Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1

The mite Tetranychus urticae is a key pest in papaya crop in Valle del Cauca (Colombia), and it has been generally controlled with chemical products; other management alternatives have not been used. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of alternatives: plant extract (garlic-chili veg...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6818
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/16852
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16852
Palabra clave:
Plant extract
Mineral oil
Entomopathogenic fungus
Chemical acaricides
Two spotted mite
Crop protection
Pest Management
Extracto vegetal
Aceite mineral
Hongo entomopatógeno
Acaricidas químicos
Ácaro de dos manchas
Protección de cultivos
Manejo de plagas
Rights
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
id REPOUPTC2_0d6be49eddbcaf35dc9d60a156f4464e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/16852
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Alternativas de manejo de Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) en Carica papaya L. Híbrido Tainung-1
title Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1
spellingShingle Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1
Plant extract
Mineral oil
Entomopathogenic fungus
Chemical acaricides
Two spotted mite
Crop protection
Pest Management
Extracto vegetal
Aceite mineral
Hongo entomopatógeno
Acaricidas químicos
Ácaro de dos manchas
Protección de cultivos
Manejo de plagas
title_short Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1
title_full Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1
title_fullStr Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1
title_full_unstemmed Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1
title_sort Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Plant extract
Mineral oil
Entomopathogenic fungus
Chemical acaricides
Two spotted mite
Crop protection
Pest Management
topic Plant extract
Mineral oil
Entomopathogenic fungus
Chemical acaricides
Two spotted mite
Crop protection
Pest Management
Extracto vegetal
Aceite mineral
Hongo entomopatógeno
Acaricidas químicos
Ácaro de dos manchas
Protección de cultivos
Manejo de plagas
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Extracto vegetal
Aceite mineral
Hongo entomopatógeno
Acaricidas químicos
Ácaro de dos manchas
Protección de cultivos
Manejo de plagas
description The mite Tetranychus urticae is a key pest in papaya crop in Valle del Cauca (Colombia), and it has been generally controlled with chemical products; other management alternatives have not been used. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of alternatives: plant extract (garlic-chili vegetable extract, Alisin®), mineral oil (vegetable fatty acid complex, Adimel®), entomopathogenic fungus (Successor®), chemical control (spiromesifen, abamectin, fenazaquin), untreated (control treatment) and farmer’s practices (14 applications of pesticides) in a randomized complete block design with three replications/treatment in a Hybrid Tainung-1 papaya crop in the municipality of Roldanillo. The sampling was done every 8 days by measuring the variables: number of leaves/plant, number of infested leaves/plant, number of floral structures/plant, number of fruits/plant, diameter of stem/plant (every 30 days), population of T. urticae/leaf and yield. It was found that the populations of T. urticae/leaf were low in entomopathogenic fungus (11.978) and chemical control (10.548), with no significant differences (P>0.05) from farmer’s practices (3.339). In contrast, the mite populations were very high in plant extract (22.086), mineral oil (20.411) and untreated (35.746), as compared to farmer’s practices. There was a significant difference in all treatments for the variable infestation from farmer’s practices, and the number of leaves/plant in mineral oil and untreated treatment was significantly different from farmer’s practices. No significant differences were found between the treatments in the rest of the evaluated variables. The entomopathogenic fungus turned out to be the best alternative for a management program of T. urticae in papaya in this region.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:42:35Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:42:35Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-01
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv Texto
dc.type.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Texte
dc.type.it-IT.fl_str_mv Testo
dc.type.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Texto
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6818
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a402
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6818
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217
10.17584/rcch.2018v12i3.8217
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16852
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16852
identifier_str_mv 10.17584/rcch.2018v12i3.8217
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217/8544
dc.rights.en-US.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf319
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf319
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.en-US.fl_str_mv Colombia; Valle del Cauca
dc.coverage.es-ES.fl_str_mv Colombia; Valle del Cauca
dc.coverage.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Colombia; Valle del Cauca
dc.coverage.it-IT.fl_str_mv Colombia; Valle del Cauca
dc.coverage.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Colombia; Valle del Cauca
dc.publisher.en-US.fl_str_mv Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTC
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2018); 561-573
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2018); 561-573
