Estado es a individuo como tutor a pupilo: Posibilidades y límites de la soberanía popular en Colombia a la luz de la institución de la tutela del Derecho romano

Based on a linguistic retrospective, one can argue that the guardianship (tutela) action has its origins in Roman private law. Guardianship comes from the Latin tutelae, term used in Roman law to encapsulate the relationship between pupil and tutor. This origin is based not only in a textual resembl...

Full description

Autores:
López Cuéllar, Nelcy
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad de la Sabana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/13540
Acceso en línea:
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1707
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1707/2205
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1707/2234
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13540
Palabra clave:
Acción de tutela
Derecho privado romano
Estado-tutor
Soberanía popular
Análisis retórico del derecho
Voluntarismo
Contrato social
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:Based on a linguistic retrospective, one can argue that the guardianship (tutela) action has its origins in Roman private law. Guardianship comes from the Latin tutelae, term used in Roman law to encapsulate the relationship between pupil and tutor. This origin is based not only in a textual resemblance, but also in the Roman law origins of the Mexican juicio de amparo in which the guardianship (tutela) action is inspired. This origin has consequences in the way individuals interact with the State. Since 1991, being the guardianship (tutela) action at the heart of the Constitutional Constitution, it is possible to draw the following analogy: State is to individual as tutor is to pupil. Thus, the State has the duty of proper administration of the individuals’ patrimony. This administration, however, is based on the individuals’ inability to develop this task—in opposition to what happens under the figure of the social contract. Therefore, participatory democracy seems illusory.