Relationship between Dynamic and Isometric Strength, Power, Speed, and Average Propulsive Speed of Recreational Athletes
The purpose of this study was to examine the type of relationship between measures of maximal force (dynamic and isometric), maximal power, and mean propulsive velocity. In total, 355 recreational athletes, 96 women (age 20.5 2.5 years; height 158.2 17.3 cm; weight 61.8 48.4 kg) and 259 men (age 21....
- Autores:
-
Fernandez, Jairo Alejandro
Mendoza Romero, Darío
Sarmento, Hugo
Prieto Mondragón, Laura
Rodríguez Buitrago, Jeansy Alonso
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2022
- Institución:
- Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional UDCA
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.udca.edu.co:11158/5013
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repository.udca.edu.co/handle/11158/5013
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7040079
https://repository.udca.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Estiramiento (Fisiología)
Velocidad
Ejercicios isométricos
Potencia máxima
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es
Summary: | The purpose of this study was to examine the type of relationship between measures of maximal force (dynamic and isometric), maximal power, and mean propulsive velocity. In total, 355 recreational athletes, 96 women (age 20.5 2.5 years; height 158.2 17.3 cm; weight 61.8 48.4 kg) and 259 men (age 21.0 2.6 years; height 170.5 12.6 cm; weight 65.9 9.2 kg) were evaluated in three sessions separated by 72 h each in isometric midthigh pull exercise (ISOS) (kg), bench press maximum strength (1RM MSBP) (kg), jump height (CMJ) (m), and maximum pedaling power (WT) the maximum squat strength (1RM MSS) (kg), the mean propulsive velocity in the bench press (MPVBP) (m s�����1), and the peak power (PPBP) (w), mean propulsive squat velocity (MPVS) (m s�����1), peak power (PP) (w), maximum handgrip force (ISOHG) (kg), and 30 m movement speed (V30) (s). Significant correlations (p 0.01) were identified between 95% of the various manifestations of force, and only 5% presented a significance of p 0.05; however, when the magnitude of these correlations is observed, there is great heterogeneity. In this sense, the dynamic strength tests present the best correlations with the other strength and power tests used in the present study, followed by PPBP and PP. The results of this study complement what is reported in the literature regarding the correlation between different types of force manifestations being heterogeneous and contradictory. |
---|