Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution

34 páginas

Autores:: Dias, Patrícia
Serrano Puche, Javier

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2020

Institución:: Universidad de la Sabana

Repositorio:: Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana

Idioma:: eng

id	REPOUSABA2_5a0821611a9858758fff98ed47dc6bcb
oai_identifier_str	oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/38957
network_acronym_str	REPOUSABA2
network_name_str	Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
repository_id_str
dc.title.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution
dc.title.alternative.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Necesidades múltiples para pantallas múltiples: prácticas, motivaciones y distribución de atención Necessidades múltiplas para telas múltiplas: práticas, motivações e distribuição de atenção
title	Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution
spellingShingle	Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution Televisión Teléfono móvil Teléfono inteligente Multi-screening Análisis cualitativo
title_short	Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution
title_full	Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution
title_fullStr	Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution
title_full_unstemmed	Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution
title_sort	Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Dias, Patrícia Serrano Puche, Javier
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Dias, Patrícia Serrano Puche, Javier
dc.subject.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Televisión Teléfono móvil Teléfono inteligente Multi-screening Análisis cualitativo
topic	Televisión Teléfono móvil Teléfono inteligente Multi-screening Análisis cualitativo
description	34 páginas
publishDate	2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2020-01-21T21:02:23Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2020-01-21T21:02:23Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2020
dc.type.es_CO.fl_str_mv	article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.hasVersion.es_CO.fl_str_mv	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Dias, P. & Serrano-Puche, J. (2020). Multi-needs for multi-screening: Practices, motivations and attention distribution. Palabra Clave, 23(1), e2312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.2
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0122-8285
dc.identifier.other.none.fl_str_mv	https://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/9207 https://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/9207/pdf
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/10818/38957
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.2
identifier_str_mv	Dias, P. & Serrano-Puche, J. (2020). Multi-needs for multi-screening: Practices, motivations and attention distribution. Palabra Clave, 23(1), e2312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.2 0122-8285
url	https://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/9207 https://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/9207/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10818/38957 https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.2
dc.language.iso.es_CO.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv	Palabra Clave, 23(1), e2312
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.es_CO.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.es_CO.fl_str_mv	Universidad de La Sabana
dc.publisher.department.none.fl_str_mv	Dirección de Publicaciones
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de La Sabana Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
institution	Universidad de la Sabana
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/38957/3/license.txt https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/38957/2/license_rdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	f52a2cfd4df262e08e9b300d62c85cab 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Intellectum Universidad de la Sabana
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	contactointellectum@unisabana.edu.co
_version_	1811952275122290688
spelling	Dias, PatríciaSerrano Puche, Javier2020-01-21T21:02:23Z2020-01-21T21:02:23Z2020Dias, P. & Serrano-Puche, J. (2020). Multi-needs for multi-screening: Practices, motivations and attention distribution. Palabra Clave, 23(1), e2312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.20122-8285https://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/9207https://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/9207/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/38957https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.234 páginasEl multi-screening o “pantallas múltiples” es una práctica emergente pero de crecimiento y cambio rápidos que evoluciona junto con las tecnologías que la median. Este artículo presenta un estudio sobre el multi-screening, en otras palabas, el uso simultaneo y secuencial de más de una pantalla. Con base en la teoría de usos y gratificaciones, nuestro estudio se centró en el escenario de multi-screening más común — el uso del teléfono inteligente junto con la televisión — para explorar los factores desencadenantes, las motivaciones, las gratificaciones y la distribución de la atención. La metodología es cualitativa e incluye revistas etnográficas y entrevistas de seguimiento a una muestra de 30 adultos jóvenes, y los datos se recopilaron en Portugal y España. Las actividades realizadas en cada dispositivo no suelen estar relacionadas y normalmente están motivadas por la necesidad de mejorar el entretenimiento que ofrece el televisor o de tener una sensación de eficiencia. La atención se distribuye en períodos alternados, y el teléfono inteligente tiene una mayor capacidad de exigir y mantener la atención.application/pdfengUniversidad de La SabanaDirección de PublicacionesPalabra Clave, 23(1), e2312Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Universidad de La SabanaIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La SabanaTelevisiónTeléfono móvilTeléfono inteligenteMulti-screeningAnálisis cualitativoMulti-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention DistributionNecesidades múltiples para pantallas múltiples: prácticas, motivaciones y distribución de atenciónNecessidades múltiplas para telas múltiplas: práticas, motivações e distribuição de atençãoarticlepublishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London, UK: Sage.Brinkman, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London, UK: Sage.Buschow, C., Schneider, B., & Ueberheide, S. (2014). Tweeting television: Exploring communication activities on Twitter while watching TV. Communications – The European Journal of Communications Research, 39(2), 129–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0009Cameron, J., & Geidner, N. (2014). Something old, something new, something borrowed from something blue: Experiments on dual ViewingTV and Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(3), 400–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.20 14.935852Chun, H., Lee, H., & Kim, D. (2012). The integrated model of smartphone adoption: Hedonic and utilitarian value perceptions of smartphones among Korean college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(9), 473–479. