Fragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora.
In these pages a composition consisting of literary, philosophical and pedagogical fragments is invited, which converses (in)directly with each other. In turn, the pieces presented here are part and art of a broader philosophical-literary investigation that essay a "critique of evaluati...
- Autores:
-
Giuliano, Facundo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional UPN
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/14030
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/11726
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/14030
- Palabra clave:
- Literatura
Crítica
Filosofía de la educación
Pedagogía
Razón evaluadora
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
id |
RPEDAGO2_ccb277b5f37e4d2ffec3eb44003a9f51 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/14030 |
network_acronym_str |
RPEDAGO2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional UPN |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Fragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora. |
title |
Fragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora. |
spellingShingle |
Fragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora. Literatura Crítica Filosofía de la educación Pedagogía Razón evaluadora |
title_short |
Fragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora. |
title_full |
Fragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora. |
title_fullStr |
Fragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora. |
title_sort |
Fragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora. |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Giuliano, Facundo |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Giuliano, Facundo |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Literatura Crítica Filosofía de la educación Pedagogía Razón evaluadora |
topic |
Literatura Crítica Filosofía de la educación Pedagogía Razón evaluadora |
description |
In these pages a composition consisting of literary, philosophical and pedagogical fragments is invited, which converses (in)directly with each other. In turn, the pieces presented here are part and art of a broader philosophical-literary investigation that essay a "critique of evaluative reason" and explores its ethical-political implications in education. In this context, the proposed journey contains different critical movements that begin in their first two moments with one foot in childhood (understood in a non-chronological way) and with another foot in philosophical discussion. Subsequently, the anecdotal and the philosophical are interwoven in a reflection on a criticism of the fetishism of the notes and a celebration of the transgressive (and artistic) action of copying. In this way, we continue pointing out some problems with the word ‘request’, which is also related to extractivism about intelligence and sometimes ends up making the subject want the evaluation. In addition, go to the cinema for rethinking some consequences of formation that privileges the evaluative over the educational and an antecedent that contributes to its decolonization is contrasted. Finally, the exit takes the form of excursion through insubordination, the pedagogical strike and laziness as forms of resistance and re-existence. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-02T16:35:38Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-02T16:35:38Z |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/11726 10.17227/ppo.num24-11726 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2462-8441 2011-804X |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/14030 |
url |
https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/11726 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/14030 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17227/ppo.num24-11726 2462-8441 2011-804X |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/11726/8477 https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/11726/9500 |
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Editorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacional |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
(pensamiento), (palabra)... Y obra; Núm. 24 (2020): jul-dic |
institution |
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Pedagógica Nacional |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@pedagogica.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814445162224418816 |
spelling |
Giuliano, Facundo2021-08-02T16:35:38Z2021-08-02T16:35:38Z2020-07-01https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/1172610.17227/ppo.num24-117262462-84412011-804Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/14030In these pages a composition consisting of literary, philosophical and pedagogical fragments is invited, which converses (in)directly with each other. In turn, the pieces presented here are part and art of a broader philosophical-literary investigation that essay a "critique of evaluative reason" and explores its ethical-political implications in education. In this context, the proposed journey contains different critical movements that begin in their first two moments with one foot in childhood (understood in a non-chronological way) and with another foot in philosophical discussion. Subsequently, the anecdotal and the philosophical are interwoven in a reflection on a criticism of the fetishism of the notes and a celebration of the transgressive (and artistic) action of copying. In this way, we continue pointing out some problems with the word ‘request’, which is also related to extractivism about intelligence and sometimes ends up making the subject want the evaluation. In addition, go to the cinema for rethinking some consequences of formation that privileges the evaluative over the educational and an antecedent that contributes to its decolonization is contrasted. Finally, the exit takes the form of excursion through insubordination, the pedagogical strike and laziness as forms of resistance and re-existence.En estas páginas se convida una composición constituida por fragmentos literarios, filosóficos y pedagógicos que conversan (in)directamente entre sí. A su vez, las piezas que aquí se presentan forman parte y arte de una investigación filosófico-literaria más amplia que ensaya una “crítica de la razón evaluadora” y explora sus implicancias ético-políticas en educación. En este con-texto, la travesía propuesta contiene diferentes movimientos críticos que comienzan con un pie en la infancia (entendida de manera no cronológica) y con otro pie en la discusión filosófica. Posteriormente, se entreteje lo anecdótico con lo filosófico en una reflexión a propósito de una crítica al fetichismo de las notas y de una celebración la acción transgresora (y artística) del copiarse. Luego se prosigue señalando algunos problemas con la palabra ‘exigencia’, que también está relacionada con el extractivismo sobre la inteligencia y a veces termina haciendo que el sujeto desee la evaluación. Además, se acude al cine por repensar algunas consecuencias de la formación que privilegia lo evaluativo por sobre lo educativo y se le contrapone un antecedente que aportar a su descolonización. Finalmente, la salida toma la forma de excursión por la insumisión, la huelga pedagógica y la pereza como formas de resistencia y re-existencia.Made available in DSpace on 2021-08-02T16:35:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0Item created via OAI harvest from source: https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/oai on 2021-08-02T16:35:38Z (GMT). Item's OAI Record identifier: oai:pedagogica.edu.co-REVISTAS-UPN-CO:article/11726application/pdftext/xmlspaEditorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalhttps://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/11726/8477https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/11726/9500https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International(pensamiento), (palabra)... Y obra; Núm. 24 (2020): jul-dicLiteraturaCríticaFilosofía de la educaciónPedagogíaRazón evaluadoraFragmentos (literarios, pedagógicos, filosóficos) de una crítica de la razón evaluadora.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a8520.500.12209/14030oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/140302024-01-19 13:01:42.866Repositorio Institucional Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalrepositorio@pedagogica.edu.co |