Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators

12 páginas

Autores:: Tantacharoenrat, Chanita
Prasopkittikun, Tassanee
Rungamornrat, Somsiri
Limprayoon, Kawewan

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2018

Institución:: Universidad de la Sabana

Repositorio:: Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana

Idioma:: eng

id	REPOUSABA2_61c890702f509e0ed7cf33f0e7d7d16a
oai_identifier_str	oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/34303
network_acronym_str	REPOUSABA2
network_name_str	Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
repository_id_str
dc.title.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators
dc.title.alternative.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Uso de una aplicación user-friendly para tableta en la comunicación con pacientes pediátricos sometidos a respirador artificial Uso de um aplicativo para tablet fácil de usar para comunicação com pacientes pediátricos em ventilação mecânica
title	Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators
spellingShingle	Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators Comunicación Enfermería pediátrica Satisfacción personal Aplicaciones para tableta Respiradores
title_short	Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators
title_full	Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators
title_fullStr	Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators
title_full_unstemmed	Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators
title_sort	Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Tantacharoenrat, Chanita Prasopkittikun, Tassanee Rungamornrat, Somsiri Limprayoon, Kawewan
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Tantacharoenrat, Chanita Prasopkittikun, Tassanee Rungamornrat, Somsiri Limprayoon, Kawewan
dc.subject.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Comunicación Enfermería pediátrica Satisfacción personal Aplicaciones para tableta Respiradores
topic	Comunicación Enfermería pediátrica Satisfacción personal Aplicaciones para tableta Respiradores
description	12 páginas
publishDate	2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2018-10-30T20:52:19Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2018-10-30T20:52:19Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2018
dc.type.es_CO.fl_str_mv	article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.hasVersion.es_CO.fl_str_mv	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Tantacharoenrat C, Prasopkittikun T, Rungamornrat S, Limprayoon K. Use of a User-Friendly Tablet Application to Communicate with Pediatric Patients on Mechanical Ventilators. Aquichan. 2018; 18(3): 275-286. doi: 10.5294/aqui.2018.18.3.3
dc.identifier.citation.none.fl_str_mv	Costello JM, Patak L, Pritchard J. Communication vulnerable patients in the pediatric ICU: Enhancing care through augmentative and alternative communication. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010;3(4):289-301. doi: 10.3233/PRM-2010-0140. Flinterud SI, Andershed B. Transitions in the communication experiences of tracheostomised patients in intensive care: A qualitative descriptive study. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(15-16):2295-304. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12826. Carruthers H, Astin F, Munro W. Which alternative communication methods are effective for voiceless patients in Inten-sive Care Units? A systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017;42(15-16):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.03.003 The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association [Internet]. Rockville: The Association; c1997-2018 [cited 2018 Apr 27]. Augmentative and alternative communication; Available from: https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589942773 Tembo AC, Higgins I, Parker V. The experience of communication difficulties in critically ill patients in and beyond intensive care: Findings from a larger phenomenological study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015;31(3):171-78. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.10.004 Leung CCH, Pun J. Lock G, Slade D, Gomersall CD, Wong WT, Joynt GM. Exploring the scopre of communication content of mechnically ventilated patients. J Crit Care. 2018;44:136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.044 Prime D, Arkless P, Fine J, Winter S, Wakefield DB, Scatena R. Patient experiences during awake mechanical ventilation. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2016;6(1):1-6. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v6.30426 Holm A, Dreyer P. Nurse-patient communication within the context of non-sedated mechanical ventilation: A herme-neutic-phenomenological study. Nurs Crit Care. 2018;23(2):88-94. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12297 Frivold G, Slettebo A, Dale B. Family members’ lived experiences of everyday life after intensive care treatment of a loved one: A phenomenological hermeneutical study. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(3-4):392-402. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13059 Chun-ui P, Thaniwattananon P, Petpichetchian W. Effects of communication card on received care based on needs and perceived communication frustration in endotracheal intubated patients. J of Nurs Sci & Health. 