Free software and its legal implications
The article analyses two traditional arguments which the spanishauthors have maintained against the compensation for nonpecuniary loss in the Law of Contract: First, in the Civil Codethe precepts about contractual liability refer only to pecuniaryloss. Second, the classic concept of non pecuniary-lo...
- Autores:
-
Gladys Estela Rodríguez; Universidad del Zulia
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2011
- Institución:
- Universidad del Norte
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Uninorte
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:manglar.uninorte.edu.co:10584/3680
- Acceso en línea:
- http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/2825
http://hdl.handle.net/10584/3680
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| Summary: | The article analyses two traditional arguments which the spanishauthors have maintained against the compensation for nonpecuniary loss in the Law of Contract: First, in the Civil Codethe precepts about contractual liability refer only to pecuniaryloss. Second, the classic concept of non pecuniary-loss, which isalways connected to personality rights. This research makes acritical analysis to the main jurisprudential line on this subject,which allows compensation for non-pecuniary loss without anyrestriction. We propose two criteria: damages for non-pecuniaryloss which result from breach of contract can be compensatedonly if they are important and foreseeable for the debtor |
|---|