El guardián de la constitución. Elementos para una epistemología de la democracia
This article aims at providing an epistemological justification for both democracy and the constitutional jurisdiction of constitutional courts (“the guardian of the constitution”) by means of the examination of the peculiar way in which truth is disclosed in political judgment, namely as opinion. S...
- Autores:
-
Barzotto, Luis Fernando
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2010
- Institución:
- Universidad de la Sabana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/13556
- Acceso en línea:
- http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1787
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1787/2313
http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1787/2395
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13556
- Palabra clave:
- Democracia
Tribunal Constitucional
Corte Suprema
Deliberación
Control de constitucionalidad
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Summary: | This article aims at providing an epistemological justification for both democracy and the constitutional jurisdiction of constitutional courts (“the guardian of the constitution”) by means of the examination of the peculiar way in which truth is disclosed in political judgment, namely as opinion. Starting with an analysis of opinion, the article intends to demonstrate the tragical nature of democracy: on the one side, it cannot dispense with truth; on the other it cannot be safe of being in truth. |
---|