Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation
In search of an explanation of the tools that must use the legal operator for making a decision, there have been different methods of interpretation and argumentation, but as the law is constantly evolving, these methods have been insufficient, in the understanding that the law consists not only by...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2014
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15475
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/4570
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15475
- Palabra clave:
- Juridical argument, juridical decision, justice, arbitrariness, rules, principles, consequentialism
Argumentación jurídica, decisión jurídica, justicia, arbitrariedad, reglas, principios, consecuencialismo
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2014 Derecho y Realidad
| id |
REPOUPTC2_d8cede59ed3bd61ca98f3654e549da22 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15475 |
| network_acronym_str |
REPOUPTC2 |
| network_name_str |
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
2014-06-042024-07-08T14:28:04Z2024-07-08T14:28:04Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/457010.19053/16923936.v1.n23.2014.4570https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15475In search of an explanation of the tools that must use the legal operator for making a decision, there have been different methods of interpretation and argumentation, but as the law is constantly evolving, these methods have been insufficient, in the understanding that the law consists not only by rules, but also for principles which today are considered as binding rules. In this regard, to avoid arbitrariness of judge decisions, there are a number of theories that seek to provide a valid and plausible basis for the assessments that determine the legal decision.En búsqueda de la explicación de las herramientas de las que se debe valer el operador jurídico para la toma de una decisión, han surgido diferentes métodos de interpretación y argumentación, pero como el derecho tiene una evolución constante, estos métodos han sido insuficientes, en el entendido de que el derecho no solo está conformado por reglas, sino por los principios que hoy se consideran como normas vinculantes. En este sentido, para procurar que los fallos de los jueces no sean arbitrarios, ha surgido una serie de teorías que pretenden proporcionar un fundamento valido y plausible para las valoraciones que determinan la decisión jurídica.application/pdfspaspaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/4570/4265Derechos de autor 2014 Derecho y Realidadhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 12 No. 23 (2014): Enero - Junio; 230-235Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 12 Núm. 23 (2014): Enero - Junio; 230-235Derecho y Realidad; v. 12 n. 23 (2014): Enero - Junio; 230-2352619-56071692-393610.19053/16923936.v1.n23.2014Juridical argument, juridical decision, justice, arbitrariness, rules, principles, consequentialismArgumentación jurídica, decisión jurídica, justicia, arbitrariedad, reglas, principios, consecuencialismoConsequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentationEl consecuencialismo como límite en la argumentación constitucional y legal y jurídicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Guagua-Castillo, JairoTorres-Quijano, César Alberto001/15475oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/154752025-07-18 11:09:15.401metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co |
| dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
El consecuencialismo como límite en la argumentación constitucional y legal y jurídica |
| title |
Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| spellingShingle |
Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation Juridical argument, juridical decision, justice, arbitrariness, rules, principles, consequentialism Argumentación jurídica, decisión jurídica, justicia, arbitrariedad, reglas, principios, consecuencialismo |
| title_short |
Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title_full |
Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title_fullStr |
Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title_sort |
Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Juridical argument, juridical decision, justice, arbitrariness, rules, principles, consequentialism |
| topic |
Juridical argument, juridical decision, justice, arbitrariness, rules, principles, consequentialism Argumentación jurídica, decisión jurídica, justicia, arbitrariedad, reglas, principios, consecuencialismo |
| dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Argumentación jurídica, decisión jurídica, justicia, arbitrariedad, reglas, principios, consecuencialismo |
| description |
In search of an explanation of the tools that must use the legal operator for making a decision, there have been different methods of interpretation and argumentation, but as the law is constantly evolving, these methods have been insufficient, in the understanding that the law consists not only by rules, but also for principles which today are considered as binding rules. In this regard, to avoid arbitrariness of judge decisions, there are a number of theories that seek to provide a valid and plausible basis for the assessments that determine the legal decision. |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-08T14:28:04Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-08T14:28:04Z |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-04 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/4570 10.19053/16923936.v1.n23.2014.4570 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15475 |
| url |
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/4570 https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15475 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.19053/16923936.v1.n23.2014.4570 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/4570/4265 |
| dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2014 Derecho y Realidad |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2014 Derecho y Realidad http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
| dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 12 No. 23 (2014): Enero - Junio; 230-235 |
| dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 12 Núm. 23 (2014): Enero - Junio; 230-235 |
| dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv |
Derecho y Realidad; v. 12 n. 23 (2014): Enero - Junio; 230-235 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
2619-5607 1692-3936 10.19053/16923936.v1.n23.2014 |
| institution |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional UPTC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1839633864049295360 |