La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos

Los partidarios de la noción sustantiva de Estado de derecho señalan que el mismo es compatible y se construye a partir de las exigencias propias del denominado Estado formal de derecho. Este último exige que el derecho cumpla con ciertas exigencias que aseguren que el contenido del mismo sea capaz...

Full description

Autores:
Candia-Falcón, Gonzalo
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad de Caldas
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/15899
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2
https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/15899
Palabra clave:
rule of law
predictability of the law
bill of rights
judicial discretion
judicial review
Estado de derecho
predictibilidad del derecho
declaraciones de derechos
discrecionalidad judicial
revisión judicial
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2016 Jurídicas
id RUCALDAS2_6aa6169667ad5aebda64582e765965c3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/15899
network_acronym_str RUCALDAS2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv The substantive conception of the Rule of Law: problems and challenges
title La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
spellingShingle La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
rule of law
predictability of the law
bill of rights
judicial discretion
judicial review
Estado de derecho
predictibilidad del derecho
declaraciones de derechos
discrecionalidad judicial
revisión judicial
title_short La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
title_full La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
title_fullStr La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
title_full_unstemmed La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
title_sort La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Candia-Falcón, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Candia-Falcón, Gonzalo
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv rule of law
predictability of the law
bill of rights
judicial discretion
judicial review
topic rule of law
predictability of the law
bill of rights
judicial discretion
judicial review
Estado de derecho
predictibilidad del derecho
declaraciones de derechos
discrecionalidad judicial
revisión judicial
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Estado de derecho
predictibilidad del derecho
declaraciones de derechos
discrecionalidad judicial
revisión judicial
description Los partidarios de la noción sustantiva de Estado de derecho señalan que el mismo es compatible y se construye a partir de las exigencias propias del denominado Estado formal de derecho. Este último exige que el derecho cumpla con ciertas exigencias que aseguren que el contenido del mismo sea capaz de: (i) limitar de forma significativa la autoridad estatal y (ii) orientar los procesos de toma de decisión de los ciudadanos. Sin embargo elementos propios de la noción de Estado de derecho sustantivo, como el reconocimiento de declaraciones de derechos judicialmente aplicables de forma directa, generan fuertes tensiones con las exigencias de la galidad. Esto especialmente en al área de la discrecionalidad judicial. Frente a esto, el autor concluye que los partidarios de la noción de Estado de derecho sustantivo deben: (i) repensar el concepto buscando aliviar dichas tensiones o (ii) simplemente construir la noción sobre bases conceptuales diversas.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01 00:00:00
2021-02-07T10:10:38Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01 00:00:00
2021-02-07T10:10:38Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
Sección Artículos
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv Journal Article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1794-2918
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2
https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/15899
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2590-8928
identifier_str_mv 1794-2918
10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2
2590-8928
url https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2
https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/15899
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 26
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 9
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 13
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Jurídicas
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Allan, T.R.S. (2001). Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of The Rule of Law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Allan, T.R.S. (2013). The Sovereignty of Law. Freedom, Constitution and Common Law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Allan, J. (2000). Oh that I were made judge in the land. Federal Law Review, 30 (3), 561-576.
Allan, J. (2011). Reasonable Disagreement and the Diminution of Democracy: Joseph’s Morally Laden Understanding of the rule of law. En Ekins, R. (Ed.). Modern challenges to the rule of law. Wellington, New Zealand: Lexis Nexis.
Beatty, D.M. (2007). The ultimate rule of law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Bingham, T. (2011). The rule of law. London, England: Penguin Books.
Craig, P. (1997). Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: An analytical framework. Public Law, 467, 1-15.
Charlow, R. (2014). American constitutional analysis and a substantive understanding of the rule of law. En Silkenat, J.R., Hickey, J.E. and Barenboim, P.D. (Ed.). The legal doctrines of the rule of law and the legal state (Rechtsstaat). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Dicey, A.V. (1982). Introduction to the study of the law and the constitution. Indiana, USA: Liberty Fund.
Dworkin, R. (1985). Political judges and the rule of law. A matter of principle. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.
Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
George, R. (2001). Reason, freedom, and the rule of law: Their significance in the natural law tradition. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 46, 249-314.
Goldsworhty, J. (2001). Legislative sovereignty and the rule of law. En Campbell, T., Ewing, K. and Tomkins, A. (Ed.). Sceptical essays on human rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Heydon, J.D. (2014). Are bills of rights necessary in common law systems? Law Quarterly Review, 130, 2-53.
