Evaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical Comparison

The methods for determining load capacity in stratified soils are numerous and differ in their methods and results. These differences in analysis lead to uncertainty in engineering practices or over-dimensioning of the foundation solution. This study seeks to determine three analytical methods of lo...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
eng
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/14299
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/12080
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14299
Palabra clave:
Stratified soils
load capacity
numerical modeling
APM
imaginary foundation
Terzaghi method
finite elements
FEM
Suelos estratificados
capacidad de carga
modelación numérica
APM
zapata imaginaria
método de Terzaghi
elementos finitos
FEM
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf170
id REPOUPTC2_7f0d80f74a8022528584428a7639b320
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/14299
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical Comparison
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Evaluación de capacidad de carga de suelos estratificados (2 estratos) mediante comparativa analítica-numérica
title Evaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical Comparison
spellingShingle Evaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical Comparison
Stratified soils
load capacity
numerical modeling
APM
imaginary foundation
Terzaghi method
finite elements
FEM
Suelos estratificados
capacidad de carga
modelación numérica
APM
zapata imaginaria
método de Terzaghi
elementos finitos
FEM
title_short Evaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical Comparison
title_full Evaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical Comparison
title_fullStr Evaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical Comparison
title_sort Evaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical Comparison
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Stratified soils
load capacity
numerical modeling
APM
imaginary foundation
Terzaghi method
finite elements
FEM
topic Stratified soils
load capacity
numerical modeling
APM
imaginary foundation
Terzaghi method
finite elements
FEM
Suelos estratificados
capacidad de carga
modelación numérica
APM
zapata imaginaria
método de Terzaghi
elementos finitos
FEM
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Suelos estratificados
capacidad de carga
modelación numérica
APM
zapata imaginaria
método de Terzaghi
elementos finitos
FEM
description The methods for determining load capacity in stratified soils are numerous and differ in their methods and results. These differences in analysis lead to uncertainty in engineering practices or over-dimensioning of the foundation solution. This study seeks to determine three analytical methods of load capacity in stratified soils (2 layers) for shallow foundations: 1) Imaginary foundation, 2) Average parameter method (APM), and 3) Terzaghi's method to compare their results with those obtained from numerical modeling by means of the finite element method using a widely applied software (Abaqus academic version). Within the methodology developed in the finite element modeling, variables were parameterized (modulus of elasticity, depth of deflection, and displacement-load) and two behavioral laws were evaluated (Elastic and Drucker-Prager). The results that were obtained from the analysis show that when performing numerical modeling using the law of elastic behavior in soils of two layers, exaggerated results are generated with respect to analytical methods. Another important result is that when hard soils are on top of soft soils the results of numerical and analytical methods tend to be similar to each other. Most importantly, the variables that have the greatest influence on the load capacity in soils of one and two layers are the angle of friction, yield stress, and in the case of numerical analysis the constraint displacement (load). In addition, it was observed that for numerical modeling better results are obtained when considering an elastoplastic model, such as Drucker Prager.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:11:56Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:11:56Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-24
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a253
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/12080
10.19053/01211129.v30.n55.2021.12080
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14299
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/12080
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14299
identifier_str_mv 10.19053/01211129.v30.n55.2021.12080
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
spa
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
spa
language eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/12080/10279
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/12080/10277
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/12080/10786
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf170
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf170
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.en-US.fl_str_mv Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 30 No. 55 (2021): January-March 2021 (Continuous Publication); e12080
