Cutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

8 páginas

Autores:
Ángel, Fernández Flores
Catherine M., Nguyen
Cassarino, David Samuel
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad de la Sabana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/34928
Acceso en línea:
https://journals.lww.com/amjdermatopathology/Fulltext/2016/09000/Cutaneous_PEComas_Express_CD10___Implications_for.1.aspx
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/34928
Palabra clave:
PEComa
CD10
malignant PEComa
Cutaneous metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Rights
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
id REPOUSABA2_cefd684fea08d48536b68f6d07fc51da
oai_identifier_str oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/34928
network_acronym_str REPOUSABA2
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
repository_id_str
spelling Ángel, Fernández FloresCatherine M., NguyenCassarino, David Samuel2/11/2019 9:192019-02-11T14:19:27Z2016-090193-1091https://journals.lww.com/amjdermatopathology/Fulltext/2016/09000/Cutaneous_PEComas_Express_CD10___Implications_for.1.aspxhttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/349288 páginasCutaneous perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are peculiar, rare mesenchymal tumors of uncertain lineage. They show a characteristic epithelioid morphology, and they are usually composed of monomorphous clear-to-granular appearing perivascular cells. One of the main differential diagnoses with PEComas is a cutaneous metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). CD10 has been emphasized to be a crucial marker in the diagnosis of metastasis from RCC. Although visceral PEComas have been studied for CD10 expression, primary cutaneous PEComas have not. Although it could be assumed a priori that cutaneous PEComas would stain as their visceral counterpart, there is increasing evidence that cutaneous PEComas could actually be unrelated to PEComas from other organs. In this report, the author's studied three primary cutaneous PEComas, and included CD10 in our immunohistochemical studies. All three PEComas expressed the marker. They conclude that a CD10+ clear-cell dermal tumor is not necessarily equivalent to a metastasis from RCC and that additional stains should be added to rule out PEComa, even if the biopsy or the panel of antibodies is limited.application/pdfengThe American Journal of DermatopathologyAm J Dermatopathol 2016;38:645–652Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Universidad de La SabanaIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La SabanaPEComaCD10malignant PEComaCutaneous metastatic renal cell carcinomaCutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaarticlepublishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/34928/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8498https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/34928/3/license.txtf52a2cfd4df262e08e9b300d62c85cabMD5310818/34928oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/349282022-05-10 05:17:44.314Intellectum Universidad de la Sabanacontactointellectum@unisabana.edu.coPGEgcmVsPSJsaWNlbnNlIiBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vY3JlYXRpdmVjb21tb25zLm9yZy9saWNlbnNlcy9ieS1uYy1uZC8zLjAvIj48aW1nIGFsdD0iTGljZW5jaWEgQ3JlYXRpdmUgQ29tbW9ucyIgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlci13aWR0aDowIiBzcmM9Imh0dHA6Ly9pLmNyZWF0aXZlY29tbW9ucy5vcmcvbC9ieS1uYy1uZC8zLjAvODh4MzEucG5nIiAvPjwvYT48YnIgLz5Fc3RlIDxzcGFuIHhtbG5zOmRjdD0iaHR0cDovL3B1cmwub3JnL2RjL3Rlcm1zLyIgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3B1cmwub3JnL2RjL2RjbWl0eXBlL1RleHQiIHJlbD0iZGN0OnR5cGUiPm9icmE8L3NwYW4+IGVzdMOhIGJham8gdW5hIDxhIHJlbD0ibGljZW5zZSIgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL2NyZWF0aXZlY29tbW9ucy5vcmcvbGljZW5zZXMvYnktbmMtbmQvMy4wLyI+bGljZW5jaWEgQ3JlYXRpdmUgQ29tbW9ucyBSZWNvbm9jaW1pZW50by1Ob0NvbWVyY2lhbC1TaW5PYnJhRGVyaXZhZGEgMy4wIFVucG9ydGVkPC9hPi4K
dc.title.es_CO.fl_str_mv Cutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
title Cutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
spellingShingle Cutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
PEComa
CD10
malignant PEComa
Cutaneous metastatic renal cell carcinoma
title_short Cutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
title_full Cutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
title_fullStr Cutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Cutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
title_sort Cutaneous PEComas Express CD10: Implications for the Classification of PEComas and the Differential Diagnosis With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Ángel, Fernández Flores
Catherine M., Nguyen
Cassarino, David Samuel
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Ángel, Fernández Flores
Catherine M., Nguyen
Cassarino, David Samuel
dc.subject.es_CO.fl_str_mv PEComa
CD10
malignant PEComa
Cutaneous metastatic renal cell carcinoma
topic PEComa
CD10
malignant PEComa
Cutaneous metastatic renal cell carcinoma
description 8 páginas
publishDate 2016
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2/11/2019 9:19
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-11T14:19:27Z
dc.type.en.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.hasVersion.es_CO.fl_str_mv publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0193-1091
dc.identifier.other.none.fl_str_mv https://journals.lww.com/amjdermatopathology/Fulltext/2016/09000/Cutaneous_PEComas_Express_CD10___Implications_for.1.aspx
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10818/34928
identifier_str_mv 0193-1091
url https://journals.lww.com/amjdermatopathology/Fulltext/2016/09000/Cutaneous_PEComas_Express_CD10___Implications_for.1.aspx
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/34928
dc.language.iso.es_CO.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv Am J Dermatopathol 2016;38:645–652
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.es_CO.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es_CO.fl_str_mv The American Journal of Dermatopathology
dc.source.es_CO.fl_str_mv Universidad de La Sabana
Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
institution Universidad de la Sabana
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/34928/2/license_rdf
https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/34928/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
f52a2cfd4df262e08e9b300d62c85cab
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Intellectum Universidad de la Sabana
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contactointellectum@unisabana.edu.co
_version_ 1811952275097124864