Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools

160 páginas

Autores:
García Herreros Machado, César Augusto
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad de la Sabana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/42990
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10818/42990
Palabra clave:
Ingles -- Enseñanza
Pedagogía
Aptitud pedagógica
Aprendizaje activo
Comprensión de lectura
Mediciones y pruebas educativas
Rights
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
id REPOUSABA2_005e9eea5c55cf44763cb250f2dd36cc
oai_identifier_str oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/42990
network_acronym_str REPOUSABA2
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad de la Sabana
repository_id_str
dc.title.es_CO.fl_str_mv Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools
title Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools
spellingShingle Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools
Magíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
Ingles -- Enseñanza
Pedagogía
Aptitud pedagógica
Aprendizaje activo
Comprensión de lectura
Mediciones y pruebas educativas
title_short Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools
title_full Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools
title_fullStr Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools
title_full_unstemmed Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools
title_sort Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools
dc.creator.fl_str_mv García Herreros Machado, César Augusto
author Magíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
author_facet Magíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Cuesta Medina, Liliana Marcela
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv García Herreros Machado, César Augusto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
dc.subject.es_CO.fl_str_mv Ingles -- Enseñanza
Pedagogía
Aptitud pedagógica
Aprendizaje activo
Comprensión de lectura
Mediciones y pruebas educativas
topic Ingles -- Enseñanza
Pedagogía
Aptitud pedagógica
Aprendizaje activo
Comprensión de lectura
Mediciones y pruebas educativas
description 160 páginas
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-24T20:28:50Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-24T20:28:50Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-04
dc.type.es_CO.fl_str_mv masterThesis
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.hasVersion.es_CO.fl_str_mv publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10818/42990
dc.identifier.local.none.fl_str_mv 277808
TE10749
url http://hdl.handle.net/10818/42990
identifier_str_mv 277808
TE10749
dc.language.iso.es_CO.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.es_CO.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es_CO.fl_str_mv Universidad de La Sabana
dc.publisher.program.es_CO.fl_str_mv Maestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
dc.publisher.department.es_CO.fl_str_mv Departamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.source.es_CO.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad de La Sabana
reponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
instname_str Universidad de La Sabana
institution Universidad de la Sabana
reponame_str Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
collection Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/42990/1/CESAR%20GARCIA-HERREROS%20Final%20Document%20.pdf
https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/42990/2/license_rdf
https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/42990/3/license.txt
https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/42990/4/Formato%20de%20autorizacion%20de%20divulgacion%20RI%20trabajos%20de%20grado%20V2bk%20CGH.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 946eb0d9f7dbf9c30ef5a0fd6da62938
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
f52a2cfd4df262e08e9b300d62c85cab
0773c45b2b0e83b05d9de8dc5dd005dd
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Intellectum Universidad de la Sabana
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contactointellectum@unisabana.edu.co
_version_ 1766695316046741504
spelling Cuesta Medina, Liliana MarcelaGarcía Herreros Machado, César AugustoMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido2020-08-24T20:28:50Z2020-08-24T20:28:50Z2020-06-04http://hdl.handle.net/10818/42990277808TE10749160 páginasEste documento es un registro del uso de andamios basados en la web para fomentar la inferencia, mejorando la comprensión de lectura. La lectura es una habilidad crucial que depende del papel activo del lector para construir el significado. El desarrollo de esta habilidad activa apoya el aprendizaje permanente. Se han implementado estrategias para mejorar la capacidad de comprensión de los alumnos por inferencia. Este documento propone que los andamios basados en la web pueden aumentar las habilidades de inferencia y el rendimiento de los alumnos. Investigaciones anteriores han demostrado cómo la inferencia tiene un efecto positivo en la comprensión lectora, presentando cómo fomentar el desarrollo de estas estrategias y su impacto en los lectores. Sin embargo, los estudios carecen de detalles sobre las herramientas tecnológicas utilizadas para promover estrategias de lectura en los alumnos. Este estudio de investigación mixta utilizó pruebas simuladas para explorar cómo las estrategias de inferencia afectan la comprensión de los alumnos en las secciones de lectura de una prueba estandarizada. El estudio recopiló información