La cuestión del bien en el bioderecho: Una aproximación desde macintyre y dewan

Most disagreements of the practical order (androids, IVF; eugenics; preimplantation design; artificial intelligence; euthanasia and abortion) are generally due to previous disagreements of the theoretical order (understanding of good and human nature); conception of the person; foundations of dignity; hierarchy of principles). In other words, depending on the understanding of the good, biotechnological practices, applied ethics and their conceptualization and bio-legal regulation will vary in their limits and in their purposes. In this sense, the purpose of this article is, in accordance with the approaches of MacIntyre and Dewan, to show that the analogous understanding of the good, rooted in the ethics of the Aristotelian-Thomistic virtues, is the most successful option to guide practical reason, in general, and shed light on difficult cases of biolaw, in particular, in the face of the crisis of contemporary moral language.

• Autores: Noguera Pardo, Camilo
• Fecha de publicación: 2020
• Institución: Universidad Santo Tomás
• Repositorio: Universidad Santo Tomás
• Idioma: spa
• OAI Identifier: oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/29610
• Acceso en línea: http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1945; http://hdl.handle.net/11634/29610
• Palabra clave: Good; Biolaw; Practical Reason; MacIntyre; Dewan; Bien; Bioderecho; Razón práctica; MacIntyre; Dewan; Ok; Bio-Right; Practical Reason; MacIntyre; Dewan; Certo; Bio-Right; Practical Reason; MacIntyre; Dewan
• License: Derechos de autor 2020 Principia Iuris