Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativa
Antecedentes: La tomografía volumétrica de haz de cono (CBCT) se ha documentado para evaluar la reparación durante el seguimiento posterior a la cirugía perirradicular mediante la observación de la evolución de imágenes hipodensas a hiperdensas que determinan la disminución de lesiones perirradicula...
- Autores:
-
García Mendieta, Diana Catalina
Ostos Pérez, Clara Inés
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional USTA
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/34464
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/11634/34464
- Palabra clave:
- Perirradicular Surgery
Bone Healing
Bioceramic Cements
Cirugía dental
Cicatrices - Cirugía
Tomografía computarizada por rayos X
Cerámica dental
Cirugía Perirradicular
Cicatrización Ósea
Cementos Biocerámicos.
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
id |
SANTTOMAS2_56baf4b0fead8ed9af4bf45bc32e26e4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/34464 |
network_acronym_str |
SANTTOMAS2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional USTA |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativa |
title |
Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativa |
spellingShingle |
Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativa Perirradicular Surgery Bone Healing Bioceramic Cements Cirugía dental Cicatrices - Cirugía Tomografía computarizada por rayos X Cerámica dental Cirugía Perirradicular Cicatrización Ósea Cementos Biocerámicos. |
title_short |
Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativa |
title_full |
Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativa |
title_fullStr |
Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativa |
title_sort |
Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativa |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
García Mendieta, Diana Catalina Ostos Pérez, Clara Inés |
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Chaves Cabrera, Angela María Serpa Vélez, María Fernanda Jiménez, Oscar Mauricio |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
García Mendieta, Diana Catalina Ostos Pérez, Clara Inés |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Perirradicular Surgery Bone Healing Bioceramic Cements |
topic |
Perirradicular Surgery Bone Healing Bioceramic Cements Cirugía dental Cicatrices - Cirugía Tomografía computarizada por rayos X Cerámica dental Cirugía Perirradicular Cicatrización Ósea Cementos Biocerámicos. |
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cirugía dental Cicatrices - Cirugía Tomografía computarizada por rayos X Cerámica dental |
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cirugía Perirradicular Cicatrización Ósea Cementos Biocerámicos. |
description |
Antecedentes: La tomografía volumétrica de haz de cono (CBCT) se ha documentado para evaluar la reparación durante el seguimiento posterior a la cirugía perirradicular mediante la observación de la evolución de imágenes hipodensas a hiperdensas que determinan la disminución de lesiones perirradiculares existentes. Objetivo: Determinar mediante una revisión narrativa los cambios óseos observados en pacientes sometidos a cirugía perirradicular con materiales biocerámicos por medio del análisis de CBCT. Metodología: Se diseñó una estrategia de búsqueda del 2011 al 2021, para estudios en pacientes tratados con cirugía perirradicular y materiales biocerámicos de última generación que evaluaran los cambios óseos mediante el análisis de CBCT, en idiomas inglés, español y portugués; se incluyeron artículos publicados en PubMed, Lilacs, Epistemonikos, Cochrane, Scopus, Web Of Science y Embase. La evaluación de la calidad metodológica, riesgo de sesgo y la extracción de datos se realizaron de forma independiente y por duplicado. Resultados: De los 22 artículos potencialmente elegibles, 13 fueron excluidos según los criterios de selección establecidos, obteniendo 9 publicaciones. Los estudios clínicos aleatorizados, los observacionales y los reportes de caso, todos evaluados con CBCT, mostraron una tasa de éxito de las cirugías perirradiculares mayores al 70%, favoreciendo la cicatrización ósea. El análisis global favoreció a los materiales biocerámicos de última generación. Estos resultados se basan en pocos ensayos con tamaños de muestra pequeñas, seguimientos relativamente cortos y con alto riesgo de sesgo, por lo tanto, deben considerarse con precaución. Conclusiones: Los materiales biocerámicos son una excelente alternativa para la obturación apical y los más utilizados en cirugía perirradicular y reportados en la literatura científica fueron EndoSequence® y Biodentine®, sin embargo, estos estudios mostraron un riesgo de sesgo de moderado a alto, por tanto, estos resultados deben asumirse con precaución. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-21T15:44:30Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-21T15:44:30Z |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-18 |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
dc.type.category.spa.fl_str_mv |
Formación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especialización |
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
status_str |
acceptedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
García Mendieta, D. C. y Ostos Pérez, C. I. (2021). Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos - Revisión narrativa [Tesis de especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombia |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/34464 |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad Santo Tomás |
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co |
identifier_str_mv |
