Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight Way

In Australian common law system, there are discrepancies between the judicial decisions regarding the interpretation of contracts. In this research paper, I intend to clarify legal issues that cause these differences. In addition, I discuss the implications of adopting more specific rules in Austral...

Full description

Autores:
Echeverry Botero, David
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional USTA
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/40988
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/2472
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40988
Palabra clave:
Palabras clave
Admisibilidad de las tratativas
análisis objetivo
interpretación de contratos
ratio decidendi
regla de derecho
admissibility of background evidence
interpretation of contracts
objective analysis
ratio decidendi
rule of law
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id SANTTOMAS2_e731407f58d557a3d3d49230e45d54fa
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/40988
network_acronym_str SANTTOMAS2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional USTA
repository_id_str
spelling Echeverry Botero, David2022-01-18T19:32:08Z2022-01-18T19:32:08Z2015-12-11https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/247210.15332/s1900-0448.2014.0041.05http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40988In Australian common law system, there are discrepancies between the judicial decisions regarding the interpretation of contracts. In this research paper, I intend to clarify legal issues that cause these differences. In addition, I discuss the implications of adopting more specific rules in Australia. To do so, I compare the Australian case to other countries with civil law systems that have established similar norms. Then, I advocate for developing and adopting a law that is in accordance with currentinternational principles.Dentro del sistema del derecho común (common law) de Australia, existen discrepanciasentre las decisiones judiciales relacionadas con la interpretación de contratos.En el presente artículo de investigación, pretendo dilucidar las cuestiones normativasque causan dichas divergencias. Además, analizo las consecuencias de adoptar unadisposición más concreta en el caso australiano, como lo han hecho otras normatividadesdentro del derecho civil. Luego, argumento a favor de la elaboración yaprobación de una ley que esté de acuerdo con los principios internacionales actuales.application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá-Colombiahttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/2472/2409IUSTA; Núm. 41 (2014)IUSTA; No. 41 (2014)2500-52861900-0448Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight WayLey de interpretación de contratos en Australia: laberinto, no camino directoArtículo revisado por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Palabras claveAdmisibilidad de las tratativasanálisis objetivointerpretación de contratosratio decidendiregla de derechoadmissibility of background evidenceinterpretation of contractsobjective analysisratio decidendirule of lawhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf211634/40988oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/409882023-07-14 16:09:54.636metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight Way
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Ley de interpretación de contratos en Australia: laberinto, no camino directo
title Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight Way
spellingShingle Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight Way
Palabras clave
Admisibilidad de las tratativas
análisis objetivo
interpretación de contratos
ratio decidendi
regla de derecho
admissibility of background evidence
interpretation of contracts
objective analysis
ratio decidendi
rule of law
title_short Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight Way
title_full Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight Way
title_fullStr Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight Way
title_full_unstemmed Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight Way
title_sort Contract Interpretation Law in Australia: It Is a Maze, Not a Straight Way
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Echeverry Botero, David
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Echeverry Botero, David
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Palabras clave
Admisibilidad de las tratativas
análisis objetivo
interpretación de contratos
ratio decidendi
regla de derecho
topic Palabras clave
Admisibilidad de las tratativas
análisis objetivo
interpretación de contratos
ratio decidendi
regla de derecho
admissibility of background evidence
interpretation of contracts
objective analysis
ratio decidendi
rule of law
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv admissibility of background evidence
interpretation of contracts
objective analysis
ratio decidendi
rule of law
description In Australian common law system, there are discrepancies between the judicial decisions regarding the interpretation of contracts. In this research paper, I intend to clarify legal issues that cause these differences. In addition, I discuss the implications of adopting more specific rules in Australia. To do so, I compare the Australian case to other countries with civil law systems that have established similar norms. Then, I advocate for developing and adopting a law that is in accordance with currentinternational principles.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-11
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-18T19:32:08Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-18T19:32:08Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo revisado por pares
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/2472
10.15332/s1900-0448.2014.0041.05
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40988
url https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/2472
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40988
identifier_str_mv 10.15332/s1900-0448.2014.0041.05
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/2472/2409
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv IUSTA; Núm. 41 (2014)
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv IUSTA; No. 41 (2014)
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv 2500-5286
1900-0448
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá-Colombia
institution Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.mail.fl_str_mv noreply@usta.edu.co
_version_ 1782026395078098944

Publicaciones similares