Falacias y verdades en las justificaciones actuales de los derechos fundamentales

In this article it pretends to show the fallacies and truths of the different actual justifications of the Essentials Rights. Precisely, being the problem of the rational justification, will focus the question on the problem of the reason and the extent of their knowledge. To better manage the expos...

Full description

Autores:
Herrera, Daniel Alejandro
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad de la Sabana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/13554
Acceso en línea:
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1784
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1784/2310
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1784/2392
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13554
Palabra clave:
Derechos humanos
Derechos fundamentales
Razón positivista
Razón procedimentalista
Razón práctica
Antropología
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:In this article it pretends to show the fallacies and truths of the different actual justifications of the Essentials Rights. Precisely, being the problem of the rational justification, will focus the question on the problem of the reason and the extent of their knowledge. To better manage the exposure of the different foundations, they will be classified in three lines: 1) positivistic reason; 2) proceduralist reason; 3) practical reason.