Popular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the government

This article analyzes some doctrinal and political disputes that took place over how the exercising of popular sovereignty should assume the construction of the Argentinian state. The focus is on the controversies brought about by the legislation of popular juries for the administration of justice....

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13919
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/13536
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13919
Palabra clave:
Argentina
soberanía popular
pueblo
democracia
juicio por jurados
Argentina
popular sovereignty
people
democracy
trial by jury
Argentine
souveraineté populaire
peuple
démocratie
jurys
Rights
License
Derechos de autor 2022 Historia Y Memoria
id REPOUPTC2_54a90f18152055543a1cae99b5f32cc0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13919
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Popular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the government
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Los jurados populares en Argentina (1868-1874). El problema de la democracia como participación del pueblo en el gobierno
dc.title.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Les jurys populaires en Argentine (1868-1874). Le problème de la démocratie comme participation du peuple dans le gouvernement
title Popular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the government
spellingShingle Popular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the government
Argentina
soberanía popular
pueblo
democracia
juicio por jurados
Argentina
popular sovereignty
people
democracy
trial by jury
Argentine
souveraineté populaire
peuple
démocratie
jurys
title_short Popular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the government
title_full Popular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the government
title_fullStr Popular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the government
title_full_unstemmed Popular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the government
title_sort Popular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the government
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Argentina
soberanía popular
pueblo
democracia
juicio por jurados
topic Argentina
soberanía popular
pueblo
democracia
juicio por jurados
Argentina
popular sovereignty
people
democracy
trial by jury
Argentine
souveraineté populaire
peuple
démocratie
jurys
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Argentina
popular sovereignty
people
democracy
trial by jury
dc.subject.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Argentine
souveraineté populaire
peuple
démocratie
jurys
description This article analyzes some doctrinal and political disputes that took place over how the exercising of popular sovereignty should assume the construction of the Argentinian state. The focus is on the controversies brought about by the legislation of popular juries for the administration of justice. With those objectives, and from a perspective of political-intellectual history, the article approaches the forum of controversies that was constituted around academic production in the University of Buenos Aires and the legislative debates that took place in the National Congress. It also takes into consideration articles published in cultural and legal journals which articulated,fed and amplified the spread of those discussions. The main argument is that the dissidences that gave way to that form of popular sovereign exercise went back to the disputes over what the place of the people was in the government of the republic, and that its lack of implementation was linked to the triumph of a form of republican functioning which privileged popular demobilization as a means to secure political stability.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:08:17Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:08:17Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-21
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/13536
10.19053/20275137.n24.2022.13536
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13919
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/13536
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13919
identifier_str_mv 10.19053/20275137.n24.2022.13536
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/13536/11278
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/13536/12009
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Historia Y Memoria
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Historia Y Memoria
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Historia Y Memoria; No. 24 (2022): «Issues of Latin American political-intellectual history: Democracy, Nation, and Representation. Latin America, 19th and 20th centuries»; 79-117
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Historia Y Memoria; Núm. 24 (2022): Enero-Junio 2022. «Problemas de historia político-intelectual latinoamericana: Democracia, Nación, Representación. América Latina, siglos XIX y XX»; 79-117
dc.source.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Historia Y Memoria; No 24 (2022): «Problèmes d’histoire politico-intellectuelle latino- américaine: démocratie, nation, représentation. Amérique latine, XIXe et XXe siècles»; 79-117
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2322-777X
2027-5137
10.19053/20275137.n24.2022
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633790940479488
spelling 2021-12-212024-07-05T19:08:17Z2024-07-05T19:08:17Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/1353610.19053/20275137.n24.2022.13536https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13919This article analyzes some doctrinal and political disputes that took place over how the exercising of popular sovereignty should assume the construction of the Argentinian state. The focus is on the controversies brought about by the legislation of popular juries for the administration of justice. With those objectives, and from a perspective of political-intellectual history, the article approaches the forum of controversies that was constituted around academic production in the University of Buenos Aires and the legislative debates that took place in the National Congress. It also takes into consideration articles published in cultural and legal journals which articulated,fed and amplified the spread of those discussions. The main argument is that the dissidences that gave way to that form of popular sovereign exercise went back to the disputes over what the place of the people was in the government of the republic, and that its lack of implementation was linked to the triumph of a form of republican functioning which privileged popular demobilization as a means to secure political stability.Este artículo analiza algunas disputas doctrinarias y políticas que se dieron sobre las formas que debía asumir el ejercicio de la soberanía popular durante la construcción del estado argentino. Centra su atención, especialmente, en las controversias desatadas por la reglamentación de los jurados populares para la administración de justicia. Con esos objetivos, y desde una perspectiva de historia político-intelectual, aborda el foro de polémicas que se constituyó en torno a la producción académica en la Universidad de Buenos Aires y a los debates legislativos que tuvieron lugar en el Congreso de la Nación. Pero atiende también a los artículos publicados en revistas culturales y jurídicas, que articularon, alimentaron y amplificaron la difusión de esas discusiones. El argumento principal es que las disidencias que desató esa forma de ejercicio soberanía popular remitían a las contiendas sobre cuál debía ser el lugar concreto del pueblo en el gobierno de la república, y que su falta de implementación se ligó al triunfo de una forma de funcionamiento republicano que privilegió la desmovilización popular como medio para asegurar la estabilidad política.Cet article analyse quelques disputes doctrinaires et politiques sur les formes qui devait assumer l’exercice de la souveraineté populaire pendant la construction de l’État argentin. On se concentre notamment sur les discussions menées à la suite de la réglementation des jurys populaires pour l’administration de justice. Pour ce faire, en faisant appel à une perspective d’histoire politico-intellectuelle, on reprend les polémiques suscitées à l’Université de Buenos Aires et aux débats législatifs ayant eu lieu à l’Assemblée de la Nation. Mais on fait grand cas aussi des articles publiés dans des revues culturelles et juridiques qui ont nourri et amplifié la diffusion de ces discussions. L’argument principal c’est que le dissidences provoquées par cette forme de souveraineté populaire renvoyaient aux disputes dont le but était de savoir quel devait être le rôle du peuple dans le gouvernement de la république, et que l’absence du peuple a donné lieu à un gouvernement républicain ayant fait appel à la démobilisation populaire comme moyen pour assurer la stabilité politique.application/pdftext/xmlspaspaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/13536/11278https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/13536/12009Derechos de autor 2022 Historia Y Memoriahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Historia Y Memoria; No. 24 (2022): «Issues of Latin American political-intellectual history: Democracy, Nation, and Representation. Latin America, 19th and 20th centuries»; 79-117Historia Y Memoria; Núm. 24 (2022): Enero-Junio 2022. «Problemas de historia político-intelectual latinoamericana: Democracia, Nación, Representación. América Latina, siglos XIX y XX»; 79-117Historia Y Memoria; No 24 (2022): «Problèmes d’histoire politico-intellectuelle latino- américaine: démocratie, nation, représentation. Amérique latine, XIXe et XXe siècles»; 79-1172322-777X2027-513710.19053/20275137.n24.2022Argentinasoberanía popularpueblodemocraciajuicio por juradosArgentinapopular sovereigntypeopledemocracytrial by juryArgentinesouveraineté populairepeupledémocratiejurysPopular juries in Argentina (1868-1874). The problem of democracy as the participation of the people in the governmentLos jurados populares en Argentina (1868-1874). El problema de la democracia como participación del pueblo en el gobiernoLes jurys populaires en Argentine (1868-1874). Le problème de la démocratie comme participation du peuple dans le gouvernementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Cucchi, Laura001/13919oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/139192025-07-18 11:17:02.43metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co