Gnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali

The cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana) is a Solanaceae species with enormous economic importance in Colombia; it is the second most exported fruit, after bananas. Vascular wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali (Fox) is the most limiting factor of this crop, with losses of up to 80% of p...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7012
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/16943
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/11699
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16943
Palabra clave:
Biological control
In vitro
Vascular wilt
Rhizosphere
Suppressive soils
Golden berry
Fusarium oxysporum
Golden berry;
Fusarium
Control biológico
In vitro
Marchitamiento vascular
Rizósfera
Suelos supresores
Uchuva
Fusarium oxysporum
Uchuva
Fusarium
Rights
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
id REPOUPTC2_2148a022600dd393401bef817a0a3edb
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/16943
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Gnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Sistema gnotobiótico para seleccionar microorganismos con potencial de biocontrol contra Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali
title Gnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali
spellingShingle Gnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali
Biological control
In vitro
Vascular wilt
Rhizosphere
Suppressive soils
Golden berry
Fusarium oxysporum
Golden berry;
Fusarium
Control biológico
In vitro
Marchitamiento vascular
Rizósfera
Suelos supresores
Uchuva
Fusarium oxysporum
Uchuva
Fusarium
title_short Gnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali
title_full Gnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali
title_fullStr Gnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali
title_full_unstemmed Gnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali
title_sort Gnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Biological control
In vitro
Vascular wilt
Rhizosphere
Suppressive soils
Golden berry
Fusarium oxysporum
Golden berry;
Fusarium
topic Biological control
In vitro
Vascular wilt
Rhizosphere
Suppressive soils
Golden berry
Fusarium oxysporum
Golden berry;
Fusarium
Control biológico
In vitro
Marchitamiento vascular
Rizósfera
Suelos supresores
Uchuva
Fusarium oxysporum
Uchuva
Fusarium
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Control biológico
In vitro
Marchitamiento vascular
Rizósfera
Suelos supresores
Uchuva
Fusarium oxysporum
Uchuva
Fusarium
description The cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana) is a Solanaceae species with enormous economic importance in Colombia; it is the second most exported fruit, after bananas. Vascular wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali (Fox) is the most limiting factor of this crop, with losses of up to 80% of production. Biological control is a promising alternative for controlling this pathogen. Bacteria and fungi, originally isolated from potentially suppressive soils of cape gooseberry crops in Nariño, Colombia with different management (organic and conventional), were evaluated as biocontrol agents of Fox using a gnotobiotic model (seedlings cultured under axenic conditions with defined microbial strains). Of the 64 isolated microorganisms, 37.5% (15 bacteria and 9 fungi) were discarded because of toxicological risks and an unknow potential biological control. The remaining 62.5% of the microorganisms, 14 bacteria and 26 fungi, were evaluated to assess their potential as biological control agents against Fox. The gnotobiotic model system evaluated the protection and plant growth promotion characteristics. Response variables were used to group the microorganism using a principal component analysis (PCA), and five clusters were obtained. Cluster number four concentrated the 10 microorganisms (three bacteria and seven fungi) with the highest protection values against Fox, with a positive effect on growth. The isolates were identified as two Bacillus subtilis strains, Rhodococcus sp., Podospora setosa, Debaryomyces vindobonensis, Plectosphaerella plurivora, Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae, Umbelopsis sp. and two strains of Trichoderma koningiopsis. The gnobiotic system offered clear advantages for evaluating and selecting microorganisms with a biological control potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physalis.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:42:45Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:42:45Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv Texto
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7012
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a596
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7012
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/11699
10.17584/rcch.2021v15i1.11699
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16943
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/11699
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16943
identifier_str_mv 10.17584/rcch.2021v15i1.11699
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/11699/10110
dc.rights.en-US.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf513
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf513
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.en-US.fl_str_mv Colombia; Cundinamarca
dc.coverage.es-ES.fl_str_mv Colombia; Cundinamarca
dc.publisher.en-US.fl_str_mv Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTC
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2021); e11699
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2021); e11699
dc.source.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 15 No 1 (2021); e11699
dc.source.it-IT.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; V. 15 N. 1 (2021); e11699