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 30 Núm. 55 (2021): Enero-Marzo 2021 (Publicación Continua); e12080
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2357-5328
0121-1129
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633828335845376
spelling 2021-02-242024-07-05T19:11:56Z2024-07-05T19:11:56Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1208010.19053/01211129.v30.n55.2021.12080https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14299The methods for determining load capacity in stratified soils are numerous and differ in their methods and results. These differences in analysis lead to uncertainty in engineering practices or over-dimensioning of the foundation solution. This study seeks to determine three analytical methods of load capacity in stratified soils (2 layers) for shallow foundations: 1) Imaginary foundation, 2) Average parameter method (APM), and 3) Terzaghi's method to compare their results with those obtained from numerical modeling by means of the finite element method using a widely applied software (Abaqus academic version). Within the methodology developed in the finite element modeling, variables were parameterized (modulus of elasticity, depth of deflection, and displacement-load) and two behavioral laws were evaluated (Elastic and Drucker-Prager). The results that were obtained from the analysis show that when performing numerical modeling using the law of elastic behavior in soils of two layers, exaggerated results are generated with respect to analytical methods. Another important result is that when hard soils are on top of soft soils the results of numerical and analytical methods tend to be similar to each other. Most importantly, the variables that have the greatest influence on the load capacity in soils of one and two layers are the angle of friction, yield stress, and in the case of numerical analysis the constraint displacement (load). In addition, it was observed that for numerical modeling better results are obtained when considering an elastoplastic model, such as Drucker Prager.Los métodos para encontrar capacidad de carga en suelos estratificados son cuantiosos y difieren en sus métodos y resultados. Lo anterior, hace que exista incertidumbre en la práctica de la ingeniería o que se incurra en sobredimensionamiento de la solución de cimentación. Este trabajo busca estudiar tres métodos analíticos de capacidad de carga en suelos estratificados (2 estratos) para cimentaciones superficiales: 1) Zapata imaginaria, 2) Método de Parámetros Promedio (APM) y 3) Método de Terzaghi, para comparar sus resultados con los obtenidos de la modelación numérica por medio del método de elementos finitos usando un software de amplia aplicación (Abaqus) versión académica. Dentro de la metodología desarrollada en la modelación de elementos finitos se parametrizaron variables (módulo de elasticidad, profundidad de desplante y desplazamiento-carga) y se evaluaron dos leyes de comportamiento (Elástica y Drucker-Prager). Los resultados que se obtuvieron en el desarrolla del análisis apuntan a que al realizar las modelaciones numéricas usando la ley de comportamiento elástica en suelos de dos estratos dan resultados exagerados respecto a los de métodos analíticos, otro resultado importante es que cuando se tiene suelos duros sobre suelos blandos los resultados de métodos numéricos y analíticos tienden a ser similares entre sí. Dentro de las conclusiones más importantes tenemos que las variables que más influyen en la capacidad de carga en suelos de un estrato y dos estratos son, el ángulo de fricción, esfuerzo de fluencia y en el caso de las modelaciones numéricas el desplazamiento impuesto de falla (carga). Además, se tiene que para las modelaciones numéricas se obtiene mejores resultados cuando se considera un modelo elastoplástico, como Drucker Prager.application/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlengspaengspaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/12080/10279https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/12080/10277https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/12080/10786Copyright (c) 2021 Jairo Alejandro Quintero-Chamorro, Brayan Julián Martínez-Ortega, Lucio Gerardo Cruz-Velasco, Ph. D.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf170http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 30 No. 55 (2021): January-March 2021 (Continuous Publication); e12080Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 30 Núm. 55 (2021): Enero-Marzo 2021 (Publicación Continua); e120802357-53280121-1129Stratified soilsload capacitynumerical modelingAPMimaginary foundationTerzaghi methodfinite elementsFEMSuelos estratificadoscapacidad de cargamodelación numéricaAPMzapata imaginariamétodo de Terzaghielementos finitosFEMEvaluation of Load Capacity of Stratified Soils (2 Layers) by Means of Numerical Analytical ComparisonEvaluación de capacidad de carga de suelos estratificados (2 estratos) mediante comparativa analítica-numéricainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a253http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Quintero-Chamorro, Jairo AlejandroMartínez-Ortega, Brayan JuliánCruz-Velasco, Lucio Gerardo001/14299oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/142992025-07-18 11:53:37.578metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co