Why study history of chemistry?
When asking for reasons why chemistry teachers should study history of chemistry, one is likely to encounter the claims that a knowledge of the great chemists of the past will allow them to humanize their subject through the use of biographical anecdotes, or will allow them to illustrate the nature...
- Autores:
-
Jensen, William B.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2011
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional UPN
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/15093
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/1084
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/15093
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
id |
RPEDAGO2_ba55e7b75c9857e7eba3641147c2c6d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/15093 |
network_acronym_str |
RPEDAGO2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional UPN |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Jensen, William B.2021-08-02T16:51:46Z2021-08-02T16:51:46Z2011-02-27https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/108410.17227/ted.num29-10842323-01262665-3184http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/15093When asking for reasons why chemistry teachers should study history of chemistry, one is likely to encounter the claims that a knowledge of the great chemists of the past will allow them to humanize their subject through the use of biographical anecdotes, or will allow them to illustrate the nature of the scientific method through a recounting of a significant event or past revolution in chemical thought, such as Lavoisier’s over-throw of the phlogiston theory of combus-tion. However, the use of biography is often subverted by the ever present demands and temptations of both patriotism and political correctness into the creation of a highly dis-torted view of who did or did not actually make truly significant contributions to the development of modern chemistry, and, alas, the history of chemistry – as modern historians of science have repeatedly remin-ded us – contains far more examples of che-mists who ignored, rather than applied, the niceties of the so-called scientific method.Made available in DSpace on 2021-08-02T16:51:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0Item created via OAI harvest from source: https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/TED/oai on 2021-08-02T16:51:46Z (GMT). Item's OAI Record identifier: oai:pedagogica.edu.co-REVISTAS-UPN-CO:article/1084application/pdfspaEditorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalhttps://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/1084/1093M. M. Pattison Muir, A History of Chemical Theories and Laws, Wiley: New York, NY, 1909, p. v. Original edition 1906.A. Ladenburg, Lectures on the History of the Development of Chemistry Since the Time of Lavoisier, Alembic Club: Edinburgh, 1900, pp. 2-3. The first German edition of this book was published in 1869.A. Ihde, “Let’s Teach History of Chemistry to Chemists,” J. Chem. Educ., 1971, 48, 686-687.W. B. Jensen, “Logic, History, and the Chemistry Textbook: I. Does Chemistry Have a Logical Structure?,” J. Chem. Educ.,1998, 75, 679-687.W. B. Jensen, “Logic, History, and the Chemistry Textbook: II. Can We Unmuddle the Chemistry Textbook?,” J. Chem. Educ.,1998, 75, 817-828.W. B. Jensen, “Logic, History, and the Chemistry Textbook: III. One Chemical Revolution or Three?,” J. Chem. Educ.,1998, 75, 661-969.W. B. Jensen, “Logic, History, and the Chemistry Textbook: A Reappraisal,” International Seminar on Chemistry, History, Philosophy and Education, 24-25 Oct., 2011, Bogotá.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 InternationalTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; Núm. 29 (2011): ene-junTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; No. 29 (2011): ene-junTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; n. 29 (2011): ene-junWhy study history of chemistry?Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a8520.500.12209/15093oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/150932024-03-12 14:29:15.17Repositorio Institucional Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalrepositorio@pedagogica.edu.co |
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Why study history of chemistry? |
title |
Why study history of chemistry? |
spellingShingle |
Why study history of chemistry? |
title_short |
Why study history of chemistry? |
title_full |
Why study history of chemistry? |
title_fullStr |
Why study history of chemistry? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why study history of chemistry? |
title_sort |
Why study history of chemistry? |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Jensen, William B. |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Jensen, William B. |
description |
When asking for reasons why chemistry teachers should study history of chemistry, one is likely to encounter the claims that a knowledge of the great chemists of the past will allow them to humanize their subject through the use of biographical anecdotes, or will allow them to illustrate the nature of the scientific method through a recounting of a significant event or past revolution in chemical thought, such as Lavoisier’s over-throw of the phlogiston theory of combus-tion. However, the use of biography is often subverted by the ever present demands and temptations of both patriotism and political correctness into the creation of a highly dis-torted view of who did or did not actually make truly significant contributions to the development of modern chemistry, and, alas, the history of chemistry – as modern historians of science have repeatedly remin-ded us – contains far more examples of che-mists who ignored, rather than applied, the niceties of the so-called scientific method. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-02-27 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-02T16:51:46Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-02T16:51:46Z |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/1084 10.17227/ted.num29-1084 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2323-0126 2665-3184 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/15093 |
url |
https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/1084 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/15093 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17227/ted.num29-1084 2323-0126 2665-3184 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/1084/1093 |
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv |
M. M. Pattison Muir, A History of Chemical Theories and Laws, Wiley: New York, NY, 1909, p. v. Original edition 1906. A. Ladenburg, Lectures on the History of the Development of Chemistry Since the Time of Lavoisier, Alembic Club: Edinburgh, 1900, pp. 2-3. The first German edition of this book was published in 1869. A. Ihde, “Let’s Teach History of Chemistry to Chemists,” J. Chem. Educ., 1971, 48, 686-687. W. B. Jensen, “Logic, History, and the Chemistry Textbook: I. Does Chemistry Have a Logical Structure?,” J. Chem. Educ.,1998, 75, 679-687. W. B. Jensen, “Logic, History, and the Chemistry Textbook: II. Can We Unmuddle the Chemistry Textbook?,” J. Chem. Educ.,1998, 75, 817-828. W. B. Jensen, “Logic, History, and the Chemistry Textbook: III. One Chemical Revolution or Three?,” J. Chem. Educ.,1998, 75, 661-969. W. B. Jensen, “Logic, History, and the Chemistry Textbook: A Reappraisal,” International Seminar on Chemistry, History, Philosophy and Education, 24-25 Oct., 2011, Bogotá. |
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Editorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacional |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; Núm. 29 (2011): ene-jun Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; No. 29 (2011): ene-jun Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; n. 29 (2011): ene-jun |
institution |
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Pedagógica Nacional |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@pedagogica.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814445168375365632 |