The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis
There is an emerging belief that electrically elicited blink reflexes (BR) may distinguish Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from other disorders characterized by memory dysfunction. To qualitatively and quantitatively distinguish the effects that electrical stimulation has over the blink reflex (eBR) record...
- Autores:
-
Leon Ariza, Daniel S.
Leon Ariza, Juan S.
Prada, Diddier G.
Castillo, Camilo
Leon Sarmiento, Fidias E.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad de Santander
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad de Santander
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.udes.edu.co:001/3116
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/handle/001/3116
- Palabra clave:
- Blink reflex
Alzheimer’s disease
Dementia
Electrical stimulation
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Rihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019
id |
RUDES2_5b06099506170aaf21463f69a032773f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.udes.edu.co:001/3116 |
network_acronym_str |
RUDES2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Universidad de Santander |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis |
title |
The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis Blink reflex Alzheimer’s disease Dementia Electrical stimulation |
title_short |
The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis |
title_full |
The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis |
title_sort |
The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Leon Ariza, Daniel S. Leon Ariza, Juan S. Prada, Diddier G. Castillo, Camilo Leon Sarmiento, Fidias E. |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Leon Ariza, Daniel S. Leon Ariza, Juan S. Prada, Diddier G. Castillo, Camilo Leon Sarmiento, Fidias E. |
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Blink reflex Alzheimer’s disease Dementia Electrical stimulation |
topic |
Blink reflex Alzheimer’s disease Dementia Electrical stimulation |
description |
There is an emerging belief that electrically elicited blink reflexes (BR) may distinguish Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from other disorders characterized by memory dysfunction. To qualitatively and quantitatively distinguish the effects that electrical stimulation has over the blink reflex (eBR) recorded from patients with AD and healthy controls (HCs), we did a systematic review of the literature, and conducted a meta-analysis. Following our selected criteria, 94 AD patients and 97 HCs were identified from articles published in English between 1950 and 2017. Although the 3 responses (R1, R2 and R3) of the eBR were studied in a number of patients, only the R2 response was quantified in all studies. Thresholds and stimulation intensities parameters were found to be used in a miscellaneous form, and the majority of times, such parameters deviated from validated guidelines. The stimulation frequencies used to elicit the BR responses ranged between 0.14 and 0.2 Hz. These frequencies favored HCs compared with AD patients (odds ratio = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.30-1.85), I2 = 0% [P = .99]; Q = 271.89 [df = 7, P < .000]). Egger’s regression test suggested publication bias (intercept = 32.38; 95% CI = −8.98 to −3.2; P = .001). Our results unveiled key shortcomings in the data reported; such shortcomings need to be corrected in future AD research looking for obtaining more reliable and reproducible eBR studies; otherwise, interventions may be misleading. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-18T20:32:00Z |
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-18T20:32:00Z |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-01 |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv |
10.1177/1550059418825169 |
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
1550-0594 |
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/handle/001/3116 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1177/1550059418825169 1550-0594 |
url |
https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/handle/001/3116 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.eng.fl_str_mv |
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Rihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Rihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019 Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1550059418825169?journalCode=eegb |
institution |
Universidad de Santander |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/62223bcc-cdd1-4b04-853b-4925ab81784f/download https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/b49cdcb6-5fa9-423f-b625-3adee14fbb17/download https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/b85e5d76-3623-4c83-8eaa-4df3301ae0dc/download https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/6500fc29-0925-47de-8b46-b1c67bd90ad5/download https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/5c6b3df2-e16b-498e-8e77-e3bfcc82d42d/download https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/6f84a3bd-2ca2-47dc-b863-4c85a1537dfc/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
