The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalism

In this text, I will try to show some relevant aspects about the controversy Stove-Popper in wich the tension between Logia Positivism and Critic Rationalism is carried out. I start from Stove's position to attack Popper's anti-inductivism, and to achieve it, the author centers herself bas...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Pereira
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional - RIBUC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.ucp.edu.co:10785/10820
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/paginas/article/view/2128
http://hdl.handle.net/10785/10820
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2009 Revista Páginas
id RepoRIBUC2_cbb0de9cac32ceeb5e6a0e7c132f55c9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.edu.co:10785/10820
network_acronym_str RepoRIBUC2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional - RIBUC
repository_id_str
spelling 2022-06-01T19:29:02Z2022-06-01T19:29:02Z2021-01-27https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/paginas/article/view/2128http://hdl.handle.net/10785/10820In this text, I will try to show some relevant aspects about the controversy Stove-Popper in wich the tension between Logia Positivism and Critic Rationalism is carried out. I start from Stove's position to attack Popper's anti-inductivism, and to achieve it, the author centers herself basically in two fundamental aspects: the first one shows the conception of Rationality as if it were possible to analyzed just from deductives points of view. The second one related to the affirmation about that science has only had progress from de pure Deductivism. The conception of Popper's rationality implies a strong Deductivism, and could not establish the affirmation of progress during the last centuries. In order to attack these aspects, the author tries to show that Popper's concept about rationality is richer and more complex than Stove's proposal, and on the other hand, shows that there is not a postulation of inferences of unobservable, from observable or from future facts starting from past facts.En este escrito trataré de mostrar algunos puntos relevantes de la controversia Stove-Popper en los que se hace clara la tensión entre el positivismo lógico y el racionalismo crítico. Se parte de la posición de Stove para atacar el antiinductivismo de Popper, para lo cual, el autor se centra básicamente en dos puntos claves: El primero muestra la concepción de racionalidad como si ésta sólo fuera posible de ser analizada desde puntos de vista deductivistas. El segundo con relación a la afirmación acerca de que la ciencia sólo ha tenido progresos desde el deductivismo puro. La concepción de racionalidad de Popper implica deductivismo fuerte y no podría hacer la afirmación de progreso durante los últimos siglos. Para atacar estos aspectos se intenta mostrar que el concepto de racionalidad de Popper es más complejo y rico de lo que Stove propone y, segundo, mostrar que no hay la postulación de inferencias de inobservables a partir de observables o de hechos futuros a partir de hechos pasados.application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica de Pereirahttps://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/paginas/article/view/2128/1976Derechos de autor 2009 Revista Páginashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_EShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Revista Páginas; Núm. 82 (Dic., 2008); 25-380121-1633The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalismLa controversia stove-popper: racionalismo o irracionalismoArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArango Arias, Ana LucíaPublication10785/10820oai:repositorio.ucp.edu.co:10785/108202025-01-27 14:23:15.326https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ESDerechos de autor 2009 Revista Páginasmetadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.ucp.edu.coRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica de Pereira - RIBUCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalism
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv La controversia stove-popper: racionalismo o irracionalismo
title The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalism
spellingShingle The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalism
title_short The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalism
title_full The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalism
title_fullStr The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalism
title_full_unstemmed The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalism
title_sort The stove-popper controversy: rationalism or irrationalism
description In this text, I will try to show some relevant aspects about the controversy Stove-Popper in wich the tension between Logia Positivism and Critic Rationalism is carried out. I start from Stove's position to attack Popper's anti-inductivism, and to achieve it, the author centers herself basically in two fundamental aspects: the first one shows the conception of Rationality as if it were possible to analyzed just from deductives points of view. The second one related to the affirmation about that science has only had progress from de pure Deductivism. The conception of Popper's rationality implies a strong Deductivism, and could not establish the affirmation of progress during the last centuries. In order to attack these aspects, the author tries to show that Popper's concept about rationality is richer and more complex than Stove's proposal, and on the other hand, shows that there is not a postulation of inferences of unobservable, from observable or from future facts starting from past facts.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-27
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01T19:29:02Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01T19:29:02Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/paginas/article/view/2128
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10785/10820
url https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/paginas/article/view/2128
http://hdl.handle.net/10785/10820
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/paginas/article/view/2128/1976
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2009 Revista Páginas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2009 Revista Páginas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es_ES
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Pereira
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Páginas; Núm. 82 (Dic., 2008); 25-38
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 0121-1633
institution Universidad Católica de Pereira
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica de Pereira - RIBUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1828143403749081088

Publicaciones similares