Sobre el iuspositivismo que hemos de dejar atrás. Una crítica iusnaturalista a “Dejemos atrás el positivismo jurídico” de Atienza y de Ruiz Manero
Through the confrontation of Atienza's and Ruiz Manero's thesis proposed in the article called "Lets leave legal positivism behind" (Dejemos atrás el positivismo jurídico) the author seeks to prove by answering the following questions: what kind of positivism should be leave behi...
- Autores:
-
Chávez-Fernández, José
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2011
- Institución:
- Universidad de la Sabana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/13559
- Acceso en línea:
- http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1947
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1947/2492
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1947/2501
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13559
- Palabra clave:
- Atienza y Ruiz Manero
Pospositivismo
Iusnaturalismo
Iuspositivismo
pragmático-constructivismo
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Summary: | Through the confrontation of Atienza's and Ruiz Manero's thesis proposed in the article called "Lets leave legal positivism behind" (Dejemos atrás el positivismo jurídico) the author seeks to prove by answering the following questions: what kind of positivism should be leave behind? Why? and how?that there are weaknesses in iuspositivism to explain the legal reality. This weaknesses are more clear in iuspositivim's ethical skepticism and as it denies the existence of an anthropological metaphysical natural law. On the other hand the author shows how those weaknesses are also common in constructivism's attempts to overcome iuspositivism so at the end neither of those conceptual schemes are able to explain Human Rights as more than just an inexcusable ethical legal debts based in the ontological dignity of all human beings. |
---|