Physiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic review

Autores:
Gutiérrez-Villamil, Diego Alejandro
Alvarado-Sanabria, Oscar Humberto
Becerra-Lagos, Juan Diego
Balaguera-López, Helber Enrique
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2025
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/21474
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.24223719.18860
Palabra clave:
Solanaceae
Gas exchange
Chlorophyll
Hypoxia
Morphological traits
Solanum crops
Intercambio gaseoso
Clorofila
Hipoxia
Rasgos morfológicos
Cultivos de Solanum
Rights
openAccess
License
Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas - 2025
id REPOUPTC2_83c83700306bfbe5f288964ce28f6339
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/21474
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Physiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic review
title Physiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic review
spellingShingle Physiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic review
Solanaceae
Gas exchange
Chlorophyll
Hypoxia
Morphological traits
Solanum crops
Intercambio gaseoso
Clorofila
Hipoxia
Rasgos morfológicos
Cultivos de Solanum
title_short Physiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic review
title_full Physiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic review
title_fullStr Physiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Physiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic review
title_sort Physiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic review
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Gutiérrez-Villamil, Diego Alejandro
Alvarado-Sanabria, Oscar Humberto
Becerra-Lagos, Juan Diego
Balaguera-López, Helber Enrique
dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv Gutiérrez-Villamil, Diego Alejandro
Alvarado-Sanabria, Oscar Humberto
Becerra-Lagos, Juan Diego
Balaguera-López, Helber Enrique
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Solanaceae
Gas exchange
Chlorophyll
Hypoxia
Morphological traits
Solanum crops
Intercambio gaseoso
Clorofila
Hipoxia
Rasgos morfológicos
Cultivos de Solanum
topic Solanaceae
Gas exchange
Chlorophyll
Hypoxia
Morphological traits
Solanum crops
Intercambio gaseoso
Clorofila
Hipoxia
Rasgos morfológicos
Cultivos de Solanum
publishDate 2025
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05-01 00:00:00
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2011-2173
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.19053/uptc.24223719.18860
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2422-3719
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.24223719.18860
identifier_str_mv 2011-2173
10.19053/uptc.24223719.18860
2422-3719
url https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.24223719.18860
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv Baracaldo, A., R. Carvajal, A.P. Romero, A.M. Prieto, F.J. García, G. Fischer, and D. Miranda. 2014. El anegamiento afecta el crecimiento y producción de biomasa en tomate chonto (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cultivado bajo sombrío. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 8(1), 92-102. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2014v8i1.2803
Betancourt-Osorio, J., D. Sanchez-Canro, and H. Restrepo-Diaz. 2016. Effect of nitrogen nutritional statuses and waterlogging conditions on growth parameters, nitrogen use efficiency and chlorophyll fluorescence in tamarillo seedlings. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 44(2), 375-381. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha44210438
Bhatt, R.M., K.K. Upreti, M. Divya, S. Bhat, C. Pavithra, and A. Sadashiva. 2015. Interspecific grafting to enhance physiological resilience to flooding stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sci. Hortic. 182, 8-17. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.043
Borsoi, F.T., G.M. Pastore, and H. Arruda. 2024. Health benefits of the alkaloids from lobeira (Solanum lycocarpum St. Hill): a comprehensive review. Plants 13(10), 1396. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101396
Briglia, N., K. Williams, D. Wu, Y. Li, S. Tao, F. Corke, G. Montanaro, A. Petrozza, D. Amato, F. Cellini, J.H. Doonan, W. Yang, and V. Nuzzo. 2020. Image-based assessment of drought response in grapevines. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 595. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00595
