Función discursiva en los debates televisados. Un estudio transcultural de los debates políticos en México, España y Estados Unidos
The article describes and compares the discourse strategies used in televised debates and those of the winning candidates in the latest presidential elections in Mexico and the United States, and in Spain’s most recent general elections. A content analysis is done, based on the functional theory of...
- Autores:
-
Téllez, Nilsa
Muñiz, Carlos
Ramírez, Jacobo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2010
- Institución:
- Universidad de la Sabana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/14520
- Acceso en línea:
- http://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/1763
http://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/1763/2297
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/14520
- Palabra clave:
- Debates electorales
Candidatos ganadores
Estrategias discursivas
Teoría funcional del discurso de campaña política
Análisis de contenido
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Summary: | The article describes and compares the discourse strategies used in televised debates and those of the winning candidates in the latest presidential elections in Mexico and the United States, and in Spain’s most recent general elections. A content analysis is done, based on the functional theory of political campaign discourse. The results show acclaim was the predominant strategy in the U.S. and Mexican debates, while the attack strategy was the most prevalent in Spain. However, the three winning candidates used acclaim more than other strategies. The debates also focused more on political issues than on the candidates themselves. |
---|