Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico

Autores:: Fragio, Alberto

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC

Idioma:

id	REPOUPTC2_2eacb464baa05545b3180a2382923682
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/19617
network_acronym_str	REPOUPTC2
network_name_str	RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico
title	Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico
spellingShingle	Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico Styles of scientific reasoning Disagreement Communicative breakdowns Epistemic relativism Pluralism Estilos de razonamiento científico Desacuerdo Quiebra comunicativa Relativismo epistémico Pluralismo
title_short	Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico
title_full	Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico
title_fullStr	Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico
title_full_unstemmed	Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico
title_sort	Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Fragio, Alberto
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Fragio, Alberto
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Styles of scientific reasoning Disagreement Communicative breakdowns Epistemic relativism Pluralism Estilos de razonamiento científico Desacuerdo Quiebra comunicativa Relativismo epistémico Pluralismo
topic	Styles of scientific reasoning Disagreement Communicative breakdowns Epistemic relativism Pluralism Estilos de razonamiento científico Desacuerdo Quiebra comunicativa Relativismo epistémico Pluralismo
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-04-29 00:00:00 2026-04-16T17:21:05Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-04-29 00:00:00
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021-04-29
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.content.none.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0123-5095
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/19617
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.19053/01235095.v7.n28.2021.12335
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2389-9441
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.19053/01235095.v7.n28.2021.12335
identifier_str_mv	0123-5095 10.19053/01235095.v7.n28.2021.12335 2389-9441
url	https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/19617 https://doi.org/10.19053/01235095.v7.n28.2021.12335
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv
language_invalid_str_mv
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv	Blumenberg, H. (2003). Trabajo sobre el mito. Barcelona: Paidós. Blumenberg, H. (2011). Descripción del ser humano. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Chandler, J.; Davidson, A. and Harootunian, H. (Eds.). (1994). Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice, and Persuasion across the Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chang, H. (2012). Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer. Chang, H. (2020). Relativism, Perspectivism and Pluralism. M. Kusch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism (pp. 398-406). London / New York: Routledge. Crombie, A. (1994). Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: The History of Argument and Explanation. London: Duckworth. Daston, L. (Ed.). (2000). Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books. Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2008). Objetivity and its Critics. Victorian Studies, 50 (4), pp. 666-677. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40060410 Davidson, A. (1996). Styles of Reasoning, Conceptual History, and the Emergence of Psychiatry. P. Galison and D. J. Stump (Eds.), The Disunity of Science (pp. 75-100). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Davidson, A. (2001). The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Davidson, A. (2004). La aparición de la sexualidad (J. López Guix, Trad.). Barcelona: Alpha Decay. Fleck, L. (1986). La génesis y el desarrollo de un hecho científico. Introducción a la teoría del estilo de pensamiento y del colectivo del pensamiento. Madrid: Alianza. Fuller, S. (2004). Kuhn vs Popper. The Struggle for the Soul of Science. New York: Columbia University Press. Gattei, S. (2008). Thomas Kuhn’s ‘Linguistic Turn’ and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism: Incommensurability, Rationality and the Search for Truth. Aldershot: Ashgate. Giere, R. (2016). Feyerabend’s Perspectivism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 57 (1), pp. 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.008 Hacking, I. (1982). Language, Truth and Reason. M. Hollis and S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism (pp. 49-66). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press. Hacking, I. (2002). Historical Ontology. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. Hacking, I. (2012). Language, Truth and Reason’ 30 Years Later. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43 (4), pp. 599-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.07.002 Hacking, I. (2015). Probable Reasoning and Its Novelties. T. Arabatzis; J. Renn and A. Simoes (Eds.), Relocating the History of Science. Essays in Honor of Kostas Gavroglu (pp. 177-192). Cham: Springer. Hales, S. (2014). Motivations for Relativism as a Solution to Disagreements. Philosophy, 89 (1), pp. 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003181911300051X Kinzel, K. and Kusch, M. (2018). De-idealizing Disagreement, Rethinking Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 26 (1), pp. 40-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2017.1411011 Kuhn, T. (1970a). Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research? I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Series: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science. (pp. 2-24). London: Cambridge University Press. Kuhn, T. (1970b). Reflections on my Critics. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Series: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 231-278). London: Cambridge University Press. Kusch, M. (2009). Objectivity and Historiography. Isis, 100 (1), pp. 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1086/597564 Kusch, M. (2010). Hacking’s Historical Epistemology: A Critique of Styles of Reasoning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41 (2), pp. 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.007 Kusch, M. (2011). Reflexivity, Relativism, Microhistory: Three Desiderata for Historical Epistemologies. Erkenntnis, 75, pp. 483-494. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10670-011-9336-5 Kusch, M. (2016). Relativism in Feyerabend’s Later Writings. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 57 (1), pp. 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.010 Kusch, M. (2019). Epistemischer Relativismus. M. Grajner and G. Melchior (Eds.), Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie (pp. 338-346). Stuttgart: Metzler. Kusch, M. (2020). Relativism in Feyerabend’s Later Writings. M. Kusch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism (pp. 3-6). London / New York: Routledge. López, S. y Domingo, A. (Eds.). (2003). Popper y Kuhn: Ecos de un debate. Barcelona: Montesinos. Lovejoy, K. (2018). A.C. Pigou and the ‘Marshallian’ Thought Style. A Study in the Philosophy and Mathematics Underlying Cambridge Economics. Cham: Palgrave. Moulines, U. (2015). Popper y Kuhn: dos gigantes de la filosofía de la ciencia del siglo XX. Barcelona: Bonalletra Alcompas. Peine, A. (2011). Challenging Incommensurability: What We Can Learn from Ludwik Fleck for the Analysis of Configurational Innovation. Minerva, 49 (4), pp. 489-508. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43548632 Popper, K. (1970). Normal Science and its Dangers. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science 1965, 4 (pp. 51-58). London: Cambridge University Press. Popper, K. (1976). The Myth of the Framework. E. Freeman (Ed.), The Abdication of Philosophy. Philosophy and the Public Good: Essays in Honor of Paul Arthur Schilpp. LaSalle: Open Court. Popper, K. (1994) The Myth of the Framework. In Defence of Science and Rationality. London / New York: Routledge. Sciortino, L. (2016). Styles of Reasoning, Forms of Life, and Relativism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 30 (2), pp. 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2016.1265868 Siegel, H. (1987). Relativism Refuted. A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism. Dordrecht: Springer. Wang, X. (2016). Incommensurability and Cross-Language Communication. London / New York: Routledge. Worrall, J. (2003). Normal Science and Dogmatism, Paradigms and Progress: Kuhn ‘versus’ Popper and Lakatos. T. Nickles (Ed.), Thomas Kuhn (pp. 65-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	51
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	28
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	35
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	7
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Cuestiones de Filosofía
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones_filosofia/article/download/12335/13314 https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones_filosofia/article/download/12335/10547
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 28 , Año 2021 : Cuestiones de Filosofía
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	Alberto Fragio - 2021
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Alberto Fragio - 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv	text/html application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones_filosofia/article/view/12335
institution	Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/bitstreams/adc3c409-6a5e-40ef-b593-65c4f9b94d73/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	b9762a4919d87f22a7270d10962fa193
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1881673997082427392
spelling	Fragio, Alberto2021-04-29 00:00:002026-04-16T17:21:05Z2021-04-29 00:00:002021-04-290123-5095https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/1961710.19053/01235095.v7.n28.2021.123352389-9441https://doi.org/10.19053/01235095.v7.n28.2021.12335text/htmlapplication/pdfUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de ColombiaAlberto Fragio - 2021http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones_filosofia/article/view/12335Styles of scientific reasoningDisagreementCommunicative breakdownsEpistemic relativismPluralismEstilos de razonamiento científicoDesacuerdoQuiebra comunicativaRelativismo epistémicoPluralismoEpistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémicoArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Blumenberg, H. (2003). Trabajo sobre el mito. Barcelona: Paidós.Blumenberg, H. (2011). Descripción del ser humano. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Chandler, J.; Davidson, A. and Harootunian, H. (Eds.). (1994). Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice, and Persuasion across the Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Chang, H. (2012). Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer.Chang, H. (2020). Relativism, Perspectivism and Pluralism. M. Kusch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism (pp. 398-406). London / New York: Routledge.Crombie, A. (1994). Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: The History of Argument and Explanation. London: Duckworth.Daston, L. (Ed.). (2000). Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2008). Objetivity and its Critics. Victorian Studies, 50 (4), pp. 666-677. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40060410Davidson, A. (1996). Styles of Reasoning, Conceptual History, and the Emergence of Psychiatry. P. Galison and D. J. Stump (Eds.), The Disunity of Science (pp. 75-100). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Davidson, A. (2001). The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Davidson, A. (2004). La aparición de la sexualidad (J. López Guix, Trad.). Barcelona: Alpha Decay.Fleck, L. (1986). La génesis y el desarrollo de un hecho científico. Introducción a la teoría del estilo de pensamiento y del colectivo del pensamiento. Madrid: Alianza.Fuller, S. (2004). Kuhn vs Popper. The Struggle for the Soul of Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Gattei, S. (2008). Thomas Kuhn’s ‘Linguistic Turn’ and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism: Incommensurability, Rationality and the Search for Truth. Aldershot: Ashgate.Giere, R. (2016). Feyerabend’s Perspectivism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 57 (1), pp. 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.008Hacking, I. (1982). Language, Truth and Reason. M. Hollis and S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism (pp. 49-66). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Hacking, I. (2002). Historical Ontology. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.Hacking, I. (2012). Language, Truth and Reason’ 30 Years Later. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43 (4), pp. 599-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.07.002Hacking, I. (2015). Probable Reasoning and Its Novelties. T. Arabatzis; J. Renn and A. Simoes (Eds.), Relocating the History of Science. Essays in Honor of Kostas Gavroglu (pp. 177-192). Cham: Springer.Hales, S. (2014). Motivations for Relativism as a Solution to Disagreements. Philosophy, 89 (1), pp. 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003181911300051XKinzel, K. and Kusch, M. (2018). De-idealizing Disagreement, Rethinking Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 26 (1), pp. 40-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2017.1411011Kuhn, T. (1970a). Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research? I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Series: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science. (pp. 2-24). London: Cambridge University Press.Kuhn, T. (1970b). Reflections on my Critics. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Series: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 231-278). London: Cambridge University Press.Kusch, M. (2009). Objectivity and Historiography. Isis, 100 (1), pp. 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1086/597564Kusch, M. (2010). Hacking’s Historical Epistemology: A Critique of Styles of Reasoning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41 (2), pp. 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.007Kusch, M. (2011). Reflexivity, Relativism, Microhistory: Three Desiderata for Historical Epistemologies. Erkenntnis, 75, pp. 483-494. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10670-011-9336-5Kusch, M. (2016). Relativism in Feyerabend’s Later Writings. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 57 (1), pp. 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.010Kusch, M. (2019). Epistemischer Relativismus. M. Grajner and G. Melchior (Eds.), Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie (pp. 338-346). Stuttgart: Metzler.Kusch, M. (2020). Relativism in Feyerabend’s Later Writings. M. Kusch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism (pp. 3-6). London / New York: Routledge.López, S. y Domingo, A. (Eds.). (2003). Popper y Kuhn: Ecos de un debate. Barcelona: Montesinos.Lovejoy, K. (2018). A.C. Pigou and the ‘Marshallian’ Thought Style. A Study in the Philosophy and Mathematics Underlying Cambridge Economics. Cham: Palgrave.Moulines, U. (2015). Popper y Kuhn: dos gigantes de la filosofía de la ciencia del siglo XX. Barcelona: Bonalletra Alcompas.Peine, A. (2011). Challenging Incommensurability: What We Can Learn from Ludwik Fleck for the Analysis of Configurational Innovation. Minerva, 49 (4), pp. 489-508. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43548632Popper, K. (1970). Normal Science and its Dangers. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science 1965, 4 (pp. 51-58). London: Cambridge University Press.Popper, K. (1976). The Myth of the Framework. E. Freeman (Ed.), The Abdication of Philosophy. Philosophy and the Public Good: Essays in Honor of Paul Arthur Schilpp. LaSalle: Open Court.Popper, K. (1994) The Myth of the Framework. In Defence of Science and Rationality. London / New York: Routledge.Sciortino, L. (2016). Styles of Reasoning, Forms of Life, and Relativism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 30 (2), pp. 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2016.1265868Siegel, H. (1987). Relativism Refuted. A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism. Dordrecht: Springer.Wang, X. (2016). Incommensurability and Cross-Language Communication. London / New York: Routledge.Worrall, J. (2003). Normal Science and Dogmatism, Paradigms and Progress: Kuhn ‘versus’ Popper and Lakatos. T. Nickles (Ed.), Thomas Kuhn (pp. 65-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.5128357Cuestiones de Filosofíahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones_filosofia/article/download/12335/13314https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones_filosofia/article/download/12335/10547Núm. 28 , Año 2021 : Cuestiones de FilosofíaPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2540https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/bitstreams/adc3c409-6a5e-40ef-b593-65c4f9b94d73/downloadb9762a4919d87f22a7270d10962fa193MD51falseAnonymousREAD001/19617oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/196172026-09-28 11:16:35.566http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Epistemología histórica cum relativismo epistémico

Publicaciones similares