94cf9b5d4e0ed43a3d5e5fb33dd39813 2b19fc6bc6cc9de9a370e6a568204513 63c9218809b6f46c198b8f51537e98e7 38d94cf55aa1bf2dac1a736ac45c881c 9a901a653751f35a13a7f3d4e52b2736 5dbe86c1111d64f45ba435df98fdc825 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad de Santander |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
soporte@metabiblioteca.com |
_version_ |
1814158614156279808 |
spelling |
Leon Ariza, Daniel S.376c7434-3d7f-451a-ac99-8b1be55d3bde-1Leon Ariza, Juan S.1d9c7815-4d9d-4d10-b3ab-1adaffa2c3d8-1Prada, Diddier G.f2037094-7867-457f-b663-ca1f1f20108c-1Castillo, Camilo1d9b63bd-30b9-4453-a999-ec0ebc7a6312-1Leon Sarmiento, Fidias E.46042405-eca5-442f-84ba-2f81d90d50b5-12019-06-18T20:32:00Z2019-06-18T20:32:00Z2019-01There is an emerging belief that electrically elicited blink reflexes (BR) may distinguish Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from other disorders characterized by memory dysfunction. To qualitatively and quantitatively distinguish the effects that electrical stimulation has over the blink reflex (eBR) recorded from patients with AD and healthy controls (HCs), we did a systematic review of the literature, and conducted a meta-analysis. Following our selected criteria, 94 AD patients and 97 HCs were identified from articles published in English between 1950 and 2017. Although the 3 responses (R1, R2 and R3) of the eBR were studied in a number of patients, only the R2 response was quantified in all studies. Thresholds and stimulation intensities parameters were found to be used in a miscellaneous form, and the majority of times, such parameters deviated from validated guidelines. The stimulation frequencies used to elicit the BR responses ranged between 0.14 and 0.2 Hz. These frequencies favored HCs compared with AD patients (odds ratio = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.30-1.85), I2 = 0% [P = .99]; Q = 271.89 [df = 7, P < .000]). Egger’s regression test suggested publication bias (intercept = 32.38; 95% CI = −8.98 to −3.2; P = .001). Our results unveiled key shortcomings in the data reported; such shortcomings need to be corrected in future AD research looking for obtaining more reliable and reproducible eBR studies; otherwise, interventions may be misleading.application/pdf10.1177/15500594188251691550-0594https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/handle/001/3116engClinical EEG and NeuroscienceRihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1550059418825169?journalCode=eegbBlink reflexAlzheimer’s diseaseDementiaElectrical stimulationThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysisArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PublicationBRANDED_PREVIEWThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.PNG.preview.jpgThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.PNG.preview.jpgGenerated Branded Previewimage/jpeg6551https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/62223bcc-cdd1-4b04-853b-4925ab81784f/download94cf9b5d4e0ed43a3d5e5fb33dd39813MD54THUMBNAILThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.PNG.jpgThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.PNG.jpgUDESimage/jpeg1472https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/b49cdcb6-5fa9-423f-b625-3adee14fbb17/download2b19fc6bc6cc9de9a370e6a568204513MD53The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdf.jpgThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg7967https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/b85e5d76-3623-4c83-8eaa-4df3301ae0dc/download63c9218809b6f46c198b8f51537e98e7MD57LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-859https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/6500fc29-0925-47de-8b46-b1c67bd90ad5/download38d94cf55aa1bf2dac1a736ac45c881cMD52ORIGINALThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdfThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdfapplication/pdf266142https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/5c6b3df2-e16b-498e-8e77-e3bfcc82d42d/download9a901a653751f35a13a7f3d4e52b2736MD55TEXTThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdf.txtThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain5https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/6f84a3bd-2ca2-47dc-b863-4c85a1537dfc/download5dbe86c1111d64f45ba435df98fdc825MD56001/3116oai:repositorio.udes.edu.co:001/31162023-10-10 09:09:46.684https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Rihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019https://repositorio.udes.edu.coRepositorio Universidad de Santandersoporte@metabiblioteca.comTGljZW5jaWEgZGUgUHVibGljYWNpw7NuIFVERVMKRGlyZWN0cmljZXMgZGUgVVNPIHkgQUNDRVNPCgo= |