García Mendieta, D. C. y Ostos Pérez, C. I. (2021). Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos - Revisión narrativa [Tesis de especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombia reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás instname:Universidad Santo Tomás repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/34464 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Figdor D. Microbial aetiology of endodontic treatment failure and pathogenic properties of selected species. Aust Endod J. 2004;30(1):11–4. Von Arx T, Jensen SS, Hänni S, Friedman S. Five-year longitudinal assessment of the prognosis of apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2012;38(5):570–9. Rubinstein RA, Kim S. Long-term follow-up of cases considered healed one year after apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2002;28(5):378–83. Shekhar V, Shashikala K. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Diagnosis, Treatment Planning, and Long-Term Followup of Large Periapical Lesions Treated by Endodontic Surgery: Two Case Reports. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:1–12. Barone C, Dao TT, Basrani BB, Wang N, Friedman S. Treatment Outcome in Endodontics: The Toronto Study-Phases 3, 4, and 5: Apical Surgery. J Endod. 2010;36(1):28–35. Surya Raghavendra S, Jadhav GR, Gathani KM, Kotadia P. Bioceramics in Endodontics – a Review. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(0):128–37. Chong BS, Rhodes JS. Endodontic surgery. Br Dent J [Internet]. 2014;216(6):281–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.220 Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(1):144–7. Olcay K, Ataoglu H, Belli S. Evaluation of Related Factors in the Failure of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-sectional Study. J Endod [Internet]. 2018;44(1):38–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.029 Seltzer S, Bender IB, Smith J, Freedman I, Nazimov H. Endodontic failures-An analysis based on clinical, roentgenographic, and histologic findings. Part I. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967;23(4):500–16. Iqbal A. The factors responsible for endodontic treatment failure in the permanent dentitions of the patients reported to the college of dentistry, the university of Aljouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10(5):ZC146–8. Kim J-E, Shim J-S, Shin Y. A new minimally invasive guided endodontic microsurgery by cone beam computed tomography and 3-dimensional printing technology. Restor Dent Endod. 2019;44(3):1–7. Segura JJ, Montero P, Ibañez R. Los biomateriales en la regeneración periapical post microcirugia endodóncica. J Endod. 2017;94–107. Torabinejad M, Higa RK, McKendry DJ, Pitt Ford TR. Dye leakage of four root end filling materials: Effects of blood contamination. J Endod. 1994;20(4):159–63. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21(7):349–53. Assadian H, Hamzelouei Moghaddam E, Amini A, Nazari Moghaddam K, Hashemzehi M. A Review of Endodontic Bioceramics. J Islam Dent Assoc IRAN. 2016;28(1):20–33. Abusrewil SM, McLean W, Scott JA. The use of Bioceramics as root-end filling materials in periradicular surgery: A literature review. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2018;30(4):273–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.07.004 Eriksen HM, Kirkevang L, Petersson K. Endodontic epidemiology and treatment outcome: general considerations. Endod Top. 2002;2:1–9. von Arx T. Apical surgery: A review of current techniques and outcome. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2011;23(1):9–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.10.004 Kaya S, Yavuz I, Uysal I, Akku Z. Measuring bone density in healing periapical lesions by using cone beam computed tomography: A clinical investigation. J Endod. 2012;38(1):28–31. Patel S, Dawood A, Pitt Ford T, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J. 2007;40(10):818–30. FRIEDMAN S. The prognosis and expected outcome of apical surgery. Endod Top. 2005;11(1):219–62. Liao WC, Lee YL, Tsai YL, Lin HJ, Chang MC, Chang SF, et al. Outcome assessment of apical surgery: A study of 234 teeth. J Formos Med Assoc [Internet]. 2019;118(6):1055–61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2018.10.019 Von Arx T, Peñarrocha M, Jensen S. Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: A meta-analysis. J Endod. 2010;36(6):957–73. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Comprehensive Literature Review-Part II: Leakage and Biocompatibility Investigations. J Endod [Internet]. 2010;36(2):190–202. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.010 Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S, Telishevsky Strauss Y, Ceresoli V, Del Fabbro M. Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: An updated meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod [Internet]. 2013;39(3):332–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.044 Niu LN, Jiao K, Wang T Da, Zhang W, Camilleri J, Bergeron BE, et al. A review of the bioactivity of hydraulic calcium silicate cements. J Dent [Internet]. 2014;42(5):517–33. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.015 Von Arx T, Alsaeed M, Salvi GE. Five-year changes in periodontal parameters after apical surgery. J Endod [Internet]. 2011;37(7):910–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.024 Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern Endodontic Surgery Concepts and Practice: A Review. J Endod. 2006;32(7):601–23. Nasseh A. The rise of bioceramics. Endod Prac. 2009;21–5. Best SM, Porter AE, Thian ES, Huang J. Bioceramics: Past, present and for the future. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2008;28(7):1319–27. Antoniac I, Iliescu AA, Perlea P, Tulus G, Iliescu MG, Gheorghiu IM, et al. Bioceramics in Endodontics. Bioceram Biocomposites. 2019;241–90. Malkondu Ö, Kazandaǧ MK, Kazazoǧlu E. A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014. Singh H, Kaur M, Markan S, Kapoor P. JBR Journal of Interdisciplinary Biodentine : A Promising Dentin substitute. 2014;2(5):1–5. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Calcium Silicate-Based Cements. Miner Trioxide Aggreg Prop Clin Appl. 2014;281–332. Tuloglu N, Bayrak S. Comparative evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and bioaggregate as apical barrier material in traumatized nonvital, immature teeth: A clinical pilot study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19(1):52–7. Leal F, De-Deus G, Brandão C, Luna AS, Fidel SR, Souza EM. Comparison of the root-end seal provided by bioceramic repair cements and White MTA. Int Endod J. 2011;44(7):662–8. Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y, Fleury A, Solomon E, He J. Clinical Outcome of Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment Using a Single-cone Technique with Endosequence Bioceramic Sealer: A Retrospective Analysis. J Endod [Internet]. 2018;44(6):941–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.019 Lovato KF, Sedgley CM. Antibacterial activity of EndoSequence root repair material and ProRoot MTA against clinical isolates of enterococcus faecalis. J Endod [Internet]. 