Burda, B.U., E.A. O'Connor, E.M. Webber, N. Redmond, and L.A. Perdue. 2017. Estimating data from figures with a Web-based program: Considerations for a systematic review. Res. Synth. Methods 8(3), 258-262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1232
Cardona, W.A.A., L.G. Bautista-Montealegre, N. Flórez-Velasco, and G. Fischer. 2016. Biomass and root development response of lulo (Solanum quitoense var. septentrionale) plants to shading and waterlogging. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 10(1), 53-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2016v10i1.5124
Chaumont, F. and S.D. Tyerman. 2014. Aquaporins: highly regulated channels controlling plant water relations. Plant Physiol. 164(4), 1600-1618. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.233791
Chen, Y., H. Zhang, W. Chen, Y. Gao, K. Xu, X. Sun, and L. Huo. 2024. The role of ethylene in the regulation of plant response mechanisms to waterlogging stress. Plant Cell Rep. 43, 278. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-024-03367-9
de Ollas, C., Z. Pitarch, J.T. Matus, H. Candela, J.L. Rambla, A. Granell, and V. Arbona. 2021. Identification of ABA-mediated genetic and metabolic responses to soil flooding in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. Mill). Front. Plant Sci. 12, 613059. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.613059
de Pedro, L.F., F. Mignolli, A. Scartazza, J.P. Melana-Colavita, C.A. Bouzo, and M.L. Vidoz. 2020. Maintenance of photosynthetic capacity in flooded tomato plants with reduced ethylene sensitivity. Physiol. Plant. 170(2), 202-217. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13141
Delbrouck, J.A., M. Desgagné, C. Comeau, K. Bouarab, F. Malouin, and P.L. Boudreault. 2023. The therapeutic value of Solanum steroidal (glyco) alkaloids: a 10-year comprehensive review. Molecules 28(13), 4957. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28134957
Dresbøll, D. B., K. Thorup-Kristensen, B. M. McKenzie, L. X. Dupuy, and A. G. Bengough. 2013. Timelapse scanning reveals spatial variation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) root elongation rates during partial waterlogging. Plant and Soil 369, 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1592-5
Elizalde-Romero, C.A., L.A. Montoya-Inzunza, L.A. Contreras-Angulo, J.B. Heredia, and E.P. Gutiérrez-Grijalva. 2021. Solanum fruits: phytochemicals, bioaccessibility and bioavailability, and their relationship with their health-promoting effects. Front. Nutr. 8, 790582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.790582
Else, M.A. and M.B. Jackson. 1998. Transport of 1-aminocycloproPane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in the transpiration stream of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in relation to foliar ethylene production and petiole epinasty. Funct. Plant Biol. 25, 453-458. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/PP97105
Else, M.A., J.M. Taylor, and C.J. Atkinson. 2006. Anti-transpirant activity in xylem sap from flooded tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants is not due to pH-mediated redistributions of root- or shoot-sourced ABA. J. Exp. Bot. 57(12), 3349-3357. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl099
Fan, B., K. Liao, L.-N. Wang, L.-L. Shi, Y. Zhang, L.-J. Xu, Y. Zhou, J.-F. Li, Y.-Q. Chen, Q.-F. Chen, and S. Xiao. 2023. Calcium-dependent activation of CPK12 facilitates its cytoplasm-to-nucleus translocation to potentiate plant hypoxia sensing by phosphorylating ERF-VII transcription factors. Mol. Plant 16(6), 979-998. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2023.04.002
Fischer, G., H.E. Balaguera-López, and S. Magnitskiy. 2021. Revisión de la ecofisiología de frutos andinos importantes: Solanaceae. Rev. U.D.C.A Act. & Div. Cient. 24(1), e1701. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v24.n1.2021.1701
Fischer, G., F. Casierra-Posada, and M. Blanke. 2023. Impact of waterlogging on fruit crops in the era of climate change, with emphasis on tropical and subtropical species: a review. Agron. Colomb. 41(2), e108351. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v41n2.108351
Flórez-Velasco, N., H.E. Balaguera-López, and H. Restrepo-Díaz. 2015. Effects of foliar urea application on lulo (Solanum quitoense cv. septentrionale) plants grown under diffeRent waterlogging and nitrogen conditions. Sci. Hortic. 186, 154-162. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.021