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; v. 15 n. 1 (2021); e11699
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2422-3719
2011-2173
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633870694121472
spelling 2021-01-012024-07-08T14:42:45Z2024-07-08T14:42:45Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/1169910.17584/rcch.2021v15i1.11699https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16943The cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana) is a Solanaceae species with enormous economic importance in Colombia; it is the second most exported fruit, after bananas. Vascular wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali (Fox) is the most limiting factor of this crop, with losses of up to 80% of production. Biological control is a promising alternative for controlling this pathogen. Bacteria and fungi, originally isolated from potentially suppressive soils of cape gooseberry crops in Nariño, Colombia with different management (organic and conventional), were evaluated as biocontrol agents of Fox using a gnotobiotic model (seedlings cultured under axenic conditions with defined microbial strains). Of the 64 isolated microorganisms, 37.5% (15 bacteria and 9 fungi) were discarded because of toxicological risks and an unknow potential biological control. The remaining 62.5% of the microorganisms, 14 bacteria and 26 fungi, were evaluated to assess their potential as biological control agents against Fox. The gnotobiotic model system evaluated the protection and plant growth promotion characteristics. Response variables were used to group the microorganism using a principal component analysis (PCA), and five clusters were obtained. Cluster number four concentrated the 10 microorganisms (three bacteria and seven fungi) with the highest protection values against Fox, with a positive effect on growth. The isolates were identified as two Bacillus subtilis strains, Rhodococcus sp., Podospora setosa, Debaryomyces vindobonensis, Plectosphaerella plurivora, Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae, Umbelopsis sp. and two strains of Trichoderma koningiopsis. The gnobiotic system offered clear advantages for evaluating and selecting microorganisms with a biological control potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physalis.La uchuva (Physalis peruviana) es Solanaceae de enorme importancia económica en Colombia ya que es la segunda fruta más exportada después del banano. La marchitez vascular causada por Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali (Fox) es el factor más limitante de este cultivo, que ocasiona pérdidas de hasta el 80% de su producción. El control biológico se ha convertido en una alternativa prometedora para controlar este patógeno. Bacterias y hongos, originalmente aislados de suelos potencialmente supresores de cultivos de uchuva de Nariño, Colombia con diferente manejo (orgánico y convencional) fueron evaluados como agentes de control de Fox utilizando un modelo gnotobiótico (plántulas cultivadas en condiciones axiológicas con cepas microbianas definidas). A partir de los 64 microorganismos aislados, 37.5% (15 bacterias y nueve hongos) fueron descartados debido a su riesgo toxicológico y a un control biológico potencial desconocido, el 62.5% restante de microorganismos, 14 bacterias y 26 hongos, se evaluaron para evaluar su potencial como agentes de control biológico contra Fox. El sistema de modelos gnotobióticos nos permitió evaluar las características de protección y promoción del crecimiento vegetal, estas variables de respuesta se utilizaron para agrupar el microorganismo utilizando un análisis de componentes principales (PCA) y se obtuvieron cinco clústeres. El clúster número cuatro concentró 10 microorganismos (tres bacterias y siete hongos) con los valores de protección más altos contra Fox y con un efecto positivo en la promoción del crecimiento. Los aislados fueron identificados como dos cepas de Bacillus subtilis, Rhodococcus sp., Podospora setosa, Debaryomyces vindobonensis, Plectosphaerella plurivora, Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae, Umbelopsis sp. y dos cepas de Trichoderma koningiopsis. El sistema gnobiótico presentado ofrece claras ventajas para evaluar y seleccionar microorganismos con un potencial de control biológico contra Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fisalis.application/pdfengengSociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTChttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/11699/10110Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf513http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2021); e11699Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2021); e11699Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 15 No 1 (2021); e11699Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; V. 15 N. 1 (2021); e11699Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; v. 15 n. 1 (2021); e116992422-37192011-2173Biological controlIn vitroVascular wiltRhizosphereSuppressive soilsGolden berryFusarium oxysporumGolden berry;FusariumControl biológicoIn vitroMarchitamiento vascularRizósferaSuelos supresoresUchuvaFusarium oxysporumUchuvaFusariumGnotobiotic system for selecting microorganisms with biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physaliSistema gnotobiótico para seleccionar microorganismos con potencial de biocontrol contra Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physaliTextTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7012http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a596http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Colombia; CundinamarcaColombia; CundinamarcaGarcia, DianaDávila, Lizeth LorenaGonzález, AdrianaCaro, AlejandroCotes, Alba Marina001/16943oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/169432025-07-18 11:49:35.443https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co

Publicaciones similares