sobre la percepción de los alumnos sobre los andamios web utilizados para promover la inferencia a través de entrevistas y la evidencia reunida a través de Google Classroom, siguiendo la metodología de la teoría fundamentada. Los datos sugieren que las herramientas integradas para promover la inferencia permitieron un enfoque de lectura más fácil para los lectores con dificultades, que se reflejó en el rendimiento de los alumnos en la sección de lectura de la prueba de salida. Fomentar la inferencia léxica es viable a través de andamios basados en la web. Los andamios seleccionados deben implementarse teniendo en cuenta los recursos disponibles y la integración adecuada al programa de estudios.application/pdfengUniversidad de La SabanaMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje AutodirigidoDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas ExtranjerasAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad de La Sabanareponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La SabanaIngles -- EnseñanzaPedagogíaAptitud pedagógicaAprendizaje activoComprensión de lecturaMediciones y pruebas educativasBuilding Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding ToolsmasterThesispublishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccAlderson, J., & Banerjee, J. (2002). Language testing and assessment (Part 2). Language Teaching, 35(2), 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444802001751Andrei, E. (2019). Adolescent English learners’ use of digital technology in the classroom. Educational Forum, 83(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1478474Ardasheva, Y., Newcomer, S. N., Firestone, J. B., & Lamb, R. L. (2019). Contributions of language-specific and metacognitive skills to science reading comprehension of middle school English learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 42(2), 150–163 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=&AN=vdc.100084320700.0x00000 1&site=eds-liveÁvila, N., & Vélez, A. (2016). Comprehension improvement through reading strategies (Master’s thesis) [Universiad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia.]. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642012000800004Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9Bailey, K. M., & Curtis, A. (2015). Learning about language assessment: dilemmas, decisions, and directions. Cengage Learning.Baldonado, A. A., Svetina, D., & Gorin, J. (2015). Using necessary information to identify item dependence in passage-based reading comprehension tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(3), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2015.1042154Banegas, D. (2015). A look at ethical issues in action research in education. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 58–67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295399800_GV9Jm2u7rmsCe65wKzPTw5jtS38n2tVEGi_research_in_educationBarakhtenko, E., & Sokolov, D. (2019). An architecture of the technology platform for computer modeling, design, and optimization of intelligent integrated energy systems. In 2019 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon), Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon), 2019 International Multi-Conference on (pp. 1–5). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=&AN=edseee.8934678&site=edsliveBattelle for Kids. (2015). P21 Framework Definitions. http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_20 15_9pgs.pdfBax, S. (2013). The cognitive processing of candidates during reading tests: evidence from eyetracking. Language Testing, 30(4), 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212473244Bazeley, P. (2008). Mixed methods in management research. In R. Thorpe & R. Holt (Eds.), The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research (Sage, pp. 133–136). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238560747_LgjH2m5c8emE66pjdExmgep47BAd KTrCJ7chBlanco, J. X., & Parra, D. A. (2016). Development of A1 L2 learners’ literal reading comprehension of short online animated stories through vocabulary pre-reading activities [Universidad de La Sabana,]. http://hdl.handle.net/10818/28543Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2010). How to research (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319404Bloom, B., Mesia, B., & Krathwohl, D. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives (two vol The affective domain & The cognitive domain). Longmans. https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Bloom et al -Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.pdfBroom, Y., & Jewson, D. (2013). The stanford diagnostic reading test: Assessing english reading comprehension and vocabulary in South Africa. Per Linguam: A Journal of Language, 29(2), 1–16. http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication_article/perling_v29_n2_a2Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–12. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/1.2.3.pdfBuckingham, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 43–55. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ901647&site=eds-liveBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Teachers. Cambridge University PressButler, S., Urrutia, K., Buenger, A., & Hunt, M. (2010). A review of the current research on comprehension instruction. National Reading Technical Assistance Centre. