Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink

This paper presents a comparison of the voltage and current dynamic responses for the Boost converter in three different simulation software, namely PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink, while using two types of nonlinear controllers. The utilized controller designs are (i) proportional-integral passivi...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15392
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/15857
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15392
Palabra clave:
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id REPOUPTC2_b81adc3c8a3972f6649c2e83ec21242c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15392
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
spelling 2024-04-092024-07-08T14:24:11Z2024-07-08T14:24:11Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/1585710.19053/01217488.v15.n1.2024.15857https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15392This paper presents a comparison of the voltage and current dynamic responses for the Boost converter in three different simulation software, namely PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink, while using two types of nonlinear controllers. The utilized controller designs are (i) proportional-integral passivity-based control (PI-PBC) and (ii) inverse optimal control with PI action (IOC-PI). The main advantage of the PI-PBC and IOC-PI controllers is that both ensure the stable operation of the converter via Lyapunov's stability theory. In addition, in both controllers, integral action enables the elimination of non-modeled dynamics in the converter by allowing it to reach the reference with minimal stabilization times. The results showed that, despite the fact that all utilized simulation software applications had their advantages, the one with the best dynamic response for both nonlinear controls was PSIM. Moreover, it is easier to use for someone who has never worked with a simulation environment. The main objective of this research was to compare simulation software and find the most suitable environment for evaluating and implementing nonlinear control with regard to power electronic converter applications.spaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de ColombiaCiencia En Desarrollo; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Vol 15, Núm.1 (2024): Enero-JunioCiencia en Desarrollo; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2024): Vol 15, Núm.1 (2024): Enero-Junio2462-76580121-7488Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/SimulinkEvaluación de controladores para un convertidor elevador mediante las teorías PI-PBC & IOC-PI para soporte de tensión en cargas lineales: validaciones numéricas en PSIM, PLECS y MATLAB/Simulinkinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Gómez Chitiva, Juan SebastiánEscalante Sarrias, Andrés FelipeMontoya Giraldo, Oscar Danilo001/15392oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/153922025-07-18 10:56:46.269metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Evaluación de controladores para un convertidor elevador mediante las teorías PI-PBC & IOC-PI para soporte de tensión en cargas lineales: validaciones numéricas en PSIM, PLECS y MATLAB/Simulink
title Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink
spellingShingle Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink
title_short Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink
title_full Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink
title_fullStr Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink
title_full_unstemmed Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink
title_sort Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink
description This paper presents a comparison of the voltage and current dynamic responses for the Boost converter in three different simulation software, namely PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink, while using two types of nonlinear controllers. The utilized controller designs are (i) proportional-integral passivity-based control (PI-PBC) and (ii) inverse optimal control with PI action (IOC-PI). The main advantage of the PI-PBC and IOC-PI controllers is that both ensure the stable operation of the converter via Lyapunov's stability theory. In addition, in both controllers, integral action enables the elimination of non-modeled dynamics in the converter by allowing it to reach the reference with minimal stabilization times. The results showed that, despite the fact that all utilized simulation software applications had their advantages, the one with the best dynamic response for both nonlinear controls was PSIM. Moreover, it is easier to use for someone who has never worked with a simulation environment. The main objective of this research was to compare simulation software and find the most suitable environment for evaluating and implementing nonlinear control with regard to power electronic converter applications.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:24:11Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:24:11Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/15857
10.19053/01217488.v15.n1.2024.15857
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15392
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/15857
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15392
identifier_str_mv 10.19053/01217488.v15.n1.2024.15857
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Ciencia En Desarrollo; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Vol 15, Núm.1 (2024): Enero-Junio
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Ciencia en Desarrollo; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2024): Vol 15, Núm.1 (2024): Enero-Junio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2462-7658
0121-7488
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633895632404480