Flórez-Velasco, N., G. Fischer, and H.E. Balaguera-López. 2024. Photosynthesis in fruit crops of the high tropical Andes: A systematic review. Agron. Colomb. 42(2), e113887. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v42n2.113887
Forero, L.E., J. Grenzer, J. Heinze, C. Schittko, and A. Kulmatiski. 2019. Greenhouse- and field-measured plant-soil feedbacks are not correlated. Front. Environ. Sci. 7, 478851. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00184
Geldhof, B., J. Pattyn, and B. Van De Poel. 2023. From a different angle: genetic diversity underlies diffeRentiation of waterlogging-induced epinasty in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1178778
Ghatak, A., P. Chaturvedi, P. Paul, G.K. Agrawal, R. Rakwal, S.T. Kim, W. Weckwerth, and R. Gupta. 2017. Proteomics survey of Solanaceae family: current status and challenges ahead. J. Proteom. 169, 41-57. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2017.05.016
Hartman, S., N. Van Dongen, D.M. Renneberg, R.A. WelsChen-Evertman, J. Kociemba, R. Sasidharan, and L.A. Voesenek. 2020. Ethylene differentially modulates hypoxia responses and tolerance across Solanum species. Plants 9(8), 1022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9081022
Igamberdiev, A.U. and R.D. Hill. 2018. Elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ in response to energy deficiency in plants: the general mechanism of adaptation to low oxygen stress. Biochem. J. 475, 1411-1425. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20180169
Jackson, M.B., L.R. Saker, C.M. Crisp, M.A. Else, and F. Janowiak. 2003. Ionic and pH signalling from roots to shoots of flooded tomato plants in relation to stomatal closure. Plant Soil 253, 103-113. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024588532535
Jethva, J., R.R. Schmidt, M. Sauter, and J. Selinski. 2022. Try or die: dynamics of plant respiration and how to survive low oxygen conditions. Plants 11(2), 205. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11020205
Jia, W., M. Ma, J. Chen, and S. Wu. 2021. Plant morphological, physiological and anatomical adaptation to flooding stress and the underlying molecular mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22(3), 1088. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031088
Kagenishi, T., F. Baluška, and K. Yokawa. 2023. Stress-induced ethanol affects endocytic vesicle recycling and F-actin organisation in arabidopsis root apex cells. Environ. Exp. Bot. 205, 105123. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.105123
Khoury, M.G., R. Martin, M. Houben, and G. Muday. 2024. Ethylene regulates root growth and development. pp. 247-260. In: Eshel, A. and T. Beeckman (eds.). Plant roots: the hidden half. 5th ed. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/b23126
Kudoyarova, G., D. Veselov, V. Yemelyanov, and M. Shishova. 2022. The role of aquaporins in plant growth under conditions of oxygen deficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(17), 10159. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710159
Liu, K., M.T. Harrison, H. Yan. D.L. Liu, H. Meinke, G. Hoogenboom, B. Wang, B. Peng, K. Guan, J. Jaegermeyr, E. Wang, F. Zhang, X. Yin, S. Archontoulis, L. Nie, A. Badea, J. Man, D. Wallach, J. Zhao, A. Borrego, S. Fahad, X. Tian, W. Wang, F. Tao, Z. Zhang, R. Rötter, Y. Yuan, M. Zhu, P. Dai, J. Nie, Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, and M. Zhou. 2023. Silver lining to a climate crisis in multiple prospects for alleviating crop waterlogging under future climates. Nat. Commun. 14, 765. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36129-4
Liu, W., K. Liu, D. Chen, Z. Zhang, B. Li, M.M., S. Tian, and T. Chen. 2022. Solanum lycopersicum, a model plant for the studies in developmental biology, stress biology and food science. Foods 11(16), 2402. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162402
Martínez-Arias, C., J. Witzell, A. Solla, J.A. Martin, and J. Rodríguez-Calcerrada. 2022 Beneficial and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions during flooding stress. Plant Cell Environ. 45, 2875-2897. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14403
Mauro, R.P., M. Agnello, M. DisteFano, L. Sabatino, C. Leonardi, and F. Giuffrida. 2020. Chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthesis and growth of tomato plants as affected by long-term oxygen root zone deprivation and grafting. Agronomy 10(1), 137. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010137
