Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1
The mite Tetranychus urticae is a key pest in papaya crop in Valle del Cauca (Colombia), and it has been generally controlled with chemical products; other management alternatives have not been used. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of alternatives: plant extract (garlic-chili veg...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6818
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/16852
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16852
- Palabra clave:
- Plant extract
Mineral oil
Entomopathogenic fungus
Chemical acaricides
Two spotted mite
Crop protection
Pest Management
Extracto vegetal
Aceite mineral
Hongo entomopatógeno
Acaricidas químicos
Ácaro de dos manchas
Protección de cultivos
Manejo de plagas
- Rights
- License
- Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
id |
REPOUPTC2_0d6be49eddbcaf35dc9d60a156f4464e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/16852 |
network_acronym_str |
REPOUPTC2 |
network_name_str |
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1 |
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Alternativas de manejo de Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) en Carica papaya L. Híbrido Tainung-1 |
title |
Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1 |
spellingShingle |
Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1 Plant extract Mineral oil Entomopathogenic fungus Chemical acaricides Two spotted mite Crop protection Pest Management Extracto vegetal Aceite mineral Hongo entomopatógeno Acaricidas químicos Ácaro de dos manchas Protección de cultivos Manejo de plagas |
title_short |
Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1 |
title_full |
Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1 |
title_fullStr |
Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1 |
title_sort |
Management alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1 |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Plant extract Mineral oil Entomopathogenic fungus Chemical acaricides Two spotted mite Crop protection Pest Management |
topic |
Plant extract Mineral oil Entomopathogenic fungus Chemical acaricides Two spotted mite Crop protection Pest Management Extracto vegetal Aceite mineral Hongo entomopatógeno Acaricidas químicos Ácaro de dos manchas Protección de cultivos Manejo de plagas |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Extracto vegetal Aceite mineral Hongo entomopatógeno Acaricidas químicos Ácaro de dos manchas Protección de cultivos Manejo de plagas |
description |
The mite Tetranychus urticae is a key pest in papaya crop in Valle del Cauca (Colombia), and it has been generally controlled with chemical products; other management alternatives have not been used. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of alternatives: plant extract (garlic-chili vegetable extract, Alisin®), mineral oil (vegetable fatty acid complex, Adimel®), entomopathogenic fungus (Successor®), chemical control (spiromesifen, abamectin, fenazaquin), untreated (control treatment) and farmer’s practices (14 applications of pesticides) in a randomized complete block design with three replications/treatment in a Hybrid Tainung-1 papaya crop in the municipality of Roldanillo. The sampling was done every 8 days by measuring the variables: number of leaves/plant, number of infested leaves/plant, number of floral structures/plant, number of fruits/plant, diameter of stem/plant (every 30 days), population of T. urticae/leaf and yield. It was found that the populations of T. urticae/leaf were low in entomopathogenic fungus (11.978) and chemical control (10.548), with no significant differences (P>0.05) from farmer’s practices (3.339). In contrast, the mite populations were very high in plant extract (22.086), mineral oil (20.411) and untreated (35.746), as compared to farmer’s practices. There was a significant difference in all treatments for the variable infestation from farmer’s practices, and the number of leaves/plant in mineral oil and untreated treatment was significantly different from farmer’s practices. No significant differences were found between the treatments in the rest of the evaluated variables. The entomopathogenic fungus turned out to be the best alternative for a management program of T. urticae in papaya in this region. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-08T14:42:35Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-08T14:42:35Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-01 |
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Texto |
dc.type.fr-FR.fl_str_mv |
Texte |
dc.type.it-IT.fl_str_mv |
Testo |
dc.type.pt-BR.fl_str_mv |
Texto |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6818 |
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a402 |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6818 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217 10.17584/rcch.2018v12i3.8217 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16852 |
url |
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217 https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16852 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17584/rcch.2018v12i3.8217 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217/8544 |
dc.rights.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf319 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf319 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Colombia; Valle del Cauca |
dc.coverage.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Colombia; Valle del Cauca |
dc.coverage.fr-FR.fl_str_mv |
Colombia; Valle del Cauca |
dc.coverage.it-IT.fl_str_mv |
Colombia; Valle del Cauca |
dc.coverage.pt-BR.fl_str_mv |
Colombia; Valle del Cauca |
dc.publisher.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTC |
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2018); 561-573 |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2018); 561-573 |
dc.source.fr-FR.fl_str_mv |
Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 No 3 (2018); 561-573 |
