The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis

There is an emerging belief that electrically elicited blink reflexes (BR) may distinguish Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from other disorders characterized by memory dysfunction. To qualitatively and quantitatively distinguish the effects that electrical stimulation has over the blink reflex (eBR) record...

Full description

Autores:
Leon Ariza, Daniel S.
Leon Ariza, Juan S.
Prada, Diddier G.
Castillo, Camilo
Leon Sarmiento, Fidias E.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad de Santander
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad de Santander
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.udes.edu.co:001/3116
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/handle/001/3116
Palabra clave:
Blink reflex
Alzheimer’s disease
Dementia
Electrical stimulation
Rights
openAccess
License
Rihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019
id RUDES2_5b06099506170aaf21463f69a032773f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udes.edu.co:001/3116
network_acronym_str RUDES2
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad de Santander
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis
title The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis
spellingShingle The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis
Blink reflex
Alzheimer’s disease
Dementia
Electrical stimulation
title_short The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis
title_full The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis
title_sort The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Leon Ariza, Daniel S.
Leon Ariza, Juan S.
Prada, Diddier G.
Castillo, Camilo
Leon Sarmiento, Fidias E.
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Leon Ariza, Daniel S.
Leon Ariza, Juan S.
Prada, Diddier G.
Castillo, Camilo
Leon Sarmiento, Fidias E.
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Blink reflex
Alzheimer’s disease
Dementia
Electrical stimulation
topic Blink reflex
Alzheimer’s disease
Dementia
Electrical stimulation
description There is an emerging belief that electrically elicited blink reflexes (BR) may distinguish Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from other disorders characterized by memory dysfunction. To qualitatively and quantitatively distinguish the effects that electrical stimulation has over the blink reflex (eBR) recorded from patients with AD and healthy controls (HCs), we did a systematic review of the literature, and conducted a meta-analysis. Following our selected criteria, 94 AD patients and 97 HCs were identified from articles published in English between 1950 and 2017. Although the 3 responses (R1, R2 and R3) of the eBR were studied in a number of patients, only the R2 response was quantified in all studies. Thresholds and stimulation intensities parameters were found to be used in a miscellaneous form, and the majority of times, such parameters deviated from validated guidelines. The stimulation frequencies used to elicit the BR responses ranged between 0.14 and 0.2 Hz. These frequencies favored HCs compared with AD patients (odds ratio = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.30-1.85), I2 = 0% [P = .99]; Q = 271.89 [df = 7, P < .000]). Egger’s regression test suggested publication bias (intercept = 32.38; 95% CI = −8.98 to −3.2; P = .001). Our results unveiled key shortcomings in the data reported; such shortcomings need to be corrected in future AD research looking for obtaining more reliable and reproducible eBR studies; otherwise, interventions may be misleading.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-18T20:32:00Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-18T20:32:00Z
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv 10.1177/1550059418825169
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 1550-0594
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/handle/001/3116
identifier_str_mv 10.1177/1550059418825169
1550-0594
url https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/handle/001/3116
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.eng.fl_str_mv Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Rihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Rihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1550059418825169?journalCode=eegb
institution Universidad de Santander
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/62223bcc-cdd1-4b04-853b-4925ab81784f/download
https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/b49cdcb6-5fa9-423f-b625-3adee14fbb17/download
https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/b85e5d76-3623-4c83-8eaa-4df3301ae0dc/download
https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/6500fc29-0925-47de-8b46-b1c67bd90ad5/download
https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/5c6b3df2-e16b-498e-8e77-e3bfcc82d42d/download