2011;37(11):1542–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.022 Zordan-Bronzel CL, Esteves Torres FF, Tanomaru-Filho M, Chávez-Andrade GM, Bosso-Martelo R, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of a New Calcium Silicate–based Sealer, Bio-C Sealer. J Endod. 2019;45(10):1248–52. Santos AD, Araújo EB, Yukimitu K, Barbosa JC, Moraes JCS. Setting time and thermal expansion of two endodontic cements. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2008;106(3):77–9. Pawar A, Kokate S, Shah R. Management of a large periapical lesion using Biodentine TM as retrograde restoration with eighteen months evident follow up. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(6):573–5. Kokate SR, Pawar A. An in vitro comparative stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal seal between MTA , glass inomer cement & biodentine as root end filling materials using 1 % methylene blue as tracer . Endodontology. 2010;23(7):36–42. Hansen SW, Marshall JG, Sedgley CM. Comparison of intracanal endosequence root repair material and proroot MTA to induce pH changes in simulated root resorption defects over 4 weeks in matched pairs of human teeth. J Endod [Internet]. 2011;37(4):502–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.010 Benetti F, Queiroz ÍO de A, Cosme-Silva L, Conti LC, de Oliveira SHP, Cintra LTA. Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and biomineralization of a new ready-for-use bioceramic repair material. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(4):325–32. Trope M, Yesilsoy C, Koren L, Moshonov J, Friedman S. Effect of different endodontic treatment protocols on periodontal repair and root resorption of replanted dog teeth. J Endod. 1992;18(10):492–6. Damas BA, Wheater MA, Bringas JS, Hoen MM. Cytotoxicity comparison of mineral trioxide aggregates and endosequence bioceramic root repair materials. J Endod [Internet]. 2011;37(3):372–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.027 Tanomaru-Filho M, Chaves Faleiros FB, Saçaki JN, Hungaro Duarte MA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Evaluation of pH and Calcium Ion Release of Root-end Filling Materials Containing Calcium Hydroxide or Mineral Trioxide Aggregate. J Endod. 2009;35(10):1418–21. Torres FFE, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Bosso-Martelo R, Chavez-Andrade GM, Tanomaru Filho M. Solubility, porosity and fluid uptake of calcium silicate-based cements. J Appl oral Sci. 2018;26:1–8. Fridland M, Rosado R. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) solubility and porosity with different water-to-powder ratios. J Endod. 2003;29(12):814–7. Zhejun W. Bioceramic materials in endodontics. Endod Top. 2015;267(4):559–60. Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. Biomineralization Ability and Interaction of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and White Portland Cement With Dentin in a Phosphate-containing Fluid. J Endod [Internet]. 2009;35(5):731–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.02.011 Zhou HM, Shen Y, Wang ZJ, Li L, Zheng YF, Häkkinen L, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of a novel root repair material. J Endod. 2013;39(4):478–83. Treviño Contreras AL. Análisis de biocompatibilidad de tres cementos de sellado apical a base de silicato de calcio. 2014;2(3):1–74. Available from: http://cd.dgb.uanl.mx/handle/201504211/6004 Nair PNR, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2005;99(2):231–52. Poggio C, Trovati F, Ceci M, Colombo M, Pietrocola G. Antibacterial activity of different root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(6):e743–8. Özyürek T, Demiryürek E. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of direct pulp-capping materials: Mineral trioxide aggregate-Angelus and Biodentine. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(6):569–72. Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Yazdizadeh M. Antimicrobial Activity of Calcium Hydroxide in Endodontics: A Review. Chonnam Med J. 2012;48(3):133. Polimeni G, Xiropaidis A V., Wikesjö UME. Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2006;41(1):30–47. Martin P. Wound healing - Aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science (80- ). 1997;276(5309):75–81. Wikesjö UM, Selvig KA. Periodontal wound healing/regeneration. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;37(7):667–74. Aukhil I. Biology of wound healing. Periodontol 2000. 2000;22(1):44–50. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: Physical principles. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(6):1088–95. Nejaim Y, De Faria Vasconcelos K, Roque-Torres GD, Meneses-López A, Norberto Bóscolo F, Haiter Neto F. Racionalización de la dosis de radiación. Rev Estomatológica Hered. 2015;25(3):238. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. The Basics of Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Semin Orthod [Internet]. 2009;15(1):2–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2008.09.001 Celikten B, Jacobs R, deFaria Vasconcelos K, Huang Y, Nicolielo LFP, Orhan K. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices. J Endod [Internet]. 2017;43(9):1517–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.035 Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Kaur N, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital echnologies. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019;49(3):179–90. Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-Beam CT Diagnostic Applications: Caries, Periodontal Bone Assessment, and Endodontic Applications. Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52(4):825–41. Kiarudi AH, Eghbal MJ, Safi Y, Aghdasi MM, Fazlyab M. The applications of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: A review of literature. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(1):16–25. Urrútia G, Bonfill X. PRISMA declaration: A proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Med Clin (Barc). 2010;135(11):507–11. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Sign 50. Diversity [Internet]. 2011;(November):2–105. Available from: www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/published/numlist.html. Needleman I. CONSORT 2010. Br Dent J. 1999;186(5):207. González de Dios J, Buñuel Álvarez J, González Rodríguez M. Listas guía de comprobación de estudios observacionales : declaración STROBE. Evidencias en pediatría [Internet]. 