El principio de proporcionalidad y razonabilidad como límite constitucional de poder al Estado: un estudio comparado

The analysis of the constitutional validity of a rule cannot be limited to a mere compliance of the adjective or procedural due process requirements; it is also necessary a substantive due process analysis of reasonableness on the actual content of the rule: its means and purposes, and its respect f...

Full description

Autores:
Sapag, Mariano
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2008
Institución:
Universidad de la Sabana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/13512
Acceso en línea:
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1401
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1401/1538
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13512
Palabra clave:
Control de constitucionalidad
Principio de proporcionalidad
Razonabilidad
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:The analysis of the constitutional validity of a rule cannot be limited to a mere compliance of the adjective or procedural due process requirements; it is also necessary a substantive due process analysis of reasonableness on the actual content of the rule: its means and purposes, and its respect for the constitutional and fundamental rights and freedoms. This work aims to outline the main aspects of the reasonableness principle, which is known as well as the principle of proportionality or as the substantive due process, and the guidelines and rules for a proper implementation. The principle is approached in this work by a comparative study of its performance in the United States legal system, Europe and Argentina. Moreover, the reasonableness maxim cannot be analyzed without reference to the question of the interpretation of fundamental rights. For this reason, this topic is reviewed, also, from the perspective of the jurisprudence and the constitutional doctrine in the different legal systems.