Jestaedt, M. (2012). The doctrine of balancing–Its strengths and weaknesses. En Klatt, M. (Ed.). Institutionalized reason: The jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Joseph, P.A. (2011). The rule of law: foundational norm. En: Ekins, R. (Ed.). Modern challenges to the rule of law. Wellington, New Zealand: Lexis Nexis.
Jowell, J. (2015). The rule of law: A practical and universal concept. En Jowell, J., Thomas, C. and van Zyl Smit, J. (Ed.). Rule of law symposium 2014. The importance of the rule of law in promoting development. Singapore, Singapore: Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law y Singapore Academy of Law.
Moens, G. (1994). The wrongs of a constitutional entrenched bill of rights. En Stephenson, M.A and Turner, C. (Ed.). Australia: Republic or monarchy? Legal and constitutional issues. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
Raz, J. (2012). The rule of law and its virtue. The authority of law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Shklar, J.N. (1987). Political theory and the rule of law. En Hutchenson, A.C. and Monahan, P. (Ed.). The rule of law: Ideal or ideology? Toronto, Canada: Carswell.
Summers, R.S. (1998). The principles of the rule of law. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 1691-1792.
Sunstein, C.R. (1996). Legal reasoning and political conflict. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.
Tamanaha, B. (2004). On the rule of law. History, politics, theory. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Urbina, F.J. (2012). A critique of proportionality. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 57 (1), 49-80.
Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Waldron, J. (2011). The rule of law and the importance of procedure. En Fleming, J.E. (Ed.). Getting to the rule of law. New York: New York University Press.
Webber, G. (2009). The negotiable constitution. On the limits of rights. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Webber, G. (2013). Rights and the rule of law in the balance. Law Quarterly Review, 129, 399-419.
Yowell, P. (2012). Legislación, Common law y la virtud de la claridad. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 39 (2), 481-512.
Zimmermann, A. (2007). The rule of law as a culture of legality: Legal and extra-legal elements for the realization of the rule of law in society. Murdoch University Law Review, 14, 10-31.
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 2 , Año 2016 : Julio - Diciembre
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/3328/3090
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Jurídicas
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Jurídicas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/3328
institution Universidad de Caldas
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/bitstream/ucaldas/15899/1/ORE.xml
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7c0436d16a5631add735b90c2e16aa3f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Caldas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1800536287859441664
spelling Candia-Falcón, Gonzalo41dde4768f2adbe6ea44f6592b9645d83002016-07-01 00:00:002021-02-07T10:10:38Z2016-07-01 00:00:002021-02-07T10:10:38Z2016-07-011794-2918https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/1589910.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.22590-8928Los partidarios de la noción sustantiva de Estado de derecho señalan que el mismo es compatible y se construye a partir de las exigencias propias del denominado Estado formal de derecho. Este último exige que el derecho cumpla con ciertas exigencias que aseguren que el contenido del mismo sea capaz de: (i) limitar de forma significativa la autoridad estatal y (ii) orientar los procesos de toma de decisión de los ciudadanos. Sin embargo elementos propios de la noción de Estado de derecho sustantivo, como el reconocimiento de declaraciones de derechos judicialmente aplicables de forma directa, generan fuertes tensiones con las exigencias de la galidad. Esto especialmente en al área de la discrecionalidad judicial. Frente a esto, el autor concluye que los partidarios de la noción de Estado de derecho sustantivo deben: (i) repensar el concepto buscando aliviar dichas tensiones o (ii) simplemente construir la noción sobre bases conceptuales diversas.Supporters of the substantive rule of law state that the concept is compatible with the demands of the formal notion of the rule of law. Indeed, they affirm that those demands represent the basis upon which the substantive concept is built. Basically, those formalities demand that the law must be able to: (a) effectively limit the discretion of public authorities and (b) guide the decision-making processes of citizens. However, elements of the substantive notion of the rule of law, such as the existence of bills of rights directly enforceable by courts, create tensions with the imperatives of legality. This is particularly true concerning judicial discretion. In this context, the author concludes that those who support the substantive notion of the rule of law must either: (a) rethink the concept seeking mechanisms to alleviate the identified tensions within the concept, or (b) build the notion upon different grounds.application/pdfspaUniversidad de CaldasDerechos de autor 2016 Jurídicashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/3328rule of lawpredictability of the lawbill of rightsjudicial discretionjudicial reviewEstado de derechopredictibilidad del derechodeclaraciones de derechosdiscrecionalidad judicialrevisión judicialLa concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíosThe substantive conception of the Rule of Law: problems and challengesArtículo de revistaSección ArtículosJournal Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85262913JurídicasAllan, T.R.S. (2001). Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of The Rule of Law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Allan, T.R.S. (2013). The Sovereignty of Law. Freedom, Constitution and Common Law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Allan, J. (2000). Oh that I were made judge in the land. Federal Law Review, 30 (3), 561-576.Allan, J. (2011). Reasonable Disagreement and the Diminution of Democracy: Joseph’s Morally Laden Understanding of the rule of law. En Ekins, R. (Ed.). Modern challenges to the rule of law. Wellington, New Zealand: Lexis Nexis.Beatty, D.M. (2007). The ultimate rule of law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Bingham, T. (2011). The rule of law. London, England: Penguin Books.Craig, P. (1997). Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: An analytical framework. Public Law, 467, 1-15.Charlow, R. (2014). American constitutional analysis and a substantive understanding of the rule of law. En Silkenat, J.R., Hickey, J.E. and Barenboim, P.D. (Ed.). The legal doctrines of the rule of law and the legal state (Rechtsstaat). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Dicey, A.V. (1982). Introduction to the study of the law and the constitution. Indiana, USA: Liberty Fund.Dworkin, R. (1985). Political judges and the rule of law. A matter of principle. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.George, R. (2001). Reason, freedom, and the rule of law: Their significance in the natural law tradition. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 46, 249-314.Goldsworhty, J. (2001). Legislative sovereignty and the rule of law. En Campbell, T., Ewing, K. and Tomkins, A. (Ed.). Sceptical essays on human rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Heydon, J.D. (2014). Are bills of rights necessary in common law systems? Law Quarterly Review, 130, 2-53.Jestaedt, M. (2012). The doctrine of balancing–Its strengths and weaknesses. En Klatt, M. (Ed.). Institutionalized reason: The jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Joseph, P.A. (2011). The rule of law: foundational norm. En: Ekins, R. (Ed.). Modern challenges to the rule of law. Wellington, New Zealand: Lexis Nexis.Jowell, J. (2015). The rule of law: A practical and universal concept. En Jowell, J., Thomas, C. and van Zyl Smit, J. (Ed.). Rule of law symposium 2014. The importance of the rule of law in promoting development. Singapore, Singapore: Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law y Singapore Academy of Law.Moens, G. (1994). The wrongs of a constitutional entrenched bill of rights. En Stephenson, M.A and Turner, C. (Ed.). Australia: Republic or monarchy? Legal and constitutional issues. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.Raz, J. (2012). The rule of law and its virtue. The authority of law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Shklar, J.N. (1987). Political theory and the rule of law. En Hutchenson, A.C. and Monahan, P. (Ed.). The rule of law: Ideal or ideology? Toronto, Canada: Carswell.Summers, R.S. (1998). The principles of the rule of law. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 1691-1792.Sunstein, C.R. (1996). Legal reasoning and political conflict. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.Tamanaha, B. (2004). On the rule of law. History, politics, theory. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.Urbina, F.J. (2012). A critique of proportionality. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 57 (1), 49-80.Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Waldron, J. (2011). The rule of law and the importance of procedure. En Fleming, J.E. (Ed.). Getting to the rule of law. New York: New York University Press.Webber, G. (2009). The negotiable constitution. On the limits of rights. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.Webber, G. (2013). Rights and the rule of law in the balance. Law Quarterly Review, 129, 399-419.Yowell, P. (2012). Legislación, Common law y la virtud de la claridad. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 39 (2), 481-512.Zimmermann, A. (2007). The rule of law as a culture of legality: Legal and extra-legal elements for the realization of the rule of law in society. Murdoch University Law Review, 14, 10-31.Núm. 2 , Año 2016 : Julio - Diciembrehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/3328/3090OREORE.xmltext/xml2559https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/bitstream/ucaldas/15899/1/ORE.xml7c0436d16a5631add735b90c2e16aa3fMD51ucaldas/15899oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/158992021-02-07 10:10:38.748Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Caldasbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Publicaciones similares