2012;8:1–5. Available from: http://archivos.evidenciasenpediatria.es/files/41-11705-RUTA/65Fundamentos.pdf Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D. The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Forsch Komplementarmed. 2013;20(5):385–6. Higgins J, Sterne J, Savović J, Page M, Hrobjartsson A, Bourton I, et al. Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;1(10). Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. Evid Based Med. 2018;23(2):60–3. Mangat, Panna; Muni, Sagarika; Singh A. Clinical evaluation of three different retrograde filling material (MTA, BIOCERAMIC, BIODENTINE) after apicoectomy utilizing cone beam computed tomography. Int J Dev Res. 2007;2005(45):3–17. Raina Ajaz, Afnan; Ayub Bin, Faizan; Mangat PBM. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of three different retrograde filling materials-mineral trioxide aggregate, mineral trioxide aggregate plus and biodentin in cases of endodontic surgery utilizing cone beam computed tomography clinical research. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2020;11(3):316–21. Tomer AK, Miglani A, Rana S, Chauhan P, Nagarjuna P. Clinical Evaluation of two Different Filling Materials In Case Of Endodontic Surgery ( Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Biodentin - Case Reports. 2017;16(1):113–8. Safi C, Kohli MR, Kratchman SI, Setzer FC, Karabucak B. Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate or Root Repair Material as Root-end Filling Material: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation. J Endod. 2019;45(7):831–9. Larreal De Rocha S. Cambios óseos posterior a cirugía perirradicular utiizando biocerámico mediante tomografía computarizada de rayo de cono (reporte de caso). Abu Hasna A, Pereira Santos D, Gavlik De Oliveira TR, Pinto ABA, Pucci CR, Lage-Marques JL. Apicoectomy of Perforated Root Canal Using Bioceramic Cement and Photodynamic Therapy. Int J Dent. 2020;2020:18–20. Kang S, Ha S-W, Kim U, Kim S, Kim E. A One-Year Radiographic Healing Assessment after Endodontic Microsurgery Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Scans. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3714. Kim D, Ku H, Nam T, Yoon TC, Lee CY, Kim E. Influence of Size and Volume of Periapical Lesions on the Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery: 3-Dimensional Analysis Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Endod [Internet]. 2016;42(8):1196–201. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.006 von Arx T, Janner SFM, Hänni S, Bornstein MM. Radiographic Assessment of Bone Healing Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scans 1 and 5 Years after Apical Surgery. J Endod. 2019;45(11):1307–13. Gatewood RS. Endodontic Materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(3):695–712. Mokbel N, Kassir A, Naaman N, Megarbane J-M. Root Resection and Hemisection Revisited. Part I: A Systematic Review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(1):e11–31. de Paula-Silva FWG, Júnior MS, Leonardo MR, Consolaro A, da Silva LAB. Cone-beam computerized tomographic, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of periapical repair in dogs’ post-endodontic treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology [Internet]. 2009;108(5):796–805. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.016 Balasundaram A, Shah P, Hoen MM, Wheater MA, Bringas JS, Gartner A, et al. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in predicting treatment decision for periapical lesions: A clinical study. Int J Dent. 2012;2012. Molven O, Halse A, Grung B. Incomplete healing (scar tissue) after periapical surgery - Radiographic findings 8 to 12 years after treatment. J Endod. 1996;22(5):264–8. Gouveia EéG, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Dos Santos Nunes Reis JM, Spin-Neto R, Gonçalves M. Periapical repair following endodontic surgery: Two- and Three-dimensional imaging evaluation methods. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(1):69–74 Kruse C, Spin-neto R, Reibel J, Wenzel A, Kirkevang L. Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2017;46(7). Chen I, Karabucak B, Wang C, Wang HG, Koyama E, Kohli MR, et al. Healing after root-end microsurgery by using mineral trioxide aggregate and a new calcium silicate-based bioceramic material as root-end filling materials in dogs. J Endod [Internet]. 2015;41(3):389–99. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.005 Shen J, Zhang H, Gao J, Du X, Chen Y, Han L. Short-term observation of clinical and radiographic results of periapical microsurgery: A prospective study. Biomed Res. 2016;27(3):923–8. Shinbori N, Grama AM, Patel Y, Woodmansey K, He J. Clinical Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery That Uses EndoSequence BC Root Repair Material as the Root-end Filling Material. J Endod [Internet]. 2015;41(5):607–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.12.028 |
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ |
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.campus.spa.fl_str_mv |
CRAI-USTA Bucaramanga |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Especialización Endodoncia |
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Odontología |
institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/22/2021GarciaCatalina.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/17/2021GarciaCatalina1.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/18/2021GarciaCatalina2.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/19/2021GarciaCatalina3.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/21/license.txt https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/20/license_rdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/23/2021GarciaCatalina.pdf.jpg https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/24/2021GarciaCatalina1.pdf.jpg https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/25/2021GarciaCatalina2.pdf.jpg https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/26/2021GarciaCatalina3.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
c9059df979ac0f3347d05d3362540a46 32ae9bb661a978c7b5c22acb206719cc 7f77272ecfe764b184c744d4edb5170a 265a232d6d6d98cd855a520477e63b53 aedeaf396fcd827b537c73d23464fc27 217700a34da79ed616c2feb68d4c5e06 256dd9b195a79f45ec56ceb4182f1f78 860cd536ea3fed766ffeb9bbe5224db3 0aa88bd3bb4b0aa095684249b35ba643 f547e915d2856be42af3b53d6e907a06 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@usantotomas.edu.co |
_version_ |
1782026401153548288 |
spelling |
