Falacias y verdades en las justificaciones actuales de los derechos fundamentales
In this article it pretends to show the fallacies and truths of the different actual justifications of the Essentials Rights. Precisely, being the problem of the rational justification, will focus the question on the problem of the reason and the extent of their knowledge. To better manage the expos...
- Autores:
-
Herrera, Daniel Alejandro
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2010
- Institución:
- Universidad de la Sabana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/13554
- Acceso en línea:
- http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1784
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1784/2310
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1784/2392
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13554
- Palabra clave:
- Derechos humanos
Derechos fundamentales
Razón positivista
Razón procedimentalista
Razón práctica
Antropología
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Summary: | In this article it pretends to show the fallacies and truths of the different actual justifications of the Essentials Rights. Precisely, being the problem of the rational justification, will focus the question on the problem of the reason and the extent of their knowledge. To better manage the exposure of the different foundations, they will be classified in three lines: 1) positivistic reason; 2) proceduralist reason; 3) practical reason. |
---|