The application of universal jurisdiction to the Tibetan genocide case
In recent times, especially as a result of the Pinochet case, the diverse interpretation of the principle of universal jurisdiction has faced continuous confrontation, not only with the doctrine, but also with the Spanish courts. The judgment of the Constitutional Court on the Guatemala case seems t...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2011
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15885
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13635
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15885
- Palabra clave:
- genocidio
jurisdiccion
inadmision
apelacion
impunidad
susceptibles
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2011 Derecho y realidad
| Summary: | In recent times, especially as a result of the Pinochet case, the diverse interpretation of the principle of universal jurisdiction has faced continuous confrontation, not only with the doctrine, but also with the Spanish courts. The judgment of the Constitutional Court on the Guatemala case seems to have settled this controversy to a certain extent by recognizing the competence of the Spanish jurisdiction to prosecute universal crimes. |
|---|