Chaves Cabrera, Angela MaríaSerpa Vélez, María FernandaJiménez, Oscar MauricioGarcía Mendieta, Diana CatalinaOstos Pérez, Clara Inés2021-06-21T15:44:30Z2021-06-21T15:44:30Z2021-06-18García Mendieta, D. C. y Ostos Pérez, C. I. (2021). Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos - Revisión narrativa [Tesis de especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombiahttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/34464reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.coAntecedentes: La tomografía volumétrica de haz de cono (CBCT) se ha documentado para evaluar la reparación durante el seguimiento posterior a la cirugía perirradicular mediante la observación de la evolución de imágenes hipodensas a hiperdensas que determinan la disminución de lesiones perirradiculares existentes. Objetivo: Determinar mediante una revisión narrativa los cambios óseos observados en pacientes sometidos a cirugía perirradicular con materiales biocerámicos por medio del análisis de CBCT. Metodología: Se diseñó una estrategia de búsqueda del 2011 al 2021, para estudios en pacientes tratados con cirugía perirradicular y materiales biocerámicos de última generación que evaluaran los cambios óseos mediante el análisis de CBCT, en idiomas inglés, español y portugués; se incluyeron artículos publicados en PubMed, Lilacs, Epistemonikos, Cochrane, Scopus, Web Of Science y Embase. La evaluación de la calidad metodológica, riesgo de sesgo y la extracción de datos se realizaron de forma independiente y por duplicado. Resultados: De los 22 artículos potencialmente elegibles, 13 fueron excluidos según los criterios de selección establecidos, obteniendo 9 publicaciones. Los estudios clínicos aleatorizados, los observacionales y los reportes de caso, todos evaluados con CBCT, mostraron una tasa de éxito de las cirugías perirradiculares mayores al 70%, favoreciendo la cicatrización ósea. El análisis global favoreció a los materiales biocerámicos de última generación. Estos resultados se basan en pocos ensayos con tamaños de muestra pequeñas, seguimientos relativamente cortos y con alto riesgo de sesgo, por lo tanto, deben considerarse con precaución. Conclusiones: Los materiales biocerámicos son una excelente alternativa para la obturación apical y los más utilizados en cirugía perirradicular y reportados en la literatura científica fueron EndoSequence® y Biodentine®, sin embargo, estos estudios mostraron un riesgo de sesgo de moderado a alto, por tanto, estos resultados deben asumirse con precaución.Background Cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) has been documented to assess repair during follow-up after periradicular surgery by observing the evolution of hypodense to hyperdense images that determine the shrinkage of existing periradicular lesions. Objective: To determine by means of a narrative review the bone changes observed in patients undergoing periradicular surgery with bioceramic materials by means of CBCT analysis. Methodology: A search strategy was designed from 2011 to 2021, for studies in patients treated with periradicular surgery and state-of-the-art bioceramic materials that evaluated bone changes by CBCT analysis, in English, Spanish and Portuguese; articles published in PubMed, Lilacs, Epistemonikos, Cochrane, Scopus, Web Of Science and Embase were included. The evaluation of methodological quality, risk of bias and data extraction were performed independently and in duplicate. Results: Of the 22 potentially eligible articles, 13 were excluded according to the established selection criteria, obtaining 9 publications. The randomized clinical studies, observational studies and case reports, all evaluated with CBCT, showed a success rate of periradicular surgeries higher than 70%, favoring bone healing. The overall analysis favored the latest generation bioceramic materials. These results are based on few trials with small sample sizes, relatively short follow-ups and with high risk of bias, therefore, they should be considered with caution. Conclusions: Bioceramic materials are an excellent alternative for apical obturation and the most commonly used in periradicular surgery and reported in the scientific literature were EndoSequence® and Biodentine®, however these studies showed a moderate to high risk of bias, therefore these results should be assumed with caution.Especialista en Endodonciahttp://www.ustabuca.edu.co/ustabmanga/presentacionEspecializaciónapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Santo TomásEspecialización EndodonciaFacultad de OdontologíaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 ColombiaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 ColombiaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 ColombiaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/Abierto (Texto Completo)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Cambios óseos observados posterior a cirugía perirradicular mediante análisis de tomografía computarizada de haz de cono con materiales biocerámicos – revisión narrativaPerirradicular SurgeryBone HealingBioceramic CementsCirugía dentalCicatrices - CirugíaTomografía computarizada por rayos XCerámica dentalCirugía PerirradicularCicatrización ÓseaCementos Biocerámicos.Trabajo de gradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Especializaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1finfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisCRAI-USTA BucaramangaFigdor D. Microbial aetiology of endodontic treatment failure and pathogenic properties of selected species. Aust Endod J. 2004;30(1):11–4.Von Arx T, Jensen SS, Hänni S, Friedman S. Five-year longitudinal assessment of the prognosis of apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2012;38(5):570–9.Rubinstein RA, Kim S. Long-term follow-up of cases considered healed one year after apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2002;28(5):378–83.Shekhar V, Shashikala K. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Diagnosis, Treatment Planning, and Long-Term Followup of Large Periapical Lesions Treated by Endodontic Surgery: Two Case Reports. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:1–12.Barone C, Dao TT, Basrani BB, Wang N, Friedman S. Treatment Outcome in Endodontics: The Toronto Study-Phases 3, 4, and 5: Apical Surgery. J Endod. 2010;36(1):28–35.Surya Raghavendra S, Jadhav GR, Gathani KM, Kotadia P. Bioceramics in Endodontics – a Review. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(0):128–37.Chong BS, Rhodes JS. Endodontic surgery. Br Dent J [Internet]. 2014;216(6):281–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.220Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(1):144–7.Olcay K, Ataoglu H, Belli S. Evaluation of Related Factors in the Failure of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-sectional Study. J Endod [Internet]. 2018;44(1):38–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.029Seltzer S, Bender IB, Smith J, Freedman I, Nazimov H. Endodontic failures-An analysis based on clinical, roentgenographic, and histologic findings. Part I. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967;23(4):500–16.Iqbal A. The factors responsible for endodontic treatment failure in the permanent dentitions of the patients reported to the college of dentistry, the university of Aljouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10(5):ZC146–8.Kim J-E, Shim J-S, Shin Y. A new minimally invasive guided endodontic microsurgery by cone beam computed tomography and 3-dimensional printing technology. Restor Dent Endod. 2019;44(3):1–7.Segura JJ, Montero P, Ibañez R. Los biomateriales en la regeneración periapical post microcirugia endodóncica. J Endod. 2017;94–107.Torabinejad M, Higa RK, McKendry DJ, Pitt Ford TR. Dye leakage of four root end filling materials: Effects of blood contamination. J Endod. 1994;20(4):159–63.Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21(7):349–53.Assadian H, Hamzelouei Moghaddam E, Amini A, Nazari Moghaddam K, Hashemzehi M. A Review of Endodontic Bioceramics. J Islam Dent Assoc IRAN. 2016;28(1):20–33.Abusrewil SM, McLean W, Scott JA. The use of Bioceramics as root-end filling materials in periradicular surgery: A literature review. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2018;30(4):273–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.07.004Eriksen HM, Kirkevang L, Petersson K. Endodontic epidemiology and treatment outcome: general considerations. Endod Top. 2002;2:1–9.von Arx T. Apical surgery: A review of current techniques and outcome. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2011;23(1):9–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.10.004Kaya S, Yavuz I, Uysal I, Akku Z. Measuring bone density in healing periapical lesions by using cone beam computed tomography: A clinical investigation. J Endod. 2012;38(1):28–31.Patel S, Dawood A, Pitt Ford T, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J. 2007;40(10):818–30.FRIEDMAN S. The prognosis and expected outcome of apical surgery. Endod Top. 2005;11(1):219–62.Liao WC, Lee YL, Tsai YL, Lin HJ, Chang MC, Chang SF, et al. Outcome assessment of apical surgery: A study of 234 teeth. J Formos Med Assoc [Internet]. 2019;118(6):1055–61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2018.10.019Von Arx T, Peñarrocha M, Jensen S. Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: A meta-analysis. J Endod. 2010;36(6):957–73.Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Comprehensive Literature Review-Part II: Leakage and Biocompatibility Investigations. J Endod [Internet]. 2010;36(2):190–202. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.010Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S, Telishevsky Strauss Y, Ceresoli V, Del Fabbro M. Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: An updated meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod [Internet]. 2013;39(3):332–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.044Niu LN, Jiao K, Wang T Da, Zhang W, Camilleri J, Bergeron BE, et al. A review of the bioactivity of hydraulic calcium silicate cements. J Dent [Internet]. 2014;42(5):517–33. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.015Von Arx T, Alsaeed M, Salvi GE. Five-year changes in periodontal parameters after apical surgery. J Endod [Internet]. 2011;37(7):910–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.024Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern Endodontic Surgery Concepts and Practice: A Review. J Endod. 2006;32(7):601–23.Nasseh A. The rise of bioceramics. Endod Prac. 2009;21–5.Best SM, Porter AE, Thian ES, Huang J. Bioceramics: Past, present and for the future. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2008;28(7):1319–27.Antoniac I, Iliescu AA, Perlea P, Tulus G, Iliescu MG, Gheorghiu IM, et al. Bioceramics in Endodontics. Bioceram Biocomposites. 2019;241–90.Malkondu Ö, Kazandaǧ MK, Kazazoǧlu E. A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014.Singh H, Kaur M, Markan S, Kapoor P. JBR Journal of Interdisciplinary Biodentine : A Promising Dentin substitute. 2014;2(5):1–5.Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Calcium Silicate-Based Cements. Miner Trioxide Aggreg Prop Clin Appl. 2014;281–332.Tuloglu N, Bayrak S. Comparative evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and bioaggregate as apical barrier material in traumatized nonvital, immature teeth: A clinical pilot study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19(1):52–7.Leal F, De-Deus G, Brandão C, Luna AS, Fidel SR, Souza EM. Comparison of the root-end seal provided by bioceramic repair cements and White MTA. Int Endod J. 2011;44(7):662–8.Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y, Fleury A, Solomon E, He J. Clinical Outcome of Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment Using a Single-cone Technique with Endosequence Bioceramic Sealer: A Retrospective Analysis. J Endod [Internet]. 2018;44(6):941–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.019Lovato KF, Sedgley CM. Antibacterial activity of EndoSequence root repair material and ProRoot MTA against clinical isolates of enterococcus faecalis. J Endod [Internet]. 2011;37(11):1542–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.022Zordan-Bronzel CL, Esteves Torres FF, Tanomaru-Filho M, Chávez-Andrade GM, Bosso-Martelo R, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of a New Calcium Silicate–based Sealer, Bio-C Sealer. J Endod. 2019;45(10):1248–52.Santos AD, Araújo EB, Yukimitu K, Barbosa JC, Moraes JCS. Setting time and thermal expansion of two endodontic cements. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2008;106(3):77–9.Pawar A, Kokate S, Shah R. Management of a large periapical lesion using Biodentine TM as retrograde restoration with eighteen months evident follow up. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(6):573–5.Kokate SR, Pawar A. An in vitro comparative stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal seal between MTA , glass inomer cement & biodentine as root end filling materials using 1 % methylene blue as tracer . Endodontology. 2010;23(7):36–42.Hansen SW, Marshall JG, Sedgley CM. Comparison of intracanal endosequence root repair material and proroot MTA to induce pH changes in simulated root resorption defects over 4 weeks in matched pairs of human teeth. J Endod [Internet]. 2011;37(4):502–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.010Benetti F, Queiroz ÍO de A, Cosme-Silva L, Conti LC, de Oliveira SHP, Cintra LTA. Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and biomineralization of a new ready-for-use bioceramic repair material. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(4):325–32.Trope M, Yesilsoy C, Koren L, Moshonov J, Friedman S. Effect of different endodontic treatment protocols on periodontal repair and root resorption of replanted dog teeth. J Endod. 1992;18(10):492–6.Damas BA, Wheater MA, Bringas JS, Hoen MM. Cytotoxicity comparison of mineral trioxide aggregates and endosequence bioceramic root repair materials. J Endod [Internet]. 2011;37(3):372–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.027Tanomaru-Filho M, Chaves Faleiros FB, Saçaki JN, Hungaro Duarte MA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Evaluation of pH and Calcium Ion Release of Root-end Filling Materials Containing Calcium Hydroxide or Mineral Trioxide Aggregate. J Endod. 2009;35(10):1418–21.Torres FFE, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Bosso-Martelo R, Chavez-Andrade GM, Tanomaru Filho M. Solubility, porosity and fluid uptake of calcium silicate-based cements. J Appl oral Sci. 2018;26:1–8.Fridland M, Rosado R. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) solubility and porosity with different water-to-powder ratios. J Endod. 2003;29(12):814–7.Zhejun W. Bioceramic materials in endodontics. Endod Top. 2015;267(4):559–60.Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. Biomineralization Ability and Interaction of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and White Portland Cement With Dentin in a Phosphate-containing Fluid. J Endod [Internet]. 2009;35(5):731–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.02.011Zhou HM, Shen Y, Wang ZJ, Li L, Zheng YF, Häkkinen L, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of a novel root repair material. J Endod. 2013;39(4):478–83.Treviño Contreras AL. Análisis de biocompatibilidad de tres cementos de sellado apical a base de silicato de calcio. 2014;2(3):1–74. Available from: http://cd.dgb.uanl.mx/handle/201504211/6004Nair PNR, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2005;99(2):231–52.Poggio C, Trovati F, Ceci M, Colombo M, Pietrocola G. Antibacterial activity of different root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(6):e743–8.Özyürek T, Demiryürek E. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of direct pulp-capping materials: Mineral trioxide aggregate-Angelus and Biodentine. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(6):569–72.Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Yazdizadeh M. Antimicrobial Activity of Calcium Hydroxide in Endodontics: A Review. Chonnam Med J. 2012;48(3):133.Polimeni G, Xiropaidis A V., Wikesjö UME. Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2006;41(1):30–47.Martin P. Wound healing - Aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science (80- ). 1997;276(5309):75–81.Wikesjö UM, Selvig KA. Periodontal wound healing/regeneration. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;37(7):667–74.Aukhil I. Biology of wound healing. Periodontol 2000. 2000;22(1):44–50.Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: Physical principles. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(6):1088–95.Nejaim Y, De Faria Vasconcelos K, Roque-Torres GD, Meneses-López A, Norberto Bóscolo F, Haiter Neto F. Racionalización de la dosis de radiación. Rev Estomatológica Hered. 2015;25(3):238.Farman AG, Scarfe WC. The Basics of Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Semin Orthod [Internet]. 2009;15(1):2–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2008.09.001Celikten B, Jacobs R, deFaria Vasconcelos K, Huang Y, Nicolielo LFP, Orhan K. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices. J Endod [Internet]. 2017;43(9):1517–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.035Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Kaur N, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital echnologies. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019;49(3):179–90.Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-Beam CT Diagnostic Applications: Caries, Periodontal Bone Assessment, and Endodontic Applications. Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52(4):825–41.Kiarudi AH, Eghbal MJ, Safi Y, Aghdasi MM, Fazlyab M. The applications of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: A review of literature. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(1):16–25.Urrútia G, Bonfill X. PRISMA declaration: A proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Med Clin (Barc). 2010;135(11):507–11.Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Sign 50. Diversity [Internet]. 2011;(November):2–105. Available from: www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/published/numlist.html.Needleman I. CONSORT 2010. Br Dent J. 1999;186(5):207.González de Dios J, Buñuel Álvarez J, González Rodríguez M. Listas guía de comprobación de estudios observacionales : declaración STROBE. Evidencias en pediatría [Internet]. 2012;8:1–5. Available from: http://archivos.evidenciasenpediatria.es/files/41-11705-RUTA/65Fundamentos.pdfGagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D. The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Forsch Komplementarmed. 2013;20(5):385–6.Higgins J, Sterne J, Savović J, Page M, Hrobjartsson A, Bourton I, et al. Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;1(10).Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. Evid Based Med. 2018;23(2):60–3.Mangat, Panna; Muni, Sagarika; Singh A. Clinical evaluation of three different retrograde filling material (MTA, BIOCERAMIC, BIODENTINE) after apicoectomy utilizing cone beam computed tomography. Int J Dev Res. 2007;2005(45):3–17.Raina Ajaz, Afnan; Ayub Bin, Faizan; Mangat PBM. