Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador

Peace and Development are two irreconcilable concepts for female leaders and administrators in the northern, central, and southern Amazon of Ecuador. In this context, development is synonymous with neo-extractivism and, therefore, entails the devastation of their territories and ways of life in harm...

Full description

Autores:
Álvarez Lugo, Yesica
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional USTA
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39510
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39510
Palabra clave:
development
neo-extractivism
alternatives to development
Sumak Kawsay
Good Living
environmental and social conflicts
nature
desarrollo
neoextractivismo
alternativas al desarrollo
Sumak Kawsay
buen vivir
conflictos ambientales y sociales
naturaleza
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id SANTTOMAS2_a148f907d3f9381a1f6e196942305db3
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39510
network_acronym_str SANTTOMAS2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional USTA
repository_id_str
spelling Álvarez Lugo, Yesica2022-01-18T16:04:20Z2022-01-18T16:04:20Z2020-07-01https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/602110.15332/25006681/6021http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39510Peace and Development are two irreconcilable concepts for female leaders and administrators in the northern, central, and southern Amazon of Ecuador. In this context, development is synonymous with neo-extractivism and, therefore, entails the devastation of their territories and ways of life in harmony with nature. In this case, the commodity consensus takes the shape of the constant threat of the South-East Round and the Intercampos Round, through which oil blocks located in their ancestral territories enter into tendering. The Amazon Women Collective —part of the Ecuadorian indigenous movement, but a political subject with its own personality— demands the fulfilment of its mandate. Through direct testimonies from some of the Collective’s members and their mandate, we will come closer to understanding this irresolvable relationship between peace and development, and we will recognize the different forms of violence that this extractive model imprints on their bodies and territories, as a result of their position as defenders of the jungle and as women. In addition, taking the history of the South-East Round as an axis for inquiry, we will address the disputes between the different jurisdictions and territorialities in conflict, which fight to maintain lifestyles in harmony with nature or establish/deepen the prevailing developmental-economicist model.Paz y desarrollo son dos conceptos irreconciliables para las mujeres lideresas y dirigentes de la Amazonía norte, centro y sur del Ecuador. En este contexto, el desarrollo es sinónimo de neoextractivismo y, por lo tanto, supone la devastación de sus territorios y formas de vida en armonía con la Naturaleza. En este caso el consenso de las commodities toma forma bajo la amenaza constante de la Ronda Suroriente y las Rondas Intercampos, a partir de la cual entran a licitación bloques petroleros localizados en sus territorios ancestrales. El colectivo Mujeres Amazónicas —integrado al movimiento indígena ecuatoriano, pero como sujeto político con personalidad propia— exige el cumplimiento de su mandato. A través de este y de sus testimonios directos nos acercaremos a la comprensión de esta relación irresoluble entre paz y desarrollo, y reconoceremos las diferentes formas de violencia que este modelo extractivista imprime en sus cuerpos y territorios, por su posición como defensoras de la selva y como mujeres. Además, tomando como eje la historia de la Ronda Suroriente, abordaremos las disputas entre las diferentes jurisdicciones y territorialidades en conflicto, que combaten por mantener modos de vida en armonía con la Naturaleza o instaurar / profundizar el modelo desarrollista-economicista imperante.application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomáshttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021/5837Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2020): Paz y desarrollo; 313-346Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Paz y desarrollo; 313-3462500-66812339-3688Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del EcuadorPeace and Development: Two Irreconcilable Concepts for Amazon Women in Ecuadorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1developmentneo-extractivismalternatives to developmentSumak KawsayGood Livingenvironmental and social conflictsnaturedesarrolloneoextractivismoalternativas al desarrolloSumak Kawsaybuen vivirconflictos ambientales y socialesnaturalezahttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf211634/39510oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/395102023-07-14 16:07:39.936metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Peace and Development: Two Irreconcilable Concepts for Amazon Women in Ecuador
title Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador
spellingShingle Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador
development
neo-extractivism
alternatives to development
Sumak Kawsay
Good Living
environmental and social conflicts
nature
desarrollo
neoextractivismo
alternativas al desarrollo
Sumak Kawsay
buen vivir
conflictos ambientales y sociales
naturaleza
title_short Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador
title_full Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador
title_fullStr Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador
title_sort Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Álvarez Lugo, Yesica
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Álvarez Lugo, Yesica
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv development
neo-extractivism
alternatives to development
Sumak Kawsay
Good Living
environmental and social conflicts
nature
topic development
neo-extractivism
alternatives to development
Sumak Kawsay
Good Living
environmental and social conflicts
nature
desarrollo
neoextractivismo
alternativas al desarrollo
Sumak Kawsay
buen vivir
conflictos ambientales y sociales
naturaleza
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv desarrollo
neoextractivismo
alternativas al desarrollo
Sumak Kawsay
buen vivir
conflictos ambientales y sociales
naturaleza
description Peace and Development are two irreconcilable concepts for female leaders and administrators in the northern, central, and southern Amazon of Ecuador. In this context, development is synonymous with neo-extractivism and, therefore, entails the devastation of their territories and ways of life in harmony with nature. In this case, the commodity consensus takes the shape of the constant threat of the South-East Round and the Intercampos Round, through which oil blocks located in their ancestral territories enter into tendering. The Amazon Women Collective —part of the Ecuadorian indigenous movement, but a political subject with its own personality— demands the fulfilment of its mandate. Through direct testimonies from some of the Collective’s members and their mandate, we will come closer to understanding this irresolvable relationship between peace and development, and we will recognize the different forms of violence that this extractive model imprints on their bodies and territories, as a result of their position as defenders of the jungle and as women. In addition, taking the history of the South-East Round as an axis for inquiry, we will address the disputes between the different jurisdictions and territorialities in conflict, which fight to maintain lifestyles in harmony with nature or establish/deepen the prevailing developmental-economicist model.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-01
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-18T16:04:20Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-18T16:04:20Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021
10.15332/25006681/6021
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39510
url https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39510
identifier_str_mv 10.15332/25006681/6021
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021/5837
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2020): Paz y desarrollo; 313-346
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Paz y desarrollo; 313-346
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv 2500-6681
2339-3688
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Santo Tomás
institution Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.mail.fl_str_mv noreply@usta.edu.co
_version_ 1782026385039032320