Molina, S., A.M. Zamarreño, J. María, and R. Aroca. 2014. The symbiosis with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus rhizophagus irregularis drives root water transport in flooded tomato plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 55(5), 1017-1029. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu035
Mullen, J.L., C. Weinig, and R.P. Hangarter. 2006. Shade avoidance and the regulation of leaf inclination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 29(6), 1099-1106. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01484.x
Nada, K., E. Iwatani, T. Doi, and S. Tachibana. 2004. Effect of putrescine pretreatment to roots on growth and lactate metabolism in the root of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under root-zone hypoxia. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 73(4), 337-339. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.73.337
Niu, L., F. Jiang, J. Yin, Y. Wang, Y. Li, X. Yu, X. Song, C-O. Ottosen, E. Rosenqvist, R. Mittler, Z. Wu, and R. Zhou. 2023. ROS-mediated waterlogging memory, induced by priming, mitigates photosynthesis inhibition in tomato under waterlogging stress. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1238108. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1238108
Orsák, M., Z. Kotíková, F. Hnilička, and J. Lachman. 2023. Effect of long-term drought and waterlogging stress on photosynthetic pigments in potato. Plant Soil Environ. 69(4), 152-160. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17221/415/2022-pse
Ortiz-Bobea, A., T.R. Ault, C.M. Carrillo, R.G. Chambers, and D.B. Lobell. 2021. Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth. Nat. Clim. Change 11(4), 306-312. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01000-1
Ren, B., W. Yu, P. Liu, B. Zhao, and J. Zhang. 2023. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics and leaf senescence in summer maize to simultaneous stresses of waterlogging and shading. Crop J. 11(1), 269-277. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2022.06.003
Rodríguez-Gamir, J., J. Xue, M.J. Clearwater, D.F. Meason, P.W. Clinton, and C. Domec. 2019. Aquaporin regulation in roots controls plant hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in Pinus radiata under water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 42(2), 717-729. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13460
Sánchez-Reinoso, A.D., Y. Jiménez-Pulido, J.P. Martínez-Pérez, C.S. Pinilla, and G. Fischer. 2019. Chlorophyll fluorescence and other physiological parameters as indicators of waterlogging and shadow stress in lulo (Solanum quitoense var. septentrionale) seedlings. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 13(3), 325-335. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2019v13i3.10017
Sarker, M.S.A., A. Islam, M.W. Islam, P.C. Dhar, and M.R. Abdullah. 2023a. Effect of water logging on vegetative growth and fruit yield of brinjal. Bangladesh J. 44, 9-12.
Sarker, K.K., A.K.M. Quamruzzaman, M.N. Uddin, A. Rahman, A. Quddus, S.K. Biswas, A. Gaber, and A. Hossain. 2023b. Evaluation of 10 eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes for development of cultivars suitable for short-term waterlogged conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen 75(1), 179-192. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00688-1
Sasidharan, R., J. Bailey-Serres, M. Ashikari, B.J. Atwell, T.D. Colmer, K. Fagerstedt, T. Fukao, P. Geigenberger, K.H. Hebelstrup, R.D. Hill, M.J. Holdsworth, A.M. Ismail, F. Licausi, A. Mustroph, M. Nakazono, O. Pedersen, P. Perata, M. Sauter, M.-C. Shih, B.K. Sorrell, G.G. Striker, J.T. van Dongen, J. Whelan, S. Xiao, E.J.W. Visser, and L.A.C.J. Voesenek. 2017. Community recommendations on terminology and procedures used in flooding and low oxygen stress research. New Phytol. 214(4), 1403-1407. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14519
Shukla, V., L. Lombardi, S. Iacopino, A. Pencik, O. Novak, P. Perata, B. Giuntoli, and F. Licausi. 2019. Endogenous hypoxia in lateral root primordia controls root architecture by antagonizing auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 12(4), 538-551. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2019.01.007
Tian, L.-X., Y.-C. Zhang, P.-L. Chen, F.-F. Zhang, J. Li, F. Yan, Y. Dong, and B.-L. Feng. 2021. How does the waterlogging regime affect crop yield? A global meta-analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 634898. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.634898
Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
