Evaluación del Modelo Estándar de Control Interno (MECI) y desarrollo de un modelo diferencial para el nivel territorial en Colombia

This research aims to establish the difficulties presented by local authorities in the municipalities of 3rd to 6th category in implementing the Standard Model of Internal Control -MECI, considering that this model is the tool that allows the development of Internal Control Policy in Colombia and co...

Full description

Autores:
Cubillos Benavides, Myrian
Cárdenas Manosalva, Ileana Romea
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2014
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional USTA
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/42029
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/signos/article/view/2736
Palabra clave:
Internal control
governance
MECI
management systems.
control interno
gestión pública
MECI
gestión de la calidad
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:This research aims to establish the difficulties presented by local authorities in the municipalities of 3rd to 6th category in implementing the Standard Model of Internal Control -MECI, considering that this model is the tool that allows the development of Internal Control Policy in Colombia and constitutes the foundation for achieving the institutions objectives. Based on the diagnosis aspects to improve or adjust this model are determined, in order to correct its implementation and in the medium term these entities can improve their corporate governance. The research takes concepts of the New Public Management (NPM); from this approach is observed and analyzed aspects related to good governance and the vocation for public service by state officials, the mechanisms for democratization of public administration and finally the basic principles of social responsibility. The research is applied and used as a model methodology CIPP (contextinput-process-products) so that the results, analysis and recommendations are shown through four stages or levels. The main findings and conclusions point to confirm the hypothesis; flaws in the implementation of the model were determined due to methodological aspects on which improvement or adjustment points are generated.