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.047Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5/6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 697–708. http://10.0.5.68/000709905X69807Carlson, S. E., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K., Rapp, D. N., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., & White, M. J. (2014). Effects of comprehension skill on inference generation during reading. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, 61(3), 258–274. http://10.0.4.56/1034912X.2014.934004Carranza, A. V. (2017). What is language for sociolinguists? The variationist, ethnographic, and conversation-analytic ontologies of language. Linguistik Online, 83(4), 115–131. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsglr&AN=edsgcl.501084840&sit e=eds-liveCasallas Acosta, M. C., & Calderón D’Martino, S. (2016). Desarrollo de la inferencia y comunicación de conclusiones a partir de la evidencia científica en la asignatura de física, mediante el uso de las TIC (Master’s thesis) [Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia]. http://hdl.handle.net/10818/27650Castello, E. (2008). Text complexity and reading comprehension tests. Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.Chan, S., Inoue, C., & Taylor, L. (2015). Developing rubrics to assess the reading-into-writing skills: A case study. Assessing Writing, 26, 20–37. http://10.0.3.248/j.asw.2015.07.004Check, D. K., Wolf, L. E., Dame, L. A., & Beskow, L. M. (2014). Certificates of confidentiality and informed consent: Perspectives of IRB chairs and institutional legal counsel. IRB Ethics and Human Research, 36(1), 1–8Chen, C., & Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part B), 1201–1212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.010Chen, L. (2015). Taiwanese EFL Learners’ perceived use of online reading strategies. IAFOR Journal of Education, 3(2), 68–80. https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1100686Clinton, V., Carlson, S. E., & Seipel, B. (2016). Linguistic markers of inference generation while reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(3), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9360-8Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Fourth ed.). SAGE Publications.Council of Europe. (2001). The Common European Framework of reference for languages : learning, teaching, assessment. Council of Europe, 1–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000221Cummins, J. (1987). Empowering minority students. Harvard Educational Review, 56. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.1.b327234461607787Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for selfregulated learning. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 33, 513-6), 513–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1278-3Denton, C. A., York, M. J., Francis, D. J., Haring, C., Ahmed, Y., & Bidulescu, A. (2017). An investigation of an intervention to promote inference generation by adolescent poor comprehenders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice (Wiley-Blackwell), 32(2), 85– 98. http://10.0.4.87/ldrp.12134Dictionarist.com. (2019). Dictionarist (1.2). https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/dictionarist-instantdict/npggnghnhkgioladlpfehafajnghlklc?hl=esDressler, C., Carlo, M., Snow, C., August, D., & White, C. (2011). Spanish-speaking students use of cognate knowledge to infer the meaning of English words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000519Driscoll, D. L., Salib, P., & Rupert, D. J. (2007). Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research : how to and why not. 18–28.Dymock, S. (2012). Teaching reading comprehension : The what, the how, the why (T. Nicholson (ed.)). Wellington, New Zealand : NZCER PressElleman, A. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761–782.Elwér, Å., Gustafson, S., Byrne, B., Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., & Samuelsson, S. (2015). A retrospective longitudinal study of cognitive and language skills in poor reading comprehension. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12188ESOL. (2003). Cambridge Preliminary English Test 2. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/0521754674Fisher, D., & Lapp, D. (2009). Essential readings on comprehension. International Reading Association. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=539062&lang=es&site =ehost-live&scope=siteFriedman, C. (1984). The construct validation of second language proficiency tests with different native language groups (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Indiana, The United States of America.Girón-García, C. (2015). Literacy and Technologies in EFL Settings: Fostering Reading Comprehension on the Internet. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature VO - 8, 8(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.616Goldman, N. (2014). Rewordify (1.0). Rewordify. https://rewordify.com/Gómez, J. (2017). Developing reading comprehension through graphic organizers in CLIL (Master’s thesis) [Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia]. https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/30303Gorard, S. (2012). Mixed methods in educational research. Mixed Methods Research in Education: Some Challenges and Possibilities. http://www.uv.uio.no/ils/personer/vit/kirstik/publikasjoner-pdf-filer/klette.-mixedmethods.pdfGusrayani, D. (2014). Developing students’ knowledge from the results of scaffolding in English teaching. English Review: Journal of English Education, 3(1), 1–10. http://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ERJEEHall, C. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9295-xHamada, M. (2009). Development of L2 word-meaning inference while reading. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.003Hammersley, M. (1993). On the teacher as researcher. Educational Action Research, 1(3), 425– 445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010308Harris, K. (2015). Integrating digital literacy into English language instruction: Issue brief. https://lincs.ed.gov/sites/default/files/ELL_Digital_Literacy_508.pdfHassanzadeh, Z., Tamjid, N. H., Ahangari, S., & Agudo, J. de D. M. (2019). The effect of lexical inference strategy instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary depth and breadth. In Cogent Education (Vol. 6, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1614750HelpScout. (2020). Padlet. https://es.padlet.com/InnovativeWorld. (2018). Voice Notes - Speech to Text Notes (1.2). https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.voicenotes.speech.ideaappJust, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 295X.87.4.329Kara, S. (2019). Learning autonomy, digital learners and Google Education: A rhizomatic English syllabus framework. The EUROCALL Review, 27(1), 30–47. https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/eurocall/article/view/10709/12010Keedy, J. L., & Simpson, D. S. (2001). Principal priorities, school norms, and teacher influence: A study of sociocultural leadership in the high school. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 16(1), 10–41.Kendeou, P., Papadopoulos, T. C., & Spanoudis, G. (2012). Processing demands of reading comprehension tests in young readers. Learning and Instruction, 22(5), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.02.001Keser, H., & Özdamli, F. (2012). What are the trends in collaborative learning studies in 21st century? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.05.086Khalid, M. S., Sutoyo, E., Mungad, M., Sari, E. N., & Herawan, T. (2014). Teaching and learning using computers: how should we tread on its’ changing technology? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 9(5), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i5.3943Kibui, A. W. (2012). Reading and comprehension in the African context : A cognitive enquiry. Zapf Chancery Publishers Africa Ltd. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=581750&lang=es&site =ehost-live&scope=siteKopitski, M. (2007). Exploring the teaching of inference skills [Hamline University]. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/340Kothari, C., Kumar, R., & Uusitalo, O. (2014). Research Methodology. New Age International. https://doi.org/http://196.29.172.66:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2574/1/Research%20 Methodology.pdfLamb, T., Gao, X., & Murray, G. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning. (Issue Vol. 54). Multilingual Matters. https://login.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true&AuthType=ip&db=nlebk&AN=370760&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=siteLanger, L. (2010). Empower English language learners with tools from the web. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1046136&site=edsliveLeaver, B., & Stryker, S. (1997). Content-based instruction in foreign language education. Georgetown University PressLee, J. K., & Calandra, B. (2004). Can embedded annotations help high school students perform problem solving tasks using a web-based historical document? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782426Logan, J. (2017). Pressure points in reading comprehension: A quantile multiple regression analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000150Mason, D. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching. A guide for practitioners. System, 38(3), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.005McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440– 466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.440McNiff, J. (2013). Action research : Principles and practice (3rd Ed.). RoutledgeMeskill, C. (2005). Triadic scaffolds: tools for teaching english language learners with computers. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10125/44008Montelongo, J. (2011). Using congnates to scaffold context clue strategies for latino els. Reading Teacher, 64(6), 429–435.Muñoz Melo, A. H., & Guayacán Velasco, L. A. (2018). Developing high school students 19 reading comprehension and self-directed learning strategies through the use of digital learning objects. http://hdl.handle.net/10818/34113Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. In Journal of Educational Psychology (Vol. 91, Issue 3, pp. 488–496). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.488Nation, K. (2008). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In The science of reading: A handbook. (pp. 248–266). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1002/9780470757642.ch14National Education Association. (2014). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An Educator’s Guide to the “ Four Cs .” 1–38.Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.Nunan, D. (1980). Nine steps to learner autonomy. Symposium 2003, 193–204. http://www.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.84007.1333707257!/menu/standard/file/2003_11_Nunan_e ng.pdfOrtiz Moreno, P. A., & Aldana Olarte, R. A. (2017). La estimulación del pensamiento crítico en los estudiantes del grado quinto de primaria del colegio San Simón de Bogotá, a partir de un ambiente de aprendizaje enmarcado en una estrategia de aprendizaje significativo [Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia]. http://hdl.handle.net/10818/29859Phillips, L. (1989). Developing and validating assessments of inference ability in reading comprehension. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/18034Ponce, O. A. (2015). Mixed methods research in education: Capturing the complexity of the profession. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.18562/IJEE.2015.0005Poonpon, K. (2010). Linguistic insights : Text complexity and reading comprehension tests. In E. Castello (Ed.), Studies in Second Language Acquisition (p. 352). Bern, CH: Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0272263110000197Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers and Education, 59(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.010Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). Lexical quality and executive control predict children’s first and second language reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9791-8Read, J. (2008). Identifying academic language needs through diagnostic assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.001Reed, D. K., & Lynn, D. (2016). The effects of an inference-making strategy taught with and without goal setting. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(3), 133–145. http://10.0.4.153/0731948715615557Reynolds, D., & Daniel, S. (2018). Toward contingency in scaffolding reading comprehension: Next steps for research. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 367–373. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1183261&site=edsliveRibeiro, I., Cadime, I., Freitas, T., & Viana, F. L. (2016). Beyond word recognition, fluency, and vocabulary: The influence of reasoning on reading comprehension. Australian Journal of Psychology, 68(2), 107–115. http://10.0.4.87/ajpy.12095Richard-Amato, P. (1988). Making it happen: Interaction in the second language classroom: from theory to practice (Longman). Longman.Sarroub, L. K., & Pearson, P. D. (1998). Two steps forward , three steps back : The stormySaye, J., & Brush, T. (2001). The Use of Embedded Scaffolds with Hypermedia-Supported Student-Centered Learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(4), 333–356. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8439Schnotz, W., & Heiß, A. (2009). Semantic scaffolds in hypermedia learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 371–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.016Shin, S., Brush, T. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2017). Designing and implementing web-based scaffolding tools for technology-enhanced socioscientific inquiry. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 1–12. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874038485?accountid=45375Smeby, J. (2012). How can qualitative and quantitative data sets be linked? Norwegian Educational Research towards 2020 - UTDANNING2020. http://www.uv.uio.no/ils/personer/vit/kirstik/publikasjoner-pdf-filer/klette.-mixedmethods.pdfSmit, J., & Eerde, H. (2011). A teacher’s learning process in dual design research: learning to scaffold language in a multilingual mathematics classroom. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(6), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0350-5Smit, N., van de Grift, W., de Bot, K., & Jansen, E. (2017). A classroom observation tool for scaffolding reading comprehension. System, 65, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.014Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding : Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=72760&lang=es&site= ehost-live&scope=siteSoliman, N. A. (2016). Teaching English for academic purposes via the flipped learning approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.036Sönmez, Y., & Sulak, S. E. (2018). The effect of the thinking-aloud strategy on the reading comprehension skills of 4th grade primary school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 168–172. http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1165440Strong, J. Z., Amendum, S. J., & Conradi Smith, K. (2018). Supporting elementary students’ reading of difficult texts. Reading Teacher, 72(2), 201–212. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pbh&AN=131500560&site=edsliveStryker, S. B., & Leaver, B. Lou. (1997). Content-based instruction in foreign language education: models and methods. Georgetown University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=21648&lang=es&site= ehost-live&scope=siteThapa-Chhetry, B., & Keck, T. (2019). A Chrome app for improving reading comprehension of health information online for individuals with low health literacy. 2019 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering for Healthcare, 57. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEH.2019.00018Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: a key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023495 Tudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language classroom: From method to postmethod.van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6van der Schoot, M., & Studies, E. (2016). Training inference making skills using a situation model approach improves reading comprehension. Paper Presented at the 23th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading (SSSR), Symposium “Reading Comprehension: From Assessment to Training”, Porto, Portugal. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/f5a21df7-6763-4768-b06d-348802544282Varga-Atkins, T., Mcisaac, J., & Willis, I. (2017). Focus group meets nominal group technique: an effective combination for student evaluation. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 54(4), 289–300. http://10.0.4.56/14703297.2015.1058721Vázquez, M. (1990). A longitudinal study of cohort academic success and bilingual education (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Rochester, New York, The United States of AmericaVillanueva, M. L., Ruiz-Madrid, M. N., & Luzón, M. J. (2010). Digital Genres, New Literacies and Autonomy in Language Learning. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://login.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true&AuthType=ip&db=nlebk&AN=524301&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=siteVygotsky, L., Hanfmann, E., & Vakar, G. (1962). Thought and language. https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000Vygotsky, L., & Mead, G. H. (1986). The phenomenology of language acquisition. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lxh&AN=ISTA2102101&site=edsliveWesche, M. B., & Paribakht, T. (2009). Lexical Inferencing in a First and Second Language : Cross-linguistic Dimensions. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692245Westwood, P. (2001). Reading and learning difficulties: approaches to teaching and assessment. Acer Press.Westwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know about reading and writing difficulties. Aust Council for Ed Research.Wiegerová, A., & Lampertová, A. (2013). A teacher’s diary as a valid tool. https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/bitstream/handle/item/1769/Adriana Wiegerova Alena Lampertova A Teacher’s Diary As A Research Instrument.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yWiggins, G. (2005). Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd ed. In Understanding by Design. Alexandria Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Williams, J. C. (2014). Recent official policy and concepts of reading comprehension and inference: the case of England’s primary curriculum. Literacy, 48(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12012Wood, D., & Middleton, D. (1975). A study of assisted problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 181−191Woolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension : assisting children with learning difficulties Dordrecht : Springer.Wu, H.-L., Weng, H.-L., & She, H.-C. (2016). Effects of scaffolds and scientific reasoning ability on web-based scientific inquiry. Online Submission, 3, 3. https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED573143Yurtseven, N., & Altun, S. (2017). Understanding by design (UbD) in EFL teaching: teachers’ professional development and students’ achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.1204Zacharias, N. T. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods for Second Language Education : A Coursebook. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=532171&lang=es&site =ehost-live&scope=siteZeni, J. (2006). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: a meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016- 9426-9Zhou, Y., & He, J. (2018). Optimizing the wisdom of the crowd: inference, learning, and teaching. http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09018Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research : instruments , validity , reliability and reporting findings. 3(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262Zwiers, J. (2006). Integrating academic language, thinking, and content: learning scaffolds for non-native speakers in the middle grades. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.005Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2013). Orientaciones para la implementacion de proyectos de fortalecimiento del inglés en las entidades territoriales. http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/micrositios/1752/articles-315518_recurso_5.pdfQuan, Z. Z. (2011). Inferencia léxica como método de ampliación de vocabulario en el aprendizaje del chino moderno. Sintagma: Revista de Linguistica, 23(1), 99–114. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=&AN=74265436&site=eds-liveRiffo, B., Reyes, F., & Novoa, A. (2014). Competencia léxica, comprensión lectora y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de enseñanza media. Literatura y Lingüística, 30, 165–180. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-58112014000200009ORIGINALCESAR GARCIA-HERREROS Final Document .pdfCESAR GARCIA-HERREROS Final Document .pdfVer documento en PDFapplication/pdf1203637https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/42990/1/CESAR%20GARCIA-HERREROS%20Final%20Document%20.pdf946eb0d9f7dbf9c30ef5a0fd6da62938MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/42990/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8498https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/42990/3/license.txtf52a2cfd4df262e08e9b300d62c85cabMD53Formato de autorizacion de divulgacion RI trabajos de grado V2bk CGH.pdfFormato de autorizacion de divulgacion RI trabajos de grado V2bk CGH.pdfCartaapplication/pdf518897https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/bitstream/10818/42990/4/Formato%20de%20autorizacion%20de%20divulgacion%20RI%20trabajos%20de%20grado%20V2bk%20CGH.pdf0773c45b2b0e83b05d9de8dc5dd005ddMD5410818/42990oai:intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:10818/429902020-11-30 08:15:58.505Intellectum Universidad de la Sabanacontactointellectum@unisabana.edu.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