EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL

In modern constitutionalism a series of principles have emerged, tending to develop the substantive nature of the higher norms and, within them, the preponderance that has acquired the principle of proportionality, which in penal matters allows to establish adequately the minimum and maximum limits...

Full description

Autores:: Cala Calvet, William

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2019

Institución:: Universidad Santo Tomás

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional USTA

Idioma:: spa

id	SANTTOMAS2_21cfe89131a24680aa2e005bc5f9b398
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/17360
network_acronym_str	SANTTOMAS2
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional USTA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv	THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN ORDINARY AND TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE
dc.title.alternative.fra.fl_str_mv	LE PRINCIPE DE PROPORTIONNALITÉ DANS LA JUSTICE ORDINAIRE ET TRANSITIONNELLE
dc.title.alternative.por.fl_str_mv	O PRINCÍPIO DA PROPORCIONALIDADE NA JUSTIÇA ORDINÁRIA E TRANSITÓRIA
title	EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL
spellingShingle	EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL Principle of Proportionality Fundamental Rights Penalties Transitional Justice Victims Conflict Peace Principio de proporcionalidad derechos fundamentales penas justicia transicional víctimas conflicto paz principe de proportionnalité droits fondamentaux sanctions justice transitionnelle victimes conflit paix Princípio Da Proporcionalidade Direitos Fundamentais Penas Justiça Transicional Vítimas Conflito Paz
title_short	EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL
title_full	EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL
title_fullStr	EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL
title_full_unstemmed	EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL
title_sort	EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Cala Calvet, William
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Cala Calvet, William
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv	Principle of Proportionality Fundamental Rights Penalties Transitional Justice Victims Conflict Peace
topic	Principle of Proportionality Fundamental Rights Penalties Transitional Justice Victims Conflict Peace Principio de proporcionalidad derechos fundamentales penas justicia transicional víctimas conflicto paz principe de proportionnalité droits fondamentaux sanctions justice transitionnelle victimes conflit paix Princípio Da Proporcionalidade Direitos Fundamentais Penas Justiça Transicional Vítimas Conflito Paz
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv	Principio de proporcionalidad derechos fundamentales penas justicia transicional víctimas conflicto paz
dc.subject.proposal.fra.fl_str_mv	principe de proportionnalité droits fondamentaux sanctions justice transitionnelle victimes conflit paix
dc.subject.proposal.por.fl_str_mv	Princípio Da Proporcionalidade Direitos Fundamentais Penas Justiça Transicional Vítimas Conflito Paz
description	In modern constitutionalism a series of principles have emerged, tending to develop the substantive nature of the higher norms and, within them, the preponderance that has acquired the principle of proportionality, which in penal matters allows to establish adequately the minimum and maximum limits of penalties, is unquestionable. being also, the main criterion to define the penalty in the concrete case; likewise, the aforementioned principle allows establishing a differentiated application of sentences in ordinary and transitional justice, noting that in the latter, restorative justice is privileged over retributive justice. In this regard, the application of the principle of proportionality is essential both in the legislative phase and at the time of the judicial application of the penalty; therefore, the amount of these should not exceed the magnitude of the seriousness that for society represents the punishable act that is sanctioned, and in parallel the establishment and imposition of derisory penalties, seriously violate the aforementioned principle; which, however, admits exceptions in transitional justice processes through which it intends to integrate various efforts in order to face the consequences of massive violations and widespread or systematic human rights abuses, suffered in the development of an armed conflict, with the purpose of building paths of peace, respect, reconciliation and consolidation of democracy; it is precisely for this reason that the application of the aforementioned principle in legislative processes and in legal and administrative proceedings acquires a huge preponderance, because if the essential postulates that stem from this principle are not met, there will be no truth, nor justice, nor proportional reparation and therefore, it will not be fulfilling the duty of peace and will not enjoy this such right.