dc.source.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 No 3 (2018); 561-573
dc.source.it-IT.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; V. 12 N. 3 (2018); 561-573
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; v. 12 n. 3 (2018); 561-573
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2422-3719
2011-2173
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633833478062080
spelling 2018-09-012024-07-08T14:42:35Z2024-07-08T14:42:35Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/821710.17584/rcch.2018v12i3.8217https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16852The mite Tetranychus urticae is a key pest in papaya crop in Valle del Cauca (Colombia), and it has been generally controlled with chemical products; other management alternatives have not been used. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of alternatives: plant extract (garlic-chili vegetable extract, Alisin®), mineral oil (vegetable fatty acid complex, Adimel®), entomopathogenic fungus (Successor®), chemical control (spiromesifen, abamectin, fenazaquin), untreated (control treatment) and farmer’s practices (14 applications of pesticides) in a randomized complete block design with three replications/treatment in a Hybrid Tainung-1 papaya crop in the municipality of Roldanillo. The sampling was done every 8 days by measuring the variables: number of leaves/plant, number of infested leaves/plant, number of floral structures/plant, number of fruits/plant, diameter of stem/plant (every 30 days), population of T. urticae/leaf and yield. It was found that the populations of T. urticae/leaf were low in entomopathogenic fungus (11.978) and chemical control (10.548), with no significant differences (P>0.05) from farmer’s practices (3.339). In contrast, the mite populations were very high in plant extract (22.086), mineral oil (20.411) and untreated (35.746), as compared to farmer’s practices. There was a significant difference in all treatments for the variable infestation from farmer’s practices, and the number of leaves/plant in mineral oil and untreated treatment was significantly different from farmer’s practices. No significant differences were found between the treatments in the rest of the evaluated variables. The entomopathogenic fungus turned out to be the best alternative for a management program of T. urticae in papaya in this region.El ácaro Tetranychus urticae es considerada una plaga clave del cultivo de papaya en el Valle del Cauca (Colombia) y su control ha sido generalmente con productos químicos sin probar otras alternativas de manejo. Por lo anterior, el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar en un cultivo de papaya Hibrido Tainung-1, en el municipio de Roldanillo, el efecto de las alternativas: extracto de planta (extracto vegetal de ajo-chile, Alisin®), aceite mineral (complejo de ácidos grasos vegetales, Adimel®), hongo entomopatógeno (Successor®), control químico (spiromesifen, abamectina, fenazaquin), sin manejo (tratamiento control) y prácticas del agricultor (14 aplicaciones de plaguicidas), utilizando un diseño de bloques al azar con tres repeticiones/tratamiento. Se hicieron muestreos cada 8 días midiendo las variables número de hojas/planta, número de hojas infestadas/planta, número de estructuras florales/planta, número de frutos/planta, diámetro del tallo/planta (cada 30 días), población de T. urticae/hoja y rendimiento. Se encontró que las poblaciones de T. urticae/hoja fueron bajas en los tratamientos hongo entomopatógeno (11,978) y control químico (10,548), donde no presentaron diferencias significativas (P>0,05) con respecto a las prácticas del agricultor (3,339); en contraste, las poblaciones del ácaro fueron muy elevadas en los tratamientos extracto de planta (22,086), aceite mineral (20,411) y sin manejo (35,746) frente a las prácticas del agricultor. Se presentó una diferencia significativa en todos los tratamientos y prácticas del agricultor para la variable infestación y entre los tratamientos aceite mineral y sin control vs. prácticas del agricultor para número de hojas/planta. Del resto de variables evaluadas no se encontró diferencias significativas entre tratamientos. El hongo entomopatógeno resultó ser la mejor alternativa para un programa de manejo de T. urticae en papaya en el departamento.application/pdfengengSociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTChttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217/8544Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf319http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2018); 561-573Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2018); 561-573Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 No 3 (2018); 561-573Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; V. 12 N. 3 (2018); 561-573Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; v. 12 n. 3 (2018); 561-5732422-37192011-2173Plant extractMineral oilEntomopathogenic fungusChemical acaricidesTwo spotted miteCrop protectionPest ManagementExtracto vegetalAceite mineralHongo entomopatógenoAcaricidas químicosÁcaro de dos manchasProtección de cultivosManejo de plagasManagement alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1Alternativas de manejo de Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) en Carica papaya L. Híbrido Tainung-1TextTextoTexteTestoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6818http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a402http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Colombia; Valle del CaucaColombia; Valle del CaucaColombia; Valle del CaucaColombia; Valle del CaucaColombia; Valle del CaucaHerrera-Palacios, Angel MauricioMena-Pérez, Yuri MercedesMesa-Cobo, Nora Cristina001/16852oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/168522025-07-18 11:49:17.129https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co