2010;33(3):1-11. Thai Toprasert T. Comparison of two comminication methods towards responded problems, needs and satisfaction in commu-nication of the patients with oroendotracheal tube [Master’s Thesis]. Bangkok, Thailand: Mahidol University; 2006. Thai. El-Soussi AH, Elshafey MM, Othman SY, Abd-Elkader FA. Augmented alternative communication methods in intubated COPD patients: Does it make difference. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2015;64(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2014.07.006 Otuzoglu M, Karahan A. Determining the effectiveness of illustrated communication material for communication with intubated patients at an intensive care unit. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20(5):490-8. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12190 Intaboonma S, Picheansathian W, Yenbut J. Effects of electronic communication device utilization on the satisfaction of intubated pediatric patients and nurses. Nursing Journal. 2007;34(1):41-51. Thai Happ MB, Roesch TK, Garrett K. Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: A feasibility study. Heart Lung. 2004;33(2):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2003.12.005 Pukkaeraka W, Wongpiriyayothar A, Wongpanarak N. The effects of communication with handheld computer on sa-tisfaction in communication among endotracheal intubation patients. Nurses’ Association of Thailand, North-Eastern division. 2013;31(2):72-9. Thai Ten Hoorn S, Elbers PW, Girbes AR, Tuinman PR. Communicating with conscious and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):1-14. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1483-2. Vilstrup DL, Madsen EE, Hansen CF, Wind G. Nurses’ use of iPads in home care-what does it mean to patients?: A quali-tative study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2017;35(3):140-4. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000304. Blackstone S, Pressman H. Effective communication in children’s hospitals: A handbook of resources for parents, pa-tients, and practitioners 2011 [updated 23 Mar 2018]. Available from: http://www.patientprovidercommunication.org/article_25.htm Mcquail D, Windahl S. Communication models for the study of mass communications. New York: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://books.google.co.th/books?id=hLpACwAAQBAJ. Happ MB, Garrett KL, Tate JA, DiVirgilio D, Houze MP, Demirci JR, et al. Effect of a multi-level intervention on nurse-pa-tient communication in the intensive care unit: Results of the SPEACS trial. Heart Lung. 2014;43:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.010 Bumpers B, Dearmon V, Dycus P. Impacting the patient’s experience in a children’s hospital using a comminication bundle strategy. J Nurs Care Qual. 2018;Jun 8. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000336. [Epub ahead of print] Aldekhyyel RN,Melton GB,Hultman G,Pitt MB. Using a bedside interactive technology to solicit and record pediatric pain re-assessments: Parent and nursing perspectives on a novel workflow. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc.2018;May18:300-309. Baumgarten M, Poulsen I. Patients’ experiences of being mechanically ventilated in an ICU: A qualitative metasynthesis. Scand J Caring Sci.2015 Jun;29(2):205-14. doi: 10.1111/scs.12177. Saeed AM, Galal IH, Shata AK. Evaluation of the psychological status of patients during and after weaning from mecha-nical ventilation. Egypt J Bronchol. 2014;8:160-6. doi: 10.4103/1687-8426.145718. Engstrom A, Nystrom N, Sundelin G, Rattray J. People’s experiences of being mechnically ventilated in an ICU: A quali-tative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013;29(2):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.07.003.
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	1657-5997
dc.identifier.other.none.fl_str_mv	http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/9197 http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/9197/4850
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/10818/34303
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.5294/aqui.2018.18.3.3
identifier_str_mv	Tantacharoenrat C, Prasopkittikun T, Rungamornrat S, Limprayoon K. Use of a User-Friendly Tablet Application to Communicate with Pediatric Patients on Mechanical Ventilators. Aquichan. 2018; 18(3): 275-286. doi: 10.5294/aqui.2018.18.3.3 Costello JM, Patak L, Pritchard J. Communication vulnerable patients in the pediatric ICU: Enhancing care through augmentative and alternative communication. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010;3(4):289-301. doi: 10.3233/PRM-2010-0140. Flinterud SI, Andershed B. Transitions in the communication experiences of tracheostomised patients in intensive care: A qualitative descriptive study. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(15-16):2295-304. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12826. Carruthers H, Astin F, Munro W. Which alternative communication methods are effective for voiceless patients in Inten-sive Care Units? A systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017;42(15-16):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.03.003 The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association [Internet]. Rockville: The Association; c1997-2018 [cited 2018 Apr 27]. Augmentative and alternative communication; Available from: https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589942773 Tembo AC, Higgins I, Parker V. The experience of communication difficulties in critically ill patients in and beyond intensive care: Findings from a larger phenomenological study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015;31(3):171-78. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.10.004 Leung CCH, Pun J. Lock G, Slade D, Gomersall CD, Wong WT, Joynt GM. Exploring the scopre of communication content of mechnically ventilated patients. J Crit Care. 2018;44:136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.044 Prime D, Arkless P, Fine J, Winter S, Wakefield DB, Scatena R. Patient experiences during awake mechanical ventilation. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2016;6(1):1-6. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v6.30426 Holm A, Dreyer P. Nurse-patient communication within the context of non-sedated mechanical ventilation: A herme-neutic-phenomenological study. Nurs Crit Care. 2018;23(2):88-94. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12297 Frivold G, Slettebo A, Dale B. Family members’ lived experiences of everyday life after intensive care treatment of a loved one: A phenomenological hermeneutical study. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(3-4):392-402. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13059 Chun-ui P, Thaniwattananon P, Petpichetchian W. Effects of communication card on received care based on needs and perceived communication frustration in endotracheal intubated patients. J of Nurs Sci & Health. 2010;33(3):1-11. Thai Toprasert T. Comparison of two comminication methods towards responded problems, needs and satisfaction in commu-nication of the patients with oroendotracheal tube [Master’s Thesis]. Bangkok, Thailand: Mahidol University; 2006. Thai. El-Soussi AH, Elshafey MM, Othman SY, Abd-Elkader FA. Augmented alternative communication methods in intubated COPD patients: Does it make difference. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2015;64(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2014.07.006 Otuzoglu M, Karahan A. Determining the effectiveness of illustrated communication material for communication with intubated patients at an intensive care unit. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20(5):490-8. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12190 Intaboonma S, Picheansathian W, Yenbut J. Effects of electronic communication device utilization on the satisfaction of intubated pediatric patients and nurses. Nursing Journal. 2007;34(1):41-51. Thai Happ MB, Roesch TK, Garrett K. Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: A feasibility study. Heart Lung. 2004;33(2):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2003.12.005 Pukkaeraka W, Wongpiriyayothar A, Wongpanarak N. The effects of communication with handheld computer on sa-tisfaction in communication among endotracheal intubation patients. Nurses’ Association of Thailand, North-Eastern division. 2013;31(2):72-9. Thai Ten Hoorn S, Elbers PW, Girbes AR, Tuinman PR. Communicating with conscious and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):1-14. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1483-2. Vilstrup DL, Madsen EE, Hansen CF, Wind G. Nurses’ use of iPads in home care-what does it mean to patients?: A quali-tative study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2017;35(3):140-4. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000304. Blackstone S, Pressman H. Effective communication in children’s hospitals: A handbook of resources for parents, pa-tients, and practitioners 2011 [updated 23 Mar 2018]. Available from: http://www.patientprovidercommunication.org/article_25.htm Mcquail D, Windahl S. Communication models for the study of mass communications. New York: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://books.google.co.th/books?id=hLpACwAAQBAJ. Happ MB, Garrett KL, Tate JA, DiVirgilio D, Houze MP, Demirci JR, et al. Effect of a multi-level intervention on nurse-pa-tient communication in the intensive care unit: Results of the SPEACS trial. Heart Lung. 2014;43:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.010 Bumpers B, Dearmon V, Dycus P. Impacting the patient’s experience in a children’s hospital using a comminication bundle strategy. J Nurs Care Qual. 2018;Jun 8. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000336. [Epub ahead of print] Aldekhyyel RN,Melton GB,Hultman G,Pitt MB. Using a bedside interactive technology to solicit and record pediatric pain re-assessments: Parent and nursing perspectives on a novel workflow. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc.2018;May18:300-309. Baumgarten M, Poulsen I. Patients’ experiences of being mechanically ventilated in an ICU: A qualitative metasynthesis. Scand J Caring Sci.2015 Jun;29(2):205-14. doi: 10.1111/scs.12177. Saeed AM, Galal IH, Shata AK. Evaluation of the psychological status of patients during and after weaning from mecha-nical ventilation. Egypt J Bronchol. 2014;8:160-6. doi: 10.4103/1687-8426.145718. Engstrom A, Nystrom N, Sundelin G, Rattray J. People’s experiences of being mechnically ventilated in an ICU: A quali-tative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013;29(2):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.07.003. 1657-5997 10.5294/aqui.2018.18.3.3
url	http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/9197 http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/9197/4850 http://hdl.handle.net/10818/34303
dc.language.iso.es_CO.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv	Aquichan Vol. 18, Núm. 3 (2018) p. 275-286