dc.source.it-IT.fl_str_mv |
Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; V. 12 N. 3 (2018); 561-573 |
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv |
Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; v. 12 n. 3 (2018); 561-573 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
2422-3719 2011-2173 |
institution |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional UPTC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co |
_version_ |
1839633833478062080 |
spelling |
2018-09-012024-07-08T14:42:35Z2024-07-08T14:42:35Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/821710.17584/rcch.2018v12i3.8217https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16852The mite Tetranychus urticae is a key pest in papaya crop in Valle del Cauca (Colombia), and it has been generally controlled with chemical products; other management alternatives have not been used. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of alternatives: plant extract (garlic-chili vegetable extract, Alisin®), mineral oil (vegetable fatty acid complex, Adimel®), entomopathogenic fungus (Successor®), chemical control (spiromesifen, abamectin, fenazaquin), untreated (control treatment) and farmer’s practices (14 applications of pesticides) in a randomized complete block design with three replications/treatment in a Hybrid Tainung-1 papaya crop in the municipality of Roldanillo. The sampling was done every 8 days by measuring the variables: number of leaves/plant, number of infested leaves/plant, number of floral structures/plant, number of fruits/plant, diameter of stem/plant (every 30 days), population of T. urticae/leaf and yield. It was found that the populations of T. urticae/leaf were low in entomopathogenic fungus (11.978) and chemical control (10.548), with no significant differences (P>0.05) from farmer’s practices (3.339). In contrast, the mite populations were very high in plant extract (22.086), mineral oil (20.411) and untreated (35.746), as compared to farmer’s practices. There was a significant difference in all treatments for the variable infestation from farmer’s practices, and the number of leaves/plant in mineral oil and untreated treatment was significantly different from farmer’s practices. No significant differences were found between the treatments in the rest of the evaluated variables. The entomopathogenic fungus turned out to be the best alternative for a management program of T. urticae in papaya in this region.El ácaro Tetranychus urticae es considerada una plaga clave del cultivo de papaya en el Valle del Cauca (Colombia) y su control ha sido generalmente con productos químicos sin probar otras alternativas de manejo. Por lo anterior, el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar en un cultivo de papaya Hibrido Tainung-1, en el municipio de Roldanillo, el efecto de las alternativas: extracto de planta (extracto vegetal de ajo-chile, Alisin®), aceite mineral (complejo de ácidos grasos vegetales, Adimel®), hongo entomopatógeno (Successor®), control químico (spiromesifen, abamectina, fenazaquin), sin manejo (tratamiento control) y prácticas del agricultor (14 aplicaciones de plaguicidas), utilizando un diseño de bloques al azar con tres repeticiones/tratamiento. Se hicieron muestreos cada 8 días midiendo las variables número de hojas/planta, número de hojas infestadas/planta, número de estructuras florales/planta, número de frutos/planta, diámetro del tallo/planta (cada 30 días), población de T. urticae/hoja y rendimiento. Se encontró que las poblaciones de T. urticae/hoja fueron bajas en los tratamientos hongo entomopatógeno (11,978) y control químico (10,548), donde no presentaron diferencias significativas (P>0,05) con respecto a las prácticas del agricultor (3,339); en contraste, las poblaciones del ácaro fueron muy elevadas en los tratamientos extracto de planta (22,086), aceite mineral (20,411) y sin manejo (35,746) frente a las prácticas del agricultor. Se presentó una diferencia significativa en todos los tratamientos y prácticas del agricultor para la variable infestación y entre los tratamientos aceite mineral y sin control vs. prácticas del agricultor para número de hojas/planta. Del resto de variables evaluadas no se encontró diferencias significativas entre tratamientos. El hongo entomopatógeno resultó ser la mejor alternativa para un programa de manejo de T. urticae en papaya en el departamento.application/pdfengengSociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTChttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8217/8544Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf319http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2018); 561-573Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2018); 561-573Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 12 No 3 (2018); 561-573Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; V. 12 N. 3 (2018); 561-573Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; v. 12 n. 3 (2018); 561-5732422-37192011-2173Plant extractMineral oilEntomopathogenic fungusChemical acaricidesTwo spotted miteCrop protectionPest ManagementExtracto vegetalAceite mineralHongo entomopatógenoAcaricidas químicosÁcaro de dos manchasProtección de cultivosManejo de plagasManagement alternatives for Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in the Carica papaya L. Hybrid Tainung-1Alternativas de manejo de Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) en Carica papaya L. Híbrido Tainung-1TextTextoTexteTestoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6818http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a402http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Colombia; Valle del CaucaColombia; Valle del CaucaColombia; Valle del CaucaColombia; Valle del CaucaColombia; Valle del CaucaHerrera-Palacios, Angel MauricioMena-Pérez, Yuri MercedesMesa-Cobo, Nora Cristina001/16852oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/168522025-07-18 11:49:17.129https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co |