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0140Cooper, R., & Tang, T. (2009). Predicting audience exposure to television in today’s media environment: An empirical integration of active-audience and structural theories. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(3), 400–418. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/08838150903102204D’heer, E., Courtois, C., & Paulussen, S. (2012). Everyday life in (front of) the screen: The consumption of multiple screen technologies in the living room context. EuroITV’12. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 195–198) July 4–6, Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2325654D’heer, E., & Courtois, C. (2014). The changing dynamics of television consumption in the multimedia living room. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 22(1), 3–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514543451D’heer, E., & Verdegem, P. (2015). What social media data mean for audience studies: A multi-dimensional investigation of Twitter use during a current affairs TV programme. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 221–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1369118X.2014.952318Dias, P. (2016). Motivations for multi-screening: An exploratory study on motivations and gratifications. European Journal of Communication, 31(6), 678–693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116674111Dias, P. & Teixeira-Botelho, I. (2016). Multi-screening: Emergent practices, motivations and expectations. Redes.com, 13, 273–292. Retrieved from http://revista-redes.hospedagemdesites.ws/index.php/revista-redes/article/view/380Ducheneaut, N., Moore, R., & Oehlberg, L. (2008). Social TV: Designing for distributed, sociable television viewing. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(2), 136–154. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/10447310701821426Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004). Complementarity in consumption of news types across traditional and news media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(1), 41–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15506878jobem4801_3Evans, E. (2011). Transmedia television: Audiences, new media and daily life. London, UK: Routledge.Fortunati, L. (2002). The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication & Society, 5(4), 513– 528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180208538803Ferguson, D. A., & Perse, E. M. (2000). The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 155–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15506878jobem4402_1Gibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.Giglietto, F., & Selva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 260–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12085Gil de Zuñiga, H. G., Garcia-Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65, 793–815. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12174Google. (2012). The new multi-screen world: Understanding cross-platform computer behavior. Google think insights. Retrieved from https:// www.thinkwithgoogle.com/advertising-channels/mobile-marketing/the-new-multi-screen-world-study/Guerrero, E., Diego, P., & Kimber, D. (2017). Hooked on lit screens / Enganchados a las pantallas. El profesional de la información, 26(6), pp. 1108–1118. Retrieved from http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2017/nov/10.pdfHammersly, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London, UK: Routledge.Han, E., & Lee, S.W. (2014). Motivations for the complimentary use of text-based media during linear TV-viewing: An exploratory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 235–243. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.015Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908270Ho, H.Y., & Syu, L.Y. (2010). Uses and gratifications of mobile application users. Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Electronics and Information Engineering, VI, 315–319Holmes, M., Josephson, S., & Carney, R. (2012). Visual attention to TV programs with a second screen application. ETRA 2012. Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 397–400), Santa Barbara, CA.Hwang, Y., Kim, H., & Jeong, S. (2014). Why do media users multitask?: Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 542–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.040Jenkins, H. (2010). Transmedia storytelling and entertainment: An annotated syllabus. Continuum – Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 24(6), 943–958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312. 2010.510599Jensen, M. (2016). The emergence of second screen gatekeeping. Digital Journalism, 4(3), 321–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2167 0811.2015.1054408Joison, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (CHI), 26th annual SIGGCHI conference, Florence, Italy.Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Katz, J. (2006). Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication Technology. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.Katz, J., & Aakhus, M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Kim, S. J. (2014). A repertoire approach to cross-platform media use behavior. New Media & Society, 18(3), 353–372. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444814543162Kramer, N., Winter, S., Benninghoff, B., & Gallus, C. (2015). How “social” is social TV? The influence of social motives and expected outcomes on the use of social TV applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 255–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.005Lee, A. (2013). News audiences revisited: Theorizing the link between audience motivations and news consumption. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 300–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.10 80/08838151.2013.816712Lee, J., & Shin, D. (2014). The relationship between human and smart TVs based on emotion recognition in HCI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8582, 652–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-09147-1_47Levinson, P. (2004). Cellphone: The story of the world’s most mobile medium and how it has transformed everything! New York, NY: Palgrave.Lin, T. (2013). Convergence and regulation of multi-screen television: The Singapore experience. Telecommunications Policy, 37(8), 673–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.04.011Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan KaufmannLochrie, M., & Coulton, P. (2012). Sharing the viewing experience through second screens. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 199–202). Berlin, Germany.Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., Grabe, M. E., & Reich, R. D. (1997). The role of screen size in viewer responses to television fare. Communication Reports, 10, 95–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219709367663Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. London, UK: Sage.McCreery, S. P., & Krugman, D. M. (2015). TV and the iPad: How the tablet is redefining the way we watch. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(4), 620–639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0 8838151.2015.1093483McNiven, M. D., Krugman, D., & Tinkham, S. F. (2012). The big picture for large-screen television viewing. Journal of Advertising Research, 52, 421–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-52-4-421-432Microsoft. (2013). Connected experiences, cross-screen engagement: Multiscreen pathways reveal new opportunities for marketers to reach and engage consumers. Retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/en/ document/read/17349623/cross-screen-engagement-research-report-microsoft-advertisingNandakumar, A. & Murray, J. (2014). Companion apps for long arc TV series: supporting new viewers in complex storyworlds with tightly synchronized context-sensitive annotations, TVX’14 – Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (pp. 3–10).Norman, D. (1999). Affordance, conventions and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168Nielsen (2015). Screen wars: The battle for eye space in a TV-everywhere world. Newswire Nielsen. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen. com/us/en/insights/report/2015/screen-wars-the-battle-foreye-space-in-a-tv-everywhere-world/Phalen, P. F., & Ducey, R. V. (2012). Audience behavior in the multi-screen “video-verse”. International Journal on Media Management, 14(2), 141–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2012.657811Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging. Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 30(5), 350–361. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/0270467610380009Ragin, C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Reeves, B., Lang, A., Kim, E. Y., & Tatar, D. (1999). The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology, 1, 49–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_4Rossi, L., & Giglietto, F., (2016). Twitter use during TV: A full-season analysis of #serviziopubblico. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(2), 331–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151. 2016.1164162Rubin, A. M. (1994). Media uses and effects: a uses and gratifications perspective. In Bryant, J., Zillman, D. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 417–436). Lawrence Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Serrano-Puche, J. (2016). Internet and emotions: New trends in an emerging field of research. Comunicar, 46, 19–26. DOI: http://doi. org/10.3916/C46-2016-02Shin, D. H. (2013). N-Screen: How multi-screening will impact diffusion and policy? Information, Communication & Society, 16(6), 918– 944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.744073Shin, D., Shin, Y., Choo, H., & Beom, K. (2011). Smartphones as smart pedagogical tools: Implications for smartphones as u-learning devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2207–2214. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.017Shin, D. H., An, H., & Kim, J. H. (2015). How the second screens change the way people interact and learn: The effects of second screen use on information processing. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1076851Simons, N. (2015). TV drama as a social experience: An empirical investigation of the social dimensions of watching TV drama in the age of non-linear television. Communications – The European Journal of Communications Research, 40(2), 219–236. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1515/commun-2015-0005Smith, A., & Boyles, J.L. (2012). The rise of the “connected viewer” (Pew internet & American life project). Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2012/07/17/the-rise-of-theconnected-viewer/Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041–1061. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1111/jcom.12187Van Cauwenberge, A., Schaap, G., & Van Roy, R. (2014). “TV no longer commands our full attention”: Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 100–109. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.021Van Cauwenberge, A., d’Haenens, L., & Beetjes, H. (2015). How to take advantage of tablet computers: Effects of news structure on recall and comprehension. Communications – The European Journal of Communications Research, 40(4), 425–446. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1515/commun-2015-0020Vergeer, M., & Franses, P. H. (2016). Live audience responses to live televised election debates: Time series analysis of issue salience and party salience on audience behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1390–1410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1 369118X.2015.1093526Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.xWeeks, B. E., & Holbert, R. L. (2013). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media a focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(2), 212– 232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013482906Wei, R. (2008). Motivations for using the mobile phone for mass communication and entertainment. Telematics & Informatics, 25, 36–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2006.03.001Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Diaz de Isla, I. & Miyata, K. (2006). The Social Affordances of the Internet for networked individualism, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003. tb00216.xDias, P. (2008). O telemóvel e o quotidiano [The mobile phone and daily life]. Lisbon, Portugal: Paulus.Pérez-Tornero, J. (2008). La sociedad multipantallas: Retos para la alfabetización mediática. Comunicar, 31(16), 15–25. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3916/c31-2008-01-002Serrano-Puche, J. (2015). Emociones en el uso de la tecnología: un análisis de las investigaciones sobre teléfonos móviles. Observatorio (OBS), 9(4), 101–112. Retrieved from https://www.academia. edu/19721736/Emociones_en_el_uso_de_la_tecnología_un_ análisis_de_las_investigaciones_sobre_teléfonos_móvilesLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8498https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/38957/3/license.txtf52a2cfd4df262e08e9b300d62c85cabMD53CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/38957/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD5210818/38957oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/389572020-10-02 21:53:22.556Intellectum Universidad de la Sabanacontactointellectum@unisabana.edu.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

Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution

Publicaciones similares