publishDate	2019
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv	2019-02-20
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.spa.fl_str_mv	http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1670
url	http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1670
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv	http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1670/1518
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	Principia Iuris; Vol. 15 Núm. 30 (2018); 80-102 0124-2067
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Derechos de autor 2019 Principia Iuris
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Derechos de autor 2019 Principia Iuris http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Santo Tomas de Aquino Seccional Tunja
institution	Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	noreply@usta.edu.co
_version_	1782026198822420480
spelling	Cala Calvet, William2019-02-20http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1670In modern constitutionalism a series of principles have emerged, tending to develop the substantive nature of the higher norms and, within them, the preponderance that has acquired the principle of proportionality, which in penal matters allows to establish adequately the minimum and maximum limits of penalties, is unquestionable. being also, the main criterion to define the penalty in the concrete case; likewise, the aforementioned principle allows establishing a differentiated application of sentences in ordinary and transitional justice, noting that in the latter, restorative justice is privileged over retributive justice. In this regard, the application of the principle of proportionality is essential both in the legislative phase and at the time of the judicial application of the penalty; therefore, the amount of these should not exceed the magnitude of the seriousness that for society represents the punishable act that is sanctioned, and in parallel the establishment and imposition of derisory penalties, seriously violate the aforementioned principle; which, however, admits exceptions in transitional justice processes through which it intends to integrate various efforts in order to face the consequences of massive violations and widespread or systematic human rights abuses, suffered in the development of an armed conflict, with the purpose of building paths of peace, respect, reconciliation and consolidation of democracy; it is precisely for this reason that the application of the aforementioned principle in legislative processes and in legal and administrative proceedings acquires a huge preponderance, because if the essential postulates that stem from this principle are not met, there will be no truth, nor justice, nor proportional reparation and therefore, it will not be fulfilling the duty of peace and will not enjoy this such right.En el constitucionalismo moderno han surgido una serie de principios tendientes a desarrollar el carácter sustantivo de las normas superiores y, dentro de ellos, es incuestionable la preponderancia que ha adquirido el principio de proporcionalidad, el cual en materia penal permite establecer adecuadamente los límites mínimos y máximos de las penas, siendo además, el principal criterio para definir la pena en el caso concreto; asimismo, el precitado principio permite establecer una aplicación diferenciada de las penas en la justicia ordinaria y transicional, advirtiendo que en esta última se privilegia la justicia restaurativa frente a la retributiva. En tal sentido, la aplicación del principio de proporcionalidad es imprescindible tanto en la fase legislativa como en el momento de la aplicación judicial de la pena; por tanto, el monto de estas no deben exceder la magnitud de la gravedad que para la sociedad representa el hecho punible que es sancionado, y paralelamente el establecimiento e imposición de penas irrisorias, quebrantan gravemente el precitado principio; el cual, sin embargo, admite excepciones en procesos de justicia transicional a través de la cual se pretende integrar diversos esfuerzos a fin de enfrentar las consecuencias de violaciones masivas y abusos generalizados o sistemáticos en materia de derechos humanos, sufridos en desarrollo de un conflicto armado, con el propósito de construir caminos de paz, respeto, reconciliación y consolidación de la democracia; es precisamente por ello, que la aplicación del mencionado principio en los trámites legislativos y en las actuaciones jurídicas y administrativas adquiere descomunal preponderancia, pues de no acatar los postulados esenciales que dimanan de este principio, no habrá verdad, ni justicia, ni reparación proporcional y por tanto, no se estará cumpliendo con el deber de la paz y de contera no se gozara de tal derecho.Dans le constitutionnalisme moderne, une série de principes ont surgi, tendant