Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology

Historically, psychology has been deeply associated with the defense and active normalization of conflicts, war, and established social orders. For instance, it is well-known that one of the most important grounds for the legitimacy of psychology as a scientific discipline depended on psychologists’...

Full description

Autores:
Pereira Soares, Mónica Catarina
Sá Caetano, Ana Margarida
Reis Barbosa, Mariana
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39484
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39484
Palabra clave:
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id SantoToma2_0e83e2fb2cde3d9fb3b1a502d0057b9c
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39484
network_acronym_str SantoToma2
network_name_str Universidad Santo Tomás
repository_id_str
spelling Pereira Soares, Mónica CatarinaSá Caetano, Ana MargaridaReis Barbosa, Mariana2022-01-18T16:02:56Z2022-01-18T16:02:56Z2020-01-01https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/571510.15332/25006681/5715http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39484Historically, psychology has been deeply associated with the defense and active normalization of conflicts, war, and established social orders. For instance, it is well-known that one of the most important grounds for the legitimacy of psychology as a scientific discipline depended on psychologists’ work done during the First and Second World Wars. At those times, and perhaps in a culturally biased way, psychological tests for military selection and practical models to treat war-related problems were widely employed. Psychology gained a practical terrain for professionalization for both clinical and social psychologists within such context. However, psychology has also been used on behalf of emancipation, and not always in the field of conflicts, war, and oppression. One of the most interesting critical movements which has tried to move psychology into an emancipatory realm has been Peace Psychology. In general, this discipline has been open to framing, discussing, and participating actively in interventions developed in the name of peace and human rights. In accordance, in this paper, we seek to capture a) the historical development of peace psychology; b) the establishment of peace psychology as a field of psychology and of peace studies; and c) some reflections upon the omnipresent challenges and possible co-options that may shape the emblematic critical engagement of this discipline.Históricamente, la psicología ha tenido vínculos profundos con la defensa y la normalización activa de conflictos, guerras y órdenes sociales establecidos. Por ejemplo, es bien sabido que uno de los fundamentos más importantes de la legitimización de la psicología como disciplina científica dependió del trabajo de los psicólogos durante la Primera y la Segunda Guerra Mundial. En la actualidad, ha sido bastante extendido el uso de pruebas psicológicas (posiblemente con un sesgo cultural) para la selección de personal militar y de modelos para tratar problemas relativos a la guerra. Dentro de tal contexto, la psicología ha ganado terreno en la profesionalización de psicólogos tanto clínicos como sociales. Con todo, la psicología también se ha usado a favor de la emancipación, y no siempre de los conflictos, la guerra y la opresión. Uno de los movimientos críticos más interesantes que ha tratado de llevar la psicología a un ámbito emancipatorio es la psicología de la paz. En general, esta disciplina ha mostrado gran entusiasmo por enmarcar, discutir y ser práctica y vigorosa en intervenciones desarrolladas en nombre de la paz y los derechos humanos. Por lo tanto, en este artículo buscamos aprehender: a) el desarrollo histórico de la psicología de la paz; b) el establecimiento de la psicología de la paz como un campo de la psicología y los estudios sobre la paz; y c) reflexiones sobre los retos ubicuos y las posibles opciones que podrían darle forma a la emblemática labor crítica de la disciplina.application/pdfengUniversidad Santo Tomáshttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715/5624Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2020); 33-60Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020); 33-602500-66812339-3688Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace PsychologyReunir la psicología y la paz: una crítica hacia el potencial emancipatorio de la psicología de la pazinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf211634/39484oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/394842023-07-14 16:09:09.558metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Reunir la psicología y la paz: una crítica hacia el potencial emancipatorio de la psicología de la paz
title Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology
spellingShingle Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology
title_short Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology
title_full Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology
title_fullStr Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology
title_full_unstemmed Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology
title_sort Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Pereira Soares, Mónica Catarina
Sá Caetano, Ana Margarida
Reis Barbosa, Mariana
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Pereira Soares, Mónica Catarina
Sá Caetano, Ana Margarida
Reis Barbosa, Mariana
description Historically, psychology has been deeply associated with the defense and active normalization of conflicts, war, and established social orders. For instance, it is well-known that one of the most important grounds for the legitimacy of psychology as a scientific discipline depended on psychologists’ work done during the First and Second World Wars. At those times, and perhaps in a culturally biased way, psychological tests for military selection and practical models to treat war-related problems were widely employed. Psychology gained a practical terrain for professionalization for both clinical and social psychologists within such context. However, psychology has also been used on behalf of emancipation, and not always in the field of conflicts, war, and oppression. One of the most interesting critical movements which has tried to move psychology into an emancipatory realm has been Peace Psychology. In general, this discipline has been open to framing, discussing, and participating actively in interventions developed in the name of peace and human rights. In accordance, in this paper, we seek to capture a) the historical development of peace psychology; b) the establishment of peace psychology as a field of psychology and of peace studies; and c) some reflections upon the omnipresent challenges and possible co-options that may shape the emblematic critical engagement of this discipline.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-18T16:02:56Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-18T16:02:56Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715
10.15332/25006681/5715
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39484
url https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39484
identifier_str_mv 10.15332/25006681/5715
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715/5624
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2020); 33-60
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020); 33-60
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv 2500-6681
2339-3688
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Santo Tomás
institution Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.mail.fl_str_mv noreply@usta.edu.co
_version_ 1800786366156505088