Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática
La simulación de síntomas ha sido una estrategia utilizada por los seres humanos a lo largo de la historia para la obtención de beneficios en diferentes aspectos, siendo así, un fenómeno común y frecuente en la evaluación psicológica en el ámbito forense. Su difícil detección y prevalecía varía segú...
- Autores:
-
Perilla Gamboa, Paola Andrea
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional USTA
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/17682
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/11634/17682
- Palabra clave:
- Sistematic review
Forensic psychology
Malingering
Assessment
Tests
Research projects -- psychology
Law - Psychological aspects
Simulation (Civil law)
Proyectos de investigación -- Psicología
Derecho-Aspectos psicológicos
Simulación (Derecho)
Revisión sistemática
Simulación de síntomas
Evaluación
Psicología forense
Simulación de síntomas
Evaluación
Instrumentos
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
| id |
SANTTOMAS2_f3d36297534177bb8c4e912fb5cfd209 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/17682 |
| network_acronym_str |
SANTTOMAS2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional USTA |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática |
| title |
Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática |
| spellingShingle |
Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática Sistematic review Forensic psychology Malingering Assessment Tests Research projects -- psychology Law - Psychological aspects Simulation (Civil law) Proyectos de investigación -- Psicología Derecho-Aspectos psicológicos Simulación (Derecho) Revisión sistemática Simulación de síntomas Evaluación Psicología forense Simulación de síntomas Evaluación Instrumentos |
| title_short |
Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática |
| title_full |
Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática |
| title_fullStr |
Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática |
| title_sort |
Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Perilla Gamboa, Paola Andrea |
| dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv |
Espinosa Becerra, Adriana Patricia |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Perilla Gamboa, Paola Andrea |
| dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-862X |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://scholar.google.es/citations?user=f3SQqzkAAAAJ&hl=es |
| dc.contributor.cvlac.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000509264 |
| dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Sistematic review Forensic psychology Malingering Assessment Tests Research projects -- psychology Law - Psychological aspects Simulation (Civil law) |
| topic |
Sistematic review Forensic psychology Malingering Assessment Tests Research projects -- psychology Law - Psychological aspects Simulation (Civil law) Proyectos de investigación -- Psicología Derecho-Aspectos psicológicos Simulación (Derecho) Revisión sistemática Simulación de síntomas Evaluación Psicología forense Simulación de síntomas Evaluación Instrumentos |
| dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Proyectos de investigación -- Psicología Derecho-Aspectos psicológicos Simulación (Derecho) |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revisión sistemática Simulación de síntomas Evaluación Psicología forense Simulación de síntomas Evaluación Instrumentos |
| description |
La simulación de síntomas ha sido una estrategia utilizada por los seres humanos a lo largo de la historia para la obtención de beneficios en diferentes aspectos, siendo así, un fenómeno común y frecuente en la evaluación psicológica en el ámbito forense. Su difícil detección y prevalecía varía según el contexto, y la importancia de evaluación radica en que acarrea consecuencias judiciales, financieras y de seguridad sobre la sociedad. Por lo tanto, el presente trabajo de grado propone una revisión sistemática de la literatura e investigación adelantada en los últimos diez años (2008-2018) sobre simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. El objetivo de este estudio, es identificar los avances y vacíos teóricos, así como los métodos, técnicas e instrumentos de evaluación de este constructo. Como fuentes de datos se indagó en revistas indexadas de las bases de datos Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, PsycArticles, Scielo, Redalyc y Psychology Database ProQuest, teniendo en cuenta los criterios de inclusión y exclusión empleados, así como un protocolo de selección y categorización de las fuentes. Ahora bien, los resultados indican que: a) la descripción utilizada por los manuales diagnósticos está permeada por el modelo criminológico; b) no hay un consenso frente a la conceptualización de este constructo; y, c) no hay precisión respecto a la metodología de evaluación. Por consiguiente, se propone una definición y se justifica la motivación de un abordaje multi-método para la evaluación de tan importante constructo. |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-15T12:57:49Z |
| dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-15T12:57:49Z |
| dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-11 |
| dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.category.spa.fl_str_mv |
Formación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especialización |
| dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
| dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Perilla Gamboa, P. A. (2019). Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática. Trabajo de grado especialización. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/17682 |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad Santo Tomás |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co |
| identifier_str_mv |
Perilla Gamboa, P. A. (2019). Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática. Trabajo de grado especialización. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás instname:Universidad Santo Tomás repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/17682 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV.TR®). American Psychiatric Pub. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub. Alwes, Y. R., Clark, J. A., Berry, D. T., & Granacher, R. P. (2008). Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(2), 133-140. Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Buela, G. (2008). Assessing and detecting the ability to faking psychological injury as a consequence of a motor vehicle accident on the MMPI-2 using mock victims. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40(3), 485-496. Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilariño, M. (2015). Daño psicológico en casos de víctimas de violencia de género: estudio comparativo de las evaluaciones forenses. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 6(2), 72-80. Ávila-Espada, A., & Jiménez-Gómez, F. (1999). Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnessota-2 (MMPI-2). Madrid: TEA Ediciones, SA. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form: manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press. Boysen, G. A., & VanBergen, A. (2014). Simulation of multiple personalities: a review of research comparing diagnosed and simulated dissociative identity disorder. Clinical psychology review, 34(1), 14-28. Brand, B. L., & Chasson, G. S. (2015). Distinguishing simulated from genuine dissociative identity disorder on the MMPI-2. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 7(1), 93. Brand, B. L., Webermann, A. R., & Frankel, A. S. (2016). Assessment of complex dissociative disorder patients and simulated dissociation in forensic contexts. International journal of law and psychiatry, 49, 197-204. Brand, B. L., Webermann, A. R., Snyder, B. L., & Kaliush, P. R. (2018). Detecting clinical and simulated dissociative identity disorder with the Test of Memory Malingering. Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice and policy. Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., ... & Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 419-426. Butcher, J.N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. University of Minnesota Press Chmielewski, M., Zhu, J., Burchett, D., Bury, A. S., & Bagby, R. M. (2017). The comparative capacity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 (MMPI–2) and MMPI–2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales to detect suspected malingering in a disability claimant sample. Psychological assessment, 29(2), 199. Christiansen, A. K., & Vincent, J. P. (2012). Assessment of litigation context, suggestion, and malingering measures among simulated personal injury litigants. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12(3), 238-258. Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(8), 771-783. Day, R. A. (2005). Cómo escribir y publicar trabajos científicos (Tercera edición). Washington DC. Organización Panamericana de Salud. *Franklin, K. (2008). Malingering as a dichotomous variable: Case report on an insanity defendant. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(1), 95-107. Freeman, T., Powell, M., & Kimbrell, T. (2008). Measuring symptom exaggeration in veterans with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Research, 158(3), 374-380. Gaines, M. V., Giles, C. L., & Morgan, R. D. (2013). The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: A new index. Assessment, 20(4), 437-447. Ger, M. C., LJOHIY, N. D., ÖNCÜ, F., Keyvan, A., ÖZGEN, G., & TÜRKCAN, A. (2016). Clinical Characteristics of Malingering Among Arrested and Convicted Male Cases That are Sent For Treatment. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 27(4). Gottfried, E., & Glassmire, D. (2016). The relationship between psychiatric and cognitive symptom feigning among forensic inpatients adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. Assessment, 23(6), 672-682. Green, D., Rosenfeld, B., & Belfi, B. (2013). New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms. Assessment, 20(2), 210-218. Greve, K. W., Binder, L. M., & Bianchini, K. J. (2009). Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(3), 534-544. Grossi, L. M., Green, D., Einzig, S., & Belfi, B. (2017). Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment. Psychological assessment, 29(5), 531. Hawes, S. W., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2009). Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 112. Hoover, S., Zottoli, T. M., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2014). ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91(2), 139-146. Ingram, P. B., & Ternes, M. S. (2016). The detection of content-based invalid responding: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form’s (MMPI-2-RF) over-reporting validity scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(4), 473-496. Jelicic, M., Ceunen, E., Peters, M. J., & Merckelbach, H. (2011). Detecting coached feigning using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(9), 850-855. Jiménez Gómez, F., Sánchez Crespo, G., & Ampudia Rueda, A. (2008). Utilidad de la escala Odecp de Nichols & Greene, (1991) en el MMPI-2. ODECP Y MMPI-2. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación-e Avaliação Psicológica, 2(26). Jones, A. (2016). Cutoff scores for MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF cognitive-somatic validity scales for psychometrically defined malingering groups in a military sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(7), 786-801. Jones, S. M. (2017). Dissimulation strategies on standard neuropsychological tests: A qualitative investigation. Brain injury, 31(8), 1131-1141. King, J., & Sullivan, K. A. (2009). Deterring malingered psychopathology: The effect of warning simulating malingerers. Behavioral sciences & the law, 27(1), 35-49. Kosheleva, E., Spadoni, A. D., Strigo, I. A., Buchsbaum, M. S., & Simmons, A. N. (2016). Faking bad: The neural correlates of feigning memory impairment. Neuropsychology, 30(3), 377. Lande, R. G., & Williams, L. B. (2013). Prevalence and characteristics of military malingering. Military medicine, 178(1), 50-54. Lange, R. T., Sullivan, K. A., & Scott, C. (2010). Comparison of MMPI-2 and PAI validity indicators to detect feigned depression and PTSD symptom reporting. Psychiatry Research, 176(2-3), 229-235. Love, C. M., Glassmire, D. M., Zanolini, S. J., & Wolf, A. (2014). Specificity and false positive rates of the Test of Memory Malingering, Rey 15-Item Test, and Rey Word Recognition Test among forensic inpatients with intellectual disabilities. Assessment, 21(5), 618-627. Machado, R., Tamames, S., López, M., Mohedano, L., D´agostino, M., & Veiga, J. (2009). Revisiones sistemáticas Exploratorias, Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo, 55(216), 12-19. Marion, B. E., Sellbom, M., Salekin, R. T., Toomey, J. A., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2013). An examination of the association between psychopathy and dissimulation using the MMPI-2-RF validity scales. Law and human behavior, 37(4), 219. McCarter, R. J., Walton, N. H., Brooks, D. N., & Powell, G. E. (2009). Effort testing in contemporary UK neuropsychological practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(6), 1050-1066. Miller, H. A. (1991). Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). Mogge, N. L., Lepage, J. S., Bell, T., & Ragatz, L. (2010). The negative distortion scale: A new PAI validity scale. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(1), 77-90. Morey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory (PAI). Myers, W. C., Hall, R. C., & Tolou-Shams, M. (2013). Prevalence and assessment of malingering in homicide defendants using the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Rey 15-Item Memory Test. Homicide studies, 17(3), 314-328. Nijdam-Jones, A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2017). Cross-cultural feigning assessment: A systematic review of feigning instruments used with linguistically, ethnically, and culturally diverse samples. Psychological assessment, 29(11), 1321. Ortega, A., Labrenz, S., Markowitsch, H. J., & Piefke, M. (2013). Diagnostic accuracy of a Bayesian latent group analysis for the detection of malingering-related poor effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(6), 1019-1042. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Review of Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide (Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 244). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers. Pierson, A. M., Rosenfeld, B., Green, D., & Belfi, B. (2011). Investigating the relationship between antisocial personality disorder and malingering. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(2), 146-156. Rogers, R., Gillard, N. D., Berry, D. T., & Granacher, R. P. (2011). Effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF validity scales for feigned mental disorders and cognitive impairment: A known-groups study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33(3), 355-367. Rogers, R., Kenneth, W., Sewell, K. W., & Nathan, D., Guillard, M. S. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms, 2nd Edition (SIRS) (SIRS-2) Rogers, R., Salekin, R. T., Sewell, K. W., Goldstein, A., & Leonard, K. (1998). A comparison of forensic and nonforensic malingerers: A prototypical analysis of explanatory models. Law and human behavior, 22(4), 353-367. Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Goldstein, A. M. (1994). Explanatory models of malingering. Law and human behavior, 18(5), 543-552. Rogers, R., Robinson, E. V., & Gillard, N. D. (2014). The SIMS screen for feigned mental disorders: The development of detection‐based scales. Behavioral sciences & the law, 32(4), 455-466. Sánchez Crespo, G., Jiménez Gómez, F., & Ampudia Rueda, A. (2008). Detectando el perfil simulador en el MMPI-2: una propuesta basada en la investigación. Revista de Psicología (Lima), 26(2), 277-298. Schenk, K., & Sullivan, K. A. (2010). Do warnings deter rather than produce more sophisticated malingering? Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 32(7), 752-762. Sellbom, M., Toomey, J. A., Wygant, D. B., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2010). Utility of the MMPI–2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: A known-groups design. Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 22. Sharf, A. J., Rogers, R., Williams, M. M., & Henry, S. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting feigned mental disorders and cognitive deficits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(3), 441-455. Smith, S. T., Cox, J., Mowle, E. N., & Edens, J. F. (2017). Intentional inattention: Detecting feigned attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on the Personality Assessment Inventory. Psychological assessment, 29(12), 1447. *Soliman, S., & Resnick, P. J. (2010). Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations. Behavioral sciences & the law, 28(5), 614-629. Sollman, M. J., Ranseen, J. D., & Berry, D. T. (2010). Detection of feigned ADHD in college students. Psychological assessment, 22(2), 325. Soria, M. Á., Yepes, M., & Armadans, I. (2011). Effectiveness of clinical assessment in Spanish forensic practice: detecting malingered psychological sequelae in victims of intimate partner violence. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 25(1), 8-18. Steffan, J. S., Morgan, R. D., Lee, J., & Sellbom, M. (2010). A comparative analysis of MMPI-2 malingering detection models among inmates. Assessment, 17(2), 185-196. Sullivan, K. A., & Elliott, C. (2012). An investigation of the validity of the MMPI-2 response bias scale using an analog simulation design. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(1), 160-176. Sullivan, K. A., Lange, R. T., & Edmed, S. L. (2016). Utility of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Validity-10 index to detect symptom exaggeration: An analogue simulation study. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 23(5), 353-362. Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering: TOMM. New York/Toronto: MHS. van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Niesten, I. J., Jelicic, M., Huhnt, B., & Campo, J. A. (2017). Biased symptom reporting and antisocial behaviour in forensic samples: A weak link. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(4), 530-548. Van Oorsouw, K. I. M., & Merckelbach, H. (2010). Detecting malingered memory problems in the civil and criminal arena. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 97-114. Vitacco, M. J., Jackson, R. L., Rogers, R., Neumann, C. S., Miller, H. A., & Gabel, J. (2008). Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: A confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions. Assessment, 15(1), 97-103. Weiss, P. A., Bell, K. J., & Weiss, W. U. (2010). Use of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales in detecting criminal malingering. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 25(1), 49-55. Weiss, R. A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2017). Identifying feigning in trauma-exposed African immigrants. Psychological assessment, 29(7), 881. Widows, M. R., & Smith, G. P. (2005). SIMS: Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. PAR. Williams, J. M. (2011). The malingering factor. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(3), 280-285. Yoxall, J., Bahr, M., & O'Neill, T. (2017). Faking bad in workers compensation psychological assessments: elevation rates of negative distortion scales on the personality assessment inventory in an Australian sample. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(5), 682-693. Ahmadi, K., Lashani, Z., Afzali, M. H., Tavalaie, S. A., & Mirzaee, J. (2013). Malingering and PTSD: Detecting malingering and war related PTSD by Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). BMC psychiatry, 13(1), 154. Álvarez-Bello, F. J. (2013). El control del engaño en la evaluación psicológica forense de la violencia de género: posibilidades y limitaciones en el contexto chileno. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 23. Arce, R., Fariña, F., Carballal, A., & Novo, M. (2006). Evaluación del daño moral en accidentes de tráfico: Desarrollo y validación de un protocolo para la detección de la simulación. Psicothema, 18(2). Arce, R., Fariña, F., Carballal, A., & Novo, M. (2009). Creación y validación de un protocolo de evaluación forense de las secuelas psicológicas de la violencia de género. Psicothema, 21(2), 241-247. Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Seijo, D. (2013). ¿Disimulan los progenitores en litigio por la custodia en el 16 PF-5? Anuario de psicología jurídica, 23. Berthelson, L., Mulchan, S. S., Odland, A. P., Miller, L. J., & Mittenberg, W. (2013). False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests. Brain Injury, 27(7-8), 909-916. Bianchini, K. J., Etherton, J. L., Greve, K. W., Heinly, M. T., & Meyers, J. E. (2008). Classification accuracy of MMPI-2 validity scales in the detection of pain-related malingering: A known-groups study. Assessment, 15(4), 435-449. Blasco Saiz, J. L., & Pallardó Durá, L. (2013). Detección de exageración de síntomas mediante el SIMS y el MMPI-2-RF en pacientes diagnosticados de trastorno mixto ansioso-depresivo y adaptativo en el contexto medicolegal: un estudio preliminar. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 177-183. De Marchi, B., & Balboni, G. (2018). Detecting malingering mental illness in forensics: Known-Group Comparison and Simulation Design with MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM. PeerJ, 6, e5259. Franklin, K. (2008). Malingering as a dichotomous variable: Case report on an insanity defendant. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(1), 95-107. García-Cortés, A., Pérez-Fernández, F., Corbí-Gran, B., & Martín-Moreno-Blasco, C. (2017). Estudio de caso: ¿simulación o trastorno de personalidad múltiple? Clínica y Salud, 28(1), 39-45. Geurten, M., Meulemans, T., & Seron, X. (2018). Detecting over-reporting of symptoms: the French version of the self-report symptom inventory. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(sup1), 164-181. Green, D., Rosenfeld, B., Dole, T., Pivovarova, E., & Zapf, P. A. (2008). Validation of an abbreviated version of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings. Law and human behavior, 32(2), 177-186. Keyvan, A., Mehmet Can, G. E. R., Ertürk, S. G., & Türkcan, A. (2015). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). Nöro Psikiyatri Arşivi, 52(3), 296. Kocsis, R. N. (2011). The structured interview of reported symptoms 2nd edition (SIRS-2): The new benchmark towards the assessment of malingering. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11(1), 73-81. Kunst, M. J. J., Aarts, M., Frolijk, J., & Poelwijk, R. (2016). Exploring the residual effects of malingering in mock victims of violent crime: an experimental vignette study. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(3), 238-251. Liu, C., Liu, Z., Chiu, H. F., Carl, T. W. C., Zhang, H., Wang, P., & Wang, Y. (2013). Detection of malingering: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2. BMC psychiatry, 13(1), 254. López, R. V., Aparicio, M., Río, M. G., & García, M. P. (2013). Utilidad de los índices de memoria verbal para detectar simulación en población española. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 169-176. McDermott, B. E., & Sokolov, G. (2009). Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a jail sample. Behavioral sciences & the law, 27(5), 753-765. McLaughlin, J. L., & Kan, L. Y. (2014). Test usage in four common types of forensic mental health assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(2), 128. Merckelbach, H., Smeets, T., & Jelicic, M. (2009). Experimental simulation: Type of malingering scenario makes a difference. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20(3), 378-386. Merten, T., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Hall, V., Schmandd, B. A., Santamaríae, P., & González-Ordi, H. (2013). Symptom validity assessment in European countries: Development and state of the art. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 129-138. Merten, T., & Rogers, R. (2017). An international perspective on feigned mental disabilities: conceptual issues and continuing controversies. Behavioral sciences & the law, 35(2), 97-112. Morales, M. I. C., & Laguna-Bonilla, S. (2017). Trastorno de síntomas somáticos: de la sospecha de simulación al tratamiento cognitivo-conductual. Clínica y Salud, 28(3), 131-138. Mossman, D., Wygant, D. B., Gervais, R. O., & Hart, K. J. (2018). Trial 1 versus Trial 2 of the Test of Memory Malingering: Evaluating accuracy without a “gold standard”. Psychological assessment, 30(1), 74. Myers, W. C., Hall, R., Marshall, R., Tolou-Shams, M., & Wooten, K. (2016). Frequency and Detection of Malingering in Homicide Defendants Undergoing Criminal Responsibility Evaluations Using the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality: A Feasibility Study. SAGE Open, 6(2), 2158244016638131. Niesten, I. J., Nentjes, L., Merckelbach, H., & Bernstein, D. P. (2015). Antisocial features and “faking bad”: A critical note. International journal of law and psychiatry, 41, 34-42. Nijdam-Jones, A., Rivera, D., Rosenfeld, B., & Arango-Lasprilla, J. C. (2017). A cross-cultural analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering among Latin American Spanish-speaking adults. Law and human behavior, 41(5), 422. Novo, M., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., & Arce, R. (2013). Eficacia del MMPI-A en casos forenses de acoso escolar: Simulación y daño psicológico. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(1), 33-40. Ortega, A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Lee, M. D., Markowitsch, H. J., & Piefke, M. (2012). A Bayesian latent group analysis for detecting poor effort in the assessment of malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(4), 453-465. Osuna, E., López-Martínez, M., Arce, R., & Vázquez, M. J. (2015). Analysis of response patterns on the MMPI-2 in psychiatric prison inmates. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(1), 29-36. 9 Ramírez, P. C., Ordi, H. G., Morales, M. I. C., Santamaría, P., & Nieto, M. A. P. (2013). Fibromialgia: ¿exageración o simulación? Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 185-195. Rogers, R., Gillard, N. D., Wooley, C. N., & Ross, C. A. (2012). The detection of feigned disabilities: The effectiveness of the Personality Assessment Inventory in a traumatized inpatient sample. Assessment, 19(1), 77-88. Rogers, R., Vitacco, M. J., & Kurus, S. J. (2010). Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: Patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 38(1), 109-114. Sánchez, G., Ampudia, A., Jiménez, F., & Amado, B. G. (2017). Contrasting the efficacy of the MMPI-2-RF overreporting scales in the detection of malingering. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9(2), 51-56. Santamaría, P., Capilla Ramírez, P., & González Ordi, H. (2013). Prevalencia de simulación en incapacidad temporal: percepción de los profesionales de la salud. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 139-151. Soliman, S., & Resnick, P. J. (2010). Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations. Behavioral sciences & the law, 28(5), 614-629. Springman, R. E., & Vandenberg, B. R. (2009). The effects of test-strategy coaching on measures of competency to stand trial. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 9(3), 179-198. Sullivan, K., & King, J. (2010). Detecting faked psychopathology: A comparison of two tests to detect malingered psychopathology using a simulation design. Psychiatry research, 176(1), 75-81. van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & Merten, T. (2014). The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1336-1365. van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & à Campo, J. (2018). Antisocial features are not predictive of symptom exaggeration in forensic patients. Legal and Criminological Psychology. van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., Niesten, I. J., & à Campo, J. (2017). Differentiating Factitious from Malingered Symptomatology: the Development of a Psychometric Approach. Psychological injury and law, 10(4), 341-357. Vetter, S., Forces, S. A., Gallo, W. T., Rossler, W., & Lupi, G. G. (2009). The pattern of psychopathology associated with malingering tendencies at basic psychiatric screening of the Swiss Armed Forces. Military medicine, 174(2), 153-157. Walters, G. D., Rogers, R., Berry, D. T., Miller, H. A., Duncan, S. A., McCusker, P. J., ... & Granacher Jr, R. P. (2008). Malingering as a categorical or dimensional construct: The latent structure of feigned psychopathology as measured by the SIRS and MMPI-2. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 238. Wisdom, N. M., Callahan, J. L., & Shaw, T. G. (2010). Diagnostic utility of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology to detect malingering in a forensic sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(2), 118-125. Wooley, C. N., & Rogers, R. (2015). The effectiveness of the personality assessment inventory with feigned PTSD: An initial investigation of Resnick’s model of malingering. Assessment, 22(4), 449-458. Wygant, D. B., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Arbisi, P. A., Berry, D. T., Freeman, D. B., & Heilbronner, R. L. (2009). Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil forensic settings: Findings from simulation and known group samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(7), 671-680. Young, G. (2017). PTSD in Court III: Malingering, assessment, and the law. International journal of law and psychiatry, 52, 81-102. Young, S., Jacobson, R., Einzig, S., Gray, K., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2016). Can we recognise malingerers? The association between malingering, personality traits and clinical impression among complainants in civil compensation cases. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 235-238. |
| dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia |
| dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ |
| dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
| dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.campus.spa.fl_str_mv |
CRAI-USTA Bogotá |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Especialización Psicología Jurídica y Forense |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Psicología |
| institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/1/2019paolaperilla.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/3/cartaderechosdeautor.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/6/cartadeaprobacion.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/10/license.txt https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/9/license_rdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/11/2019paolaperilla.pdf.jpg https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/12/cartaderechosdeautor.pdf.jpg https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/13/cartadeaprobacion.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
