“Buen vivír” and constitutional rights within the constitutional and democratic State in Latin America

This reflection article aims to reference the theory-practice relevance of Constitucional rights looking for the good life, on the environment of the constitutional and democracy State whith the permanent interacition between Constituient power and constituted power in Latin America. Furthermore acc...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15814
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/9785
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15814
Palabra clave:
Constituient power
constituted power
Constitutional Democracy State
Constitutional rights
Buen vivír
Neoconstituionalism
Poder Constituyente
Poder Constituido
Derechos Constitucionales
buen vivir
Neoconstitucionalismo
Estado Constitucional democrático
Poder constituinte
Poder Constituído
Estado Constitucional Democrático
Direitos constitucionais
bom viver
neoconstitucionalismo
Rights
License
Derechos de autor 2018 Derecho y Realidad
Description
Summary:This reflection article aims to reference the theory-practice relevance of Constitucional rights looking for the good life, on the environment of the constitutional and democracy State whith the permanent interacition between Constituient power and constituted power in Latin America. Furthermore accompained by constitucional interpretation like suported of constitutional judge on the guaranty exercise and protection of constitutional rights together neo constitutionalism evolution. It is found that Latin America has changed the Creole constitutional postulate of the 19th and 20th centuries under the line of constitutionalism or neo-constitutionalism, which delegates the protection of constitutional rights to the interpretive normative and discretionary sphere of the judge that in many occasions minimizes or maximizes the rights.