à développer le caractère substantif de normes supérieures et à l’intérieur de ceux-ci, il est indubitable, la prépondérance qui a acquis le principe de proportionnalité, qui en matière pénale permet d’établir convenablement les limites minimales et le maximum des peines, en étant de plus, le critère principal pour définir la peine dans le cas concret. De la même manière, le principe précité permet d’établir une application différenciée des peines par la justice ordinaire et transitionnelle, en remarquant la justice transitionnelle privilégie la justice réparatrice, face à la rétributive. De telle sort que l’application du principe de proportionnalité est indispensable dans la phase législative et au moment de l’application judiciaire de la peine. C’est pourquoi, la somme de ces peines ne doit pas excéder l’ampleur de la gravité qui représente pour la société le fait punissable qui est sanctionné. Parallèlement, l’établissement et l’imposition de peines dérisoires enfreignent gravement le principe précité.Toutefois ce principe admet des exceptions dans les processus de justice transitionnelle à travers la laquelle, de divers efforts essaient d’être intégrés pour faire face aux conséquences de violations massives et d’abus répandus ou systématiques en matière des droits de l’homme subis dans développement d’un conflit armé, avec le propos de construire des chemins de paix, de respect, de réconciliation et une consolidation de la démocratie. C´est pour cela que l’application du principe mentionné auparavant, dans les formalités législatives et dans les rôles juridiques et administratifs acquiert une prépondérance extraordinaire, puisque si les postulats essentiels qui proviennent de ce principe ne sont pas respectés, il n’y aura pas de vérité, ni de justice, ni de réparation proportionnelle et donc, le devoir de la paix ne sera pas accompli, et d’embout tel droit ne sera pas profité.No constitucionalismo moderno, surgiram uma série de princípios tendentes a desenvolver a natureza substantiva de padrões mais elevados e, dentro deles, a preponderância que adquiriu o Princípio Da Proporcionalidade é inquestionável, que em matéria penal permite estabelecer adequadamente os limites mínimo e máximo de sentenças, sendo também o principal critério para definir a penalidade no caso específico; da mesma forma, o mencionado princípio permite estabelecer uma aplicação diferenciada de sentenças na justiça ordinária e transicional, observando que, na segunda, a justiça restaurativa é privilegiada em detrimento da justiça retributiva. Sendo assim, a aplicação do princípio da proporcionalidade é essencial tanto na fase legislativa como no momento da aplicação judicial da pena; portanto, a quantidade destes não deve exceder a magnitude da gravidade que para a sociedade representa o ato punível que é sancionado, paralelamente ao estabelecimento e imposição de sanções irrisórias, quebram seriamente o princípio mencionado acima; que, no entanto, admite exceções nos processos da justiça transicional por meio dos quais pretende integrar vários esforços para enfrentar as consequências de violações em massa e abusos generalizados ou sistemáticos dos direitos humanos, infringidos no desenvolvimento de um conflito armado, com a finalidade de construir estradas de paz, respeito, reconciliação e consolidação da democracia; é precisamente por este motivo que a aplicação do referido princípio nos processos legislativos e nos processos judiciais e administrativos adquire uma enorme preponderância, pois de não obedecer aos postulados essenciais que emanam desse princípio, não haverá verdade, nem justiça, nem reparação proporcional e, portanto, não estará cumprindo o dever de paz e, é claro, não gozará desse direito.application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomas de Aquino Seccional Tunjahttp://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1670/1518Principia Iuris; Vol. 15 Núm. 30 (2018); 80-1020124-2067Derechos de autor 2019 Principia Iurishttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONALTHE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN ORDINARY AND TRANSITIONAL JUSTICELE PRINCIPE DE PROPORTIONNALITÉ DANS LA JUSTICE ORDINAIRE ET TRANSITIONNELLEO PRINCÍPIO DA PROPORCIONALIDADE NA JUSTIÇA ORDINÁRIA E TRANSITÓRIAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Principle of ProportionalityFundamental RightsPenaltiesTransitional JusticeVictimsConflictPeacePrincipio de proporcionalidadderechos fundamentalespenasjusticia transicionalvíctimasconflictopazprincipe de proportionnalitédroits fondamentauxsanctionsjustice transitionnellevictimesconflitpaixPrincípio Da ProporcionalidadeDireitos FundamentaisPenasJustiça TransicionalVítimasConflitoPaz11634/17360oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/173602023-07-14 16:27:14.499metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co

EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL

Publicaciones similares