Failed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab Project

We present the results of the BCNStreet-lab project, a co-creation process of a prototype that "died before it even existed" and that has led us to reflect on the creative power that participatory design can have among experts. Examining the high variability that the design acquired with t...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/14366
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/15267
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14366
Palabra clave:
Co-creation
Engineering
overtechnification
sociomaterial variability
fluid technologies
Co-creación
Ingeniería
sobre tecnificación
variabilidad sociomaterial
tecnologías fluidas
Rights
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
id REPOUPTC2_f39703c144a111f512c396bf74a5a79d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/14366
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Failed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab Project
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Co-creación Fallida: El caso del proyecto BCNStreet-Lab
title Failed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab Project
spellingShingle Failed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab Project
Co-creation
Engineering
overtechnification
sociomaterial variability
fluid technologies
Co-creación
Ingeniería
sobre tecnificación
variabilidad sociomaterial
tecnologías fluidas
title_short Failed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab Project
title_full Failed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab Project
title_fullStr Failed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab Project
title_full_unstemmed Failed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab Project
title_sort Failed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab Project
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Co-creation
Engineering
overtechnification
sociomaterial variability
fluid technologies
topic Co-creation
Engineering
overtechnification
sociomaterial variability
fluid technologies
Co-creación
Ingeniería
sobre tecnificación
variabilidad sociomaterial
tecnologías fluidas
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Co-creación
Ingeniería
sobre tecnificación
variabilidad sociomaterial
tecnologías fluidas
description We present the results of the BCNStreet-lab project, a co-creation process of a prototype that "died before it even existed" and that has led us to reflect on the creative power that participatory design can have among experts. Examining the high variability that the design acquired with the co-creation sessions, we realized how an open co-creation process can generate overflows in the design. It makes innovation possible but can also lead to failure, as is this case, because of how risky participatory design of “fluid technologies” and how ineffective reproducing the Quadruple helix innovation model in small projects can be. We tried to account for the fruitful relationship between co-creation and the design of electronic technologies, which happens in the “lobby” of the technical design of the prototype. It generates negotiations and interactions that lead to progress in the democratization of design practices in electronic engineering, computing, and telecommunications. At this point, co-creation is conceived as a space in which institutional practices, social needs, technological imaginaries, economic interests, techno-scientific interests, etc., are brought together, translated and inscribed into the design of technologies.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:12:10Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:12:10Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a515
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/15267
10.19053/01211129.v31.n62.2022.15267
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14366
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/15267
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14366
identifier_str_mv 10.19053/01211129.v31.n62.2022.15267
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/15267/12534
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/15267/12574
dc.rights.en-US.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf432
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf432
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.en-US.fl_str_mv Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 31 No. 62 (2022): October-December 2022 (Continuous Publication); e15267
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 31 Núm. 62 (2022): Octubre-Diciembre 2022 (Publicación Continua) ; e15267
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2357-5328
0121-1129
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633904099655680
spelling 2022-12-312024-07-05T19:12:10Z2024-07-05T19:12:10Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1526710.19053/01211129.v31.n62.2022.15267https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14366We present the results of the BCNStreet-lab project, a co-creation process of a prototype that "died before it even existed" and that has led us to reflect on the creative power that participatory design can have among experts. Examining the high variability that the design acquired with the co-creation sessions, we realized how an open co-creation process can generate overflows in the design. It makes innovation possible but can also lead to failure, as is this case, because of how risky participatory design of “fluid technologies” and how ineffective reproducing the Quadruple helix innovation model in small projects can be. We tried to account for the fruitful relationship between co-creation and the design of electronic technologies, which happens in the “lobby” of the technical design of the prototype. It generates negotiations and interactions that lead to progress in the democratization of design practices in electronic engineering, computing, and telecommunications. At this point, co-creation is conceived as a space in which institutional practices, social needs, technological imaginaries, economic interests, techno-scientific interests, etc., are brought together, translated and inscribed into the design of technologies.Se presentan los resultados del proyecto BCNStreet-lab, un proceso de cocreación de un prototipo que “murió antes de existir” y que llevo a reflexionar sobre el poder creativo que puede tener el diseño participativo entre expertos. Observando la alta variabilidad que adquirió el diseño con las sesiones de cocreación, se denota cómo un proceso abierto puede generar desbordamientos en el diseño, que hacen posible la innovación pero también pueden llevar al fracaso, como en este caso, debido a lo arriesgado que puede ser el diseño participativo de “tecnologías fluidas” y lo ineficaz que puede ser tratar de reproducir el modelo de innovación de cuádruple hélice en pequeños proyectos. Se intenta dar cuenta de la fructífera relación entre la cocreación y el diseño de tecnologías electrónicas, la cual se da en el “lobby” del diseño técnico del prototipo, genera negociaciones e interacciones y permite avanzar en la democratización de las prácticas de diseño en ingeniería electrónica, computación y telecomunicaciones. En este punto, la cocreación se concibe como un espacio en el que las prácticas institucionales, las necesidades sociales, los imaginarios tecnológicos, los intereses económicos, los intereses tecnocientíficos, etc. son reunidas, se traduce e inscriben en el diseño de las tecnologías.application/pdftext/xmlengengUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/15267/12534https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/15267/12574Copyright (c) 2022 Juan-Carlos Vidal-Rojas, Marcos Cereceda-Otárola, Konstantinos Kourkoutas, Jordi Roig-de-Zárate, Marc Vallrribera-Roshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf432http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 31 No. 62 (2022): October-December 2022 (Continuous Publication); e15267Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 31 Núm. 62 (2022): Octubre-Diciembre 2022 (Publicación Continua) ; e152672357-53280121-1129Co-creationEngineeringovertechnificationsociomaterial variabilityfluid technologiesCo-creaciónIngenieríasobre tecnificaciónvariabilidad sociomaterialtecnologías fluidasFailed Co-Creation: The Case of the BCNStreet-Lab ProjectCo-creación Fallida: El caso del proyecto BCNStreet-Labinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a515http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Vidal-Rojas, Juan-CarlosCereceda-Otárola, MarcosKourkoutas, KonstantinosRoig-de-Zárate, JordiVallrribera-Ros, Marc001/14366oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/143662025-07-18 11:53:58.342metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co