Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador
Peace and Development are two irreconcilable concepts for female leaders and administrators in the northern, central, and southern Amazon of Ecuador. In this context, development is synonymous with neo-extractivism and, therefore, entails the devastation of their territories and ways of life in harm...
- Autores:
-
Álvarez Lugo, Yesica
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional USTA
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39510
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39510
- Palabra clave:
- development
neo-extractivism
alternatives to development
Sumak Kawsay
Good Living
environmental and social conflicts
nature
desarrollo
neoextractivismo
alternativas al desarrollo
Sumak Kawsay
buen vivir
conflictos ambientales y sociales
naturaleza
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
SANTOTOMAS_a148f907d3f9381a1f6e196942305db3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39510 |
network_acronym_str |
SANTOTOMAS |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional USTA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Álvarez Lugo, Yesica2022-01-18T16:04:20Z2022-01-18T16:04:20Z2020-07-01https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/602110.15332/25006681/6021http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39510Peace and Development are two irreconcilable concepts for female leaders and administrators in the northern, central, and southern Amazon of Ecuador. In this context, development is synonymous with neo-extractivism and, therefore, entails the devastation of their territories and ways of life in harmony with nature. In this case, the commodity consensus takes the shape of the constant threat of the South-East Round and the Intercampos Round, through which oil blocks located in their ancestral territories enter into tendering. The Amazon Women Collective —part of the Ecuadorian indigenous movement, but a political subject with its own personality— demands the fulfilment of its mandate. Through direct testimonies from some of the Collective’s members and their mandate, we will come closer to understanding this irresolvable relationship between peace and development, and we will recognize the different forms of violence that this extractive model imprints on their bodies and territories, as a result of their position as defenders of the jungle and as women. In addition, taking the history of the South-East Round as an axis for inquiry, we will address the disputes between the different jurisdictions and territorialities in conflict, which fight to maintain lifestyles in harmony with nature or establish/deepen the prevailing developmental-economicist model.Paz y desarrollo son dos conceptos irreconciliables para las mujeres lideresas y dirigentes de la Amazonía norte, centro y sur del Ecuador. En este contexto, el desarrollo es sinónimo de neoextractivismo y, por lo tanto, supone la devastación de sus territorios y formas de vida en armonía con la Naturaleza. En este caso el consenso de las commodities toma forma bajo la amenaza constante de la Ronda Suroriente y las Rondas Intercampos, a partir de la cual entran a licitación bloques petroleros localizados en sus territorios ancestrales. El colectivo Mujeres Amazónicas —integrado al movimiento indígena ecuatoriano, pero como sujeto político con personalidad propia— exige el cumplimiento de su mandato. A través de este y de sus testimonios directos nos acercaremos a la comprensión de esta relación irresoluble entre paz y desarrollo, y reconoceremos las diferentes formas de violencia que este modelo extractivista imprime en sus cuerpos y territorios, por su posición como defensoras de la selva y como mujeres. Además, tomando como eje la historia de la Ronda Suroriente, abordaremos las disputas entre las diferentes jurisdicciones y territorialidades en conflicto, que combaten por mantener modos de vida en armonía con la Naturaleza o instaurar / profundizar el modelo desarrollista-economicista imperante.application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomáshttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021/5837Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2020): Paz y desarrollo; 313-346Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Paz y desarrollo; 313-3462500-66812339-3688Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del EcuadorPeace and Development: Two Irreconcilable Concepts for Amazon Women in Ecuadorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1developmentneo-extractivismalternatives to developmentSumak KawsayGood Livingenvironmental and social conflictsnaturedesarrolloneoextractivismoalternativas al desarrolloSumak Kawsaybuen vivirconflictos ambientales y socialesnaturalezahttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf211634/39510oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/395102023-07-14 16:07:39.936metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Peace and Development: Two Irreconcilable Concepts for Amazon Women in Ecuador |
title |
Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador |
spellingShingle |
Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador development neo-extractivism alternatives to development Sumak Kawsay Good Living environmental and social conflicts nature desarrollo neoextractivismo alternativas al desarrollo Sumak Kawsay buen vivir conflictos ambientales y sociales naturaleza |
title_short |
Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador |
title_full |
Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador |
title_fullStr |
Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador |
title_full_unstemmed |
Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador |
title_sort |
Paz y desarrollo: dos conceptos irreconciliables para las Mujeres Amazónicas del Ecuador |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Álvarez Lugo, Yesica |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Álvarez Lugo, Yesica |
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
development neo-extractivism alternatives to development Sumak Kawsay Good Living environmental and social conflicts nature |
topic |
development neo-extractivism alternatives to development Sumak Kawsay Good Living environmental and social conflicts nature desarrollo neoextractivismo alternativas al desarrollo Sumak Kawsay buen vivir conflictos ambientales y sociales naturaleza |
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
desarrollo neoextractivismo alternativas al desarrollo Sumak Kawsay buen vivir conflictos ambientales y sociales naturaleza |
description |
Peace and Development are two irreconcilable concepts for female leaders and administrators in the northern, central, and southern Amazon of Ecuador. In this context, development is synonymous with neo-extractivism and, therefore, entails the devastation of their territories and ways of life in harmony with nature. In this case, the commodity consensus takes the shape of the constant threat of the South-East Round and the Intercampos Round, through which oil blocks located in their ancestral territories enter into tendering. The Amazon Women Collective —part of the Ecuadorian indigenous movement, but a political subject with its own personality— demands the fulfilment of its mandate. Through direct testimonies from some of the Collective’s members and their mandate, we will come closer to understanding this irresolvable relationship between peace and development, and we will recognize the different forms of violence that this extractive model imprints on their bodies and territories, as a result of their position as defenders of the jungle and as women. In addition, taking the history of the South-East Round as an axis for inquiry, we will address the disputes between the different jurisdictions and territorialities in conflict, which fight to maintain lifestyles in harmony with nature or establish/deepen the prevailing developmental-economicist model. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T16:04:20Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T16:04:20Z |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021 10.15332/25006681/6021 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39510 |
url |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021 http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39510 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15332/25006681/6021 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/campos/article/view/6021/5837 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2020): Paz y desarrollo; 313-346 |
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
Campos en Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Paz y desarrollo; 313-346 |
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv |
2500-6681 2339-3688 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
noreply@usta.edu.co |
_version_ |
1800800540894953472 |