ed0bb226109cb7341c982f9ae5f6f26f 0391e69047e49500d0069dc843fd9e36 0333d6bf6f3bf0b413c8ad2aee659609 f6b8c5608fa6b2f649b2d63e10c5fa73 217700a34da79ed616c2feb68d4c5e06 b8c8b2f835d07cc7f943ae8b652417c4 bbe4a1b0dbb23c818b7171b1b63b8278 f9820d38f1bae769d9bbb299aa79ad53 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@usantotomas.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1782026229755412480 |
| spelling |
Espinosa Becerra, Adriana PatriciaPerilla Gamboa, Paola Andreahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-862Xhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=f3SQqzkAAAAJ&hl=eshttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=00005092642019-07-15T12:57:49Z2019-07-15T12:57:49Z2019-07-11Perilla Gamboa, P. A. (2019). Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemática. Trabajo de grado especialización. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.http://hdl.handle.net/11634/17682reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.coLa simulación de síntomas ha sido una estrategia utilizada por los seres humanos a lo largo de la historia para la obtención de beneficios en diferentes aspectos, siendo así, un fenómeno común y frecuente en la evaluación psicológica en el ámbito forense. Su difícil detección y prevalecía varía según el contexto, y la importancia de evaluación radica en que acarrea consecuencias judiciales, financieras y de seguridad sobre la sociedad. Por lo tanto, el presente trabajo de grado propone una revisión sistemática de la literatura e investigación adelantada en los últimos diez años (2008-2018) sobre simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. El objetivo de este estudio, es identificar los avances y vacíos teóricos, así como los métodos, técnicas e instrumentos de evaluación de este constructo. Como fuentes de datos se indagó en revistas indexadas de las bases de datos Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, PsycArticles, Scielo, Redalyc y Psychology Database ProQuest, teniendo en cuenta los criterios de inclusión y exclusión empleados, así como un protocolo de selección y categorización de las fuentes. Ahora bien, los resultados indican que: a) la descripción utilizada por los manuales diagnósticos está permeada por el modelo criminológico; b) no hay un consenso frente a la conceptualización de este constructo; y, c) no hay precisión respecto a la metodología de evaluación. Por consiguiente, se propone una definición y se justifica la motivación de un abordaje multi-método para la evaluación de tan importante constructo.Malingering has been a strategy of human beings throughout history to obtain benefits in different aspects, and it is thus, a common and frequent phenomenon in the psychological assessment in the forensic field. Its difficult detection and its prevalence are based on the context, and the importance of evaluation lies in the fact it enjails judicial, financial and security consequences on society. Therefore, the present degree work proposes a systematic review of the literature and the research carried out in the last ten years (2008-2018) on malingering in the forensic context. The objective of this study is to identify the advances and theoretical gaps, as well as the methods, techniques and instruments of evaluation of this construct. As sources of data, it was investigated in endexed journals of the databases ProQuest, Web of Science, Science Direct, PsycArticles, Scielo, Redalyc and Psychology Database, taking into account the inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as a protocol for the selection and categorization of sources. However, the results indicate that: a) the description provided by the diagnostic manuals is permeated by the criminological model; b) there is no consensus regarding the conceptualization of this construct; and, c) there is no precision regarding the evaluation methodology. Therefore, a definition is proposed and the motivation of a multi-method approach for the evaluation of such an important construct is justified.Especialista En Psicología Jurídicahttp://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.coEspecializaciónapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Santo TomásEspecialización Psicología Jurídica y ForenseFacultad de PsicologíaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 ColombiaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 ColombiaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/Abierto (Texto Completo)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Simulación de síntomas en el contexto forense. Una revisión sistemáticaSistematic reviewForensic psychologyMalingeringAssessmentTestsResearch projects -- psychologyLaw - Psychological aspectsSimulation (Civil law)Proyectos de investigación -- PsicologíaDerecho-Aspectos psicológicosSimulación (Derecho)Revisión sistemáticaSimulación de síntomasEvaluaciónPsicología forenseSimulación de síntomasEvaluaciónInstrumentosTrabajo de gradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1finfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisCRAI-USTA BogotáAmerican Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV.TR®). American Psychiatric Pub.American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.Alwes, Y. R., Clark, J. A., Berry, D. T., & Granacher, R. P. (2008). Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(2), 133-140.Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Buela, G. (2008). Assessing and detecting the ability to faking psychological injury as a consequence of a motor vehicle accident on the MMPI-2 using mock victims. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40(3), 485-496.Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilariño, M. (2015). Daño psicológico en casos de víctimas de violencia de género: estudio comparativo de las evaluaciones forenses. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 6(2), 72-80.Ávila-Espada, A., & Jiménez-Gómez, F. (1999). Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnessota-2 (MMPI-2). Madrid: TEA Ediciones, SA.Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form: manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.Boysen, G. A., & VanBergen, A. (2014). Simulation of multiple personalities: a review of research comparing diagnosed and simulated dissociative identity disorder. Clinical psychology review, 34(1), 14-28.Brand, B. L., & Chasson, G. S. (2015). Distinguishing simulated from genuine dissociative identity disorder on the MMPI-2. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 7(1), 93.Brand, B. L., Webermann, A. R., & Frankel, A. S. (2016). Assessment of complex dissociative disorder patients and simulated dissociation in forensic contexts. International journal of law and psychiatry, 49, 197-204.Brand, B. L., Webermann, A. R., Snyder, B. L., & Kaliush, P. R. (2018). Detecting clinical and simulated dissociative identity disorder with the Test of Memory Malingering. Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice and policy.Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., ... & Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 419-426.Butcher, J.N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. University of Minnesota PressChmielewski, M., Zhu, J., Burchett, D., Bury, A. S., & Bagby, R. M. (2017). The comparative capacity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 (MMPI–2) and MMPI–2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales to detect suspected malingering in a disability claimant sample. Psychological assessment, 29(2), 199.Christiansen, A. K., & Vincent, J. P. (2012). Assessment of litigation context, suggestion, and malingering measures among simulated personal injury litigants. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12(3), 238-258.Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(8), 771-783.Day, R. A. (2005). Cómo escribir y publicar trabajos científicos (Tercera edición). Washington DC. Organización Panamericana de Salud.*Franklin, K. (2008). Malingering as a dichotomous variable: Case report on an insanity defendant. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(1), 95-107.Freeman, T., Powell, M., & Kimbrell, T. (2008). Measuring symptom exaggeration in veterans with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Research, 158(3), 374-380.Gaines, M. V., Giles, C. L., & Morgan, R. D. (2013). The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: A new index. Assessment, 20(4), 437-447.Ger, M. C., LJOHIY, N. D., ÖNCÜ, F., Keyvan, A., ÖZGEN, G., & TÜRKCAN, A. (2016). Clinical Characteristics of Malingering Among Arrested and Convicted Male Cases That are Sent For Treatment. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 27(4).Gottfried, E., & Glassmire, D. (2016). The relationship between psychiatric and cognitive symptom feigning among forensic inpatients adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. Assessment, 23(6), 672-682.Green, D., Rosenfeld, B., & Belfi, B. (2013). New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms. Assessment, 20(2), 210-218.Greve, K. W., Binder, L. M., & Bianchini, K. J. (2009). Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(3), 534-544.Grossi, L. M., Green, D., Einzig, S., & Belfi, B. (2017). Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment. Psychological assessment, 29(5), 531.Hawes, S. W., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2009). Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 112.Hoover, S., Zottoli, T. M., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2014). ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91(2), 139-146.Ingram, P. B., & Ternes, M. S. (2016). The detection of content-based invalid responding: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form’s (MMPI-2-RF) over-reporting validity scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(4), 473-496.Jelicic, M., Ceunen, E., Peters, M. J., & Merckelbach, H. (2011). Detecting coached feigning using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(9), 850-855.Jiménez Gómez, F., Sánchez Crespo, G., & Ampudia Rueda, A. (2008). Utilidad de la escala Odecp de Nichols & Greene, (1991) en el MMPI-2. ODECP Y MMPI-2. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación-e Avaliação Psicológica, 2(26).Jones, A. (2016). Cutoff scores for MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF cognitive-somatic validity scales for psychometrically defined malingering groups in a military sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(7), 786-801.Jones, S. M. (2017). Dissimulation strategies on standard neuropsychological tests: A qualitative investigation. Brain injury, 31(8), 1131-1141.King, J., & Sullivan, K. A. (2009). Deterring malingered psychopathology: The effect of warning simulating malingerers. Behavioral sciences & the law, 27(1), 35-49.Kosheleva, E., Spadoni, A. D., Strigo, I. A., Buchsbaum, M. S., & Simmons, A. N. (2016). Faking bad: The neural correlates of feigning memory impairment. Neuropsychology, 30(3), 377.Lande, R. G., & Williams, L. B. (2013). Prevalence and characteristics of military malingering. Military medicine, 178(1), 50-54.Lange, R. T., Sullivan, K. A., & Scott, C. (2010). Comparison of MMPI-2 and PAI validity indicators to detect feigned depression and PTSD symptom reporting. Psychiatry Research, 176(2-3), 229-235.Love, C. M., Glassmire, D. M., Zanolini, S. J., & Wolf, A. (2014). Specificity and false positive rates of the Test of Memory Malingering, Rey 15-Item Test, and Rey Word Recognition Test among forensic inpatients with intellectual disabilities. Assessment, 21(5), 618-627.Machado, R., Tamames, S., López, M., Mohedano, L., D´agostino, M., & Veiga, J. (2009). Revisiones sistemáticas Exploratorias, Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo, 55(216), 12-19.Marion, B. E., Sellbom, M., Salekin, R. T., Toomey, J. A., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2013). An examination of the association between psychopathy and dissimulation using the MMPI-2-RF validity scales. Law and human behavior, 37(4), 219.McCarter, R. J., Walton, N. H., Brooks, D. N., & Powell, G. E. (2009). Effort testing in contemporary UK neuropsychological practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(6), 1050-1066.Miller, H. A. (1991). Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST).Mogge, N. L., Lepage, J. S., Bell, T., & Ragatz, L. (2010). The negative distortion scale: A new PAI validity scale. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(1), 77-90.Morey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory (PAI).Myers, W. C., Hall, R. C., & Tolou-Shams, M. (2013). Prevalence and assessment of malingering in homicide defendants using the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Rey 15-Item Memory Test. Homicide studies, 17(3), 314-328.Nijdam-Jones, A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2017). Cross-cultural feigning assessment: A systematic review of feigning instruments used with linguistically, ethnically, and culturally diverse samples. Psychological assessment, 29(11), 1321.Ortega, A., Labrenz, S., Markowitsch, H. J., & Piefke, M. (2013). Diagnostic accuracy of a Bayesian latent group analysis for the detection of malingering-related poor effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(6), 1019-1042.Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Review of Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide (Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 244). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Pierson, A. M., Rosenfeld, B., Green, D., & Belfi, B. (2011). Investigating the relationship between antisocial personality disorder and malingering. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(2), 146-156.Rogers, R., Gillard, N. D., Berry, D. T., & Granacher, R. P. (2011). Effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF validity scales for feigned mental disorders and cognitive impairment: A known-groups study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33(3), 355-367.Rogers, R., Kenneth, W., Sewell, K. W., & Nathan, D., Guillard, M. S. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms, 2nd Edition (SIRS) (SIRS-2)Rogers, R., Salekin, R. T., Sewell, K. W., Goldstein, A., & Leonard, K. (1998). A comparison of forensic and nonforensic malingerers: A prototypical analysis of explanatory models. Law and human behavior, 22(4), 353-367.Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Goldstein, A. M. (1994). Explanatory models of malingering. Law and human behavior, 18(5), 543-552.Rogers, R., Robinson, E. V., & Gillard, N. D. (2014). The SIMS screen for feigned mental disorders: The development of detection‐based scales. Behavioral sciences & the law, 32(4), 455-466.Sánchez Crespo, G., Jiménez Gómez, F., & Ampudia Rueda, A. (2008). Detectando el perfil simulador en el MMPI-2: una propuesta basada en la investigación. Revista de Psicología (Lima), 26(2), 277-298.Schenk, K., & Sullivan, K. A. (2010). Do warnings deter rather than produce more sophisticated malingering? Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 32(7), 752-762.Sellbom, M., Toomey, J. A., Wygant, D. B., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2010). Utility of the MMPI–2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: A known-groups design. Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 22.Sharf, A. J., Rogers, R., Williams, M. M., & Henry, S. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting feigned mental disorders and cognitive deficits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(3), 441-455.Smith, S. T., Cox, J., Mowle, E. N., & Edens, J. F. (2017). Intentional inattention: Detecting feigned attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on the Personality Assessment Inventory. Psychological assessment, 29(12), 1447.*Soliman, S., & Resnick, P. J. (2010). Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations. Behavioral sciences & the law, 28(5), 614-629.Sollman, M. J., Ranseen, J. D., & Berry, D. T. (2010). Detection of feigned ADHD in college students. Psychological assessment, 22(2), 325.Soria, M. Á., Yepes, M., & Armadans, I. (2011). Effectiveness of clinical assessment in Spanish forensic practice: detecting malingered psychological sequelae in victims of intimate partner violence. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 25(1), 8-18.Steffan, J. S., Morgan, R. D., Lee, J., & Sellbom, M. (2010). A comparative analysis of MMPI-2 malingering detection models among inmates. Assessment, 17(2), 185-196.Sullivan, K. A., & Elliott, C. (2012). An investigation of the validity of the MMPI-2 response bias scale using an analog simulation design. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(1), 160-176.Sullivan, K. A., Lange, R. T., & Edmed, S. L. (2016). Utility of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Validity-10 index to detect symptom exaggeration: An analogue simulation study. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 23(5), 353-362.Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering: TOMM. New York/Toronto: MHS.van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Niesten, I. J., Jelicic, M., Huhnt, B., & Campo, J. A. (2017). Biased symptom reporting and antisocial behaviour in forensic samples: A weak link. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(4), 530-548.Van Oorsouw, K. I. M., & Merckelbach, H. (2010). Detecting malingered memory problems in the civil and criminal arena. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 97-114.Vitacco, M. J., Jackson, R. L., Rogers, R., Neumann, C. S., Miller, H. A., & Gabel, J. (2008). Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: A confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions. Assessment, 15(1), 97-103.Weiss, P. A., Bell, K. J., & Weiss, W. U. (2010). Use of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales in detecting criminal malingering. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 25(1), 49-55.Weiss, R. A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2017). Identifying feigning in trauma-exposed African immigrants. Psychological assessment, 29(7), 881.Widows, M. R., & Smith, G. P. (2005). SIMS: Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. PAR.Williams, J. M. (2011). The malingering factor. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(3), 280-285.Yoxall, J., Bahr, M., & O'Neill, T. (2017). Faking bad in workers compensation psychological assessments: elevation rates of negative distortion scales on the personality assessment inventory in an Australian sample. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(5), 682-693.Ahmadi, K., Lashani, Z., Afzali, M. H., Tavalaie, S. A., & Mirzaee, J. (2013). Malingering and PTSD: Detecting malingering and war related PTSD by Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). BMC psychiatry, 13(1), 154.Álvarez-Bello, F. J. (2013). El control del engaño en la evaluación psicológica forense de la violencia de género: posibilidades y limitaciones en el contexto chileno. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 23.Arce, R., Fariña, F., Carballal, A., & Novo, M. (2006). Evaluación del daño moral en accidentes de tráfico: Desarrollo y validación de un protocolo para la detección de la simulación. Psicothema, 18(2).Arce, R., Fariña, F., Carballal, A., & Novo, M. (2009). Creación y validación de un protocolo de evaluación forense de las secuelas psicológicas de la violencia de género. Psicothema, 21(2), 241-247.Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Seijo, D. (2013). ¿Disimulan los progenitores en litigio por la custodia en el 16 PF-5? Anuario de psicología jurídica, 23.Berthelson, L., Mulchan, S. S., Odland, A. P., Miller, L. J., & Mittenberg, W. (2013). False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests. Brain Injury, 27(7-8), 909-916.Bianchini, K. J., Etherton, J. L., Greve, K. W., Heinly, M. T., & Meyers, J. E. (2008). Classification accuracy of MMPI-2 validity scales in the detection of pain-related malingering: A known-groups study. Assessment, 15(4), 435-449.Blasco Saiz, J. L., & Pallardó Durá, L. (2013). Detección de exageración de síntomas mediante el SIMS y el MMPI-2-RF en pacientes diagnosticados de trastorno mixto ansioso-depresivo y adaptativo en el contexto medicolegal: un estudio preliminar. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 177-183.De Marchi, B., & Balboni, G. (2018). Detecting malingering mental illness in forensics: Known-Group Comparison and Simulation Design with MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM. PeerJ, 6, e5259.Franklin, K. (2008). Malingering as a dichotomous variable: Case report on an insanity defendant. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(1), 95-107.García-Cortés, A., Pérez-Fernández, F., Corbí-Gran, B., & Martín-Moreno-Blasco, C. (2017). Estudio de caso: ¿simulación o trastorno de personalidad múltiple? Clínica y Salud, 28(1), 39-45.Geurten, M., Meulemans, T., & Seron, X. (2018). Detecting over-reporting of symptoms: the French version of the self-report symptom inventory. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(sup1), 164-181.Green, D., Rosenfeld, B., Dole, T., Pivovarova, E., & Zapf, P. A. (2008). Validation of an abbreviated version of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings. Law and human behavior, 32(2), 177-186.Keyvan, A., Mehmet Can, G. E. R., Ertürk, S. G., & Türkcan, A. (2015). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). Nöro Psikiyatri Arşivi, 52(3), 296.Kocsis, R. N. (2011). The structured interview of reported symptoms 2nd edition (SIRS-2): The new benchmark towards the assessment of malingering. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11(1), 73-81.Kunst, M. J. J., Aarts, M., Frolijk, J., & Poelwijk, R. (2016). Exploring the residual effects of malingering in mock victims of violent crime: an experimental vignette study. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(3), 238-251.Liu, C., Liu, Z., Chiu, H. F., Carl, T. W. C., Zhang, H., Wang, P., & Wang, Y. (2013). Detection of malingering: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2. BMC psychiatry, 13(1), 254.López, R. V., Aparicio, M., Río, M. G., & García, M. P. (2013). Utilidad de los índices de memoria verbal para detectar simulación en población española. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 169-176.McDermott, B. E., & Sokolov, G. (2009). Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a jail sample. Behavioral sciences & the law, 27(5), 753-765.McLaughlin, J. L., & Kan, L. Y. (2014). Test usage in four common types of forensic mental health assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(2), 128.Merckelbach, H., Smeets, T., & Jelicic, M. (2009). Experimental simulation: Type of malingering scenario makes a difference. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20(3), 378-386.Merten, T., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Hall, V., Schmandd, B. A., Santamaríae, P., & González-Ordi, H. (2013). Symptom validity assessment in European countries: Development and state of the art. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 129-138.Merten, T., & Rogers, R. (2017). An international perspective on feigned mental disabilities: conceptual issues and continuing controversies. Behavioral sciences & the law, 35(2), 97-112.Morales, M. I. C., & Laguna-Bonilla, S. (2017). Trastorno de síntomas somáticos: de la sospecha de simulación al tratamiento cognitivo-conductual. Clínica y Salud, 28(3), 131-138.Mossman, D., Wygant, D. B., Gervais, R. O., & Hart, K. J. (2018). Trial 1 versus Trial 2 of the Test of Memory Malingering: Evaluating accuracy without a “gold standard”. Psychological assessment, 30(1), 74.Myers, W. C., Hall, R., Marshall, R., Tolou-Shams, M., & Wooten, K. (2016). Frequency and Detection of Malingering in Homicide Defendants Undergoing Criminal Responsibility Evaluations Using the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality: A Feasibility Study. SAGE Open, 6(2), 2158244016638131.Niesten, I. J., Nentjes, L., Merckelbach, H., & Bernstein, D. P. (2015). Antisocial features and “faking bad”: A critical note. International journal of law and psychiatry, 41, 34-42.Nijdam-Jones, A., Rivera, D., Rosenfeld, B., & Arango-Lasprilla, J. C. (2017). A cross-cultural analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering among Latin American Spanish-speaking adults. Law and human behavior, 41(5), 422.Novo, M., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., & Arce, R. (2013). Eficacia del MMPI-A en casos forenses de acoso escolar: Simulación y daño psicológico. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(1), 33-40.Ortega, A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Lee, M. D., Markowitsch, H. J., & Piefke, M. (2012). A Bayesian latent group analysis for detecting poor effort in the assessment of malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(4), 453-465.Osuna, E., López-Martínez, M., Arce, R., & Vázquez, M. J. (2015). Analysis of response patterns on the MMPI-2 in psychiatric prison inmates. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(1), 29-36. 9Ramírez, P. C., Ordi, H. G., Morales, M. I. C., Santamaría, P., & Nieto, M. A. P. (2013). Fibromialgia: ¿exageración o simulación? Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 185-195.Rogers, R., Gillard, N. D., Wooley, C. N., & Ross, C. A. (2012). The detection of feigned disabilities: The effectiveness of the Personality Assessment Inventory in a traumatized inpatient sample. Assessment, 19(1), 77-88.Rogers, R., Vitacco, M. J., & Kurus, S. J. (2010). Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: Patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 38(1), 109-114.Sánchez, G., Ampudia, A., Jiménez, F., & Amado, B. G. (2017). Contrasting the efficacy of the MMPI-2-RF overreporting scales in the detection of malingering. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9(2), 51-56.Santamaría, P., Capilla Ramírez, P., & González Ordi, H. (2013). Prevalencia de simulación en incapacidad temporal: percepción de los profesionales de la salud. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 139-151.Soliman, S., & Resnick, P. J. (2010). Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations. Behavioral sciences & the law, 28(5), 614-629.Springman, R. E., & Vandenberg, B. R. (2009). The effects of test-strategy coaching on measures of competency to stand trial. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 9(3), 179-198.Sullivan, K., & King, J. (2010). Detecting faked psychopathology: A comparison of two tests to detect malingered psychopathology using a simulation design. Psychiatry research, 176(1), 75-81.van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & Merten, T. (2014). The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1336-1365.van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & à Campo, J. (2018). Antisocial features are not predictive of symptom exaggeration in forensic patients. Legal and Criminological Psychology.van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., Niesten, I. J., & à Campo, J. (2017). Differentiating Factitious from Malingered Symptomatology: the Development of a Psychometric Approach. Psychological injury and law, 10(4), 341-357.Vetter, S., Forces, S. A., Gallo, W. T., Rossler, W., & Lupi, G. G. (2009). The pattern of psychopathology associated with malingering tendencies at basic psychiatric screening of the Swiss Armed Forces. Military medicine, 174(2), 153-157.Walters, G. D., Rogers, R., Berry, D. T., Miller, H. A., Duncan, S. A., McCusker, P. J., ... & Granacher Jr, R. P. (2008). Malingering as a categorical or dimensional construct: The latent structure of feigned psychopathology as measured by the SIRS and MMPI-2. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 238.Wisdom, N. M., Callahan, J. L., & Shaw, T. G. (2010). Diagnostic utility of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology to detect malingering in a forensic sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(2), 118-125.Wooley, C. N., & Rogers, R. (2015). The effectiveness of the personality assessment inventory with feigned PTSD: An initial investigation of Resnick’s model of malingering. Assessment, 22(4), 449-458.Wygant, D. B., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Arbisi, P. A., Berry, D. T., Freeman, D. B., & Heilbronner, R. L. (2009). Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil forensic settings: Findings from simulation and known group samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(7), 671-680.Young, G. (2017). PTSD in Court III: Malingering, assessment, and the law. International journal of law and psychiatry, 52, 81-102.Young, S., Jacobson, R., Einzig, S., Gray, K., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2016). Can we recognise malingerers? The association between malingering, personality traits and clinical impression among complainants in civil compensation cases. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 235-238.ORIGINAL2019paolaperilla.pdf2019paolaperilla.pdfapplication/pdf668206https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/1/2019paolaperilla.pdfed0bb226109cb7341c982f9ae5f6f26fMD51open accesscartaderechosdeautor.pdfcartaderechosdeautor.pdfapplication/pdf431445https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/3/cartaderechosdeautor.pdf0391e69047e49500d0069dc843fd9e36MD53metadata only accesscartadeaprobacion.pdfcartadeaprobacion.pdfapplication/pdf38270https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/6/cartadeaprobacion.pdf0333d6bf6f3bf0b413c8ad2aee659609MD56metadata only accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8807https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/10/license.txtf6b8c5608fa6b2f649b2d63e10c5fa73MD510open accessCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/9/license_rdf217700a34da79ed616c2feb68d4c5e06MD59open accessTHUMBNAIL2019paolaperilla.pdf.jpg2019paolaperilla.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4401https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/11/2019paolaperilla.pdf.jpgb8c8b2f835d07cc7f943ae8b652417c4MD511open accesscartaderechosdeautor.pdf.jpgcartaderechosdeautor.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6843https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/12/cartaderechosdeautor.pdf.jpgbbe4a1b0dbb23c818b7171b1b63b8278MD512open accesscartadeaprobacion.pdf.jpgcartadeaprobacion.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg7165https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/17682/13/cartadeaprobacion.pdf.jpgf9820d38f1bae769d9bbb299aa79ad53MD513open access11634/17682oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/176822022-10-10 17:06:34.779open accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásrepositorio@usantotomas.edu.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 |