La resistencia a la constitucionalización del Derecho administrativo en Colombia: el Consejo de Estado y el caso de los actos discrecionales que ordenan el retiro

The purpose of this article is to analyze the intensity of the constitutionalization in Colombian administrative law, especially in discretionary administrative acts, that command the retirement of members of the Military Forces, Police, Administrative Department of Security (DAS) and Penitentiary N...

Full description

Autores:
Benítez Rojas, Vicente Fabián
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad de la Sabana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/13539
Acceso en línea:
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1704
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1704/2202
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1704/2230
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13539
Palabra clave:
Constitucionalización del ordenamiento jurídico
Actos administrativos discrecionales
Inseguridad jurídica
Debido proceso
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:The purpose of this article is to analyze the intensity of the constitutionalization in Colombian administrative law, especially in discretionary administrative acts, that command the retirement of members of the Military Forces, Police, Administrative Department of Security (DAS) and Penitentiary National Institute of Colombia (INPEC). In order to achieve said purpose, the author compares –through dynamic and static analysis of case lawthe readings made by the Council of State and the Constitutional Court, and concludes that the position of the latter is the most legally convenient and the most efficient when it comes to the administration of public resources, therefore, it must be accepted by the Council of State. The convenience analysis uses as reference points 1) some constitutional principles; 2) the Constitutional State; 3) the national and foreign administrative doctrine; and 4) some InterAmerican Court of Human Rights rulings.