Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores
El propósito de este estudio in vitro fue evaluar la resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación. Métodos: los dientes primeros premolares superiores extraídos posteriormente tratados endodónticamente se dividier...
- Autores:
-
Álvarez Ibarra, Yenifer
Javela Sáenz, Edna Rocio
López Piña, Itzel Nohemí
Torres Serrano, Erika Johana
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional USTA
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/33501
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/11634/33501
- Palabra clave:
- Endocrown
Fracture resistance
Endodontically treated teeth
Lithium disilicate
Preparation designs.
Ensayo de materiales
Ensayo de compresión de materiales
Cargas dinámicas
Endodoncia-cargas dinámicas
Implantes dentarios
Dientes-erosión
Tecnología dental
Endocrown
Resistencia a la fractura
Dientes tratados endodónticamente
Disilicato de litio
Diseños de preparación.
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
| id |
SANTTOMAS2_bb077be7d95a95e7deebd39aa44e28cc |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/33501 |
| network_acronym_str |
SANTTOMAS2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional USTA |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores |
| title |
Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores |
| spellingShingle |
Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores Endocrown Fracture resistance Endodontically treated teeth Lithium disilicate Preparation designs. Ensayo de materiales Ensayo de compresión de materiales Cargas dinámicas Endodoncia-cargas dinámicas Implantes dentarios Dientes-erosión Tecnología dental Endocrown Resistencia a la fractura Dientes tratados endodónticamente Disilicato de litio Diseños de preparación. |
| title_short |
Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores |
| title_full |
Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores |
| title_fullStr |
Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores |
| title_sort |
Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Álvarez Ibarra, Yenifer Javela Sáenz, Edna Rocio López Piña, Itzel Nohemí Torres Serrano, Erika Johana |
| dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Pinilla Martínez, Sandra Milena |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Álvarez Ibarra, Yenifer Javela Sáenz, Edna Rocio López Piña, Itzel Nohemí Torres Serrano, Erika Johana |
| dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Endocrown Fracture resistance Endodontically treated teeth Lithium disilicate Preparation designs. |
| topic |
Endocrown Fracture resistance Endodontically treated teeth Lithium disilicate Preparation designs. Ensayo de materiales Ensayo de compresión de materiales Cargas dinámicas Endodoncia-cargas dinámicas Implantes dentarios Dientes-erosión Tecnología dental Endocrown Resistencia a la fractura Dientes tratados endodónticamente Disilicato de litio Diseños de preparación. |
| dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ensayo de materiales Ensayo de compresión de materiales Cargas dinámicas Endodoncia-cargas dinámicas Implantes dentarios Dientes-erosión Tecnología dental |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Endocrown Resistencia a la fractura Dientes tratados endodónticamente Disilicato de litio Diseños de preparación. |
| description |
El propósito de este estudio in vitro fue evaluar la resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación. Métodos: los dientes primeros premolares superiores extraídos posteriormente tratados endodónticamente se dividieron en dos grupos, El grupo A: la preparación junta a tope sin terminación en hombro y el grupo B: la preparación con reducción axial y línea de acabado de hombro de 1 mm. Cementados y llevados a prueba de resistencia a la fractura. Resultados: las preparaciones con línea terminal, presentaron una mayor resistencia compresiva; la mitad de las restauraciones con valores superiores a 1414,1MPa, una cuarta parte con valores por debajo (1357,8MPa) y solo una cuarta parte de la muestra evaluada por encima de (1795,3MPa). Mediante el análisis descriptivo de las variables, comparando la resistencia compresiva con una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (valor p = 0.017), del tiempo, en el cual no se encontró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p- valor= 0.32). Conclusiones: Dentro de las limitaciones de este estudio, podemos enfatizar que solo se ejecutaron cargas axiales en la fosa central de los premolares. Se recomienda realizar pruebas de cargas cíclica ejerciendo fuerzas de corte o tangenciales. Evaluar fracturas que comprometan no solo la restauración sino también el remanente dental a tratar. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-14T22:44:21Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-14T22:44:21Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-14 |
| dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.category.spa.fl_str_mv |
Formación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especialización |
| dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
| dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alvarez,Ibarra, Y. et al. (2021). Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores. [Tesis de grado Especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombia |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/33501 |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad Santo Tomás |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co |
| identifier_str_mv |
