The Centenary revisited: A German traveller in Colombia's national festivities (1910)
The Centenary of the Independence of Colombia, celebrated in 1910 has recently been revisited by Colombian historiography. Within the framework of the bicentennial celebrations of the independence between 2010 and 2019, the proliferation of articles and books that deal with the subject or specific a...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13879
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/11355
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13879
- Palabra clave:
- Centenary of Independence
Colombia
historiography
travel literature
Centenario de la Independencia
Colombia
historiografía
literatura de viajes
Centenaire de l’Independence
Colombie
historiographie
littérature de voyages
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2021 Historia Y MEMORIA
Summary: | The Centenary of the Independence of Colombia, celebrated in 1910 has recently been revisited by Colombian historiography. Within the framework of the bicentennial celebrations of the independence between 2010 and 2019, the proliferation of articles and books that deal with the subject or specific aspects of it has been considerable. Nevertheless, the great majority of the studies are based on official documents and the press of the time, thus, their judgment regarding the impact and the reception of the event are limited. By means of a new source - the travel chronicle of the German publisher, Konrad Beisswanger-an alternative perspective is offered to the interpretation and significance of the centenary independence celebrations in Bogotá. Although Beisswanger's chronicle has a political and ideological bias; its factual veracity and detailed descriptions make it a valuable document for the study of the centenary. In addition, it forces us to reflect on the use and the interpretation of the sources used in historiography that has recently been produced on the subject. |
---|