Modernidad y falacia naturalista

The importance of the socalled “naturalistic fallacy” in the juridical philosophy of the past two centuries is almost indisputable, not only due to how frequently it is used as an irrefutable argument but also because of the centrality that the defense of its validity has in positivist thought1 . The following pages contain a brief examination of one of the edges on which this argument was built, the epistemological one, followed by its analysis and a description of the answers given from jusnaturalism. The intention here is revealing and highlighting the existing connection between the fallacy argument and juridical modernity.

• Autores: Cianciardo, Juan
• Fecha de publicación: 2004
• Institución: Universidad de la Sabana
• Repositorio: Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
• Idioma: spa
• OAI Identifier: oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/13413
• Acceso en línea: http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1300; http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1300/1442; http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13413
• Palabra clave: Falacia naturalista; Modernidad jurídica; Razón; Derecho natural.
• License: http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2