The underprivileged classes and the face of the state in central Mexico during the Second Empire (1864- 1867)
Following the postulates of state anthropology and the everyday aspects of its formation, this article reveals the face of the state in interaction with the rural population of central Mexico during the reign of Maximilian of Habsburg (1864 to 1867). The daily functioning of the state was studied fr...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2024
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13954
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/15557
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13954
- Palabra clave:
- antropología del estado
Formación cotidiana del estado
población rural del centro de México
imperio de Maximiliano de Habsburgo
Junta Protectora
Clases Menesterosas
state anthropology
day to day construction of the state
rural population of central Mexico
mpire of Maximilian of Habsburg
Protectorate Board
underprivileged classes
anthropologie de l’État
formation quotidienne de l’État
population rurale du centre du Mexique
empire de Maximilien de Habsbourg
Conseil de protection
classes officieuses
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2024 Nórida Fernanda Muñoz Ortiz
Summary: | Following the postulates of state anthropology and the everyday aspects of its formation, this article reveals the face of the state in interaction with the rural population of central Mexico during the reign of Maximilian of Habsburg (1864 to 1867). The daily functioning of the state was studied from the perspectives and experiences of both the governed and the authorities, through the analysis of the complaints and demands forwarded by this population to the Protectorate Board of the Underprivileged Classes. An inquiry was made into the institutional organs, while the discursive terms permitted by the government were appealed to, which allows us to infer that rural sectors constructed a negative image of local authorities, whereas the emperor and central officials were characterised in positive terms. Meanwhile, the authorities of the Board, writing from an official public space, projected an idea of a government obedient to imperial mandates and laws, with the purpose of preserving the stability of the empire. In general terms, the theoretical-methodological pertinence of the postulates of state anthropology is demonstrated in order to analyse the day to day relationship between the state - institutions and authorities - and the governed. |
---|