Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology
Historically, psychology has been deeply associated with the defense and active normalization of conflicts, war, and established social orders. For instance, it is well-known that one of the most important grounds for the legitimacy of psychology as a scientific discipline depended on psychologists’...
- Autores:
-
Pereira Soares, Mónica Catarina
Sá Caetano, Ana Margarida
Reis Barbosa, Mariana
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39484
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39484
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
SantoToma2_0e83e2fb2cde3d9fb3b1a502d0057b9c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39484 |
network_acronym_str |
SantoToma2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pereira Soares, Mónica CatarinaSá Caetano, Ana MargaridaReis Barbosa, Mariana2022-01-18T16:02:56Z2022-01-18T16:02:56Z2020-01-01https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/571510.15332/25006681/5715http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39484Historically, psychology has been deeply associated with the defense and active normalization of conflicts, war, and established social orders. For instance, it is well-known that one of the most important grounds for the legitimacy of psychology as a scientific discipline depended on psychologists’ work done during the First and Second World Wars. At those times, and perhaps in a culturally biased way, psychological tests for military selection and practical models to treat war-related problems were widely employed. Psychology gained a practical terrain for professionalization for both clinical and social psychologists within such context. However, psychology has also been used on behalf of emancipation, and not always in the field of conflicts, war, and oppression. One of the most interesting critical movements which has tried to move psychology into an emancipatory realm has been Peace Psychology. In general, this discipline has been open to framing, discussing, and participating actively in interventions developed in the name of peace and human rights. In accordance, in this paper, we seek to capture a) the historical development of peace psychology; b) the establishment of peace psychology as a field of psychology and of peace studies; and c) some reflections upon the omnipresent challenges and possible co-options that may shape the emblematic critical engagement of this discipline.Históricamente, la psicología ha tenido vínculos profundos con la defensa y la normalización activa de conflictos, guerras y órdenes sociales establecidos. Por ejemplo, es bien sabido que uno de los fundamentos más importantes de la legitimización de la psicología como disciplina científica dependió del trabajo de los psicólogos durante la Primera y la Segunda Guerra Mundial. En la actualidad, ha sido bastante extendido el uso de pruebas psicológicas (posiblemente con un sesgo cultural) para la selección de personal militar y de modelos para tratar problemas relativos a la guerra. Dentro de tal contexto, la psicología ha ganado terreno en la profesionalización de psicólogos tanto clínicos como sociales. Con todo, la psicología también se ha usado a favor de la emancipación, y no siempre de los conflictos, la guerra y la opresión. Uno de los movimientos críticos más interesantes que ha tratado de llevar la psicología a un ámbito emancipatorio es la psicología de la paz. En general, esta disciplina ha mostrado gran entusiasmo por enmarcar, discutir y ser práctica y vigorosa en intervenciones desarrolladas en nombre de la paz y los derechos humanos. Por lo tanto, en este artículo buscamos aprehender: a) el desarrollo histórico de la psicología de la paz; b) el establecimiento de la psicología de la paz como un campo de la psicología y los estudios sobre la paz; y c) reflexiones sobre los retos ubicuos y las posibles opciones que podrían darle forma a la emblemática labor crítica de la disciplina.application/pdfengUniversidad Santo Tomáshttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715/5624Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2020); 33-60Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020); 33-602500-66812339-3688Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace PsychologyReunir la psicología y la paz: una crítica hacia el potencial emancipatorio de la psicología de la pazinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf211634/39484oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/394842023-07-14 16:09:09.558metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Reunir la psicología y la paz: una crítica hacia el potencial emancipatorio de la psicología de la paz |
title |
Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology |
spellingShingle |
Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology |
title_short |
Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology |
title_full |
Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology |
title_fullStr |
Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology |
title_sort |
Bringing Together Psychology and Peace: A Critique towards the Emancipatory Potential of Peace Psychology |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Pereira Soares, Mónica Catarina Sá Caetano, Ana Margarida Reis Barbosa, Mariana |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Pereira Soares, Mónica Catarina Sá Caetano, Ana Margarida Reis Barbosa, Mariana |
description |
Historically, psychology has been deeply associated with the defense and active normalization of conflicts, war, and established social orders. For instance, it is well-known that one of the most important grounds for the legitimacy of psychology as a scientific discipline depended on psychologists’ work done during the First and Second World Wars. At those times, and perhaps in a culturally biased way, psychological tests for military selection and practical models to treat war-related problems were widely employed. Psychology gained a practical terrain for professionalization for both clinical and social psychologists within such context. However, psychology has also been used on behalf of emancipation, and not always in the field of conflicts, war, and oppression. One of the most interesting critical movements which has tried to move psychology into an emancipatory realm has been Peace Psychology. In general, this discipline has been open to framing, discussing, and participating actively in interventions developed in the name of peace and human rights. In accordance, in this paper, we seek to capture a) the historical development of peace psychology; b) the establishment of peace psychology as a field of psychology and of peace studies; and c) some reflections upon the omnipresent challenges and possible co-options that may shape the emblematic critical engagement of this discipline. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T16:02:56Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T16:02:56Z |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715 10.15332/25006681/5715 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39484 |
url |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715 http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39484 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15332/25006681/5715 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/5715/5624 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2020); 33-60 |
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020); 33-60 |
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv |
2500-6681 2339-3688 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
noreply@usta.edu.co |
_version_ |
1800786366156505088 |