EL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD EN LA JUSTICIA ORDINARIA Y TRANSICIONAL

In modern constitutionalism a series of principles have emerged, tending to develop the substantive nature of the higher norms and, within them, the preponderance that has acquired the principle of proportionality, which in penal matters allows to establish adequately the minimum and maximum limits...

Full description

Autores:
Cala Calvet, William
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional USTA
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/17360
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1670
Palabra clave:
Principle of Proportionality
Fundamental Rights
Penalties
Transitional Justice
Victims
Conflict
Peace
Principio de proporcionalidad
derechos fundamentales
penas
justicia transicional
víctimas
conflicto
paz
principe de proportionnalité
droits fondamentaux
sanctions
justice transitionnelle
victimes
conflit
paix
Princípio Da Proporcionalidade
Direitos Fundamentais
Penas
Justiça Transicional
Vítimas
Conflito
Paz
Rights
License
Derechos de autor 2019 Principia Iuris
Description
Summary:In modern constitutionalism a series of principles have emerged, tending to develop the substantive nature of the higher norms and, within them, the preponderance that has acquired the principle of proportionality, which in penal matters allows to establish adequately the minimum and maximum limits of penalties, is unquestionable. being also, the main criterion to define the penalty in the concrete case; likewise, the aforementioned principle allows establishing a differentiated application of sentences in ordinary and transitional justice, noting that in the latter, restorative justice is privileged over retributive justice. In this regard, the application of the principle of proportionality is essential both in the legislative phase and at the time of the judicial application of the penalty; therefore, the amount of these should not exceed the magnitude of the seriousness that for society represents the punishable act that is sanctioned, and in parallel the establishment and imposition of derisory penalties, seriously violate the aforementioned principle; which, however, admits exceptions in transitional justice processes through which it intends to integrate various efforts in order to face the consequences of massive violations and widespread or systematic human rights abuses, suffered in the development of an armed conflict, with the purpose of building paths of peace, respect, reconciliation and consolidation of democracy; it is precisely for this reason that the application of the aforementioned principle in legislative processes and in legal and administrative proceedings acquires a huge preponderance, because if the essential postulates that stem from this principle are not met, there will be no truth, nor justice, nor proportional reparation and therefore, it will not be fulfilling the duty of peace and will not enjoy this such right.