https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/6f84a3bd-2ca2-47dc-b863-4c85a1537dfc/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 94cf9b5d4e0ed43a3d5e5fb33dd39813
2b19fc6bc6cc9de9a370e6a568204513
63c9218809b6f46c198b8f51537e98e7
38d94cf55aa1bf2dac1a736ac45c881c
9a901a653751f35a13a7f3d4e52b2736
5dbe86c1111d64f45ba435df98fdc825
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad de Santander
repository.mail.fl_str_mv soporte@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1814158614156279808
spelling Leon Ariza, Daniel S.376c7434-3d7f-451a-ac99-8b1be55d3bde-1Leon Ariza, Juan S.1d9c7815-4d9d-4d10-b3ab-1adaffa2c3d8-1Prada, Diddier G.f2037094-7867-457f-b663-ca1f1f20108c-1Castillo, Camilo1d9b63bd-30b9-4453-a999-ec0ebc7a6312-1Leon Sarmiento, Fidias E.46042405-eca5-442f-84ba-2f81d90d50b5-12019-06-18T20:32:00Z2019-06-18T20:32:00Z2019-01There is an emerging belief that electrically elicited blink reflexes (BR) may distinguish Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from other disorders characterized by memory dysfunction. To qualitatively and quantitatively distinguish the effects that electrical stimulation has over the blink reflex (eBR) recorded from patients with AD and healthy controls (HCs), we did a systematic review of the literature, and conducted a meta-analysis. Following our selected criteria, 94 AD patients and 97 HCs were identified from articles published in English between 1950 and 2017. Although the 3 responses (R1, R2 and R3) of the eBR were studied in a number of patients, only the R2 response was quantified in all studies. Thresholds and stimulation intensities parameters were found to be used in a miscellaneous form, and the majority of times, such parameters deviated from validated guidelines. The stimulation frequencies used to elicit the BR responses ranged between 0.14 and 0.2 Hz. These frequencies favored HCs compared with AD patients (odds ratio = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.30-1.85), I2 = 0% [P = .99]; Q = 271.89 [df = 7, P < .000]). Egger’s regression test suggested publication bias (intercept = 32.38; 95% CI = −8.98 to −3.2; P = .001). Our results unveiled key shortcomings in the data reported; such shortcomings need to be corrected in future AD research looking for obtaining more reliable and reproducible eBR studies; otherwise, interventions may be misleading.application/pdf10.1177/15500594188251691550-0594https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/handle/001/3116engClinical EEG and NeuroscienceRihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1550059418825169?journalCode=eegbBlink reflexAlzheimer’s diseaseDementiaElectrical stimulationThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease : State of the Evidence and Meta-analysisArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PublicationBRANDED_PREVIEWThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.PNG.preview.jpgThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.PNG.preview.jpgGenerated Branded Previewimage/jpeg6551https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/62223bcc-cdd1-4b04-853b-4925ab81784f/download94cf9b5d4e0ed43a3d5e5fb33dd39813MD54THUMBNAILThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.PNG.jpgThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.PNG.jpgUDESimage/jpeg1472https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/b49cdcb6-5fa9-423f-b625-3adee14fbb17/download2b19fc6bc6cc9de9a370e6a568204513MD53The Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdf.jpgThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg7967https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/b85e5d76-3623-4c83-8eaa-4df3301ae0dc/download63c9218809b6f46c198b8f51537e98e7MD57LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-859https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/6500fc29-0925-47de-8b46-b1c67bd90ad5/download38d94cf55aa1bf2dac1a736ac45c881cMD52ORIGINALThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdfThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdfapplication/pdf266142https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/5c6b3df2-e16b-498e-8e77-e3bfcc82d42d/download9a901a653751f35a13a7f3d4e52b2736MD55TEXTThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdf.txtThe Three Nociceptive Responses of the Orbicularis Oculi Reflex in Alzheimer’s Disease. State of the Evidence and Meta-analysis.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain5https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/bitstreams/6f84a3bd-2ca2-47dc-b863-4c85a1537dfc/download5dbe86c1111d64f45ba435df98fdc825MD56001/3116oai:repositorio.udes.edu.co:001/31162023-10-10 09:09:46.684https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Rihgts - EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society, 2019https://repositorio.udes.edu.coRepositorio Universidad de Santandersoporte@metabiblioteca.comTGljZW5jaWEgZGUgUHVibGljYWNpw7NuIFVERVMKRGlyZWN0cmljZXMgZGUgVVNPIHkgQUNDRVNPCgo=