Alvarez,Ibarra, Y. et al. (2021). Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores. [Tesis de grado Especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombia reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás instname:Universidad Santo Tomás repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/33501 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alomran, W. (2018). Endocrowns: A Review Article. Scholars Journal of Dental Sciences, 5(5), 306-309. https://dx.doi.org/10.21276/sjds.2018.5.5.10 Anusavice, K. J. (2004). Phillips Ciencia De Los Materiales Dentales (11 ed.). Elsevier. Asmussen, E., Peutzfeldt, A., & Sahafi, A. (2005). Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 94(4), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.003 Bacchi, A., Fernandes dos Santos, M. B., Pimentel, M. J., Caetano, C. R., Sinhoreti, M. A., & Consani, R. L. (2013). Influence of post-thickness and material on the fracture strength of teeth with reduced coronal structure. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 16(2), 139. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.108196 Belleflamme, M. M., Geerts, S. O., Louwette, M. M., Grenade, C. F., Vanheusden, A. J., & Mainjot, A. K. (2017). No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. Journal of Dentistry, 63, 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.009 Belli, S., A., E., Ozcopur, M., & Eskitascioglu, G. (2005). The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Int Endod J, 38(2), 73-80. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00892.x Beuer, F., Schweiger, J., & Edelhoff, D. (2008). Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J, 204(9), 505-511. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350 Biacchi, G. R., & Basting, R. T. (2012). Comparison of Fracture Strength of Endocrowns and Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crowns. Operative Dentistry, 37(2), 130-136. doi:https://doi.org/10.2341/11-105-l Bindl, A., & Mörmann, W. H. (1999). Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years--preliminary results. J Adhes Dent, 1(3), 255-265. Borgia Botto, E., Barón, R., & Borgia, J. L. (2016). Endocrown: Estudio clínico retrospectivo de una serie de pacientes, en un período de 8 a 19 años. Odontoestomatología, 18(28), 48-59. Obtenido de http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-93392016000200007&lng=es&tlng=es Bowen, R. L., Eick, J. D., Henderson, D. A., & Anderson, D. W. (1984). Smear layer: removal and bonding considerations. Oper Dent Suppl, 3, 30-34. Büttel, L., Krastl, G., Lorch, H., Naumann, M., Zitzmann, N. U., & Weiger, R. (2009). Influence of post fit and post length on fracture resistance. . International Endodontic Journal, 42(1), 47-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01492.x Caparroso Pérez, C., & Duque Vargas, J. A. (2010). Cerámicas y sistemas para restauraciones CAD-CAM: una revisión. Revista Facultad de Odontología , 22(1), 88-108. Obtenido de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-246X2010000200011&lng=en&tlng=es. Cecchin, D., Farina, A.-P., Guerreiro, C.-A.-M., & Carlini-Junior, B. (2010). (2010). Fracture resistance of roots prosthetically restored with intra-radicular posts of different lengths. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 37(2), 116-122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02028.x Cedillo, J., Cedillo, J., & Espinosa, R. (2014). Endocorona: Reporte de un caso clínico. Revista de Operatoria Dental y Biomateriales, 3(3), 21-29. Obtenido de https://www.rodyb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3-vol-3-N3-Endocorona.pdf Chang, C.-Y., Kuo, J.-S., Lin, Y.-S., & Chang, Y.-H. (2009). Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Journal of Dental Sciences, 4(3), 110-117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s1991-7902(09)60016-7 Clausson, C., Schroeder, C. C., Goloni, P. V., Farias, F. A., Passos, L., & Zanetti, R. V. (2019). Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Damaged Molars Based on Different Preparation Designs. International Journal of Biomaterials, 1-7. doi:10.1155/2019/2475297 Creugers, N. H., Mentink, A. G., Fokkinga, W. A., & Kreulen, C. M. (Jan-Feb de 2005). 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont, 18(1), 34-39. doi:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15754890/ Darcangelo, C., Deangelis, F., Vadini, M., Zazzeroni, S., Ciampoli, C., & Damario, M. (2008). In Vitro Fracture Resistance and Deflection of Pulpless Teeth Restored with Fiber Posts and Prepared for Veneers. Journal of Endodontics, 34(7), 838-841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.026 Dartora, N. R., Maurício Moris, I. C., Poole, S. F., Bacchi, A., Sousa-Neto, M. D., Silva-Sousa, Y. T., & Gomes, E. A. (2021). Mechanical behavior of endocrowns fabricated with different CAD-CAM ceramic systems. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry , 125(1), 117-125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.008 Darwish, H. A., Morsi, T. S., & El Dimeery, A. G. (2017). Internal fit of lithium disilicate and resin nano-ceramic endocrowns with different preparation designs. Future Dental Journal, 3(2), 67-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2017.05.001 Dash, S., Jena, D., Govind, S., Jena, S. P., & Singh, N. R. (2020). Endocrowns: A Comprehensive Review. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 14(4), 8360-8364. doi:https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12999 Dietschi, D., Duc, O., Krejci, I., & Sadan, A. (2008). Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int., 39(2), 117-129. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18560650/ Dirxen, C., Blunck, U., & Preissner, S. (2013). Clinical Performance of a New Biomimetic Double Network Material. The Open Dentistry Journal, 7(1), 118-122. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210620130904003 Eick, J. D., Cobb, C. M., Chappell, R. P., Spencer, P., & Robinson, S. J. (1991). The dentinal surface: its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part I. Quintessence Int, 22(12), 967-977. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1813914/ Einhorn, M., DuVall, N., Wajdowicz, M., Brewster, J., & Roberts, H. (2017). Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance. Journal of Prosthodontics, 28(1), e237-e242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12671 ElAyouti, A., Serry, M. I., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., & Löst, C. (2011). Influence of cusp coverage on the fracture resistance of premolars with endodontic access cavities. International Endodontic Journal, 44(6), 543-549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2 Eliades, G. (1994). Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentine bonding systems. Journal of Dentistry, 22(2), 73-81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90004-3 Ferencz, J. L., Silva, N. R., & Navarro, J. M. (2014). High-Strength Ceramics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Editorial Quintessence Publishing Co. Ferrari, M., Vichi, A., & García-Godoy, F. (2000). Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent, 13(Esp No), 15B-18B. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11763866/ Fokkinga, W. A., Kreulen, C. M., Le Bell-Ronnlof, A.-M., Lassila, L. V., Vallittu, P. K., & Creugers, N. H. (2006). In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 114(3), 250-256. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00357.x Fokkinga, W. A., Kreulen, C. M., Vallittu, P. K., & Creugers, N. H. (2004). A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont, 17(4), 476-482. doi:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15382786/ Govare, N., & Contrepois, M. (2020). Endocrowns: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent, 123(3), 411-418.e9. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent. Gulec, L., & Ulusoy, N. (2017). Effect of Endocrown Restorations with Different CAD/CAM Materials: 3D Finite Element and Weibull Analyses. BioMed Research International, 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5638683 Hasan, I., Frentzen, M., Utz, K. H., Hoyer, D., Langenbach, A., & Bourauel, C. (2012). Finite element analysis of adhesive endo-crowns of molars at different height levels of buccally applied load. Journal of dental biomechanics, 3. doi:10.1177/1758736012455421 Hatta, M., Shinya, A., Vallittu, P. K., Shinya, A., & Lassila, L. V. (2011). High volume individual fibre post versus low volume fibre post: The fracture load of the restored tooth . Journal of Dentistry, 39(1), 65-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.10.004 Hattar, S., Hatamleh, M. M., Sawair, F., & Al-Rabab'ah, M. (2015). Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to tooth structure. Saudi Dent J, 27(2), 70–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.006 Jantarat, J., Palamara, J. E., & Messer, H. H. (2001). An investigation of cuspal deformation and delayed recovery after occlusal loading. Journal of Dentistry, 29(5), 363-370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00018-5 Lassila, L. V., Tanner, J., Le Bell, A.-M., Narva, K., & Vallittu, P. K. (2004). Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. . Dental Materials, 20(1), 29-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00065-4 Lin, C.-L., Chang, Y.-H., & Pa, C.-A. (2009). Estimation of the Risk of Failure for an Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar With MODP Preparation and CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorations. Journal of Endodontics, 35(10), 1391-1395. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.j Maceri, F., Martignoni, M., & Vairo, G. (2007). Mechanical behaviour of endodontic restorations with multiple prefabricated posts: A finite-element approach. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(11), 2386-2398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.11.018 Magne, P., & Knezevic, A. (2009). Influence of overlay restorative materials and load cusps on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int, 40(9), 729-737. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19862399/ Martínez, R. F., Pradíes, R. G., Suárez, M. J., & G., R. (2007). Cerámicas dentales: clasificación y criterios de selección. 2007; 12(4):. RCOE Rev Ilustre Cons Gen Col Odontol Estomatol Esp, 12(4), 253-263. MASSIVE ART WebServices GmbH . (s.f.). Establecemos nuevos estándares en el cuidado dental. . Obtenido de Ivoclar Vivadent: https://www.ivoclarvivadent.co/es-co/ MASSIVE ART WebServices GmbH. (s.f.). IPS e.max CAD. Obtenido de Ivoclar Vivadent: https://www.ivoclarvivadent.es/es-es/p/todos/ips-emax-cad-clinica Mörmann, W. H., Brandestini, M., Lutz, F., & Barbakow, F. (1989). Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int, 20(5), 329-339. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2756089/ Nakamura, T., Ohyama, T., Waki, T., Kinuta, S., Wakabayashi, K., Mutobe, Y., . . . Yatani, H. (2006). Stress Analysis of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Types of Post Material. Dental Materials Journal, 25(1), 145-150. doi:10.4012/dmj.25.145 Naumann, M., Koelpin, M., Beuer, F., & Meyer-Lueckel, H. (Apr de 2012). 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported postendodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study. J Endod, 38(4), 432-5. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.003 Ng, C. C., Dumbrigue, H. B., Al-Bayat, M. I., Griggs, J. A., & Wakefield, C. W. (2006). Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 95(4), 290-296. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.026 Özcan, M., & Vallittu, P. K. (2003). Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. . Dental Materials, 19(8), 725-731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00019-8 Perdigão, J. (2002). Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure. Dental Clinics of North America, 46(2), 277-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-8532(01)00008-8 Perdigão, J. (2007). New Developments in Dental Adhesion. Dental Clinics of North America, 51(2), 333-357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.01.001 Pissis, P. (1995). Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract perio aesth dent, 7(5), 83-94. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7548896/ Pospiech, P. (2002). All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing? Clinical Oral Investigations, 6(4), 189-197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-002-0183-2 Preis, V., Behr, M., Hahnel, S., & Rosentritt, M. (2015). Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated ZLS molar crowns. Dental Materials, 31(11), 1363-1369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.154 Qvist, V., K., S., & Qvist, J. (1989). Human pulp reactions to resin restorations performed with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scand, 47(5), 253-263. doi:10.3109/00016358909007710 Rocca, G. T., Daher, R., Saratti, C. M., Sedlacek, R., Suchy, T. F., & Krejci, I. (2018). Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns. Journal of Dentistry, 68, 41-50. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.011 Rocca, G. T., Rizcalla, N., & Krejci, I. (2013). Fiber-reinforced Resin Coating for Endocrown Preparations: A Technical Report. Operative Dentistry, 38(3), 242-248. doi:https://doi.org/10.2341/12-139-tr Rosenstiel, S. F., Land, M. F., & Crispin, B. J. (1998). Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 80(3), 280-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70128-3 Sakaguchi, R. L., & Powers, J. M. (2012). Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials - E-Book (Dental Materials: Properties & Manipulation (Craig)) (English Edition) (13 ed.). Editorial Mosby. Salvi, G. E., Siegrist Guldener, B. E., Amstad, T., Joss, A. P., & N., L. (Mar de 2007). Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post-and-core systems in a specialist practice setting. Int Endod J., 40(3), 209-15. doi:doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01218.x. Schwartz, R. S., & Robbins, J. W. (2004). Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod, 30(5), 289-301. doi:10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001 Sedrez-Porto, J. A., Munchow, E. A., Valente, L. L., Cenci, M. S., & Pereira-Cenci, T. (2019). New material perspective for endocrown restorations: effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior. Brazilian Oral Research, 33, e012. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0012 Sedrez-Porto, J. A., Rosa, W. L., da Silva, A. F., Münchow, E. A., & Pereira-Cenci, T. (2016). Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 52, 8-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.005 Shrivastava, S., Agrawal, S., Parlani, S., & Saoji, S. (2014). All ceramic cementation: a key to successful restoration. Annals & Essences of Dentistry, 6(3), 35-43. doi:doi:10.5368/aedj.2014.6.3.4.5 Soares, P. V., Santos-Filho, P. C., Martins, L. R., & Soares, C. J. (2008). Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: Fracture resistance and fracture mode. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 99(1), 30-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(08)60006-2 Taha, D., Spintzyk, S., Schille, C., Sabet, A., Wahsh, M., Salah, T., & Geis-Gerstorfer, J. (2018). Fracture resistance and failure modes of polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations with variations in margin design and occlusal thickness. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 62(3), 293-297. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2017.11.003 Thomas, R. M., Kelly, A., Tagiyeva, N., & Kanagasingam, S. (2020). Comparing endocrown restorations on permanent molars and premolars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Dental Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2279-y Tinschert, J., Natt, G., Hassenpflug, S., & Spiekermann, H. (2004). Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine. Int J Comput Dent, 7(1), 25-45. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15317306/ Trope, M., Maltz, D. O., & Tronstad, L. (1985). Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol., 1(3), 108-111. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00571.x. Tsai, Y. L., Petsche, P. E., Anusavice, K. J., & Yang, M. C. (1998). Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. Int J Prosthodont, 11(1), 27-32. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9588988/ VITA. (21 de Sep de 2016). VITA Zahnfabrik. Obtenido de VITA Alemania: https://www.vitazahnfabrik.com/ Waltimo, A., & Könönen, M. (1993). A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 101(3), 171-175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1993.tb01658.x Wolfart, S., Eschbach, S., Scherrer, S., & Kern, M. (2009). Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass–ceramic fixed dental prostheses: Up to 8 years results. Dental Materials, 25(9), e63-e71-. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.05.003 Zarone, F., Sorrentino, R., Apicella, D., Valentino, B., Ferrari, M., Aversa, R., & Apicella, A. (2006). Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: A 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dent Mater, 22(11), 1035-1044. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.034 Zhou, L., & Wang, Q. (2013). Comparison of Fracture Resistance between Cast Posts and Fiber Posts: A Meta-analysis of Literature. Journal of Endodontics, 39(1), 11-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.026 Zicari, F., Van Meerbeek, B., Scotti, R., & Naert, I. (2012). Effect of fibre post length and adhesive strategy on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. Journal of Dentistry, 40(4), 312-321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.006 Zicari, F., Van Meerbeek, B., Scotti, R., & Naert, I. (2013). Effect of ferrule and post placement on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. Journal of Dentistry, 41(3), 207-215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.004 |
| dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia |
| dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ |
| dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
| dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.campus.spa.fl_str_mv |
CRAI-USTA Bucaramanga |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Especialización Rehabilitación Oral |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Odontología |
| institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/1/2021JavelaEdna.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/2/2021JavelaEdna1.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/3/2021JavelaEdna2.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/4/license_rdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/5/license.txt https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/6/2021JavelaEdna.pdf.jpg https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/7/2021JavelaEdna1.pdf.jpg https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/8/2021JavelaEdna2.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
2d76cdad1bab76a1d45d0a9600c14823 3918a908c0306b1f5bd01e13e2c7ebb8 b25fdf0ac512978a4e241613cebb2ba0 217700a34da79ed616c2feb68d4c5e06 aedeaf396fcd827b537c73d23464fc27 c740d14873ef2ed3eb1ea08ff3c18650 09cf8ac3e144271715a418c8cfc52758 e75891fe9b526c1e5361f37defc9bd75 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@usantotomas.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1782026403326197760 |
| spelling |
Pinilla Martínez, Sandra MilenaÁlvarez Ibarra, YeniferJavela Sáenz, Edna RocioLópez Piña, Itzel NohemíTorres Serrano, Erika Johana2021-04-14T22:44:21Z2021-04-14T22:44:21Z2021-04-14Alvarez,Ibarra, Y. et al. (2021). Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superiores. [Tesis de grado Especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombiahttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/33501reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.coEl propósito de este estudio in vitro fue evaluar la resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación. Métodos: los dientes primeros premolares superiores extraídos posteriormente tratados endodónticamente se dividieron en dos grupos, El grupo A: la preparación junta a tope sin terminación en hombro y el grupo B: la preparación con reducción axial y línea de acabado de hombro de 1 mm. Cementados y llevados a prueba de resistencia a la fractura. Resultados: las preparaciones con línea terminal, presentaron una mayor resistencia compresiva; la mitad de las restauraciones con valores superiores a 1414,1MPa, una cuarta parte con valores por debajo (1357,8MPa) y solo una cuarta parte de la muestra evaluada por encima de (1795,3MPa). Mediante el análisis descriptivo de las variables, comparando la resistencia compresiva con una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (valor p = 0.017), del tiempo, en el cual no se encontró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p- valor= 0.32). Conclusiones: Dentro de las limitaciones de este estudio, podemos enfatizar que solo se ejecutaron cargas axiales en la fosa central de los premolares. Se recomienda realizar pruebas de cargas cíclica ejerciendo fuerzas de corte o tangenciales. Evaluar fracturas que comprometan no solo la restauración sino también el remanente dental a tratar.The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the resistance to fracture under compressive loads in endocrown lithium disilicate restorations with two preparation designs. Methods: the posteriorly extracted maxillary first premolar teeth treated endodontically were divided into two groups, Group A: the butt joint preparation without shoulder termination and group B: the preparation with axial reduction and 1 mm shoulder finishing line. Cemented and tested for resistance to fracture. Results: the preparations with terminal lines, presented a greater compressive resistance; half of the restorations with values above 1414.1MPa, a quarter with values below (1357.8MPa) and only a quarter of the sample evaluated above (1795.3MPa). Through the descriptive analysis of the variables, comparing the compressive strength with a statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.017), of the time, in which no statistically significant difference was found (p-value = 0.32). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, we can emphasize that only axial loads were executed in the central fossa of the premolars. Cyclic load testing is recommended by exerting shear or tangential forces. Evaluate fractures that compromise not only the restoration but also the dental remnant to be treated.Especialista en Rehabilitación Oralhttp://www.ustabuca.edu.co/ustabmanga/presentacionEspecializaciónapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Santo TomásEspecialización Rehabilitación OralFacultad de OdontologíaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/Abierto (Texto Completo)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Resistencia a la fractura ante cargas compresivas en restauraciones endocrown de disilicato de litio con dos diseños de preparación en primeros premolares superioresEndocrownFracture resistanceEndodontically treated teethLithium disilicatePreparation designs.Ensayo de materialesEnsayo de compresión de materialesCargas dinámicasEndodoncia-cargas dinámicasImplantes dentariosDientes-erosiónTecnología dentalEndocrownResistencia a la fracturaDientes tratados endodónticamenteDisilicato de litioDiseños de preparación.Trabajo de gradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1finfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisCRAI-USTA BucaramangaAlomran, W. (2018). Endocrowns: A Review Article. Scholars Journal of Dental Sciences, 5(5), 306-309. https://dx.doi.org/10.21276/sjds.2018.5.5.10Anusavice, K. J. (2004). Phillips Ciencia De Los Materiales Dentales (11 ed.). Elsevier.Asmussen, E., Peutzfeldt, A., & Sahafi, A. (2005). Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 94(4), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.003Bacchi, A., Fernandes dos Santos, M. B., Pimentel, M. J., Caetano, C. R., Sinhoreti, M. A., & Consani, R. L. (2013). Influence of post-thickness and material on the fracture strength of teeth with reduced coronal structure. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 16(2), 139. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.108196Belleflamme, M. M., Geerts, S. O., Louwette, M. M., Grenade, C. F., Vanheusden, A. J., & Mainjot, A. K. (2017). No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. Journal of Dentistry, 63, 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.009Belli, S., A., E., Ozcopur, M., & Eskitascioglu, G. (2005). The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Int Endod J, 38(2), 73-80. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00892.xBeuer, F., Schweiger, J., & Edelhoff, D. (2008). Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J, 204(9), 505-511. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350Biacchi, G. R., & Basting, R. T. (2012). Comparison of Fracture Strength of Endocrowns and Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crowns. Operative Dentistry, 37(2), 130-136. doi:https://doi.org/10.2341/11-105-lBindl, A., & Mörmann, W. H. (1999). Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years--preliminary results. J Adhes Dent, 1(3), 255-265.Borgia Botto, E., Barón, R., & Borgia, J. L. (2016). Endocrown: Estudio clínico retrospectivo de una serie de pacientes, en un período de 8 a 19 años. Odontoestomatología, 18(28), 48-59. Obtenido de http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-93392016000200007&lng=es&tlng=esBowen, R. L., Eick, J. D., Henderson, D. A., & Anderson, D. W. (1984). Smear layer: removal and bonding considerations. Oper Dent Suppl, 3, 30-34.Büttel, L., Krastl, G., Lorch, H., Naumann, M., Zitzmann, N. U., & Weiger, R. (2009). Influence of post fit and post length on fracture resistance. . International Endodontic Journal, 42(1), 47-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01492.xCaparroso Pérez, C., & Duque Vargas, J. A. (2010). Cerámicas y sistemas para restauraciones CAD-CAM: una revisión. Revista Facultad de Odontología , 22(1), 88-108. Obtenido de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-246X2010000200011&lng=en&tlng=es.Cecchin, D., Farina, A.-P., Guerreiro, C.-A.-M., & Carlini-Junior, B. (2010). (2010). Fracture resistance of roots prosthetically restored with intra-radicular posts of different lengths. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 37(2), 116-122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02028.xCedillo, J., Cedillo, J., & Espinosa, R. (2014). Endocorona: Reporte de un caso clínico. Revista de Operatoria Dental y Biomateriales, 3(3), 21-29. Obtenido de https://www.rodyb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3-vol-3-N3-Endocorona.pdfChang, C.-Y., Kuo, J.-S., Lin, Y.-S., & Chang, Y.-H. (2009). Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Journal of Dental Sciences, 4(3), 110-117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s1991-7902(09)60016-7Clausson, C., Schroeder, C. C., Goloni, P. V., Farias, F. A., Passos, L., & Zanetti, R. V. (2019). Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Damaged Molars Based on Different Preparation Designs. International Journal of Biomaterials, 1-7. doi:10.1155/2019/2475297Creugers, N. H., Mentink, A. G., Fokkinga, W. A., & Kreulen, C. M. (Jan-Feb de 2005). 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont, 18(1), 34-39. doi:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15754890/Darcangelo, C., Deangelis, F., Vadini, M., Zazzeroni, S., Ciampoli, C., & Damario, M. (2008). In Vitro Fracture Resistance and Deflection of Pulpless Teeth Restored with Fiber Posts and Prepared for Veneers. Journal of Endodontics, 34(7), 838-841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.026Dartora, N. R., Maurício Moris, I. C., Poole, S. F., Bacchi, A., Sousa-Neto, M. D., Silva-Sousa, Y. T., & Gomes, E. A. (2021). Mechanical behavior of endocrowns fabricated with different CAD-CAM ceramic systems. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry , 125(1), 117-125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.008Darwish, H. A., Morsi, T. S., & El Dimeery, A. G. (2017). Internal fit of lithium disilicate and resin nano-ceramic endocrowns with different preparation designs. Future Dental Journal, 3(2), 67-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2017.05.001Dash, S., Jena, D., Govind, S., Jena, S. P., & Singh, N. R. (2020). Endocrowns: A Comprehensive Review. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 14(4), 8360-8364. doi:https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12999Dietschi, D., Duc, O., Krejci, I., & Sadan, A. (2008). Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int., 39(2), 117-129. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18560650/Dirxen, C., Blunck, U., & Preissner, S. (2013). Clinical Performance of a New Biomimetic Double Network Material. The Open Dentistry Journal, 7(1), 118-122. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210620130904003Eick, J. D., Cobb, C. M., Chappell, R. P., Spencer, P., & Robinson, S. J. (1991). The dentinal surface: its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part I. Quintessence Int, 22(12), 967-977. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1813914/Einhorn, M., DuVall, N., Wajdowicz, M., Brewster, J., & Roberts, H. (2017). Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance. Journal of Prosthodontics, 28(1), e237-e242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12671ElAyouti, A., Serry, M. I., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., & Löst, C. (2011). Influence of cusp coverage on the fracture resistance of premolars with endodontic access cavities. International Endodontic Journal, 44(6), 543-549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2Eliades, G. (1994). Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentine bonding systems. Journal of Dentistry, 22(2), 73-81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90004-3Ferencz, J. L., Silva, N. R., & Navarro, J. M. (2014). High-Strength Ceramics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Editorial Quintessence Publishing Co.Ferrari, M., Vichi, A., & García-Godoy, F. (2000). Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent, 13(Esp No), 15B-18B. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11763866/Fokkinga, W. A., Kreulen, C. M., Le Bell-Ronnlof, A.-M., Lassila, L. V., Vallittu, P. K., & Creugers, N. H. (2006). In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 114(3), 250-256. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00357.xFokkinga, W. A., Kreulen, C. M., Vallittu, P. K., & Creugers, N. H. (2004). A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont, 17(4), 476-482. doi:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15382786/Govare, N., & Contrepois, M. (2020). Endocrowns: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent, 123(3), 411-418.e9. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.Gulec, L., & Ulusoy, N. (2017). Effect of Endocrown Restorations with Different CAD/CAM Materials: 3D Finite Element and Weibull Analyses. BioMed Research International, 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5638683Hasan, I., Frentzen, M., Utz, K. H., Hoyer, D., Langenbach, A., & Bourauel, C. (2012). Finite element analysis of adhesive endo-crowns of molars at different height levels of buccally applied load. Journal of dental biomechanics, 3. doi:10.1177/1758736012455421Hatta, M., Shinya, A., Vallittu, P. K., Shinya, A., & Lassila, L. V. (2011). High volume individual fibre post versus low volume fibre post: The fracture load of the restored tooth . Journal of Dentistry, 39(1), 65-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.10.004Hattar, S., Hatamleh, M. M., Sawair, F., & Al-Rabab'ah, M. (2015). Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to tooth structure. Saudi Dent J, 27(2), 70–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.006Jantarat, J., Palamara, J. E., & Messer, H. H. (2001). An investigation of cuspal deformation and delayed recovery after occlusal loading. Journal of Dentistry, 29(5), 363-370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00018-5Lassila, L. V., Tanner, J., Le Bell, A.-M., Narva, K., & Vallittu, P. K. (2004). Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. . Dental Materials, 20(1), 29-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00065-4Lin, C.-L., Chang, Y.-H., & Pa, C.-A. (2009). Estimation of the Risk of Failure for an Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar With MODP Preparation and CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorations. Journal of Endodontics, 35(10), 1391-1395. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jMaceri, F., Martignoni, M., & Vairo, G. (2007). Mechanical behaviour of endodontic restorations with multiple prefabricated posts: A finite-element approach. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(11), 2386-2398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.11.018Magne, P., & Knezevic, A. (2009). Influence of overlay restorative materials and load cusps on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int, 40(9), 729-737. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19862399/Martínez, R. F., Pradíes, R. G., Suárez, M. J., & G., R. (2007). Cerámicas dentales: clasificación y criterios de selección. 2007; 12(4):. RCOE Rev Ilustre Cons Gen Col Odontol Estomatol Esp, 12(4), 253-263.MASSIVE ART WebServices GmbH . (s.f.). Establecemos nuevos estándares en el cuidado dental. . Obtenido de Ivoclar Vivadent: https://www.ivoclarvivadent.co/es-co/MASSIVE ART WebServices GmbH. (s.f.). IPS e.max CAD. Obtenido de Ivoclar Vivadent: https://www.ivoclarvivadent.es/es-es/p/todos/ips-emax-cad-clinicaMörmann, W. H., Brandestini, M., Lutz, F., & Barbakow, F. (1989). Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int, 20(5), 329-339. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2756089/Nakamura, T., Ohyama, T., Waki, T., Kinuta, S., Wakabayashi, K., Mutobe, Y., . . . Yatani, H. (2006). Stress Analysis of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Types of Post Material. Dental Materials Journal, 25(1), 145-150. doi:10.4012/dmj.25.145Naumann, M., Koelpin, M., Beuer, F., & Meyer-Lueckel, H. (Apr de 2012). 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported postendodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study. J Endod, 38(4), 432-5. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.003Ng, C. C., Dumbrigue, H. B., Al-Bayat, M. I., Griggs, J. A., & Wakefield, C. W. (2006). Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 95(4), 290-296. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.026Özcan, M., & Vallittu, P. K. (2003). Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. . Dental Materials, 19(8), 725-731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00019-8Perdigão, J. (2002). Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure. Dental Clinics of North America, 46(2), 277-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-8532(01)00008-8Perdigão, J. (2007). New Developments in Dental Adhesion. Dental Clinics of North America, 51(2), 333-357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.01.001Pissis, P. (1995). Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract perio aesth dent, 7(5), 83-94. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7548896/Pospiech, P. (2002). All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing? Clinical Oral Investigations, 6(4), 189-197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-002-0183-2Preis, V., Behr, M., Hahnel, S., & Rosentritt, M. (2015). Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated ZLS molar crowns. Dental Materials, 31(11), 1363-1369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.154Qvist, V., K., S., & Qvist, J. (1989). Human pulp reactions to resin restorations performed with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scand, 47(5), 253-263. doi:10.3109/00016358909007710Rocca, G. T., Daher, R., Saratti, C. M., Sedlacek, R., Suchy, T. F., & Krejci, I. (2018). Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns. Journal of Dentistry, 68, 41-50. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.011Rocca, G. T., Rizcalla, N., & Krejci, I. (2013). Fiber-reinforced Resin Coating for Endocrown Preparations: A Technical Report. Operative Dentistry, 38(3), 242-248. doi:https://doi.org/10.2341/12-139-trRosenstiel, S. F., Land, M. F., & Crispin, B. J. (1998). Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 80(3), 280-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70128-3Sakaguchi, R. L., & Powers, J. M. (2012). Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials - E-Book (Dental Materials: Properties & Manipulation (Craig)) (English Edition) (13 ed.). Editorial Mosby.Salvi, G. E., Siegrist Guldener, B. E., Amstad, T., Joss, A. P., & N., L. (Mar de 2007). Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post-and-core systems in a specialist practice setting. Int Endod J., 40(3), 209-15. doi:doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01218.x.Schwartz, R. S., & Robbins, J. W. (2004). Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod, 30(5), 289-301. doi:10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001Sedrez-Porto, J. A., Munchow, E. A., Valente, L. L., Cenci, M. S., & Pereira-Cenci, T. (2019). New material perspective for endocrown restorations: effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior. Brazilian Oral Research, 33, e012. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0012Sedrez-Porto, J. A., Rosa, W. L., da Silva, A. F., Münchow, E. A., & Pereira-Cenci, T. (2016). Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 52, 8-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.005Shrivastava, S., Agrawal, S., Parlani, S., & Saoji, S. (2014). All ceramic cementation: a key to successful restoration. Annals & Essences of Dentistry, 6(3), 35-43. doi:doi:10.5368/aedj.2014.6.3.4.5Soares, P. V., Santos-Filho, P. C., Martins, L. R., & Soares, C. J. (2008). Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: Fracture resistance and fracture mode. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 99(1), 30-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(08)60006-2Taha, D., Spintzyk, S., Schille, C., Sabet, A., Wahsh, M., Salah, T., & Geis-Gerstorfer, J. (2018). Fracture resistance and failure modes of polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations with variations in margin design and occlusal thickness. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 62(3), 293-297. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2017.11.003Thomas, R. M., Kelly, A., Tagiyeva, N., & Kanagasingam, S. (2020). Comparing endocrown restorations on permanent molars and premolars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Dental Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2279-yTinschert, J., Natt, G., Hassenpflug, S., & Spiekermann, H. (2004). Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine. Int J Comput Dent, 7(1), 25-45. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15317306/Trope, M., Maltz, D. O., & Tronstad, L. (1985). Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol., 1(3), 108-111. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00571.x.Tsai, Y. L., Petsche, P. E., Anusavice, K. J., & Yang, M. C. (1998). Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. Int J Prosthodont, 11(1), 27-32. Obtenido de https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9588988/VITA. (21 de Sep de 2016). VITA Zahnfabrik. Obtenido de VITA Alemania: https://www.vitazahnfabrik.com/Waltimo, A., & Könönen, M. (1993). A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 101(3), 171-175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1993.tb01658.xWolfart, S., Eschbach, S., Scherrer, S., & Kern, M. (2009). Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass–ceramic fixed dental prostheses: Up to 8 years results. Dental Materials, 25(9), e63-e71-. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.05.003Zarone, F., Sorrentino, R., Apicella, D., Valentino, B., Ferrari, M., Aversa, R., & Apicella, A. (2006). Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: A 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dent Mater, 22(11), 1035-1044. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.034Zhou, L., & Wang, Q. (2013). Comparison of Fracture Resistance between Cast Posts and Fiber Posts: A Meta-analysis of Literature. Journal of Endodontics, 39(1), 11-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.026Zicari, F., Van Meerbeek, B., Scotti, R., & Naert, I. (2012). Effect of fibre post length and adhesive strategy on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. Journal of Dentistry, 40(4), 312-321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.006Zicari, F., Van Meerbeek, B., Scotti, R., & Naert, I. (2013). Effect of ferrule and post placement on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. Journal of Dentistry, 41(3), 207-215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.004ORIGINAL2021JavelaEdna.pdf2021JavelaEdna.pdfTrabajo principalapplication/pdf1648757https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/1/2021JavelaEdna.pdf2d76cdad1bab76a1d45d0a9600c14823MD51open access2021JavelaEdna1.pdf2021JavelaEdna1.pdfAprobación de facultadapplication/pdf178803https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/2/2021JavelaEdna1.pdf3918a908c0306b1f5bd01e13e2c7ebb8MD52metadata only access2021JavelaEdna2.pdf2021JavelaEdna2.pdfAutorización de publicaciónapplication/pdf236724https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/3/2021JavelaEdna2.pdfb25fdf0ac512978a4e241613cebb2ba0MD53metadata only accessCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/4/license_rdf217700a34da79ed616c2feb68d4c5e06MD54open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8807https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/5/license.txtaedeaf396fcd827b537c73d23464fc27MD55open accessTHUMBNAIL2021JavelaEdna.pdf.jpg2021JavelaEdna.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg5536https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/6/2021JavelaEdna.pdf.jpgc740d14873ef2ed3eb1ea08ff3c18650MD56open access2021JavelaEdna1.pdf.jpg2021JavelaEdna1.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg9068https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/7/2021JavelaEdna1.pdf.jpg09cf8ac3e144271715a418c8cfc52758MD57open access2021JavelaEdna2.pdf.jpg2021JavelaEdna2.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg8086https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/33501/8/2021JavelaEdna2.pdf.jpge75891fe9b526c1e5361f37defc9bd75MD58open access11634/33501oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/335012023-01-04 03:15:55.447open accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásrepositorio@usantotomas.edu.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 |