Independencia, ¿para quién? Esclavización, raza y subalternidad.
Appelbaum, Macpherson and Rosemblatt (2003)have developed a timeline about the vision of race and nation in Latin America. This article starts from these conceptions and explores some abolitionist arguments for andagainst, in the first period when the idea of nation takesplace by Creole people, sinc...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Pereira
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional - RIBUC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.ucp.edu.co:10785/15542
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/textosysentidos/article/view/1014
http://hdl.handle.net/10785/15542
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos de autor 2019 Textos y Sentidos
| Summary: | Appelbaum, Macpherson and Rosemblatt (2003)have developed a timeline about the vision of race and nation in Latin America. This article starts from these conceptions and explores some abolitionist arguments for andagainst, in the first period when the idea of nation takesplace by Creole people, since it is assumed there is no racial difference. Nevertheless, this paper illustrates how tokeep the slavery was considered as a contradiction to theindependence legitimacy. It also looks for the race term andhow it appears in books that are related with this debate,because of racial thinking is not absent from nation beginning. Finally, some conclusions are given as reflections aboutthe urgency to pluralize and densify representations and rethorics of the Independence from a post-colonial approachto ask about their position those who were subordinating. |
|---|