COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO

Objective: To compare two cementing techniques in uniradicular teeth with root weakened walls.Methods: An in vitro experimental study was done with sixty collected teeth which were divided into three groups at random (A, B and C). The conventional technique with resin cement was done in 20 teeth wit...

Full description

Autores:
Celis Corzo, Juliana Elisa
Cáceres Marulanda, Adriana
Cabrera Rojas, Juan Carlos
Díaz Rodríguez, Jorge Guillermo
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional USTA
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/36993
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/36993
Palabra clave:
Rights
License
Derechos de autor 2018 UstaSalud
id SANTTOMAS2_393cfae0de8fced6508c1d4afa15595f
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/36993
network_acronym_str SANTTOMAS2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional USTA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv COMPARISON OF RESISTANCE IN PRECAST POST EVICTION UNIRADICULAR TEETH: AN IN VITRO STUDY
title COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO
spellingShingle COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO
title_short COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO
title_full COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO
title_fullStr COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO
title_full_unstemmed COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO
title_sort COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Celis Corzo, Juliana Elisa
Cáceres Marulanda, Adriana
Cabrera Rojas, Juan Carlos
Díaz Rodríguez, Jorge Guillermo
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Celis Corzo, Juliana Elisa
Cáceres Marulanda, Adriana
Cabrera Rojas, Juan Carlos
Díaz Rodríguez, Jorge Guillermo
description Objective: To compare two cementing techniques in uniradicular teeth with root weakened walls.Methods: An in vitro experimental study was done with sixty collected teeth which were divided into three groups at random (A, B and C). The conventional technique with resin cement was done in 20 teeth with narrow canals 20 other teeth with weakened root walls (groups A and B). The technique of root reinforcement and flowable resin cement was used in the remaining 20 teeth (group C) which had weakened root walls. The dislodging force in the three groups was tested using an universal testing machine. The Mann Whitney and one-way ANOVA tests were used with a p value < 0.05 as statistically significant.Results: It was not found a statistically significant difference when comparing the dislodging force in the three groups (p = 0.064) but, it was found a difference when comparing traction forces (p = 0.005). In addition, it was observed that there was less adhesion between dentin - restorative interface materials in the three groups. The behavior exhibited between said post - cement poles showed higher adhesion with the resin cement.Conclusion: Group C showed greater resistance to the tensile force perhaps because the resistance of the tooth structure was increased when the root canal was reinforced with composite resine. The conventional technique was effective in the case of restoring teeth with narrow root canals.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-24T16:23:11Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-24T16:23:11Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo revisado por pares
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116
10.15332/us.v12i1.1116
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11634/36993
url http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/36993
identifier_str_mv 10.15332/us.v12i1.1116
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116/915
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv Ustasalud; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2013); 55-62
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv Ustasalud; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2013); 55-62
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv 2590-7875
1692-5106
10.15332/us.v12i1
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 UstaSalud
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 UstaSalud
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Santo Tomás Seccional Bucaramanga
institution Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.mail.fl_str_mv noreply@usta.edu.co
_version_ 1782026372010475520
spelling Celis Corzo, Juliana ElisaCáceres Marulanda, AdrianaCabrera Rojas, Juan CarlosDíaz Rodríguez, Jorge Guillermo2021-09-24T16:23:11Z2021-09-24T16:23:11Z2013-01-01http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/111610.15332/us.v12i1.1116http://hdl.handle.net/11634/36993Objective: To compare two cementing techniques in uniradicular teeth with root weakened walls.Methods: An in vitro experimental study was done with sixty collected teeth which were divided into three groups at random (A, B and C). The conventional technique with resin cement was done in 20 teeth with narrow canals 20 other teeth with weakened root walls (groups A and B). The technique of root reinforcement and flowable resin cement was used in the remaining 20 teeth (group C) which had weakened root walls. The dislodging force in the three groups was tested using an universal testing machine. The Mann Whitney and one-way ANOVA tests were used with a p value < 0.05 as statistically significant.Results: It was not found a statistically significant difference when comparing the dislodging force in the three groups (p = 0.064) but, it was found a difference when comparing traction forces (p = 0.005). In addition, it was observed that there was less adhesion between dentin - restorative interface materials in the three groups. The behavior exhibited between said post - cement poles showed higher adhesion with the resin cement.Conclusion: Group C showed greater resistance to the tensile force perhaps because the resistance of the tooth structure was increased when the root canal was reinforced with composite resine. The conventional technique was effective in the case of restoring teeth with narrow root canals.Objetivo: comparar dos técnicas de cementación de postes en fibra de vidrio en dientes con paredes radiculares debilitadas.Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio experimental In vitro. Se recolectaron 60 piezas dentales y se dividieron en tres grupos de manera aleatoria (A, B y C), se empleó la técnica convencional con cemento resinoso en 20 dientes con conductos angostos y en 20 dientes con paredes radiculares debilitados (grupos A y B). La técnica de refuerzo radicular con resina fluida y cemento resinoso se usó en los 20 dientes restantes (grupo C) que presentaban paredes radiculares debilitadas. Se evaluó la fuerza de desalojo a la tracción en los tres grupos mediante una Máquina Universal de Ensayos para medir la fuerza de desalojo a la tracción. Se utilizó el test de Mann Whitney y el ANOVA de una vía con un valor de p<0,05 como estadísticamente significativo.Resultados: no se encontró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa al comparar la resistencia al desalojo en los tres grupos (p=0,064) pero si se observó al analizar las fuerzas de tracción (p=0,005). Además, se evidenció que existe menor adhesión entre la interfase dentina-material restaurador en los tres grupos y que el comportamiento presentado entre poste-cemento indicó que los postes presentaron mayor adhesión con el cemento resinoso.Conclusión: el grupo C presentó mayor resistencia a la fuerza de tracción posiblemente, debido a que la resistencia de la estructura dental se incrementó cuando el canal radicular fue reforzado con resina compuesta. La técnica convencional fue efectiva en el caso de rehabilitar dientes con conductos radiculares angostos.[Celis JE, Cáceres A, Cabrera JC, Díaz JG. Comparación de la resistencia al desalojo de postes prefabricados en dientes uniradiculares: un estudio In vitro. Ustasalud 2013; 12: 55 - 62]application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomás Seccional Bucaramangahttp://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116/915Ustasalud; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2013); 55-62Ustasalud; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2013); 55-622590-78751692-510610.15332/us.v12i1Derechos de autor 2018 UstaSaludhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITROCOMPARISON OF RESISTANCE IN PRECAST POST EVICTION UNIRADICULAR TEETH: AN IN VITRO STUDYArtículo revisado por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb111634/36993oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/369932023-07-14 16:23:07.449metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co