Yin, J., L. Niu, Y. Li, X. Song, and C.O. Ottosen. 2023. The effects of waterlogging stress on plant morphology, leaf physiology and fruit yield in six tomato genotypes at anthesis stage. Veg. Res. 3, 31. Doi: https://doi.org/10.48130/VR-2023-0031
Zhang, Y., G. Liu, H. Dong, and C. Li. 2021. Waterlogging stress in cotton: damage, adaptability, alleviation strategies, and mechanisms. Crop J. 9(2), 257-270. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.08.005
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 12
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv 2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv 19
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/download/18860/15489
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas - 2025
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas - 2025
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTC
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/18860
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/bitstreams/3130a370-86ba-4d56-aebf-d7cb7c66bc6a/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv eabb3aed7d93d80d73a965fc6476b2a3
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1881673891520184320
spelling Gutiérrez-Villamil, Diego AlejandroAlvarado-Sanabria, Oscar HumbertoBecerra-Lagos, Juan DiegoBalaguera-López, Helber Enrique2025-05-01 00:00:002025-05-01 00:00:002025-05-012011-217310.19053/uptc.24223719.188602422-3719https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.24223719.18860application/pdfengSociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTCRevista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas - 2025http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/18860SolanaceaeGas exchangeChlorophyllHypoxiaMorphological traitsSolanum cropsIntercambio gaseosoClorofilaHipoxiaRasgos morfológicosCultivos de SolanumPhysiological responses in commercial plants of the genus Solanum to flooding stress: a systematic reviewArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Baracaldo, A., R. Carvajal, A.P. Romero, A.M. Prieto, F.J. García, G. Fischer, and D. Miranda. 2014. El anegamiento afecta el crecimiento y producción de biomasa en tomate chonto (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cultivado bajo sombrío. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 8(1), 92-102. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2014v8i1.2803Betancourt-Osorio, J., D. Sanchez-Canro, and H. Restrepo-Diaz. 2016. Effect of nitrogen nutritional statuses and waterlogging conditions on growth parameters, nitrogen use efficiency and chlorophyll fluorescence in tamarillo seedlings. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 44(2), 375-381. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha44210438Bhatt, R.M., K.K. Upreti, M. Divya, S. Bhat, C. Pavithra, and A. Sadashiva. 2015. Interspecific grafting to enhance physiological resilience to flooding stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sci. Hortic. 182, 8-17. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.043Borsoi, F.T., G.M. Pastore, and H. Arruda. 2024. Health benefits of the alkaloids from lobeira (Solanum lycocarpum St. Hill): a comprehensive review. Plants 13(10), 1396. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101396Briglia, N., K. Williams, D. Wu, Y. Li, S. Tao, F. Corke, G. Montanaro, A. Petrozza, D. Amato, F. Cellini, J.H. Doonan, W. Yang, and V. Nuzzo. 2020. Image-based assessment of drought response in grapevines. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 595. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00595Burda, B.U., E.A. O'Connor, E.M. Webber, N. Redmond, and L.A. Perdue. 2017. Estimating data from figures with a Web-based program: Considerations for a systematic review. Res. Synth. Methods 8(3), 258-262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1232Cardona, W.A.A., L.G. Bautista-Montealegre, N. Flórez-Velasco, and G. Fischer. 2016. Biomass and root development response of lulo (Solanum quitoense var. septentrionale) plants to shading and waterlogging. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 10(1), 53-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2016v10i1.5124Chaumont, F. and S.D. Tyerman. 2014. Aquaporins: highly regulated channels controlling plant water relations. Plant Physiol. 164(4), 1600-1618. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.233791Chen, Y., H. Zhang, W. Chen, Y. Gao, K. Xu, X. Sun, and L. Huo. 2024. The role of ethylene in the regulation of plant response mechanisms to waterlogging stress. Plant Cell Rep. 43, 278. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-024-03367-9de Ollas, C., Z. Pitarch, J.T. Matus, H. Candela, J.L. Rambla, A. Granell, and V. Arbona. 2021. Identification of ABA-mediated genetic and metabolic responses to soil flooding in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. Mill). Front. Plant Sci. 12, 613059. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.613059de Pedro, L.F., F. Mignolli, A. Scartazza, J.P. Melana-Colavita, C.A. Bouzo, and M.L. Vidoz. 2020. Maintenance of photosynthetic capacity in flooded tomato plants with reduced ethylene sensitivity. Physiol. Plant. 170(2), 202-217. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13141Delbrouck, J.A., M. Desgagné, C. Comeau, K. Bouarab, F. Malouin, and P.L. Boudreault. 2023. The therapeutic value of Solanum steroidal (glyco) alkaloids: a 10-year comprehensive review. Molecules 28(13), 4957. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28134957Dresbøll, D. B., K. Thorup-Kristensen, B. M. McKenzie, L. X. Dupuy, and A. G. Bengough. 2013. Timelapse scanning reveals spatial variation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) root elongation rates during partial waterlogging. Plant and Soil 369, 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1592-5Elizalde-Romero, C.A., L.A. Montoya-Inzunza, L.A. Contreras-Angulo, J.B. Heredia, and E.P. Gutiérrez-Grijalva. 2021. Solanum fruits: phytochemicals, bioaccessibility and bioavailability, and their relationship with their health-promoting effects. Front. Nutr. 8, 790582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.790582Else, M.A. and M.B. Jackson. 1998. Transport of 1-aminocycloproPane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in the transpiration stream of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in relation to foliar ethylene production and petiole epinasty. Funct. Plant Biol. 25, 453-458. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/PP97105Else, M.A., J.M. Taylor, and C.J. Atkinson. 2006. Anti-transpirant activity in xylem sap from flooded tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants is not due to pH-mediated redistributions of root- or shoot-sourced ABA. J. Exp. Bot. 57(12), 3349-3357. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl099Fan, B., K. Liao, L.-N. Wang, L.-L. Shi, Y. Zhang, L.-J. Xu, Y. Zhou, J.-F. Li, Y.-Q. Chen, Q.-F. Chen, and S. Xiao. 2023. Calcium-dependent activation of CPK12 facilitates its cytoplasm-to-nucleus translocation to potentiate plant hypoxia sensing by phosphorylating ERF-VII transcription factors. Mol. Plant 16(6), 979-998. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2023.04.002Fischer, G., H.E. Balaguera-López, and S. Magnitskiy. 2021. Revisión de la ecofisiología de frutos andinos importantes: Solanaceae. Rev. U.D.C.A Act. & Div. Cient. 24(1), e1701. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v24.n1.2021.1701Fischer, G., F. Casierra-Posada, and M. Blanke. 2023. Impact of waterlogging on fruit crops in the era of climate change, with emphasis on tropical and subtropical species: a review. Agron. Colomb. 41(2), e108351. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v41n2.108351Flórez-Velasco, N., H.E. Balaguera-López, and H. Restrepo-Díaz. 2015. Effects of foliar urea application on lulo (Solanum quitoense cv. septentrionale) plants grown under diffeRent waterlogging and nitrogen conditions. Sci. Hortic. 186, 154-162. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.021Flórez-Velasco, N., G. Fischer, and H.E. Balaguera-López. 2024. Photosynthesis in fruit crops of the high tropical Andes: A systematic review. Agron. Colomb. 42(2), e113887. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v42n2.113887Forero, L.E., J. Grenzer, J. Heinze, C. Schittko, and A. Kulmatiski. 2019. Greenhouse- and field-measured plant-soil feedbacks are not correlated. Front. Environ. Sci. 7, 478851. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00184Geldhof, B., J. Pattyn, and B. Van De Poel. 2023. From a different angle: genetic diversity underlies diffeRentiation of waterlogging-induced epinasty in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1178778Ghatak, A., P. Chaturvedi, P. Paul, G.K. Agrawal, R. Rakwal, S.T. Kim, W. Weckwerth, and R. Gupta. 2017. Proteomics survey of Solanaceae family: current status and challenges ahead. J. Proteom. 169, 41-57. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2017.05.016Hartman, S., N. Van Dongen, D.M. Renneberg, R.A. WelsChen-Evertman, J. Kociemba, R. Sasidharan, and L.A. Voesenek. 