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.es_CO.fl_str_mv	text/plain
dc.coverage.spatial.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Colombia
dc.publisher.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Universidad de La Sabana
dc.publisher.department.none.fl_str_mv	Dirección de Publicaciones
dc.source.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Universidad de La Sabana Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
institution	Universidad de la Sabana
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/34303/2/license_rdf https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/34303/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	7c9ab7f006165862d8ce9ac5eac01552 f52a2cfd4df262e08e9b300d62c85cab
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Intellectum Universidad de la Sabana
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	contactointellectum@unisabana.edu.co
_version_	1811952264540061696
spelling	Tantacharoenrat, ChanitaPrasopkittikun, TassaneeRungamornrat, SomsiriLimprayoon, KawewanColombia2018-10-30T20:52:19Z2018-10-30T20:52:19Z2018Tantacharoenrat C, Prasopkittikun T, Rungamornrat S, Limprayoon K. Use of a User-Friendly Tablet Application to Communicate with Pediatric Patients on Mechanical Ventilators. Aquichan. 2018; 18(3): 275-286. doi: 10.5294/aqui.2018.18.3.3Costello JM, Patak L, Pritchard J. Communication vulnerable patients in the pediatric ICU: Enhancing care through augmentative and alternative communication. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010;3(4):289-301. doi: 10.3233/PRM-2010-0140.Flinterud SI, Andershed B. Transitions in the communication experiences of tracheostomised patients in intensive care: A qualitative descriptive study. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(15-16):2295-304. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12826.Carruthers H, Astin F, Munro W. Which alternative communication methods are effective for voiceless patients in Inten-sive Care Units? A systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017;42(15-16):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.03.003The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association [Internet]. Rockville: The Association; c1997-2018 [cited 2018 Apr 27]. Augmentative and alternative communication; Available from: https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589942773Tembo AC, Higgins I, Parker V. The experience of communication difficulties in critically ill patients in and beyond intensive care: Findings from a larger phenomenological study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015;31(3):171-78. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.10.004Leung CCH, Pun J. Lock G, Slade D, Gomersall CD, Wong WT, Joynt GM. Exploring the scopre of communication content of mechnically ventilated patients. J Crit Care. 2018;44:136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.044Prime D, Arkless P, Fine J, Winter S, Wakefield DB, Scatena R. Patient experiences during awake mechanical ventilation. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2016;6(1):1-6. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v6.30426Holm A, Dreyer P. Nurse-patient communication within the context of non-sedated mechanical ventilation: A herme-neutic-phenomenological study. Nurs Crit Care. 2018;23(2):88-94. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12297Frivold G, Slettebo A, Dale B. Family members’ lived experiences of everyday life after intensive care treatment of a loved one: A phenomenological hermeneutical study. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(3-4):392-402. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13059Chun-ui P, Thaniwattananon P, Petpichetchian W. Effects of communication card on received care based on needs and perceived communication frustration in endotracheal intubated patients. J of Nurs Sci & Health. 2010;33(3):1-11. ThaiToprasert T. Comparison of two comminication methods towards responded problems, needs and satisfaction in commu-nication of the patients with oroendotracheal tube [Master’s Thesis]. Bangkok, Thailand: Mahidol University; 2006. Thai.El-Soussi AH, Elshafey MM, Othman SY, Abd-Elkader FA. Augmented alternative communication methods in intubated COPD patients: Does it make difference. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2015;64(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2014.07.006Otuzoglu M, Karahan A. Determining the effectiveness of illustrated communication material for communication with intubated patients at an intensive care unit. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20(5):490-8. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12190Intaboonma S, Picheansathian W, Yenbut J. Effects of electronic communication device utilization on the satisfaction of intubated pediatric patients and nurses. Nursing Journal. 2007;34(1):41-51. ThaiHapp MB, Roesch TK, Garrett K. Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: A feasibility study. Heart Lung. 2004;33(2):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2003.12.005Pukkaeraka W, Wongpiriyayothar A, Wongpanarak N. The effects of communication with handheld computer on sa-tisfaction in communication among endotracheal intubation patients. Nurses’ Association of Thailand, North-Eastern division. 2013;31(2):72-9. ThaiTen Hoorn S, Elbers PW, Girbes AR, Tuinman PR. Communicating with conscious and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):1-14. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1483-2.Vilstrup DL, Madsen EE, Hansen CF, Wind G. Nurses’ use of iPads in home care-what does it mean to patients?: A quali-tative study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2017;35(3):140-4. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000304.Blackstone S, Pressman H. Effective communication in children’s hospitals: A handbook of resources for parents, pa-tients, and practitioners 2011 [updated 23 Mar 2018]. Available from: http://www.patientprovidercommunication.org/article_25.htmMcquail D, Windahl S. Communication models for the study of mass communications. New York: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://books.google.co.th/books?id=hLpACwAAQBAJ.Happ MB, Garrett KL, Tate JA, DiVirgilio D, Houze MP, Demirci JR, et al. Effect of a multi-level intervention on nurse-pa-tient communication in the intensive care unit: Results of the SPEACS trial. Heart Lung. 2014;43:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.010Bumpers B, Dearmon V, Dycus P. Impacting the patient’s experience in a children’s hospital using a comminication bundle strategy. J Nurs Care Qual. 2018;Jun 8. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000336. [Epub ahead of print]Aldekhyyel RN,Melton GB,Hultman G,Pitt MB. Using a bedside interactive technology to solicit and record pediatric pain re-assessments: Parent and nursing perspectives on a novel workflow. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc.2018;May18:300-309.Baumgarten M, Poulsen I. Patients’ experiences of being mechanically ventilated in an ICU: A qualitative metasynthesis. Scand J Caring Sci.2015 Jun;29(2):205-14. doi: 10.1111/scs.12177.Saeed AM, Galal IH, Shata AK. Evaluation of the psychological status of patients during and after weaning from mecha-nical ventilation. Egypt J Bronchol. 2014;8:160-6. doi: 10.4103/1687-8426.145718.Engstrom A, Nystrom N, Sundelin G, Rattray J. People’s experiences of being mechnically ventilated in an ICU: A quali-tative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013;29(2):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.07.003.1657-5997http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/9197http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/9197/4850http://hdl.handle.net/10818/3430310.5294/aqui.2018.18.3.312 páginasObjetivos: examinar cómo el uso de una aplicación para tableta como ayuda en la comunicación con pacientes pediátricos con respirador artificial afecta el nivel de satisfacción con la comunicación por parte del personal de enfermería y en las díadas cuidador–paciente. Materiales y método: se utilizó el diseño pretest-postest de un solo grupo para analizar el nivel de satisfacción del personal de enfermería con la comunicación y se utilizó un diseño de grupo de control pretest-postest no equivalente para los cuidadores. La muestra estaba conformada por 44 miembros del personal de enfermería y 18 díadas de cuidadores y pacientes pediátricos con ventilación de dos hospitales en Tailandia. Se utilizó una prueba de T pareada para comparar al personal de enfermería, la prueba U de Mann-Whitney para comparar los cuidadores y una estadística descriptiva para describir la satisfacción de los niños. Resultados: el personal de enfermería se sintió más satisfecho con la comunicación al usar la aplicación de la tableta que los métodos de comunicación regulares (t = -9,13, df = 43, p < ,001). Los cuidadores que usaron la aplicación para tableta también reportaron una mayor satisfacción con la comunicación respecto a aquellos que usaron los métodos de comunicación regulares (U = -3,41, p < ,001). Casi el 90 % de los pacientes pediátricos reportaron sentirse completamente satisfechos con el uso de la aplicación. Conclusiones: la aplicación para tableta diseñada para facilitar la comunicación con pacientes pediátricos con respirador artificial mejoró los niveles de satisfacción con la comunicación y debe promoverse como uno de los dispositivos de comunicación de asistencia para uso amplio.text/plainengUniversidad de La SabanaDirección de PublicacionesAquichan Vol. 18, Núm. 3 (2018) p. 275-286Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Universidad de La SabanaIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La SabanaComunicaciónEnfermería pediátricaSatisfacción personalAplicaciones para tabletaRespiradoresUse of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilatorsUso de una aplicación user-friendly para tableta en la comunicación con pacientes pediátricos sometidos a respirador artificialUso de um aplicativo para tablet fácil de usar para comunicação com pacientes pediátricos em ventilação mecânicaarticlepublishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81223https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/34303/2/license_rdf7c9ab7f006165862d8ce9ac5eac01552MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8498https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/34303/3/license.txtf52a2cfd4df262e08e9b300d62c85cabMD5310818/34303oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/343032018-12-13 15:58:50.934Intellectum Universidad de la Sabanacontactointellectum@unisabana.edu.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

Use of a user-friendly tablet application to communicate with pediatric patients on mechanical ventilators

Publicaciones similares