8 : Innovation Governance: From the “Endless Frontier” to the Triple Helix. In Springer (Ed.), Geographies of the University (12th ed., pp. 291–310). Nottingham.Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerespol/v_3a29_3ay_3a2000_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a109-123.htmEtzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. https://doi.org///dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4Fantoni, J. (2016). La ecología de la acción: conflicto y responsabilidad The ecology of the action: conflict and responsibility.Fischer, M. M., & Varga, A. (2002). Technological Innovation and Interfirm Cooperation An exploratory analysis using survey data from manufacturing firms in the metropolitan region of Vienna. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, (10679).Flores, R. L., Belaud, J.-P., Le Lann, J.-M., & Negny, S. (2015). Using the Collective Intelligence for inventive problem solving: A contribution for Open Computer Aided Innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9340–9352.Fritsch, M. (2001). Co-operation in Regional Innovation Systems. Regional Studies, 35(4), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400124434Fritsch, M., & Graf, H. (2011). How sub-national conditions affect regional innovation systems: The case of the two Germanys. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00364.xFromhold-Eisebith, M., & Werker, C. (2013). Universities’ functions in knowledge transfer: A geographical perspective. Annals of Regional Science, 51(3), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0559-zGarcía de León, G. (2009). El concepto de competitividad sistémica. Revista de La Universidad de Sonora, 25, 29–31.Gergen, K. (1996). Realidades y relaciones. Aproximaciones a la construcción social. Barcelona: Paidos.Goddard, J. (2018). Chapter 11- The Civic University and the City. In Springer (Ed.), Geographies of the University (12th ed., pp. 355–373). Nottingham.González-Sánchez, R., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2011). Innovación abierta: Un modelo preliminar desde la gestión del conocimiento. Intangible Capital, 7(1), 82–115.González-Sanmamed, M., Sangrà, A., Souto-Seijo, A., & Blanco, E. (2018). Ecologías de aprendizaje en la Era Digital: desafíos para la Educación Superior.Graca, P., & Camarinha, L. (2016). Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems. Literature review. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1–19.Gros, B., & Maina, M. (2015). The future of ubiquitous learning: Learning designs for emerging pedagogies. Springer.Guan, J. C., Zuo, K. R., Chen, K. H., & Yam, R. C. M. (2016). Does country-level R&D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure? Research Policy, 45(4), 770–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2016.01.003Guan, J., Zhang, J., & Yan, Y. (2015). The impact of multilevel networks on innovation. Research Policy, 44(3), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.007Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments.Hanneman, R. (2000). Introducción a los métodos del análisis de redes sociales.Hansen, T. (2013). Bridging regional innovation: cross-border collaboration in the Øresund Region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 113(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2013.781306Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672–1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.873120Hernandez-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza-Torres, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación - Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Interamericana. Retrieved from https://www.ebooks7-24.com:443/?il=6443Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2014). Are technology gatekeepers renewing clusters? Understanding gatekeepers and their dynamics across cluster life cycles. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26(5–6), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.933489Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Albors-Garrigos, J., de-Miguel, B., & Hidalgo, A. (2012). The role of a firm’s absorptive capacity and the technology transfer process in clusters: How effective are technology centres in low-tech clusters? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(7–8), 523–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.710256Hu, J., Liu, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A semantic model for academic social network analysis. In 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014) (pp. 310–313). https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2014.6921602Huggins, R., & Johnston, A. (2010). Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(5), 457–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903171350Inkinen, T., & Kaakinen, I. (2016). Economic Geography of Knowledge-Intensive Technology Clusters: Lessons from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1090196Inkinen, T., & Suorsa, K. (2009). Intermediaries in regional innovation systems. High-technology enterprise survey from Northern Finland. Nordia Geographical Publications, 38(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903491556Instance, D. (2012). DEBATES DE EDUCACIÓN: DAVID ISTANCE “CREAR ENTORNOS INNOVADORES PARA MEJORAR EL APRENDIZAJE.” Retrieved from https://www.macba.cat/es/educacion-debates-david-istanceJames, R, Mcinnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities : ideas, strategies and resources for quality in student assessment. (Richard James, Ed.). Melbourne : Centre for the Study of Higher Education.Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3).Kozma, R. (2012). Las TIC y la transformación de la educación en la economía del conocimiento. Retrieved from http://www.debats.cat/es/debates/las-tic-y-la-transformacion-de-la-educacion-en-la-economia-del-conocimientoKustepeli, Y., Gulcan, Y., & Akgungor, S. (2012). The innovativeness of the Turkish textile industry within similar knowledge bases across different regional innovation systems. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412448088Lee, P. C., & Su, H. N. (2010). Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.26Levy, P. (2010). Cibercultura. (Anthropos, Ed.). Barcelona: Editora 34.López, M., Marulanda, C., & Castaño, J. (2015). Competir y colaborar con conocimiento e innovación. (Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ed.). Manizales.Loveless, A., & Williamson, B. (2017). Nuevas indentidades de aprendizaje en la era digital. Creatividad. Educación. Tecnología. Sociedad. Ministerio de Educación.Lundvall, B.-Å. (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem press.Lundvall, B. A., & Johnson, B. (1994). Sistemas nacionales de innovación y aprendizaje institucional. Comercio Exterior, 44(8), 695–704.Maggioni, M. A., Uberti, T. E., & Usai, S. (2011). Treating patents as relational data: Knowledge transfers and spillovers across Italian provinces. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.528928Makkonen, T., & Rohde, S. (2016). Cross-border regional innovation systems: conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1623–1642. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1184626Malerba, F. (2007). Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(4), 675–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.07.005Marek, D., & Blažek, J. (2016). The challenge of breaking the academia–business firewall in Czechia: comparing the role of differentiated knowledge bases in collaborative R&D projects. European Planning Studies, 24(4), 809–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1121204Martin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411427326Miguélez, E., & Moreno, R. (2015). Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions. Research Policy, 44(4), 833–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.016Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2012a). Mapping the network structure of science parks: An exploratory study of cross‐sectoral interactions reflected on the web. Aslib Proceedings, 64(4), 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244716Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2012b). Mapping the network structure of science parks. Aslib Proceedings, 64(4), 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244716Misión Internacional de Sabios 2019. (2019). Colombia hacia una sociedad del conocimiento. Retrieved from https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/paginas/191205_informe_mision_de_sabios_2019_vpreliminar.pdfMisseri, V. (2013). Local Ecosystem versus Digital Ecosystem: A Different Purpose Than Multiple Innovation Platforms (pp. 688–694). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2013.117Morales-Gualdrón, S. T., & Giraldo-Gómez, A. S. (2015). Análisis de una innovación social: el Comité Universidad Empresa Estado del Departamento de Antioquia (Colombia) y su funcionamiento como mecanismo de interacción. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 25(56), 141–152. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24329636Muscio, A. (2013). University-industry linkages: What are the determinants of distance in collaborations? Papers in Regional Science, 92(4), 715–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00442.xNiu, X. S. (2014). International scientific collaboration between Australia and China: A mixed-methodology for investigating the social processes and its implications for national innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.014Ó Huallacháin, B., & Kane, K. (2015). Regional Aspects of Collaborative Invention Across National Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2227–2252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.942602Oerlemans, L., & Meeus, M. (2005). Do Organizational and Spatial Proximity Impact on Firm Performance? Regional Studies, 39(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320896Onrubia, J. (2016). ¿Por qué aprender en red? El debate sobre las finalidades de la educación en la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. In B. Gros-Salvat & C. Suárez-Guerrero (Eds.) (pp. 13–36). España.Padilla‐Meléndez, A., & Garrido‐Moreno, A. (2013). Open innovation in universities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552551211239474Park, S. O. (2003). Economic spaces in the Pacific Rim: A paradigm shift and new dynamics. Papers in Regional Science, 82(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101100200144Perkmann, M. (2006). Extraregional linkages and the territorial embeddedness of multinational branch plants: Evidence from the South Tyrol region in northeast Italy. Economic Geography, 82(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00324.xPetticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. (Oxford, Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.Plechero, M., & Chaminade, C. (2016). The role of regional sectoral specialisation on the geography of innovation networks: a comparison between firms located in regions in developed and emerging economies. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 8(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2016.077106Prats, L., Guia, J., & Molina, F. X. (2008). How tourism destinations evolve: The Notion of Tourism Local Innovation System. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(3), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1057/thr.2008.24Quatraro, F. (2009). Diffusion of regional innovation capabilities: Evidence from Italian patent data. Regional Studies, 43(10), 1333–1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802195162Quintella, R. H., da Silva Monteiro de Freitas, E. J., Ventura, A. C., Santos, M. A., de Melo, D. R. A., da Silva Motta, G., & Jucá, S. (2012). Scientific knowledge networks in peripheral regions and local innovation systems: The case of chemistry in the state of Bahia. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(1), 85–103.R., J. M., M., M. J., & A., S. (2009). El análisis de redes en el estudio de la colaboración científica. Redes. Revista Hispana Para El Análisis de Redes Sociales, 17, 39–47. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93112847002Radosevic, S. (2002). Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: determinants, organizers and alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87–96.Rodríguez-Martínez, J. B., & Rodríguez-Fernandez, E. (2017). Ecologías de Aprendizaje: Educación Expandida en.Rodríguez, E. F., & Martínez, R. A. (2015). Aprendizajes invisibles en contextos de educación expandida. Retos y oportunidades en la sociedad hiperconectada. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 19(2), 1–16.Rubach, S. S. (2013). Collaborative Regional Innovation Initiatives: A Booster for Local Company Innovation Processes? Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9270-8Ruiz-Corbella, M., & Bautista-Cerro, M. J. (2016). La responsabilidad social en la universidad española. Teoría de La Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 28(1), 159–188.Russo, M., & Rossi, F. (2009). Cooperation Networks and Innovation. Evaluation, 15(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008097872Salavisa, I., Sousa, C., & Fontes, M. (2012). Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: Sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties. Technovation, 32(6), 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.003Saleh, M.-H. A. M., & Misseri, V. (2015). Investigating the similarity between collaboration systems and digital ecosystems (p. 30). Piscataway: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709535508Salinas, J. (2000). El aprendizaje colaborativo con los nuevo canales de comunicación (pp. 199–228).Saltzberg, S., & Polyson, S. (1995). Distributed learning on the world wide web. Syllabus, 9(1), 10–12.Schøtt, T., & Jensen, K. W. (2016). Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects. Research Policy, 45(6), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.006Schüßler, E., Decker, C., & Lerch, F. (2013). Networks of Clusters: A Governance Perspective. Industry and Innovation, 20(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.805929Shapiro, M. A., So, M., & Park, H. W. (2010). Quantifying the national innovation system: Inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(7), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511158Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 15.Siemens, G., & Downes, S. (2008). Connectivism & connective knowledge. Universidad de Manitoba.Sohn, D. W., Kim, H., & Lee, J. H. (2009). Policy-driven university - Industry linkages and regional innovation networks in Korea. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(4), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0890bSolleiro, J. L., Luna, R. C. K., Herrera, A., & Montiel, M. (2007). A Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy in Mexico, Spain, Chile and Korea. In PICMET ’07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 392–400). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349353Stantchev, V., Prieto-González, L., & Tamm, G. (2015). Cloud computing service for knowledge assessment and studies recommendation in crowdsourcing and collaborative learning environments based on social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 762–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.11.092Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2016). How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006Sternberg, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship, proximity and regional innovation systems. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(5), 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00431.xStiglitz, J. E., & Greenwald, B. C. N. (2015). Creating a learning society. New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved from http://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1089748Stuck, J., Broekel, T., & Revilla Diez, J. (2016). Network Structures in Regional Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 24(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1074984Su, H. N., Lee, P. C., & Chan, T. Y. (2010). Bibliometric assessments of network formations by keyword-based vector space model. PICMET ’10 - Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings - Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, 230–238.Suárez-Guerrero, C., & Gros-Salvat, B. (2013). Aprender en red. De la interacción a la colaboración (Primera ed, Vol. 52). Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Retrieved from http://www.digitaliapublishing.com/a/24389/Takeda, Y., Kajikawa, Y., Sakata, I., & Matsushima, K. (2008). An analysis of geographical agglomeration and modularized industrial networks in a regional cluster: A case study at Yamagata prefecture in Japan. Technovation, 28(8), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2007.12.006Teixeira, A. A. C., Santos, P., & Delgado, A. (2013). International regional patterns of R & D networks involving low tech SMEs. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8(2), 1–20.Tödtling, F., Grillitsch, M., & Höglinger, C. (2012). Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation in Austrian ICT Companies-How Does Geography Matter? Industry and Innovation, 19(4), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.694678Tsai, H.-T. T., Huang, S.-Z. Z., & Wang, C.-H. H. (2015). Cross-border R&D alliance networks: An empirical study of the umbilical cord blood banking industry in emerging markets. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2015.1120502Valkering, P., Beumer, C., de Kraker, J., & Ruelle, C. (2013). An analysis of learning interactions in a cross-border network for sustainable urban neighbourhood development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.09.010van der Valk, T., & Gijsbers, G. (2010). The use of social network analysis in innovation studies: Mapping actors and technologies. Innovation-management Policy & Practice - INNOV-MANAG POLICY PRACT (Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.5Velázquez, A., & Aguilar, N. (2005). Manual introductorio al análisis de redes sociales. México.von Proff, S., & Brenner, T. (2014). The dynamics of inter-regional collaboration: An analysis of co-patenting. Annals of Regional Science, 52(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0573-1Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1999). Social Network Analysis- Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2008). The Internet in everyday life. John Wiley & Sons.World Economic Forum. (2015). Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015.World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report. Ginebra-Suiza. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdfYan, J. (2011). A study on consulting network of university research team. In 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC) (pp. 1871–1874). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMSEC.2011.6011215Yokura, Y., Matsubara, H., & Sternberg, R. (2013). R&D networks and regional innovation: A social network analysis of joint research projects in Japan. Area, 45(4), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12055Zhao, S. L., Cacciolatti, L., Lee, S. H., & Song, W. (2015). Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: A multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.014ORIGINAL2020GuayanOscar.pdf2020GuayanOscar.pdfapplication/pdf2809577https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/1/2020GuayanOscar.pdfd94fed89e22c8b9bf9c3b7a52d5d2b3eMD51open access2020GuayanOscar1.pdf2020GuayanOscar1.pdfapplication/pdf457244https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/2/2020GuayanOscar1.pdfb382def65ad87683091995e51b66e18fMD52metadata only access2020GuayanOscar2.pdf2020GuayanOscar2.pdfapplication/pdf277844https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/3/2020GuayanOscar2.pdfbd11617e340e4d31278974fe7ba8528fMD53metadata only accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8807https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/4/license.txtaedeaf396fcd827b537c73d23464fc27MD54open accessTHUMBNAIL2020GuayanOscar.pdf.jpg2020GuayanOscar.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2694https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/5/2020GuayanOscar.pdf.jpg7854f781b2066c5fcd34019021a5ecd7MD55open access2020GuayanOscar1.pdf.jpg2020GuayanOscar1.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3696https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/6/2020GuayanOscar1.pdf.jpg04f189263a51a89ee3d6a378f1fb2d04MD56open access2020GuayanOscar2.pdf.jpg2020GuayanOscar2.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3801https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/27563/7/2020GuayanOscar2.pdf.jpg28ced9524ad7f14a106da5a697c2bef0MD57open access11634/27563oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/275632022-10-10 15:29:28.872open accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásrepositorio@usantotomas.edu.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

Publicaciones similares