Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems Engineering

This article exposes the results of a research made in the classroom looking for establishing elements of comparative judgment that would allow comparing two teaching strategies, and their impact on learning, of computer programming in a Systems Engineering program. The two strategies to be compared...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Pereira
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional - RIBUC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.ucp.edu.co:10785/13637
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/entrecienciaeingenieria/article/view/1132
http://hdl.handle.net/10785/13637
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2019 Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería
id RepoRIBUC2_e9114bb82e195fc886599ecccb6dd20e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.edu.co:10785/13637
network_acronym_str RepoRIBUC2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional - RIBUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems Engineering
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Episteme vs. Tekné: una aproximación al aprendizaje de la programación de computadores en Ingeniería de Sistemas
title Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems Engineering
spellingShingle Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems Engineering
title_short Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems Engineering
title_full Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems Engineering
title_fullStr Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems Engineering
title_sort Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems Engineering
description This article exposes the results of a research made in the classroom looking for establishing elements of comparative judgment that would allow comparing two teaching strategies, and their impact on learning, of computer programming in a Systems Engineering program. The two strategies to be compared consist of the teaching of the logic of programming (the episteme) or the teaching of its application reflected in a programming language (tekné). In order to measure the impact of the two strategies on the learning of programming, Programming I courses were divided into two subgroups so that a comparative follow-up could be carried out permanently. The process was carried out with the 1st semester of Systems Engineering of a public university. The results were measured quantitatively from identical written evaluations and under highly similar conditions for their resolution. A qualitative approach was also made based on the opinion of the students at the end of the course. It is concluded that the teaching of the episteme of programming seems to be much more relevant than its application since the student can go from the 1st to the other. However, there were cases in which some students, from the study of the programming language, were able to infer the underlying concepts of the relevant logic.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-06
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-29T03:49:31Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-29T03:49:31Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/entrecienciaeingenieria/article/view/1132
10.31908/19098367.4013
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10785/13637
url https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/entrecienciaeingenieria/article/view/1132
http://hdl.handle.net/10785/13637
identifier_str_mv 10.31908/19098367.4013
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/entrecienciaeingenieria/article/view/1132/1104
https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/entrecienciaeingenieria/article/view/1132/2561
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ES
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Pereira
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv Entre ciencia e ingeniería; Vol. 13 Núm. 25 (2019); 45-51
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería; Vol. 13 Núm. 25 (2019); 45-51
dc.source.por.fl_str_mv Entre ciencia e ingeniería; Vol. 13 Núm. 25 (2019); 45-51
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2539-4169
1909-8367
institution Universidad Católica de Pereira
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica de Pereira - RIBUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1828143355412873216
spelling 2023-08-29T03:49:31Z2023-08-29T03:49:31Z2019-06-06https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/entrecienciaeingenieria/article/view/113210.31908/19098367.4013http://hdl.handle.net/10785/13637This article exposes the results of a research made in the classroom looking for establishing elements of comparative judgment that would allow comparing two teaching strategies, and their impact on learning, of computer programming in a Systems Engineering program. The two strategies to be compared consist of the teaching of the logic of programming (the episteme) or the teaching of its application reflected in a programming language (tekné). In order to measure the impact of the two strategies on the learning of programming, Programming I courses were divided into two subgroups so that a comparative follow-up could be carried out permanently. The process was carried out with the 1st semester of Systems Engineering of a public university. The results were measured quantitatively from identical written evaluations and under highly similar conditions for their resolution. A qualitative approach was also made based on the opinion of the students at the end of the course. It is concluded that the teaching of the episteme of programming seems to be much more relevant than its application since the student can go from the 1st to the other. However, there were cases in which some students, from the study of the programming language, were able to infer the underlying concepts of the relevant logic.El presente artículo expone los resultados de una investigación realizada en el aula, cuyo propósito fue el de establecer elementos de juicio para comparar dos estrategias de enseñanza y su impacto en el aprendizaje de la programación de computadores. Las dos estrategias comparadas fueron la enseñanza de la lógica de programación (la episteme), o la enseñanza de la aplicación de esta, reflejada en un lenguaje de programación (la tekné). Para medir su impacto, se segmentaron los cursos de Programación I en dos subgrupos, con el fin de poder realizar un seguimiento comparativo. El proceso se llevó a cabo con el 1er semestre de Ingeniería de Sistemas de una universidad pública. Los resultados se midieron desde lo cuantitativo con evaluaciones escritas idénticas y en condiciones similares para su resolución. También se realizó una aproximación cualitativa a la opinión de los estudiantes, al final del curso. Se concluye que pareciera ser más relevante la enseñanza de la episteme de la programación que de su aplicación, puesto que el estudiante puede ir de aquella a este. Sin embargo, se encontraron casos en los que algunos estudiantes, desde el estudio del lenguaje de programación, infirieron los conceptos subyacentes de la lógica pertinente.application/pdfapplication/xmlspaUniversidad Católica de Pereirahttps://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/entrecienciaeingenieria/article/view/1132/1104https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/entrecienciaeingenieria/article/view/1132/2561Derechos de autor 2019 Entre Ciencia e Ingenieríahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_EShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Entre ciencia e ingeniería; Vol. 13 Núm. 25 (2019); 45-51Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería; Vol. 13 Núm. 25 (2019); 45-51Entre ciencia e ingeniería; Vol. 13 Núm. 25 (2019); 45-512539-41691909-8367Episteme vs. Tekné: an approach to the learning of computer programming in Systems EngineeringEpisteme vs. Tekné: una aproximación al aprendizaje de la programación de computadores en Ingeniería de SistemasArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTrejos Buriticá, Omar IvánPublication10785/13637oai:repositorio.ucp.edu.co:10785/136372025-01-27 18:58:52.727https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ESDerechos de autor 2019 Entre Ciencia e Ingenieríametadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.ucp.edu.coRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica de Pereira - RIBUCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com