The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes

Medical liability processes, by their nature, have a high degree of difficulty in evidentiary matters, which is why the different courts have adopted theories to try to solve said problem; to this extent, the positions adopted have varied significantly. One of the most recent is the duty- obligation...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15888
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15888
Palabra clave:
dynamic load; must; obligation; procedural load.
carga procesal
obligación
deber
carga dinámica
Prueba
Teste; carga dinâmica; deve; obrigação; ónus processual.
Rights
License
Derechos de autor 2019 Derecho y realidad
id REPOUPTC2_918f7772724a152e004e8be71355b52a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15888
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv La teoría del deber - obligación de las partes, en los procesos de responsabilidad médica
dc.title.pt-BR.fl_str_mv A teoria do dever - obrigação das partes, nos processos de responsabilidade médica
title The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes
spellingShingle The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes
dynamic load; must; obligation; procedural load.
carga procesal
obligación
deber
carga dinámica
Prueba
Teste; carga dinâmica; deve; obrigação; ónus processual.
title_short The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes
title_full The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes
title_fullStr The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes
title_full_unstemmed The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes
title_sort The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv dynamic load; must; obligation; procedural load.
topic dynamic load; must; obligation; procedural load.
carga procesal
obligación
deber
carga dinámica
Prueba
Teste; carga dinâmica; deve; obrigação; ónus processual.
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv carga procesal
obligación
deber
carga dinámica
Prueba
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Teste; carga dinâmica; deve; obrigação; ónus processual.
description Medical liability processes, by their nature, have a high degree of difficulty in evidentiary matters, which is why the different courts have adopted theories to try to solve said problem; to this extent, the positions adopted have varied significantly. One of the most recent is the duty- obligation of the parties to provide evidence, which differs from the dynamic burden of prooftheory. For this reason, an analysis of the preponderant theories in this matter was carried out in order to later develop in a timely manner the theory of duty-obligation of the parties to provide evidence, contemplated in Sentence C 218282017 of the Supreme Court of Justice, taking into account their main characteristics, their legal effects, and their differences with the dynamicburden of proof. In this study, it was evidenced that this new evidentiary theory moves away from the dynamic burden of proof, and demarcates a new position of the Supreme Court of Justice in medical liability processes.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:28:46Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:28:46Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15888
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15888
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683/11144
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Derecho y realidad
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Derecho y realidad
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 17 No. 34 (2019); 117-132
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 17 Núm. 34 (2019); 117-132
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Derecho y Realidad; v. 17 n. 34 (2019); 117-132
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2619-5607
1692-3936
10.19053/16923936.v17.n34.2019
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633841776492544
spelling 2019-07-302024-07-08T14:28:46Z2024-07-08T14:28:46Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15888Medical liability processes, by their nature, have a high degree of difficulty in evidentiary matters, which is why the different courts have adopted theories to try to solve said problem; to this extent, the positions adopted have varied significantly. One of the most recent is the duty- obligation of the parties to provide evidence, which differs from the dynamic burden of prooftheory. For this reason, an analysis of the preponderant theories in this matter was carried out in order to later develop in a timely manner the theory of duty-obligation of the parties to provide evidence, contemplated in Sentence C 218282017 of the Supreme Court of Justice, taking into account their main characteristics, their legal effects, and their differences with the dynamicburden of proof. In this study, it was evidenced that this new evidentiary theory moves away from the dynamic burden of proof, and demarcates a new position of the Supreme Court of Justice in medical liability processes.Los procesos de responsabilidad médica, por su naturaleza, revisten alto grado de dificultad en materia probatoria, es por esto que las diferentes cortes han adoptado teorías para tratar de resolver dicha problemática; en esta medida las posturas adoptadas han variado de manera significativa. Una de las más recientes es la de deber- obligación de las partes de aportar pruebas,que difiere de la teoría de la carga dinámica de la prueba. Por esto, se realizó un análisis de las teorías preponderantes en esta materia para luego desarrollar de manera puntual la teoría de deber- obligación de las partes de aportar pruebas, contemplada en la Sentencia C 218282017 de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, teniendo en cuenta sus características principales, sus efectos jurídicos, y sus diferencias con la carga dinámica de la prueba. En este estudio, se evidenció que esta nueva teoría probatoria se aleja de la carga dinámica de la prueba, y demarca una nueva posición de la Corte Suprema de Justicia en los procesos de responsabilidad médica.Os processos de responsabilidade médica, por sua natureza, apresentam alto grau de dificuldade em matéria probatória, é por isso que os diferentes tribunais têm adotado teorias para tentar resolver o referido problema; nesta medida as posições adotadas têm variado de certa forma significativo. Uma das mais recentes é o dever-obrigação das partes de apresentarem provas,que difere da teoria da prova de carga dinâmica. Portanto, uma análise do teorias preponderantes neste assunto para posteriormente desenvolver em tempo hábil a teoria da dever- obrigação das partes de apresentarem provas, prevista na Sentença C 218282017 de o Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, levando em consideração suas principais características, seus efeitoslegais e suas diferenças com o ônus da prova dinâmico. Neste estudo, foi mostrado que Esta nova teoria das evidências afasta-se do ônus da prova dinâmico e demarca um novo posição do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça em processos de responsabilidade médica.application/pdfspaspaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683/11144Derechos de autor 2019 Derecho y realidadhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 17 No. 34 (2019); 117-132Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 17 Núm. 34 (2019); 117-132Derecho y Realidad; v. 17 n. 34 (2019); 117-1322619-56071692-393610.19053/16923936.v17.n34.2019dynamic load; must; obligation; procedural load.carga procesalobligacióndebercarga dinámicaPruebaTeste; carga dinâmica; deve; obrigação; ónus processual.The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processesLa teoría del deber - obligación de las partes, en los procesos de responsabilidad médicaA teoria do dever - obrigação das partes, nos processos de responsabilidade médicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Vega Pérez, Leonel AntonioAriza Mantilla, Dianey Carolina001/15888oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/158882025-07-18 11:09:10.097metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co

Publicaciones similares