2020. Ethylene differentially modulates hypoxia responses and tolerance across Solanum species. Plants 9(8), 1022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9081022Igamberdiev, A.U. and R.D. Hill. 2018. Elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ in response to energy deficiency in plants: the general mechanism of adaptation to low oxygen stress. Biochem. J. 475, 1411-1425. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20180169Jackson, M.B., L.R. Saker, C.M. Crisp, M.A. Else, and F. Janowiak. 2003. Ionic and pH signalling from roots to shoots of flooded tomato plants in relation to stomatal closure. Plant Soil 253, 103-113. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024588532535Jethva, J., R.R. Schmidt, M. Sauter, and J. Selinski. 2022. Try or die: dynamics of plant respiration and how to survive low oxygen conditions. Plants 11(2), 205. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11020205Jia, W., M. Ma, J. Chen, and S. Wu. 2021. Plant morphological, physiological and anatomical adaptation to flooding stress and the underlying molecular mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22(3), 1088. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031088Kagenishi, T., F. Baluška, and K. Yokawa. 2023. Stress-induced ethanol affects endocytic vesicle recycling and F-actin organisation in arabidopsis root apex cells. Environ. Exp. Bot. 205, 105123. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.105123Khoury, M.G., R. Martin, M. Houben, and G. Muday. 2024. Ethylene regulates root growth and development. pp. 247-260. In: Eshel, A. and T. Beeckman (eds.). Plant roots: the hidden half. 5th ed. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/b23126Kudoyarova, G., D. Veselov, V. Yemelyanov, and M. Shishova. 2022. The role of aquaporins in plant growth under conditions of oxygen deficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(17), 10159. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710159Liu, K., M.T. Harrison, H. Yan. D.L. Liu, H. Meinke, G. Hoogenboom, B. Wang, B. Peng, K. Guan, J. Jaegermeyr, E. Wang, F. Zhang, X. Yin, S. Archontoulis, L. Nie, A. Badea, J. Man, D. Wallach, J. Zhao, A. Borrego, S. Fahad, X. Tian, W. Wang, F. Tao, Z. Zhang, R. Rötter, Y. Yuan, M. Zhu, P. Dai, J. Nie, Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, and M. Zhou. 2023. Silver lining to a climate crisis in multiple prospects for alleviating crop waterlogging under future climates. Nat. Commun. 14, 765. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36129-4Liu, W., K. Liu, D. Chen, Z. Zhang, B. Li, M.M., S. Tian, and T. Chen. 2022. Solanum lycopersicum, a model plant for the studies in developmental biology, stress biology and food science. Foods 11(16), 2402. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162402Martínez-Arias, C., J. Witzell, A. Solla, J.A. Martin, and J. Rodríguez-Calcerrada. 2022 Beneficial and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions during flooding stress. Plant Cell Environ. 45, 2875-2897. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14403Mauro, R.P., M. Agnello, M. DisteFano, L. Sabatino, C. Leonardi, and F. Giuffrida. 2020. Chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthesis and growth of tomato plants as affected by long-term oxygen root zone deprivation and grafting. Agronomy 10(1), 137. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010137Molina, S., A.M. Zamarreño, J. María, and R. Aroca. 2014. The symbiosis with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus rhizophagus irregularis drives root water transport in flooded tomato plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 55(5), 1017-1029. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu035Mullen, J.L., C. Weinig, and R.P. Hangarter. 2006. Shade avoidance and the regulation of leaf inclination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 29(6), 1099-1106. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01484.xNada, K., E. Iwatani, T. Doi, and S. Tachibana. 2004. Effect of putrescine pretreatment to roots on growth and lactate metabolism in the root of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under root-zone hypoxia. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 73(4), 337-339. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.73.337Niu, L., F. Jiang, J. Yin, Y. Wang, Y. Li, X. Yu, X. Song, C-O. Ottosen, E. Rosenqvist, R. Mittler, Z. Wu, and R. Zhou. 2023. ROS-mediated waterlogging memory, induced by priming, mitigates photosynthesis inhibition in tomato under waterlogging stress. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1238108. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1238108Orsák, M., Z. Kotíková, F. Hnilička, and J. Lachman. 2023. Effect of long-term drought and waterlogging stress on photosynthetic pigments in potato. Plant Soil Environ. 69(4), 152-160. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17221/415/2022-pseOrtiz-Bobea, A., T.R. Ault, C.M. Carrillo, R.G. Chambers, and D.B. Lobell. 2021. Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth. Nat. Clim. Change 11(4), 306-312. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01000-1Ren, B., W. Yu, P. Liu, B. Zhao, and J. Zhang. 2023. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics and leaf senescence in summer maize to simultaneous stresses of waterlogging and shading. Crop J. 11(1), 269-277. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2022.06.003Rodríguez-Gamir, J., J. Xue, M.J. Clearwater, D.F. Meason, P.W. Clinton, and C. Domec. 2019. Aquaporin regulation in roots controls plant hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in Pinus radiata under water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 42(2), 717-729. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13460Sánchez-Reinoso, A.D., Y. Jiménez-Pulido, J.P. Martínez-Pérez, C.S. Pinilla, and G. Fischer. 2019. Chlorophyll fluorescence and other physiological parameters as indicators of waterlogging and shadow stress in lulo (Solanum quitoense var. septentrionale) seedlings. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 13(3), 325-335. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2019v13i3.10017Sarker, M.S.A., A. Islam, M.W. Islam, P.C. Dhar, and M.R. Abdullah. 2023a. Effect of water logging on vegetative growth and fruit yield of brinjal. Bangladesh J. 44, 9-12.Sarker, K.K., A.K.M. Quamruzzaman, M.N. Uddin, A. Rahman, A. Quddus, S.K. Biswas, A. Gaber, and A. Hossain. 2023b. Evaluation of 10 eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes for development of cultivars suitable for short-term waterlogged conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen 75(1), 179-192. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00688-1Sasidharan, R., J. Bailey-Serres, M. Ashikari, B.J. Atwell, T.D. Colmer, K. Fagerstedt, T. Fukao, P. Geigenberger, K.H. Hebelstrup, R.D. Hill, M.J. Holdsworth, A.M. Ismail, F. Licausi, A. Mustroph, M. Nakazono, O. Pedersen, P. Perata, M. Sauter, M.-C. Shih, B.K. Sorrell, G.G. Striker, J.T. van Dongen, J. Whelan, S. Xiao, E.J.W. Visser, and L.A.C.J. Voesenek. 2017. Community recommendations on terminology and procedures used in flooding and low oxygen stress research. New Phytol. 214(4), 1403-1407. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14519Shukla, V., L. Lombardi, S. Iacopino, A. Pencik, O. Novak, P. Perata, B. Giuntoli, and F. Licausi. 2019. Endogenous hypoxia in lateral root primordia controls root architecture by antagonizing auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 12(4), 538-551. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2019.01.007Tian, L.-X., Y.-C. Zhang, P.-L. Chen, F.-F. Zhang, J. Li, F. Yan, Y. Dong, and B.-L. Feng. 2021. How does the waterlogging regime affect crop yield? A global meta-analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 634898. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.634898Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4Yin, J., L. Niu, Y. Li, X. Song, and C.O. Ottosen. 2023. The effects of waterlogging stress on plant morphology, leaf physiology and fruit yield in six tomato genotypes at anthesis stage. Veg. Res. 3, 31. Doi: https://doi.org/10.48130/VR-2023-0031Zhang, Y., G. Liu, H. Dong, and C. Li. 2021. Waterlogging stress in cotton: damage, adaptability, alleviation strategies, and mechanisms. Crop J. 9(2), 257-270. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.08.005122119Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolashttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/download/18860/15489PublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2894https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/bitstreams/3130a370-86ba-4d56-aebf-d7cb7c66bc6a/downloadeabb3aed7d93d80d73a965fc6476b2a3MD51falseAnonymousREAD001/21474oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/214742026-09-29 21:33:06.592http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com