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of three different retrograde filling materials-mineral trioxide aggregate, mineral trioxide aggregate plus and biodentin in cases of endodontic surgery utilizing cone beam computed tomography clinical research. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2020;11(3):316–21.Tomer AK, Miglani A, Rana S, Chauhan P, Nagarjuna P. Clinical Evaluation of two Different Filling Materials In Case Of Endodontic Surgery ( Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Biodentin - Case Reports. 2017;16(1):113–8.Safi C, Kohli MR, Kratchman SI, Setzer FC, Karabucak B. Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate or Root Repair Material as Root-end Filling Material: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation. J Endod. 2019;45(7):831–9.Larreal De Rocha S. Cambios óseos posterior a cirugía perirradicular utiizando biocerámico mediante tomografía computarizada de rayo de cono (reporte de caso).Abu Hasna A, Pereira Santos D, Gavlik De Oliveira TR, Pinto ABA, Pucci CR, Lage-Marques JL. Apicoectomy of Perforated Root Canal Using Bioceramic Cement and Photodynamic Therapy. Int J Dent. 2020;2020:18–20.Kang S, Ha S-W, Kim U, Kim S, Kim E. A One-Year Radiographic Healing Assessment after Endodontic Microsurgery Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Scans. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3714.Kim D, Ku H, Nam T, Yoon TC, Lee CY, Kim E. Influence of Size and Volume of Periapical Lesions on the Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery: 3-Dimensional Analysis Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Endod [Internet]. 2016;42(8):1196–201. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.006von Arx T, Janner SFM, Hänni S, Bornstein MM. Radiographic Assessment of Bone Healing Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scans 1 and 5 Years after Apical Surgery. J Endod. 2019;45(11):1307–13.Gatewood RS. Endodontic Materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(3):695–712.Mokbel N, Kassir A, Naaman N, Megarbane J-M. Root Resection and Hemisection Revisited. Part I: A Systematic Review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(1):e11–31.de Paula-Silva FWG, Júnior MS, Leonardo MR, Consolaro A, da Silva LAB. Cone-beam computerized tomographic, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of periapical repair in dogs’ post-endodontic treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology [Internet]. 2009;108(5):796–805. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.016Balasundaram A, Shah P, Hoen MM, Wheater MA, Bringas JS, Gartner A, et al. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in predicting treatment decision for periapical lesions: A clinical study. Int J Dent. 2012;2012.Molven O, Halse A, Grung B. Incomplete healing (scar tissue) after periapical surgery - Radiographic findings 8 to 12 years after treatment. J Endod. 1996;22(5):264–8.Gouveia EéG, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Dos Santos Nunes Reis JM, Spin-Neto R, Gonçalves M. Periapical repair following endodontic surgery: Two- and Three-dimensional imaging evaluation methods. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(1):69–74Kruse C, Spin-neto R, Reibel J, Wenzel A, Kirkevang L. Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2017;46(7).Chen I, Karabucak B, Wang C, Wang HG, Koyama E, Kohli MR, et al. Healing after root-end microsurgery by using mineral trioxide aggregate and a new calcium silicate-based bioceramic material as root-end filling materials in dogs. J Endod [Internet]. 2015;41(3):389–99. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.005Shen J, Zhang H, Gao J, Du X, Chen Y, Han L. Short-term observation of clinical and radiographic results of periapical microsurgery: A prospective study. Biomed Res. 2016;27(3):923–8.Shinbori N, Grama AM, Patel Y, Woodmansey K, He J. Clinical Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery That Uses EndoSequence BC Root Repair Material as the Root-end Filling Material. J Endod [Internet]. 2015;41(5):607–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.12.028ORIGINAL2021GarciaCatalina.pdf2021GarciaCatalina.pdfTrabajo de gradoapplication/pdf525689https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/22/2021GarciaCatalina.pdfc9059df979ac0f3347d05d3362540a46MD522open access2021GarciaCatalina1.pdf2021GarciaCatalina1.pdfCarta de aprobación facultadapplication/pdf125910https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/17/2021GarciaCatalina1.pdf32ae9bb661a978c7b5c22acb206719ccMD517metadata only access2021GarciaCatalina2.pdf2021GarciaCatalina2.pdfAutorización de publicaciónapplication/pdf655073https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/18/2021GarciaCatalina2.pdf7f77272ecfe764b184c744d4edb5170aMD518metadata only access2021GarciaCatalina3.pdf2021GarciaCatalina3.pdfApéndiceapplication/pdf314832https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/19/2021GarciaCatalina3.pdf265a232d6d6d98cd855a520477e63b53MD519open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8807https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/21/license.txtaedeaf396fcd827b537c73d23464fc27MD521open accessCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/20/license_rdf217700a34da79ed616c2feb68d4c5e06MD520open accessTHUMBNAIL2021GarciaCatalina.pdf.jpg2021GarciaCatalina.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg5619https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/23/2021GarciaCatalina.pdf.jpg256dd9b195a79f45ec56ceb4182f1f78MD523open access2021GarciaCatalina1.pdf.jpg2021GarciaCatalina1.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg9808https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/24/2021GarciaCatalina1.pdf.jpg860cd536ea3fed766ffeb9bbe5224db3MD524open access2021GarciaCatalina2.pdf.jpg2021GarciaCatalina2.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg10399https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/25/2021GarciaCatalina2.pdf.jpg0aa88bd3bb4b0aa095684249b35ba643MD525open access2021GarciaCatalina3.pdf.jpg2021GarciaCatalina3.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6239https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34464/26/2021GarciaCatalina3.pdf.jpgf547e915d2856be42af3b53d6e907a06MD526open access11634/34464oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/344642023-01-03 03:18:27.355open accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásrepositorio@usantotomas.edu.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 |