Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development Teams

The success of Global Software Development (GSD) depends largely on how geographically dispersed project management and teamwork efforts are communicated, cooperated and coordinated (3Cs). From a literature analysis, some works were found where risks and metrics for DGS projects are proposed, but it...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/14289
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/11759
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14289
Palabra clave:
communication, cooperation and coordination (3Cs)
global software development (GSD)
goal question metric (GQM) method
metrics in the GSD
risks in the GSD
desarrollo global de software (DGS)
método GQM
métricas en el DGS
riesgos en el DGS
comunicación, cooperación y coordinación (3Cs)
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf252
id REPOUPTC2_576102465905d8f99c4c8cab88be12d1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/14289
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development Teams
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Métricas basadas en un enfoque guiado por riesgos para evaluar la comunicación, cooperación y coordinación en equipos de desarrollo global de software
title Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development Teams
spellingShingle Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development Teams
communication, cooperation and coordination (3Cs)
global software development (GSD)
goal question metric (GQM) method
metrics in the GSD
risks in the GSD
desarrollo global de software (DGS)
método GQM
métricas en el DGS
riesgos en el DGS
comunicación, cooperación y coordinación (3Cs)
title_short Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development Teams
title_full Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development Teams
title_fullStr Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development Teams
title_full_unstemmed Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development Teams
title_sort Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development Teams
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv communication, cooperation and coordination (3Cs)
global software development (GSD)
goal question metric (GQM) method
metrics in the GSD
risks in the GSD
topic communication, cooperation and coordination (3Cs)
global software development (GSD)
goal question metric (GQM) method
metrics in the GSD
risks in the GSD
desarrollo global de software (DGS)
método GQM
métricas en el DGS
riesgos en el DGS
comunicación, cooperación y coordinación (3Cs)
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv desarrollo global de software (DGS)
método GQM
métricas en el DGS
riesgos en el DGS
comunicación, cooperación y coordinación (3Cs)
description The success of Global Software Development (GSD) depends largely on how geographically dispersed project management and teamwork efforts are communicated, cooperated and coordinated (3Cs). From a literature analysis, some works were found where risks and metrics for DGS projects are proposed, but it was evidenced that some risks are not described in detail, they are ambiguous and hard to understand, which makes it difficult to know which category they belong to. In addition, it is necessary to classify risks in a less-subjective way, which allows to improve their understanding and thus define and apply measurement tools to obtain the impact magnitude of mentioned risks, and generate some indicators for support decision-making in DGS teams. In this article, 37 risks for the communication, cooperation and coordination in the DGS are proposed, as a result of the comparison and integration of identified risks in the literature. A set of metrics defined with the application of the Goal Question Metric (GQM) paradigm is also presented, organized according to these questions: What does it measure? Where the attribute to be measured is established; How to measure it? Where the metric is formulated through the following elements: description, type, scale and calculation function. Through the focus group technique, its completeness, relevance, clarity, precision, and ease of use were evaluated. The proposed metrics could be useful for organizations, teams, projects, and consultants operating in DGS contexts.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:11:55Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:11:55Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a335
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/11759
10.19053/01211129.v29.n54.2020.11759
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14289
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/11759
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14289
identifier_str_mv 10.19053/01211129.v29.n54.2020.11759
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/11759/9625
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/11759/10013
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf252
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf252
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.en-US.fl_str_mv Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 29 No. 54 (2020): Continuos Publication; e11759
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 29 Núm. 54 (2020): Publicación Continua; e11759
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2357-5328
0121-1129
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633851499937792
spelling 2020-09-182024-07-05T19:11:55Z2024-07-05T19:11:55Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1175910.19053/01211129.v29.n54.2020.11759https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14289The success of Global Software Development (GSD) depends largely on how geographically dispersed project management and teamwork efforts are communicated, cooperated and coordinated (3Cs). From a literature analysis, some works were found where risks and metrics for DGS projects are proposed, but it was evidenced that some risks are not described in detail, they are ambiguous and hard to understand, which makes it difficult to know which category they belong to. In addition, it is necessary to classify risks in a less-subjective way, which allows to improve their understanding and thus define and apply measurement tools to obtain the impact magnitude of mentioned risks, and generate some indicators for support decision-making in DGS teams. In this article, 37 risks for the communication, cooperation and coordination in the DGS are proposed, as a result of the comparison and integration of identified risks in the literature. A set of metrics defined with the application of the Goal Question Metric (GQM) paradigm is also presented, organized according to these questions: What does it measure? Where the attribute to be measured is established; How to measure it? Where the metric is formulated through the following elements: description, type, scale and calculation function. Through the focus group technique, its completeness, relevance, clarity, precision, and ease of use were evaluated. The proposed metrics could be useful for organizations, teams, projects, and consultants operating in DGS contexts.El éxito del desarrollo global de software (DGS) depende, en gran parte, de la forma como se comunican, cooperan y coordinan (3Cs) los esfuerzos en la gestión de los proyectos y los equipos de trabajo geográficamente dispersos. En la literatura, se identifican varios trabajos que proponen riesgos y métricas para proyectos de DGS, pero algunos de ellos no se describen con detalle, son ambiguos o complicados de entender, lo que dificulta ubicarlos en alguna categoría precisa. Además, es necesario clasificar los riesgos de una manera menos subjetiva, que mejore su comprensión; facilite la definición y aplicación de herramientas para medir su impacto, y genere algunos indicadores que apoyen la toma de decisiones en los equipos de DGS. En este artículo, se proponen 37 riesgos para la comunicación, cooperación y coordinación en el DGS, como resultado de la comparación e integración de riesgos identificados en la literatura. También se presenta un conjunto de métricas definidas con la aplicación del paradigma Goal Question Metric (GQM), organizadas con estas interrogantes: ¿qué mide?, donde se establece el atributo por calibrar, y ¿cómo lo mide?, donde se indica la métrica a través de los siguientes elementos: descripción, tipo, escala y función de cálculo. Mediante la técnica de grupo focal, se evaluó la completitud, pertinencia, claridad, precisión y facilidad de uso de las métricas, que podrían resultar útiles para las organizaciones, equipos, proyectos y consultores que operan en contextos de DGS.application/pdfapplication/xmlspaspaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/11759/9625https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/11759/10013Copyright (c) 2020 César Jesús Pardo-Calvache, Ph. D., Gustavo Adolfo Salazar-Escobar, Gabriel Fernando Vargas-Arias, Jhon Eder Masso-Daza, M.Sc.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf252http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 29 No. 54 (2020): Continuos Publication; e11759Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 29 Núm. 54 (2020): Publicación Continua; e117592357-53280121-1129communication, cooperation and coordination (3Cs)global software development (GSD)goal question metric (GQM) methodmetrics in the GSDrisks in the GSDdesarrollo global de software (DGS)método GQMmétricas en el DGSriesgos en el DGScomunicación, cooperación y coordinación (3Cs)Metrics Based on a Risk-Driven Approach to Assess Communication, Cooperation and Coordination in Global Software Development TeamsMétricas basadas en un enfoque guiado por riesgos para evaluar la comunicación, cooperación y coordinación en equipos de desarrollo global de softwareinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a335http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Pardo-Calvache, César JesúsSalazar-Escobar, Gustavo AdolfoVargas-Arias, Gabriel FernandoMasso-Daza, Jhon Eder001/14289oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/142892025-07-18 11:53:44.195metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co